To the people who believe 911 was an inside job...
Comments
-
*poof* (so goes all three steel and concrete buildings....little bit of fire...voila ....textbook demolitions.... ironically or not so ironically?)
http://www.layscience.net/files/wtc/2.jpg
sorry....gravity alone just does not do that folks....
no way...not on this planet...not in this universe.Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
Nevermind wrote:Ok, but you asked to find something similair. Nazi's burning the reichstag for pwer is similair to the US bring down 3 buildings for power.
you don't get it man...
they burned down an empty builing...nobody died...nobody killed himself doing it (not on the nazi's side and not FOR the nazis)
how is that in any way similiar to kill thousands of your own citizens???
or...some killing himself and killing thousands of people from his own nation?
there is no connection between the two except the one you imagine...and I won't continue to argue this, because this is plain for EVERYone to see!!!
good night...
PS and the US didn't bring those buildings down...it was several INDIVIDUALS...and I am looking for the motivation of those individuals to do it...individuals make up societies...not dark forces...and you have to explain their behaviour in order to explain the world...Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:*poof* (so goes all three....textbook demolitions ironically or not so ironically?)
http://www.layscience.net/files/wtc/2.jpg
sorry....gravity alone just does not do that folks....
no way...not on this planet...not in this universe.
I'll take the opportinuty still to put my question to you again...
since you bring up your gravity story that has nothing to do with my question...
who flew the planes...and what was their reward/motivation?
maybe you can come up with something that makes sense...
m.Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
nobody wrote:you don't get it man...
they burned down an empty builing...nobody died...nobody killed himself doing it (not on the nazi's side and not FOR the nazis)
how is that in any way similiar to kill thousands of your own citizens???
or...some killing himself and killing thousands of people from his own nation?
there is no connection between the two except the one you imagine...and I won't continue to argue this, because this is plain for EVERYone to see!!!
good night...0 -
nobody wrote:they will still have to persuade those people to kill themselves...for no reward...
Not really, if they go through people who find these people they do not persuade them to do anything, the person who has got this person onboard and brainwashed them is the one who has to persuade them not the guy with the plan at the top.
Why is it so hard to believe that a government agency could be the brains behind an attack, but yet so simple to see why any other extremist leader can easily persuade someone to kill themselves?Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.0 -
Nevermind wrote:The events are similair. The circumstances arent.
yeah I guess you're right....
you just have to be right...
dark forces and "groups" and "elites" do everything...
don't bother explain what the actual individuals involved were driven by...
actually I know what they were driven by...the more or less the same as any suicide attacker...killing a hated enemy, for heavenly rewards, personal hatred, revenge...whatever...
and yet I have to see how you explain to me someone from "the other" side killing himself for nothing...except maybe brainwash, okay...
m.Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
Terrorists using box cutters hijacked the planes and used their Cesna flight training to crash them into the buildings and are now enjoying their 70 virgins. But to quote Bob Dylan...
To kill with no pain
Like a dog on a chain
He ain't got no name
But it ain't him to blame
He's only a pawn in their game.0 -
nobody wrote:I'll take the opportinuty still to put my question to you again...
since you bring up your gravity story that has nothing to do with my question...
who flew the planes...and what was their reward/motivation?
maybe you can come up with something that makes sense...
m.
You're still on about that aspect? Honestly?
Who cares....GPS on pre programmed autopilot....human beings trained by the very same that are conducting the entire operation in the first place?
All the supposed "terrorist" pilots were completely inept to even fly a cessna.
In any event.....stell framed buildings (not to mention reinforced with concrete) don't fall down like a deck of cards...
elevator shafts were being worked on for 7 or 9 months prior.....access to inbetween all floors to entire frame during 9 am - 5 pm was 100% available.
Plus all the coinciding stories, the motive.....
The list goes on forever....Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
nobody wrote:yeah I guess you're right....
you just have to be right...
dark forces and "groups" and "elites" do everything...
don't bother explain what the actual individuals involved were driven by...
actually I know what they were driven by...the more or less the same as any suicide attacker...killing a hated enemy, for heavenly rewards, personal hatred, revenge...whatever...
and yet I have to see how you explain to me someone from "the other" side killing himself for nothing...except maybe brainwash, okay...
m.
