this Brother song...

dreamweaver
dreamweaver New York Posts: 736
edited February 2009 in The Porch
we've all heard the one released earlier during the Lost Dogs time. from what I've heard doesn't sound like it's a new vocal track... if that's the case whats the big deal with this "new release thing" on the radio??
Meadowlands, MSG 1, MSG 2 - '98
Jones Beach NY 1 + 3 - '00
MSG 1 + 2 - '03
Boston Garden - '04
Montreal - '05
Boston Garden 1, Meadowlands 1 + 2 - '06
Mansfield 1 - '08
(EV solo) Boston 1 - '08
Chicago 1 - '09
MSG -'10
Brooklyn 1+2 - '13
Central Park - '15
MSG - '16
Fenway - '16
Wrigley - '16
(RRHOF) Brooklyn - '17
Fenway - '18
MSG - '22
MSG 1 - '24
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13456

Comments

  • red mos
    red mos Posts: 4,953
    Well it's a marketing thing in one aspect and the opportunity allows pearl jam to have a new song (even though it's an old outake) on the radio airwaves in another aspect.
    PJ: 10/14/00 06/09/03 10/4/09 11/15/13 11/16/13 10/08/14
    EV Solo: 7/11/11 11/12/12 11/13/12
  • hrd2imgn
    hrd2imgn Southwest Burbs of Chicago Posts: 4,924
    I would guess it is the older mix- remixed/mastered. They did several vocal takes as the versions from the demos/rare-unrealeased CD leak sounded differen than the rough mixes tape version.

    the LD version was an atrocity- but would have been awesome had we not heard the "real" version way before it. The vocal add such an awesome dimension.

    I hope the radios play the fuck out of it so the newbies can hear the aura in Ed and the group that has long since gone away. Ed just sounds different, younger, more energetic, more frantic.
  • dreamweaver
    dreamweaver New York Posts: 736
    def a polished up version.. but sounds great.. I love the sound of this song!
    Meadowlands, MSG 1, MSG 2 - '98
    Jones Beach NY 1 + 3 - '00
    MSG 1 + 2 - '03
    Boston Garden - '04
    Montreal - '05
    Boston Garden 1, Meadowlands 1 + 2 - '06
    Mansfield 1 - '08
    (EV solo) Boston 1 - '08
    Chicago 1 - '09
    MSG -'10
    Brooklyn 1+2 - '13
    Central Park - '15
    MSG - '16
    Fenway - '16
    Wrigley - '16
    (RRHOF) Brooklyn - '17
    Fenway - '18
    MSG - '22
    MSG 1 - '24
  • Lee M
    Lee M Posts: 142
    dreamweaver wrote:
    def a polished up version.. but sounds great.. I love the sound of this song!

    Agreed. I'm loving this song all over again.
  • vedderman
    vedderman Posts: 801
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.
    2000 Ljubljana
    2006 Vienna, Zagreb
    2007 Munich
    2009 Berlin
    2010 Dublin, Belfast, Berlin, Venice
    2011 Montreal, Toronto 1&2
    2012 Manchester 1&2, Amsterdam 1&2, Prague, Berlin 1&2, EV Manchester
    2013 Worcester 1&2, Brooklyn 1&2
    2014 Amsterdam 1&2, Manchester 1&2, Milano, Trieste, Vienna, Berlin
    2017 EV Firenze, Taormina 1&2
    2018 Amsterdam 1&2, Padova, Prague, Krakow, Berlin
    2019 EV Firenze
  • dreamweaver
    dreamweaver New York Posts: 736
    vedderman wrote:
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.


    i dont think so dude, the vocals just sound spliced up and compressed.. but def not new recordings, I think your confused.
    Meadowlands, MSG 1, MSG 2 - '98
    Jones Beach NY 1 + 3 - '00
    MSG 1 + 2 - '03
    Boston Garden - '04
    Montreal - '05
    Boston Garden 1, Meadowlands 1 + 2 - '06
    Mansfield 1 - '08
    (EV solo) Boston 1 - '08
    Chicago 1 - '09
    MSG -'10
    Brooklyn 1+2 - '13
    Central Park - '15
    MSG - '16
    Fenway - '16
    Wrigley - '16
    (RRHOF) Brooklyn - '17
    Fenway - '18
    MSG - '22
    MSG 1 - '24
  • Jammin2Pearl
    Jammin2Pearl Posts: 266
    vedderman wrote:
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.

    these actual sound like the original demo version of the song, where he says 'sister' at times and not 'brother'
  • strummers
    strummers Posts: 2,611
    Have to say - this version does rock - but I just love the instrumental version.
    http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
    http://www.strummersphotography.com

