this Brother song...

2456

Comments

  • NewJPage
    NewJPage Posts: 3,320
    se7v7en wrote:
    NewJPage wrote:
    halszka123 wrote:
    For sure it's His current voice:)
    probably people are not deaf, only too excited;) to consider it

    yep. re-recorded...just as i feared


    What???? No!!! They even talked about about this on WMMY-Philly. They are the origional vocals. The song was only remixed, not rerecorded.[/quote]

    well, i'm about 90% sure that it is re-recorded. for one, it sounds nothing like ed did back then. second, it sounds completely like Ed sounds now. all of the bellowing baritone parts are gone, which was the trademark of the early ed voice.
    6/26/98, 8/17/00, 10/8/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/25/03, 5/28/03, 6/1/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 6/6/03, 6/12/03, 6/13/03, 6/15/03, 6/18/03, 6/21/03, 6/22/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03, 10/3/04, 10/5/04, 9/9/05, 9/11/05, 9/16/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/19/06, 6/30/06, 7/23/06, 8/5/07, 6/30/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 5/4/10, 5/7/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 10/11/13, 10/17/14, 8/20/16
  • arthurdent
    arthurdent Posts: 969
    se7v7en wrote:
    What???? No!!! They even talked about about this on WMMY-Philly. They are the origional vocals. The song was only remixed, not rerecorded.

    They most definitely aren't the original vocals from Rough Mixes or the Rarities leak. If that's Ed circa 1991, then they've used a very early take. But the way he completely butchers the lyrics reminds me of Alone from LD more than anything else.
    Rock me Jesus, roll me Lord...
    Wash me in the blood of Rock & Roll
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,599
    Sounds like new Ed to me, but maybe it's from 91. Like the instrumental version more, maybe because I'm so
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • andrewb
    andrewb Posts: 488
    Ed sounds nothing like this anymore, its obviously an old take.
    PJ
    6/03/06 6/24/08 6/25/08 6/28/08 8/28/09 10/30/09 10/31/09 3/13/10 5/15/10 5/18/10 5/20/10 5/21/10 9/3/11 9/4/11 9/2/12 10/18/13 10/19/13 10/25/13 10/22/14 9/26/15 5/1/16 5/2/16 8/5/16 8/7/16 8/20/16 4/7/17

    Ed Ved
    8/5/08 6/12/09 6/21/11 6/22/11

    Brad
    5/23/12

    Soundgarden
    7/9/11 1/23/13 8/1/14

    RNDM
    3/7/16
  • se7v7en
    se7v7en Philadelphia, PA Posts: 329
    well, i'm about 90% sure that it is re-recorded. for one, it sounds nothing like ed did back then. second, it sounds completely like Ed sounds now. all of the bellowing baritone parts are gone, which was the trademark of the early ed voice.[/quote]

    What about the high pitched sqeels that ed would throw in. There are a couple in there that sond kind of high for the current ed. Can even hit those notes now?
  • prytocorduroy
    prytocorduroy Posts: 4,355
    Pearl Jam released a bunch of different takes of Brother to radio stations. Some stations got new vocals, some got original, some got alternate takes, and some got the instrumental. They're trying to fuck with us because we obviously have nothing better to do than analyze what era Ed's vocals are from.
  • DD164485
    DD164485 Posts: 149
    I don't know how anyone can listen to this and think that this is a re-recorded track.

    I find it very doubtful that Eddie would re record his vocals.

    As if he even gives a shit about this song.

    Why on earth would he take a break from recording a NEW ALBUM so that he can come in the and fuck around with some outake from 20 years ago?

    Not only would this be totally LAME, but completly out of character.

    This is definately an early take of "Brother" re-mixed by Brendon O'Brien using modern 2009 technology.

    It's 1991 Eddie. with a brand new coat of paint....
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    this is 100% remixed...NOT re-recorded
  • strummers
    strummers Posts: 2,611
    arthurdent wrote:
    DD164485 wrote:
    Why in the hell would Eddie bother to come in and re-record his vocals to this song 20 years after the fact?

    For exactly the same reason he had Mike butcher the song and turn it into an instrumental for LD..

    :o

    Take that back! :evil:

    Mike doesn't butcher anything!
    http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
    http://www.strummersphotography.com

    <object width="360" height="300"><param name="movie" value="http://www.redbubble.com/swf/redbubble.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><PARAM NAME=FlashVars VALUE="url=http://www.redbubble.com/people/strummers/works/visual.atom?campaign=sales_widget&mode=slideshow"><embed src="http://www.redbubble.com/swf/redbubble.swf&quot; FlashVars="url=http://www.redbubble.com/people/strummers/works/visual.atom?campaign=sales_widget&mode=slideshow&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="360" height="300"></embed></object>
  • arthurdent
    arthurdent Posts: 969
    strummers wrote:
    :o

    Take that back! :evil:

    Mike doesn't butcher anything!

    It's OK. I don't hold it against him. Mike was just "following orders."
    Rock me Jesus, roll me Lord...
    Wash me in the blood of Rock & Roll
  • arthurdent
    arthurdent Posts: 969
    DD164485 wrote:
    Why on earth would he take a break from recording a NEW ALBUM so that he can come in the and fuck around with some outake from 20 years ago?

    Alot of bands do it, usually for like a greatest hits album or something. U2 did it with Sweetest Thing (which was a Joshua Tree b-side). REM did it with both Bad Day and All the Right Friends
    Rock me Jesus, roll me Lord...
    Wash me in the blood of Rock & Roll
  • DD164485
    DD164485 Posts: 149
    arthurdent wrote:
    DD164485 wrote:
    Why on earth would he take a break from recording a NEW ALBUM so that he can come in the and fuck around with some outake from 20 years ago?