So your saying you want to know what drives someone to kill themselves for a cause? an ideal, fear, hatred?Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.0 -
spiral out wrote:Not really, if they go through people who find these people they do not persuade them to do anything, the person who has got this person onboard and brainwashed them is the one who has to persuade them not the guy with the plan at the top.
Why is it so hard to believe that a government agency could be the brains behind an attack, but yet so simple to see why any other extremist leader can easily persuade someone to kill themselves?
because first: Bush(be he as he may) is not "any other extremist leader"
second: it makes absolutely no sense at all to harm your country in such an extraordinairy fashion to achieve your goals (whatever they may be)
third: pretty much all the "evidence" that is brought up by conspiracy theorists is a)unsourced b) taken from other conspiracy theories (some of them hundreds of years old, like Antisemitism) c) disproven or d) all the other three together...
I have yet to see a conspiracy theory that claims only the main (and true) facts of its thesis without throwing at least twice as much totally outragous claims in as well. Who has to use such an amount of deception to get its point across is absolutely worthless for anything, except entertainment(like the da vince code). If they are true and honest, there would be no need for deception...it's not that they are in a position of power where they have to hide things (not necessarily sinister things) (like governments).
It diverts people from real problems. Sure BUsh has done it...we just have to start a revolution and put the good guys in. and forget that it is clearly possible to eliminate terrorism, not by bombs...but by solving actual regional crisis with actual real people involved that have interests, motives, fears...living in situations with an individual historical and social background. By enganging problems in this manner individual solutions for the world's problems can be found (and I don't mean only terrorism), not by claiming the dark forces are behind it. The world is too complex to be controlled by a hundred, or even a million people...this is FACT...not opinion
rant over...
m.Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:*poof* (so goes all three steel and concrete buildings....little bit of fire...voila ....textbook demolitions.... ironically or not so ironically?)
http://www.layscience.net/files/wtc/2.jpg
sorry....gravity alone just does not do that folks....
no way...not on this planet...not in this universe.
Textbook demolition. Are you kidding? Go look at those pictures i posted in the other thread. There was an enormous amount of damage done to buildings around the area. Not even close to textbook demolition.
Like i said in the other thread, this is my problem with the conspiracy people. You post this picture and refer to atomizing or it is proof of something much larger. It's a picture of the debris from one of the worlds tallest building collapsing. Nothing more, nothing less. Yet you pull this picture out as proof for textbook demolition. Give me a break.
http://www.layscience.net/?q=node/124Seeing visions of falling up somehow.
Pensacola '94
New Orleans '95
Birmingham '98
New Orleans '00
New Orleans '03
Tampa '08
New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
Fenway Park '18
St. Louis '220 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:You're still on about that aspect? Honestly?
Who cares....GPS on pre programmed autopilot....human beings trained by the very same that are conducting the entire operation in the first place?
All the supposed "terrorist" pilots were completely inept to even fly a cessna.
In any event.....stell framed buildings (not to mention reinforced with concrete) don't fall down like a deck of cards...
elevator shafts were being worked on for 7 or 9 months prior.....access to inbetween all floors to entire frame during 9 am - 5 pm was 100% available.
Plus all the coinciding stories, the motive.....
The list goes on forever....
you obvioulsy don't care too much...
have you actually ever tried to get any information about 911 from any non-conspiracy source...
cause I tell you something: a CLOSED world view is quite something to get rid of...Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
MakingWaves wrote:Textbook demolition. Are you kidding? Go look at those pictures i posted in the other thread. There was an enormous amount of damage done to buildings around the area. Not even close to textbook demolition.
Like i said in the other thread, this is my problem with the conspiracy people. You post this picture and refer to atomizing or it is proof of something much larger. It's a picture of the debris from one of the worlds tallest building collapsing. Nothing more, nothing less. Yet you pull this picture out as proof for textbook demolition. Give me a break.
http://www.layscience.net/?q=node/124
the irony is: he uses websites to prove his point, that actually disprove his point...since he used the same source you did...
m.Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
nobody wrote:because first: Bush(be he as he may) is not "any other extremist leader"
second: it makes absolutely no sense at all to harm your country in such an extraordinairy fashion to achieve your goals (whatever they may be)
third: pretty much all the "evidence" that is brought up by conspiracy theorists is a)unsourced b) taken from other conspiracy theories (some of them hundreds of years old, like Antisemitism) c) disproven or d) all the other three together...
