2007 New England Patriots

1141517192042

Comments

  • i hate the patriots so much (don't know why... i guess since they beat the cowboys, which isn't that big of a deal for that cowboys loss, but anyway) so i decided to play madden 08. cowboys vs patriots. i played the first game and they were killing me (so i was hating them more). i played the second game and i threw 565 yard, 8 td and 1 int. with tony romo and still, i barely beat the patriots by a fucking field goal. (so i was still pissed and fucking felt like blowing those little characters heads off) so again i started over and this time the score was 45-0... i finally shut those fuckers out. tom brady had a 6.9 rating 64 yrds, 2 int, and 38% pass completion. i threw 382 yrd, 4 td, 79% passing completion with tony romo. ahh, so now i can rest happily. they were supposed to lose to the ravens... bummer for the ravens i'd of been seriously pissed if i were them. thank god for madden 08, i can pretend that the pats lost today. ;)
    This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    yea, it was probably a hold, but holding happens on every single play. I mean, how many chances can you give this damn team? You can't let a game be decided on an iffy call. And something just aint right when one team gets 13 penalties, and the other (who wins) 4...
    um how much more clutching and grabbing did the ravens think they were gonna get? the only reason it was close was the holding!
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    PJ_Saluki wrote:
    NFL -- Not Fucking Legitimate.


    the delusional are out


    the ravens fucking clutched and grabbed all night

    the refs had enough

    was there ever a better reason to fire billick tonight?

    no control over his team

    the ray lewis poison is very apparent, so much talk they forgot how to win



    NAHEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    they were supposed to lose to the ravens... bummer for the ravens i'd of been seriously pissed if i were them. )
    the cry of losers
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    Fuck The Patriots!! Why Do The Officials Have To Decide Football Games!?! 4th And 5 And A Holding Call?!?!? Fuck!!!!


    its funny how in the first three quarters you werent impartial enough to post that the ravens were getting away with holding calls.
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    gue_barium wrote:
    C'mon, if nothing else, this game shows that this team still has a heart. If BB were so vacant, that wouldn't be so.
    even the baltimore paper was impartial enough to realize the ravens choked

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/football/bal-sp.steele04dec04,0,6714779.column?coll=bal_tab01_layout
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • NOCODE#1NOCODE#1 Posts: 1,477
    JSBE wrote:
    and how many penalties did the pats get when they beat the colts AT indy?

    oh yeah...about a dozen plus for over 140 yards.
    you see but these babies aren't coherent they are so frustrated that their team isnt relevant they shout into the wind with nothing of any note, begging and pleading to be heard.
    Let's not be negative now. Thumper has spoken
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,529
    NOCODE#1 wrote:
    its funny how in the first three quarters you werent impartial enough to post that the ravens were getting away with holding calls.


    shut the f-up you whining sniveling little cheating bastards - jeez you won the damn game. i guess the only reason it was close was because of the refs - damn, just enjoy the winning and stop bitching.
  • JSBEJSBE Posts: 1,078
    pjhawks wrote:
    shut the f-up you whining sniveling little cheating bastards - jeez you won the damn game. i guess the only reason it was close was because of the refs - damn, just enjoy the winning and stop bitching.

    i don't think any single pats fan in this thread is bitching. i know i'm just trying to counter the argument.
  • JSBEJSBE Posts: 1,078
    NOCODE#1 wrote:
    you see but these babies aren't coherent they are so frustrated that their team isnt relevant they shout into the wind with nothing of any note, begging and pleading to be heard.

    i understand. it is easy to use facts to try to back up your side of the argument (ie - the ravens had so many penalties, how were they supposed to win?) while easily forgetting facts that disprove your argument (see my post about the pats/indy game and penalties against the pats).
  • JSBEJSBE Posts: 1,078
    Ravens cornerback Samari Rolle was particularly upset with the officiating tonight. He was upset with more than what he perceived to be incorrect calls. He was upset at how officials treated Ravens players in this game. He singled out head linesman Phil McKinnely for using disrespectful language.

