Oprah Makes A Sterotypical Racist Comment!

Options
189111314

Comments

  • Alex_Coe
    Alex_Coe Posts: 762
    The O is powerful. The O will crush all who get in her (its) way.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    RainDog wrote:
    I believe NMyTree also thought Michael Richards' little tyrade was quite "profound." And I'm the one with a malfunctioning sense of humor?


    Incorrect.

    Once again your inability to comprehend the subject matter at hand and over-simplify everything, has exposed you.

    I never thought what Richards said was profound. I found the reaction to what he said by blacks and the overly-PC; to be quite revealing and yes....profound. Especially when everyone completely ignored that the emotionally wounded black guy who continued to escalate the matter, soon afterwards started seeking a financial kickback and had in fact, been the first one to spout a stereotypical racist/discriminatory attack towards Richards, when he was heckling him.

    The overly-PC and alleged overly-sensitive did their best to ignore those facts and continue to defend the double-standard.

    That was a very revealing moment.

    Now return to your regularly scheduled misinterpretations and incomprehensible disposition.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    gue_barium wrote:
    Parasite ~ spermicide. I always confuse those two.


    That's really not hard to believe at all.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    NMyTree wrote:
    That's really not hard to believe at all.

    I said, I stay out of these things.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    Yet here you are:D:D

    Good job staying out:D
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    NMyTree wrote:
    Yet here you are:D:D

    Good job staying out:D

    Usually, usually.

    But, if ya wanna dance...:D

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    gue_barium wrote:
    Usually, usually.

    But, if ya wanna dance...:D


    Since Rainy likes to use television shows as his main source of reference, let me submit one.

    This reminds me of that episode of Sienfeld when Jerry makes a reservation for a rent-a-car, but when he goes to pick up the car; they have rented it out. He debates the meaning of taking a reservation with the Rental car company's Rep and tells her she really doesn't understand how reservations work. That the most important part of taking a reservation, is to actually hold the car for him. Anyone can just take a reservation:D

    Staying out of it, actually requires one to abstain from being involved:D
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    NMyTree wrote:
    Since Rainy likes to use television shows as his main source of reference, let me submit one.

    This reminds me of that episode of Sienfeld when Jerry makes a reservation for a rent-a-car, but when he goes to pick up the car; they have rented it out. He debates the meaning of taking a reservation with the Rental car company's Rep and tells her she really doesn't understand how reservations work. That the most important part of taking a reservation, is to actually hold the car for him. Anyone can just take a reservation:D

    Staying out of it, actually requires one to abstain from being involved:D

    That was a funny show in it's day. I watch the reruns now and again.

    Remember "eenie, meenie, minee, moe"?

    It goes,
    eenie meenie minee moe,
    caught a nmytree by the toe
    if he holla, make he pay-uh
    fit-tuh dollah e'vree day-uh.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    For instance, today, 69Charger learned that it was a big shot conservative that led the charge to get Imus off the air, while he had been led to believe it was a case of liberalism.

    Last time I checked neither Al Sharpton nor Jesse Jackson are labeled as 'big shot conservatives'.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Last time I checked neither Al Sharpton nor Jesse Jackson are labeled as 'big shot conservatives'.

    So, you're telling me the conservative owner of Staples, the strong supporter of that silly willy Romney from Massachussetts, is afraid of what Sharpton and Jackson have to think about him and his constituents?

    What kind of wimps do you look up to?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    So, you're telling me the conservative owner of Staples, the strong supporter of that silly willy Romney from Massachussetts, is afraid of what Sharpton and Jackson have to think about him and his constituents?

    What kind of wimps do you look up to?

    I don't look up to the owner of Staples?!? Who the fuck does? He is trying to protect his business from a boycott from liberal douchebags.

    The "Revs" are leading this fight. Ironically they are the ones making money off of this snafu. They are pimps.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    I don't look up to the owner of Staples?!? Who the fuck does? He is trying to protect his business from a boycott from liberal douchebags.

    The "Revs" are leading this fight. Ironically they are the ones making money off of this snafu. They are pimps.

    But you run with the conservatives... you're a band of freethinkers...is this not so?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    But you run with the conservatives... you're a band of freethinkers...is this not so?

    Capitalists. He needs to protect his business just like GM and the rest had to.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Capitalists. He needs to protect his business just like GM and the rest had to.

    From what? Honesty? That what Imus said is honestly stupid and they didn't need him around doing that kind of stupid thing? Where do you get the liberalism out of that?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    Where do you get the liberalism out of that?

    Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson

    Let me get this straight. If not for the liberalism of two black men, what Imus said was not really stupid afterall.

    Is that it?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    Let me get this straight. If not for the liberalism of two black men, what Imus said was not really stupid afterall.

    Is that it?

    Yes. What Imus said is rainbows and unicorns compared to what has come out of the mouths of those two. They are hippocrates using these girls as a political and financial springboard.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Yes. What Imus said is rainbows and unicorns compared to what has come out of the mouths of those two. They are hippocrates using these girls as a political and financial springboard.

    So, basically, what 69Charger is telling me today is that he loves his guns, America would be better off without blacks, or at least liberal blacks, and that without those kind of people around, white people could go around talking as stupid as they wanted to talk.

    I hope somebody has a copy of this guys IP addy, this has the markings of one of those, ahem, "special" profiles.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    gue_barium wrote:
    So, basically, what 69Charger is telling me today is that he loves his guns, America would be better off without blacks, or at least liberal blacks, and that without those kind of people around, white people could go around talking as stupid as they wanted to talk.

    I hope somebody has a copy of this guys IP addy, this has the markings of one of those, ahem, "special" profiles.

    Better without LIBERALS? Yes! Yes! YES!!!

    Black, Blue, Red, Green, Purple, White, Grey, Striped, it doesn't matter. I never said anything racist. You are putting words in my mouth.

    I do love my guns. What good are your rights without the means to protect them?
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    69charger wrote:
    Better without LIBERALS? Yes! Yes! YES!!!

    Black, Blue, Red, Green, Purple, White, Grey, Striped, it doesn't matter. I never said anything racist. You are putting words in my mouth.

    I do love my guns. What good are your rights without the means to protect them?

    Well, the only liberals you mention here are sharpton and jackson, so i've got to assume there's a color code to your thinking. I don't even think you know what a liberal is, but you know what a black is, hence the reason I suspect that distinction.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.