I have yet to see a conspiracy theory that claims only the main (and true) facts of its thesis without throwing at least twice as much totally outragous claims in as well. Who has to use such an amount of deception to get its point across is absolutely worthless for anything, except entertainment(like the da vince code). If they are true and honest, there would be no need for deception...it's not that they are in a position of power where they have to hide things (not necessarily sinister things) (like governments).
It diverts people from real problems. Sure BUsh has done it...we just have to start a revolution and put the good guys in. and forget that it is clearly possible to eliminate terrorism, not by bombs...but by solving actual regional crisis with actual real people involved that have interests, motives, fears...living in situations with an individual historical and social background. By enganging problems in this manner individual solutions for the world's problems can be found (and I don't mean only terrorism), not by claiming the dark forces are behind it. The world is too complex to be controlled by a hundred, or even a million people...this is FACT...not opinion
rant over...
m.
Ok so let me get this straight there is no way in your mind that you can ever have people who do sinister things work for a government yet it is easy to see how so called extremists could do it?
Why do you think everyone who works in government is incapable of devising and carrying out actions that would hurt people?
Have you read operation northwoods? They decided not to carry it out but they devised the plan.Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.0 -
spiral out wrote:Ok so let me get this straight there is no way in your mind that you can ever have people who do sinister things work for a government yet it is easy to see how so called extremists could do it?
Why do you think everyone who works in government is incapable of devising and carrying out actions that would hurt people?
Have you read operation northwoods? They decided not to carry it out but they devised the plan.
you are a reasonable fellow...and I don't mean this in a patronizing way...just in a nice way...but it's getting near my bedtime so I can't go into depth...
I just want to emphazise the last point again that I made in my rant...cause it is the most important to me...
individuals carry out everyday's actions, not forces, governments or any other entity for that matter...
there have been conspiracies...even sinister ones (can't think of any example right now)...formed by individuals on a local/regional level...to achieve specific shared individual goals...but never...and I mean never has there or will there ever be a WORLD CONSPIRACY or even one tenth of the world for that matter...a small group of people (say 1000) can't control the world, it's way too complex...you would need I guess 1 million people to even plan one year ahead...and with so many people, how would they coordinate? Again, you have to keep in mind that humans are supposedly "behind" it not Darth Vader...
Socialist governemts thought they can control their countries...and they had a vast amount of burocrats, unlimited coercive powers, and sheer brute force...yet they couldn't even plan their economy for 5 years ahead...people were starving, no goods in the shops, nothing worked...so please nobody tell me any group of people can stir the whole world towards their ends...NOT POSSIBLE...
really go on read chomsky, I read him too...
but also read some scolarly history...dry and boring, yet valuable...especially social and economic history...
there are actually facts...even in history and politics...not only opinions and interpretations, like some here like to claim...
and that's all I have to say...
don't even know why I'm doing this...
m.Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
nobody wrote:they will still have to persuade those people to kill themselves...for no reward...
Maybe Bin Laden is a FRAUD, and takes orders from the CIA? Now if Bin Laden told his loony toon squad to go fly planes into the World Trade Center, in the name of Jihad, why wouldn't they? As long as his people didn't know he was on the take, I'm sure they'd see no problem in killing themselves, and thousands of others in the name of their beliefs.
OR
Bin Laden is a completely separate entity that hates us, and we've been watching him. US intelligence picked up every detail about the attacks in advance from spying on Al-Qaeda for years on end, as they pieced their plan together. What if our government knew everything: The who, when, why, what, where... If only a select few people in the CIA knew the towers were going to get hit on the morning of the 11th of September, how hard would it really be to plant demolition explosives in there a few weeks in advance, and detonate them shortly after the planes hit? How hard would it be to conveniently have no fighter planes anywhere near ground zero, to prevent the second building from getting hit? It's a simple matter of scheduling. Was Pearl Harbor allowed to happen? Some say, DEFINITELY.
