34th annual March for Life on the 22nd

24567…10

Comments

  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Jeanie wrote:
    Not having a go at you at all. It's just it never ceases to amaze me some people would choose the rights of an embryo that cannot support itself over that a fully functioning sexually mature female. And still not having a go at you but it makes me really angry when men, who will never have to make the decision one way or another think they have the right to dictate what I and other women will do with our bodies. When embryos can support themselves and or men can carry a pregnancy to full term then I might be more able to consider their opinion on this. My body, my choice. When it's your body it's your choice. AND people, both men and women, need to understand that the outcome of sex CAN in some cases result in pregnancy and perhaps a discussion about possible outcomes needs to happen before they get down and dirty together. Embryos are not babies. AND embryos deserve the right to be allowed to grow into a baby in a body that wants them there. Not trying to negate you. It just makes my blood boil when some people try to hijack a personal decision. If CorporateWhore and his pals really want to do some good in this world then how about looking after the children that are born in horrific circumstances to a life of misery? Or, gee, I don't know maybe spending a bit of their misguided energies on making sure that both males and females are properly educated in how to avoid being in a situation where they have to make this decision in the first place. But I understand what you are saying. It is a very difficult decision to have to make and I guess I can only say, be grateful you'll never have to make it. Hope you don't feel I'm earbashing you. This topic just really makes me cross! :mad: Not you or your comments. The topic.

    Stop with the crap.

    This is about Roe v. Wade and whether it was constitutional jurisprudence.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    Jeanie wrote:
    Not having a go at you at all. It's just it never ceases to amaze me some people would choose the rights of an embryo that cannot support itself over that a fully functioning sexually mature female. And still not having a go at you but it makes me really angry when men, who will never have to make the decision one way or another think they have the right to dictate what I and other women will do with our bodies. When embryos can support themselves and or men can carry a pregnancy to full term then I might be more able to consider their opinion on this. My body, my choice. When it's your body it's your choice. AND people, both men and women, need to understand that the outcome of sex CAN in some cases result in pregnancy and perhaps a discussion about possible outcomes needs to happen before they get down and dirty together. Embryos are not babies. AND embryos deserve the right to be allowed to grow into a baby in a body that wants them there. Not trying to negate you. It just makes my blood boil when some people try to hijack a personal decision. If CorporateWhore and his pals really want to do some good in this world then how about looking after the children that are born in horrific circumstances to a life of misery? Or, gee, I don't know maybe spending a bit of their misguided energies on making sure that both males and females are properly educated in how to avoid being in a situation where they have to make this decision in the first place. But I understand what you are saying. It is a very difficult decision to have to make and I guess I can only say, be grateful you'll never have to make it. Hope you don't feel I'm earbashing you. This topic just really makes me cross! :mad: Not you or your comments. The topic.

    i guess the question revolves around the decision to close your legs, drive to the drug store, or "kill" (if you believe that) an embryo. decisions decisions. let convenience prevail.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Stop with the crap.

    This is about Roe v. Wade and whether it was constitutional jurisprudence.

    Then why is it called "The march for Life"?
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Then why is it called "The march for Life"?

    Why does it happen on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade??? Why don't you get back to playing poker because you are out of your element, donny.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Stop with the crap.

    This is about Roe v. Wade and whether it was constitutional jurisprudence.


    Look enjoy this while you have the chance kid. Fact is that there's been a huge swing against George and his religious cronies and if you really want to fight to get rid of Roe v. Wade then I say MARCH!! Give it your best shot because there is going to be a backlash against this religious monopoly sooner rather than later. And fact is you are in the minority anyway. So dance away!! I can't be bothered arguing with you and if you really want to look at some crap I suggest you read back over your posts. The board is littered with your verbal diarrohea!
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    Jeanie wrote:
    there is going to be a backlash against this religious monopoly sooner rather than later.

    Do you realize there isn't that big of a gap in religious people voting for Bush vs. Gore or Kerry? (Fiorina 2001) Of course you don't b/c the media hypes up this religious bullshit.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Jeanie wrote:
    Look enjoy this while you have the chance kid. Fact is that there's been a huge swing against George and his religious cronies and if you really want to fight to get rid of Roe v. Wade then I say MARCH!! Give it your best shot because there is going to be a backlash against this religious monopoly sooner rather than later. And fact is you are in the minority anyway. So dance away!! I can't be bothered arguing with you and if you really want to look at some crap I suggest you read back over your posts. The board is littered with your verbal diarrohea!
    That's what I thought. You can't defend Roe v. Wade either.

    Anybody else?

    Looks like Roe v. Wade can constitutionally be overturned based on the debate in this thread.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    Purple Hawk wrote:
    i guess the question revolves around the decision to close your legs, drive to the drug store, or "kill" (if you believe that) an embryo. decisions decisions. let convenience prevail.

