Oprah Makes A Sterotypical Racist Comment!

Options
1…89101214

Comments

  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Better without LIBERALS? Yes! Yes! YES!!!

    Black, Blue, Red, Green, Purple, White, Grey, Striped, it doesn't matter. I never said anything racist. You are putting words in my mouth.

    I do love my guns. What good are your rights without the means to protect them?

    That gun didn't do Imus much good in protecting his constitutionally guaranteed right to free speech, did it? Doesn't that irk you?
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    Well, the only liberals you mention here are sharpton and jackson, so i've got to assume there's a color code to your thinking. I don't even think you know what a liberal is, but you know what a black is, hence the reason I suspect that distinction.

    They are the ones spearheading this witch-hunt. That's why I singled them out. Sounds like you may be the racist here. You are the only one to mention race.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    That gun didn't do Imus much good in protecting his constitutionally guaranteed right to free speech, did it? Doesn't that irk you?

    What the fuck are you talking about? You make as much sense as LBM.

    I miss that guy.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    They are the ones spearheading this witch-hunt. That's why I singled them out. Sounds like you may be the racist here. You are the only one to mention race.

    This topic is about racism.
    There is no witch hunt, Imus is gone. Gone, gone, gone, into the sunset like a good 'ol boy. *sniff* and it's all the liberals fault dammit.... cuz 69Charger says so.

    You have some twisted mindpieces going on up there in Wisconsin.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    What the fuck are you talking about? You make as much sense as LBM.

    That was a pretty straight-forward question for a straight-forward kind of guy like yourself, I thought.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    This topic is about racism.
    There is no witch hunt, Imus is gone. Gone, gone, gone, into the sunset like a good 'ol boy. *sniff* and it's all the liberals fault dammit.... cuz 69Charger says so.

    You have some twisted mindpieces going on up there in Wisconsin.

    gue_barium hates black people.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    gue_barium hates black people.

    That causes me no grief, trust me.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    That causes me no grief, trust me.

    Cause you wear your hood and robe in public?
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Cause you wear your hood and robe in public?

    Look man, I find your logic on this Imus subject rather illogical. I haven't said you're racist, and you're just not going to get me on that count, so continuing down this line makes you look sillier than you know. I hope this is just a case of you being silly, I really do. I mean all of it, not just these weak jabs at me. It's just that I've never known your posts to be any different. It's almost as if you believe these lies you tell. I hope that isn't the case. That's a dangerous thing to be doing.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    Look man, I find your logic on this Imus subject rather illogical. I haven't said you're racist,
    So, basically, what 69Charger is telling me today is that he loves his guns, America would be better off without blacks, or at least liberal blacks, and that without those kind of people around, white people could go around talking as stupid as they wanted to talk.
    and you're just not going to get me on that count, so continuing down this line makes you look sillier than you know. I hope this is just a case of you being silly, I really do. I mean all of it, not just these weak jabs at me. It's just that I've never known your posts to be any different. It's almost as if you believe these lies you tell. I hope that isn't the case. That's a dangerous thing to be doing.

    Now you are a liar and a racist.

    Put that on your resume ;)
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    gue_barium wrote:
    So, basically, what 69Charger is telling me today is that he loves his guns, America would be better off without blacks, or at least liberal blacks, and that without those kind of people around, white people could go around talking as stupid as they wanted to talk.

    I hope somebody has a copy of this guys IP addy, this has the markings of one of those, ahem, "special" profiles.

    Wow, what a fantastical embelishment of what he has been saying...LOL!

    I mean, I'd even give you credit and tip my hat to you, if at least you were creative. But that was just plain silly ....absurd.

    By any chance are you and Rainy related?
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    69charger looks silly?

    Oh man, this guy/gal is getting funnier by the minute!! :D:D:D
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    NMyTree wrote:
    Wow, what a fantastical embelishment of what he has been saying...LOL!

    I mean, I'd even give you credit and tip my hat to you, if at least you were creative. But that was just plain silly ....absurd.

    By any chance are you and Rainy related?

    I interpreted, in an effort to get to the bottom of it. Basically he's said that Imus' comment was only stupid because there are two black liberal men in this country. Go back and read it. That's the logic.
    I added the gun stuff for the hell of it.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    NMyTree wrote:
    69charger looks silly?

    Oh man, this guy/gal is getting funnier by the minute!! :D:D:D

    You can't beat me. You can flame away, but you can't win a debate with me, on anything.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    gue_barium wrote:
    You can't beat me. You can flame away, but you can't win a debate with me, on anything.


    Well, when you begin debating, let me know.

    Thus far you haven't debated anything. You've simply made up a bunch of crap which has no resemblence to anything, anyone said; and tried to pass it off as the words and intentions of others.

    That's called talking shit.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    I interpreted, in an effort to get to the bottom of it. Basically he's said that Imus' comment was only stupid because there are two black liberal men in this country. Go back and read it. That's the logic.
    I added the gun stuff for the hell of it.

    Nope. Wrong again David Duke!

    I said it was being made into something it shouldn't be by two profiteering liberal media whores. You keep making up the racist part.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Nope. Wrong again David Duke!

    I said it was being made into something it shouldn't be by two profiteering liberal media whores. You keep making up the racist part.

    You can't cover up what you've already posted. I'll ask you again. Was it the stupidity of Imus' remarks that got him fired or was it the liberalism of Sharpton and Jackson that got him fired?
    So far, you've claimed the latter. Here's your chance to clarify. It's a simple question, there's only two possible choices.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    NMyTree wrote:
    Well, when you begin debating, let me know.

    Thus far you haven't debated anything. You've simply made up a bunch of crap which has no resemblence to anything, anyone said; and tried to pass it off as the words and intentions of others.

    That's called talking shit.

    Ho hum
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    gue_barium wrote:
    You can't cover up what you've already posted. I'll ask you again. Was it the stupidity of Imus' remarks that got him fired or was it the liberalism of Sharpton and Jackson that got him fired?
    So far, you've claimed the latter. Here's your chance to clarify. It's a simple question, there's only two possible choices.


    uh boy.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    You can't cover up what you've already posted. I'll ask you again. Was it the stupidity of Imus' remarks that got him fired or was it the liberalism of Sharpton and Jackson that got him fired?
    So far, you've claimed the latter. Here's your chance to clarify. It's a simple question, there's only two possible choices.

    There aren't only two possible choices, James Earl Ray.

    Imus made a stupid remark that was mild and par for the course as far as Imus show goes. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson jumped on it even though they have made comparable remarks at one time or another. Imus' remarks no different and are less severe than remarks found in popular music. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are hyping this up to make a quick buck and avoid addressing the real problems facing thier communities. They know how to stir the pot to benefit themselves, they've made careers out of it.

    Thank you for asking though, Byron De La Beckwith.

    "I see you true colors...shining through..."

Categories