And you're dealing with the most blindly loyal people in the world when it comes to US intelligence. Of course these people think they're doing the greatest thing for the common good of everyone... After all, they are the best and brightest of the greatest country in the world! We're always the good guys, RIGHT?
CIA chief: JOHNSON! I have your next mission!
Johnson: Reporting for duty, Sir!
CIA chief: Now this may sound crazy, but..
Johnson: Nothing you say is crazy, Sir! Unless, of course, YOU say it's crazy, sir.
CIA chief: I like the way you think, Johnson. Now where was I? Oh yeah! Your next mission may sound crazy, but it is guaranteed to bring peace to the entire world, through a New World Order, where everyone gets to live like an American!
Johnson: I had a dream about that last night, Sir!
CIA chief: Sure ya did. Now what I need you to do, is plant some demolition explosives in the twin towers,-- they have to come down, about a half hour after some planes crash into them. You are a demolition expert, correct?
Johnson: Sir, yes sir! But, Sir, take down towers?
CIA chief: Yeah.... We really liked them, too, I know... BUT, only a few people will die, we'll put new towers there that will be wayyyyyy more badass, and 'terror-proof', and, we will have a world government that mimics ours here at home! We will finally achieve peace on earth, and finally, some order. Again, the cost: just a couple of buildings, and less than 10,000 American lives, and of course, a few Muslims, but who cares about them?-- and imagine, UTOPIA!"
Johnson: Consider it done, Sir!
I still don't know what to believe about what happened that day. Some things just don't add up. Building 7, for one. You have an "official" explanation from Popular Science: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7
where there is no mention of the building being intentionally demolished, and then you have this video from a PBS special, where the owner of the World Trade Center, Larry Silverstein, admitting that he ordered the Fire Department to "Pull it": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100
When were they going to plant the explosives in that building, with all the smoke, dust. It takes preparation to demolish a building of that size, even when rigged with explosives. Wouldn't the explosives had to be in the building already?
The Popular Science article is taken as gospel by so many. Why wouldn't Larry's story match up? Unless, we really don't know what he means by "pull it," but I think it's kind of obvious. That building DEFINITELY looked like it came down in controlled demolition form.
I don't understand any of it. It's frustrating. The official story isn't doing it for a lot of people-- I don't think it can be ruled out 100%, but with all the secrecy surrounding it, why should we believe it?
Just some answers, please. That's all we want.0 -
Nobody:
I haven't read this last page, but let me tell you this:
You are asking questions that are just impossible to find answers for. The only thing people can do is speculate and GUESS. But to come out and say that ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THIS WAS AN INSIDE JOB CAN BELIEVE ANYTHING is just pure nonsense. The fact of the matter is that there are just way too many unanswered questions and the only thing people can do is to try to piece information together and come up with theories.
That's all.0 -
nobody wrote:a small group of people (say 1000) can't control the world, it's way too complex...
m.
I do believe that if you control the money supply, that you can control MANY MANY people. Prime example: The Federal Reserve. They screw with interest rates a tenth of a point, and the whole world goes batshit crazy-- happy, sad, scared, etc... In the meantime, the interest rates are all smoke and mirrors anyway. They straight robbed us.0 -
_outlaw wrote:Nobody:
I haven't read this last page, but let me tell you this:
You are asking questions that are just impossible to find answers for. The only thing people can do is speculate and GUESS. But to come out and say that ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THIS WAS AN INSIDE JOB CAN BELIEVE ANYTHING is just pure nonsense. The fact of the matter is that there are just way too many unanswered questions and the only thing people can do is to try to piece information together and come up with theories.
That's all.
please, go ahead: come up with theories.
but please don't fill them up with 50% garbage claims and say people can pick whatever they think is true...
and you should read the last page...I made some pretty profound points;)
m.Godwin's Law:
"As an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."0 -
_outlaw wrote:of course not.
9/11 was so important to the Bush admin. It put the country in a complete state of fear and let him get away with so much, like the PATRIOT ACT, war in Afghanistan, etc.
So let me see if I've got the talking points down:
1) The Bush Administration is, perhaps, the most inept administration in the history of the United States
and 2) That didn't stop them from pulling off the single greatest conspiracy in the history of conspiracies and getting away with it.
Oh-kay ...everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help