    "The refs called me a boy. No. 110 called me a boy. I will be calling my agent in the morning and sending my complaint. I have a wife and three kids. Don't call me a boy. Don't call me a boy on the field during a game because I said, 'You've never played football before.' "

    Official No. 110 is Byron "Phil" McKinnely, who played for three NFL teams (Atlanta, the Los Angeles Rams and Chicago) during the 1970s and 1980s. He also apparently played in the USFL.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Without an ill-timed timeout, the Ravens would have been in position to run out the clock on the Patriots tonight. They stuffed Tom Brady on fourth down, only to learn the play did not count. "The coaches called timeout, so that's out of our hands," Ravens cornerback Samari Rolle said. "I can't comment on that. I don't know what happened. The coaches make those decisions."

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Patriots receiver Randy Moss took a shot at the Ravens for talking smack during the game. "Coach Belichick doesn't coach us or raise us that way. So for us to come up and shut them up with a last-second touchdown, that's what really felt good."

    Moss on his feelings toward the end of the game: "I'm not going to sit here and lie. I think a little bit of anxiety, you know, setting in. It was getting first, second, third down; we got the fourth down. I was really still confident in what we were doing, and then the flags came out, and they started seeing the game. Hell, they were hoping for holding for three quarters and now they want to throw the flags in the fourth quarter. It was a good thing to see that they called the game right."

    Moss on the trash talking: "There was just so much trash talking, man, from guys who really hadn't done anything in the league. So basically, me being a 10-year vet and seeing those guys out there talking smack, they haven't done nothing yet. So it was a good thing for the offense that Jabar Gaffney came up with a key catch, luckily, for six and, you know, we shut them up, and that was a good thing. I'm not a trash talker. I talk with my play, not with my mouth."

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The Ravens rushed for 166 yards against the Patriots. "I felt that this was the first time all year that we got bullied," Patriots safety Rodney Harrison said. "We can't allow teams to run the ball and pound it like that. There are times this is a mano-on-mano battle and they were winning it. Tonight's game showed we have a lot of problems and we're going to look at the film and make corrections before we play Pittsburgh."

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Just returned from the Ravens' locker room. Those guys are ticked off. They said the league wants the Patriots to win, to the point that officials make calls favoring New England with the game on the line. They said Tom Brady sells tickets for the league, so the league wants Brady and the Patriots to stay unbeaten. I'll start posting the direct quotes momentarily. Refresh the blog periodically and you'll see them as they post.

    Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs on officiating: "Everybody is kind of cheering for them to go undefeated and break all the records. They called them the greatest offense on earth. So who knows? ... They made one more play than us and they got a little help."

    Suggs on the timeout attributed to the Ravens, which gave New England another chance on fourth down after Baltimore appeared to stop Tom Brady short on a sneak: "You only get a few times to really get the NFL's poster boy in that type of situation. I don't know. It looked like all 22 men on the field played as if no timeout was called. But if it was called, it was called. I don't get into that part of the game. I just do my job."

    Suggs on officiating: "It's kind of the feeling of the 2001 tuck rule. It kind of feels like the tuck rule. That is the NFL for you, man. When they got a guy like that that is selling a lot of tickets, you want to keep him selling tickets."

    Ravens linebacker Bart Scott on the timeout: "I didn't hear a timeout. That was very convenient."

    Scott: "We outplayed them, plain and simple. We punched them in the mouth on both sides of the ball."

    Ravens receiver Derrick Mason: "Allow the players to dictate how the game is going to go, especially the last couple of seconds. It's kind of like basketball. There's three seconds on the clock. Let the guys play. The best team is going to win. You don't let outside circumstances dictate how the game is going to go. It's hard to play against the best team in the NFL and beat them. You are out there and working hard. You are playing against them and then also you have the other guys and it seems you are playing against them, also."