    <object width="360" height="300"><param name="movie" value="http://www.redbubble.com/swf/redbubble.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><PARAM NAME=FlashVars VALUE="url=http://www.redbubble.com/people/strummers/works/visual.atom?campaign=sales_widget&mode=slideshow"><embed src="http://www.redbubble.com/swf/redbubble.swf&quot; FlashVars="url=http://www.redbubble.com/people/strummers/works/visual.atom?campaign=sales_widget&mode=slideshow&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="360" height="300"></embed></object>
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    WAAF in Boston is making a big deal out of this too, i dont get it...this isnt "new" and im finding this annoying for some odd reason maybe its the weather..haha
  • halszka123
    halszka123 Posts: 1,109
    vedderman wrote:
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.
    For sure it's His current voice:)
    probably people are not deaf, only too excited;) to consider it
    Not 10c member? Have sth to say? write to me - I'll put it on the forum
    halszka123@op.pl
  • Jed
    Jed New York City Posts: 1,207
    it's on their myspace if you haven't heard it yet.
    https://twitter.com/pjfour
  • DD164485
    DD164485 Posts: 149
    halszka123 wrote:
    vedderman wrote:
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.
    For sure it's His current voice:)
    probably people are not deaf, only too excited;) to consider it


    Eddie did NOT re-record the vocal.
    Brendon O'Brien has just mixed the ORIGINAL vocal track using modern equipment; which might be what you are hearing.

    Why in the hell would Eddie bother to come in and re-record his vocals to this song 20 years after the fact?
    That doesn't make the slightest bit of sense....considering he's out writing NEW SONGS for a NEW ALBUM
  • NewJPage
    NewJPage Posts: 3,320
    halszka123 wrote:
    vedderman wrote:
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.
    For sure it's His current voice:)
    probably people are not deaf, only too excited;) to consider it

    yep. re-recorded...just as i feared
    6/26/98, 8/17/00, 10/8/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/25/03, 5/28/03, 6/1/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 6/6/03, 6/12/03, 6/13/03, 6/15/03, 6/18/03, 6/21/03, 6/22/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03, 10/3/04, 10/5/04, 9/9/05, 9/11/05, 9/16/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/19/06, 6/30/06, 7/23/06, 8/5/07, 6/30/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 5/4/10, 5/7/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 10/11/13, 10/17/14, 8/20/16
  • arq
    arq Posts: 8,101
    I love this song, lyrics by eddie and music by stone?
    "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it"
    Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Why not (V) (°,,,,°) (V) ?
  • arthurdent
    arthurdent Posts: 969
    DD164485 wrote:
    Why in the hell would Eddie bother to come in and re-record his vocals to this song 20 years after the fact?

    For exactly the same reason he had Mike butcher the song and turn it into an instrumental for LD. Apparently Ed HATES (or at the very least is extremely embarrassed by) the lyrics to this song.
    Rock me Jesus, roll me Lord...
    Wash me in the blood of Rock & Roll
  • NewJPage
    NewJPage Posts: 3,320
    arthurdent wrote:
    DD164485 wrote:
    Why in the hell would Eddie bother to come in and re-record his vocals to this song 20 years after the fact?

    For exactly the same reason he had Mike butcher the song and turn it into an instrumental for LD. Apparently Ed HATES (or at the very least is extremely embarrassed by) the lyrics to this song.

    maybe he just hates his voice from back then, cause he re-recorded vocals on a number of tracks for lost dogs.
    6/26/98, 8/17/00, 10/8/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/25/03, 5/28/03, 6/1/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 6/6/03, 6/12/03, 6/13/03, 6/15/03, 6/18/03, 6/21/03, 6/22/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03, 10/3/04, 10/5/04, 9/9/05, 9/11/05, 9/16/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/19/06, 6/30/06, 7/23/06, 8/5/07, 6/30/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 5/4/10, 5/7/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 10/11/13, 10/17/14, 8/20/16
  • NewJPage
    NewJPage Posts: 3,320
    Jed wrote:
    it's on their myspace if you haven't heard it yet.

    bunch of stuff from the super deluxe there too!!
    6/26/98, 8/17/00, 10/8/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/25/03, 5/28/03, 6/1/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 6/6/03, 6/12/03, 6/13/03, 6/15/03, 6/18/03, 6/21/03, 6/22/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03, 10/3/04, 10/5/04, 9/9/05, 9/11/05, 9/16/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/19/06, 6/30/06, 7/23/06, 8/5/07, 6/30/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 5/4/10, 5/7/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 10/11/13, 10/17/14, 8/20/16
  • arthurdent
    arthurdent Posts: 969
    NewJPage wrote:
    maybe he just hates his voice from back then, cause he re-recorded vocals on a number of tracks for lost dogs.

    This doesn't bode well for the other bonus tracks. Although, I will LMFAO if Ed re-recorded vocals for Goat :lol:
    Rock me Jesus, roll me Lord...
    Wash me in the blood of Rock & Roll
  • se7v7en
    se7v7en Philadelphia, PA Posts: 329
    NewJPage wrote:
    halszka123 wrote:
    vedderman wrote:
    are you people deaf? :shock:

    eddie recorded new vocals for this song, this vocals are present not from '91.
    For sure it's His current voice:)
    probably people are not deaf, only too excited;) to consider it

    yep. re-recorded...just as i feared


    What???? No!!! They even talked about about this on WMMY-Philly. They are the origional vocals. The song was only remixed, not rerecorded.
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    could it possibly be another take from those sessions? it's not unusual at all to keep several takes when recording. just a thought...
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com

Categories