    Abortion is legal and should be available to anyone who requires it under any circumstances. There is nothing "convenient" about being in a situation where you have to choose abortion over carrying a pregnancy to term. Abortion is just a surgical procedure. In most cases no more than a dilatation and curettage, the same procedure used to treat gynaecological problems in women. Perhaps we should all get up in arms and start protesting that removing cancer is "killing" a living organism and therefore immoral.
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    That's what I thought. You can't defend Roe v. Wade either.

    Anybody else?

    Looks like Roe v. Wade can constitutionally be overturned based on the debate in this thread.

    funny how when the left is engaged they retreat. actually, it's not that funny..:(
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    That's what I thought. You can't defend Roe v. Wade either.

    Anybody else?

    Looks like Roe v. Wade can constitutionally be overturned based on the debate in this thread.

    I don't have to. It is already in place. And will stay in place.
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Purple Hawk wrote:
    funny how when the left is engaged they retreat. actually, it's not that funny..:(


    Haha, they say silly things like this:
    Jeanie wrote:
    Perhaps we should all get up in arms and start protesting that removing cancer is "killing" a living organism and therefore immoral.

    Huh?! Hahaha
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • JOEJOEJOE
    JOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,822
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    That's what I thought. You can't defend Roe v. Wade either.

    Anybody else?

    Looks like Roe v. Wade can constitutionally be overturned based on the debate in this thread.

    For someone who claims to be a member of a Parish, you sure have a lot of contempt towards your fellow man.

    From where does this come?........are you a member of a Parish because you can't find any other sort of fellowship?

    Can you not simply go out and make friends in the secular world?
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    Jeanie wrote:
    Abortion is legal and should be available to anyone who requires it under any circumstances. There is nothing "convenient" about being in a situation where you have to choose abortion over carrying a pregnancy to term. Abortion is just a surgical procedure. In most cases no more than a dilatation and curettage, the same procedure used to treat gynaecological problems in women. Perhaps we should all get up in arms and start protesting that removing cancer is "killing" a living organism and therefore immoral.

    to me, abortion seems all about convenience...given all the other options.

    and trust me...this isn't a sexist issue to me...i haven't wanted to be a father...and guess what...I'm NOT! wow. trust me, i'm not some pro-life walker, or even some zealot on the issue...but i think it's really pathetic that it would ever come down to that for someone. personal responsibility comes a long way...and yes, i think defining the point where life begins comes from conveniences.....just my take.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    For someone who claims to be a member of a Parish, you sure have a lot of contempt towards your fellow man.

    From where does this come?........are you a member of a Parish because you can't find any other sort of fellowship?

    Can you not simply go out and make friends in the secular world?
    Actually most of the country is religious, not secular.

    You should try going out and making friends in the religious world, b/c most of the world is religious too. Haha
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • JOEJOEJOE
    JOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,822
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Actually most of the country is religious, not secular.

    You should try going out and making friends in the religious world, b/c most of the world is religious too. Haha

    Only making friends in your own religion will just make you more narrow minded.
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    Only making friends in your own religion will just make you more narrow minded.

    Thanks for that piece of advice, JOEJOEGun
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    Only making friends in your own religion will just make you more narrow minded.

    I'm predicting that CW produces a video where thumbing my way and miller saw joe joe's (who would be donning an orange jump suit) head off.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    Purple Hawk wrote:
    Do you realize there isn't that big of a gap in religious people voting for Bush vs. Gore or Kerry? (Fiorina 2001) Of course you don't b/c the media hypes up this religious bullshit.


    Look Purple Hawk, I have no idea what you will all decide in America. But I do know that there has been a huge monopoly about the whole abortion debate here in Australia brought to us courtesy of Little Johnny and Tony Bloody Abbott and they are losing ground. Their religious and political ideology has been too closely linked to your Presidents for far too long. They have been hijacking the parliament with it. AND people here have had enough. Church and state should be separate. And a women's right to choose is and should continue to be enshrined in law. Now it may not happen there. But it will be happening here. Well nothing will change here.
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • JOEJOEJOE
    JOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,822
    CorporateWhore wrote:
    Thanks for that piece of advice, JOEJOEGun

    good luck with your protest....we are not on the same side, but i am happy we each have the right to voice our views.
  • CorporateWhore
    CorporateWhore Posts: 1,890
    Jeanie wrote:
    Look Purple Hawk, I have no idea what you will all decide in America. But I do know that there has been a huge monopoly about the whole abortion debate here in Australia brought to us courtesy of Little Johnny and Tony Bloody Abbott and they are losing ground. Their religious and political ideology has been too closely linked to your Presidents for far too long. They have been hijacking the parliament with it. AND people here have had enough. Church and state should be separate. And a women's right to choose is and should continue to be enshrined in law. Now it may not happen there. But it will be happening here. Well nothing will change here.

    Haha, a "woman's right to suck those brains out of her baby's head should continue to be enshrined in law." oops! I mean 'choose.'

    Continue aborting your population, Australia. It's not getting any bigger if you noticed. Yep, your birthrate is dying too. There won't be any white people there anymore because the people coming in won't abort their babies! We conservatives ALWAYS win!

    Haha
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell

Categories