Oprah Makes A Sterotypical Racist Comment!
Options
Comments
-
reborncareerist wrote:So you're fine with inequality, I am not. Fundamental difference, I suppose. Nor am I fine with a whole group of people playing the victim role, although I am willing to concede that the continued existance of this victim role probably indicates that racism against blacks is indeed alive and well. What's ironic is that some black leaders are exaserbating the problem.
The truth is, I see racism every day - and I'm not talking about the media, and I don't go looking for it.0 -
RainDog wrote:See, I don't see it that way. I believe there's such a thing as going "too far." What Oprah said was that white people don't have rhythm. What Imus said is that black women pass their asses around the street for money."When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."0
-
NMyTree wrote:Just about all of your "theories" and interpretations are gross over-simplifications. Simplifications in your interpretations, not in what is being said.
What Imus said was toung-in-cheek sarcasm which actually is a bit more complicated than what you see.
There's no doubt a large majority of people have completely missed the joke and simply never got it.
Imus was completely aware that there are non-blacks on that women's basketball team.
Hell, I'm not even a fan of Imus, nor would I ever defend the guy. But I certainly am aware of his material and his approach to his jokes, comments, parodies and satire. Which by the way is no different than that of many non-white entertainers.
Was it a poor choice of words, yeah. But certainly nothing to get all worked up about.
Truth is, Imus hasn't had this much exposure and publicity since he fell off the horse and required surgery. Thanks to the overly-sensitive, overly-PC goofballs and a plethora of hypocritcal black people who cherish stereotypical racial double-standards; they succeeded in giving him a level of exposure he'd never, ever see.0 -
RainDog wrote:Yeah, it's all those black people's fault.
Another silly over-simplification and misinterpretation.
So I'll respond in kind. No, it's all "Whitey's" fault.:rolleyes:RainDog wrote:
Perhaps you grew up in some enlightened community where racism, and a desire to use racist words whenever possible, simply didn't exist, but I didn't. In fact, I almost got the shit kicked out of me for expressing offense when someone standing next to me (in an all white crowd) began on some racist tyrade (I'm sick of typing the word, so I'll assume you know what I mean). His reason for getting pissed off at me for calling him on it? "Hey, I work all day with black people, so I should be able to say whatever the hell I want." I shut him up when I asked "so why don't you say it around them, then?".
Seems to me this issue with people being mad because they are wanting to use the n***** word, which you insist is the real "truth" here, is really just your own emotional torch. Just as I speculated several posts ago.
So you almost got your ass kicked:rolleyes: Get a grip. I had to fight from 3rd grade.....right through 8th grade and freshman year. I got into so amny fights I lost count.
I did get my ass kicked a dozen times and I kicked ass....a dozen times. There was no "almost".0 -
RainDog wrote:Would the rape scene in Pulp Fiction have left you feeling differently if it was a woman? If the answer is "yes" then you, too, believe in a certain level of inequality - though I wouldn't necessarily call it that.
The truth is, I see racism every day - and I'm not talking about the media, and I don't go looking for it.
To be honest, I didn't find the Marcellus rape scene funny either, although I freely admit that the emotional reaction was different. If it has been a woman, I'd have felt horrified. As it was, it just made my arsehole pucker a bit, in more of a disgust reaction.
Sure, I too hold double standards. But does that holding make it somehow right? People used to think blacks shouldn't use water fountains that I use, no? I have as many implicit prejudicial attitudes as you do, or anyone else. That still doesn't make it right.
One more point to address ... You see racism everyday, sure. Someone else might not see some of the real racism you do detect. Conversely, though, someone else might not label something as racism while you do so. There is a certain amount of subjectivity involved.0 -
NMyTree wrote:Another silly over-simplification and misiterpretation.
So I'll respond in kind. No, it's all "Whitey's" fault.:rolleyes:0 -
gue_barium wrote:Wow.
Let me ask this a different way: Do you suppose those executives at MSNBC and CBS had liberalism in mind?