    Alot of bands do it, usually for like a greatest hits album or something. U2 did it with Sweetest Thing (which was a Joshua Tree b-side). REM did it with both Bad Day and All the Right Friends

    Good point...but this clearly is 1991 Ed with a fresh coat of paint.
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    Not re-recorded.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • ZosoCat
    ZosoCat Posts: 176
    i think it should have been re-recorded or left alone.
  • Ledbetterman1O
    Ledbetterman1O Posts: 59
    vedderman wrote:
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.


    Well you're right that it's not the same vocal from the Brother demo that we all know from 1991. That being said, it may be a vocal from a different take or recording of Brother from '91 and not a recent re-recording.
  • gndcd402_
    gndcd402_ Posts: 153
    DD164485 wrote:
    I don't know how anyone can listen to this and think that this is a re-recorded track.

    I find it very doubtful that Eddie would re record his vocals.

    As if he even gives a shit about this song.

    Why on earth would he take a break from recording a NEW ALBUM so that he can come in the and fuck around with some outake from 20 years ago?

    Not only would this be totally LAME, but completly out of character.

    This is definately an early take of "Brother" re-mixed by Brendon O'Brien using modern 2009 technology.

    It's 1991 Eddie. with a brand new coat of paint....
    \

    doesnt seem too out of character for somebody who came back and added a different ending to the MTV unplugged Oceans.
  • NewJPage
    NewJPage Posts: 3,320
    DD164485 wrote:
    I don't know how anyone can listen to this and think that this is a re-recorded track.

    I find it very doubtful that Eddie would re record his vocals.

    As if he even gives a shit about this song.

    Why on earth would he take a break from recording a NEW ALBUM so that he can come in the and fuck around with some outake from 20 years ago?

    Not only would this be totally LAME, but completly out of character.

    This is definately an early take of "Brother" re-mixed by Brendon O'Brien using modern 2009 technology.

    It's 1991 Eddie. with a brand new coat of paint....

    see lost dogs for MANY other examples of ed re-recording his vocal track...
    6/26/98, 8/17/00, 10/8/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/25/03, 5/28/03, 6/1/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 6/6/03, 6/12/03, 6/13/03, 6/15/03, 6/18/03, 6/21/03, 6/22/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03, 10/3/04, 10/5/04, 9/9/05, 9/11/05, 9/16/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/19/06, 6/30/06, 7/23/06, 8/5/07, 6/30/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 5/4/10, 5/7/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 10/11/13, 10/17/14, 8/20/16
  • dreamweaver
    dreamweaver New York Posts: 736
    edited February 2009
    ....[/quote]

    see lost dogs for MANY other examples of ed re-recording his vocal track...[/quote]




    um.. i think you are completely wrong about all of this dude... simply put, there are usually more than one take in one session and I could bet alot on the fact that they are NOT re-recorded on a later date.

    its pretty funny how sure you are about it too...
    Post edited by dreamweaver on
    Meadowlands, MSG 1, MSG 2 - '98
    Jones Beach NY 1 + 3 - '00
    MSG 1 + 2 - '03
    Boston Garden - '04
    Montreal - '05
    Boston Garden 1, Meadowlands 1 + 2 - '06
    Mansfield 1 - '08
    (EV solo) Boston 1 - '08
    Chicago 1 - '09
    MSG -'10
    Brooklyn 1+2 - '13
    Central Park - '15
    MSG - '16
    Fenway - '16
    Wrigley - '16
    (RRHOF) Brooklyn - '17
    Fenway - '18
    MSG - '22
    MSG 1 - '24
  • Sludge Factory
    Sludge Factory Posts: 976
    dreamweaver wrote:
    NewJPage wrote:
    DD164485 wrote:
    I don't know how anyone can listen to this and think that this is a re-recorded track.

    I find it very doubtful that Eddie would re record his vocals.

    As if he even gives a shit about this song.

    Why on earth would he take a break from recording a NEW ALBUM so that he can come in the and fuck around with some outake from 20 years ago?

    Not only would this be totally LAME, but completly out of character.

    This is definately an early take of "Brother" re-mixed by Brendon O'Brien using modern 2009 technology.

    It's 1991 Eddie. with a brand new coat of paint....

    see lost dogs for MANY other examples of ed re-recording his vocal track...




    um.. i think you are completely wrong about all of this dude... simply put, there are usually more than one take in one session and I could bet alot on the fact that they are NOT re-recorded on a later date.

    What? I could've sworn that Alone and Hold On from Lost Dogs were re recorded vocals; especially Hold On.
  • dreamweaver
    dreamweaver New York Posts: 736
    quote]

    What? I could've sworn that Alone and Hold On from Lost Dogs were re recorded vocals; especially Hold On.[/quote]




    no, just different TAKES!
    Meadowlands, MSG 1, MSG 2 - '98
    Jones Beach NY 1 + 3 - '00
    MSG 1 + 2 - '03
    Boston Garden - '04
    Montreal - '05
    Boston Garden 1, Meadowlands 1 + 2 - '06
    Mansfield 1 - '08
    (EV solo) Boston 1 - '08
    Chicago 1 - '09
    MSG -'10
    Brooklyn 1+2 - '13
    Central Park - '15
    MSG - '16
    Fenway - '16
    Wrigley - '16
    (RRHOF) Brooklyn - '17
    Fenway - '18
    MSG - '22
    MSG 1 - '24

Categories