They were certainly thinking of the backlash by a small extremely vocal minority of rabidly liberal people (i.e. MoveOn.org).0 -
RainDog wrote:Funny. I seem to remember my post being longer than that. And, really, all I saw in your post was how black people were going to bring some sort of - I don't know, retribution, maybe - upon themselves for the way they talk to each other.
Just for the record, do you think black people should use the word?0 -
reborncareerist wrote:Just for the record, do you think black people should use the word?
For the record, I think it has a different definition when they use it.0 -
RainDog wrote:Funny. I seem to remember my post being longer than that. And, really, all I saw in your post was how black people were going to bring some sort of - I don't know, retribution, maybe - upon themselves for the way they talk to each other.
It's not a "retribution". it's a vicous cycle of racism. It's human nature and human behavior.
Do some research, you'll see.
Then again, probably not:rolleyes:0 -
RainDog wrote:I don't have a problem with it, and hearing them say it doesn't make me want to.
For the record, I think it has a different definition when they use it.
I think this attitude is potentially dangerous, although I admit that there's no real evidence either way.0 -
69charger wrote:They were certainly thinking of the backlash by a small extremely vocal minority of rabidly liberal people (i.e. MoveOn.org).
So, they got scared? I don't think so.
Almost immediately after the slurs, Proctor and Gamble and Staples threatened to pull their advertising. Now, that got their attention, don't you think?
And if you're wondering, I did a little research. I think you might be interested to know that Staples is owned by a conservative who strongly backs Republican Mitt Romney in Massachussetts.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
cornnifer wrote:Is that what the word "nigger" is? Common vernacular?! Do you (and others) seriously not see the difference between Blacks calling EACHOTHER this and Whites calling Blacks this? You really see absolutely no difference?! Unfreakingbelievable.
i offer an analogy. If i'm in the grocery store and my children are being loud and obnoxious and i tell them to "shut up, and settle down", although it may be inappropriate for me to use such harsh language with my children, they are my children and thats one thing. If someone else tells MY children to "shut up" that person just may get a beatin'. Seen?
yes it is common venacular. my dad picked up the phrase "it'll blow your mind" back in the 70's. he uses it to this day but he picked it up because those around him used it frequently. btw; he's 73.
so when you're in an office with 20 people and 19 of them use the word nigger the way i use the word dude or man; the 20th person is going to pick up that word or phrase.0 -
reborncareerist wrote:I think this attitude is potentially dangerous, although I admit that there's no real evidence either way.
"And that's another thing. I don't like it when you guys call each other 'queer.' That's our word for making fun of you. We need it."0 -
RainDog wrote:It kind of reminds me of that Simpson's episode when Homer was worried Bart was becoming gay. I believe the line went:
"And that's another thing. I don't like it when you guys call each other 'queer.' That's our word for making fun of you. We need it."
I think a person's intent should matter more than their skin colour, when we are talking who should or should not use particular words.0 -
RainDog wrote:The vicous cycle of racism requires someone to peddle on both sides.
Correct.
But vicious cycle only needs to be continued by one side, then human nature takes over.
Racism/discriminaton is a parasite which lives in all human beings, whether you or anyone else wants to admit it, or not. Those who choose to feed the parasite will help it grow and spread. Right now and for the last several years; there are a lot of black people feeding that parasite.
Which isn't to say there are no white racists. There certainly are.
But this parasite and the vicous cycle goes much deeper and way beyond the over-simplification of "retribution". There's so much more to it all. "Retribution" is simply one of the many nutrients used to feed the parasite.0 -
RainDog wrote:It kind of reminds me of that Simpson's episode when Homer was worried Bart was becoming gay. I believe the line went:
"And that's another thing. I don't like it when you guys call each other 'queer.' That's our word for making fun of you. We need it."
This explains a lot:rolleyes:
The Simpsons is hardly any thing to derive profound overtures and undertones, from.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 272 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.6K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help