    More from Mason on officiating: "I'm going to take it back to last game. San Diego. Quinn Sypniewski runs down the field, runs into one of their DBs, we catch the ball and they call offensive pass interference. OK. Great. This game, same thing happens. Randy Moss runs right into Samari Rolle. They call defensive pass interference. I don't understand that. One game it's called one way, the next game it's called another way. At the end, you have a phantom call. That's why it's hard to play and win a game when you are playing against more than just the best team in the NFL."

    More from Mason on how hard it is to beat the Patriots: "It's kind of like that old Bulls team when they were running the tables. You were playing against Jordan, Pippen and the bunch and it was hard to beat them because everyone was on their side. That's the way it is now. You've got Brady and the bunch. It's hard to beat them when you're playing against them and extra people."

    Mason on whether the refs can get caught up in talk of an undefeated season: "I think everybody can get caught up. You should have heard some of the verbal blasts we were taking from the refs. It was just despicable. They don't want us to say anything to them, but they treat us like we're little kids out there, saying anything they want to say. As players, we can't say anything back. We can't report it to anybody because it's our word against theirs. But you have to give it up to New England. They did what they had to do. They scored at the end and that's all you can ask of a team."

    Ravens cornerback Chris McAlister on whether the NFL wants the Patriots to win: "They get a lot of calls. I'll say that. We've been watching film on them all week and I mean, they do get a lot of calls. As far as the NFL wanting them to win, you can't totally not think about it in those terms."

    Ravens running back Willis McGahee: "I felt like we played our hearts out tonight and got some bogus calls, but it is what it is."

    McGahee on which calls bothered him the most: "Shhh. Pass interference, the holding on [Jamaine] Winborne. There was a lot. I can't even remember them all."

    Ravens coach Brian Billick spoke with reporters for only about a minute after the game. Asked why the Ravens called timeout before stuffing Brady on fourth down, Billick said, "We didn't feel like we were in the right configuration, kind of knew what they were going to do and felt like we needed a better call, I guess." It wasn't clear what he meant. Asked which person called the timeout, Billick said, "We called the timeout." Asked if the calls just didn't seem to go the Ravens' way late in the game, Billick said, "Yeah, evidently not."

    Asked about what he said to Scott about tossing an official's flag into the stands, Billick said, "You've gotta be smarter than that. Can't be a dumb football player."

    I'll leave you with a comment overheard from a veteran player: "You might as well crown them the Super Bowl champs if it's going to be like that."
  • pjhawks wrote:
    shut the f-up you whining sniveling little cheating bastards - jeez you won the damn game. i guess the only reason it was close was because of the refs - damn, just enjoy the winning and stop bitching.

    this is how we enjoy the winning, seeing you panzies cry like babies.
    "This guy back here is giving me the ole one more....one more back to you buddy."

    - Mr. Edward Vedder 7/11/03


  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,529
    this is how we enjoy the winning, seeing you panzies cry like babies.

    sorry If I offended was just annoyed at Pats fans complaining when they won. I will say the Ravens surely were acting like punks, especially on the defensive side. As some of the stories/quotes above regarding the trash talking - hard to trash talk when your 4-8 but apparantly the Ravens didn't get that memo.

    Lost in all this BS after the game was another great game. At least the last two weeks for the Pats has been great football to watch. Last night was a brutally physical game. One has to wonder if the physicality of the last two weeks might catch up with the Pats. I think the last two weeks shows why its so darn hard to go undefeated - teams come at you at a whole other level when you get so close to being undefeated. Might not matter though cause Brady is just so cool. Never seen a QB be so relaxed back there. He plays like he is on the playground with no rush coming at him.
  • NY PJ1NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    I THOUGHT ONLY HEAD COACHES AND PLAYERS WERE allowed to call timeouts

    actually the whole timeout system in the nfl is messed up

    30 different people can call one and any one of the 10 refs can grant u one ,,its weird

    that being said they won the game ..period
  • NY PJ1 wrote:
    I THOUGHT ONLY HEAD COACHES AND PLAYERS WERE allowed to call timeouts

    actually the whole timeout system in the nfl is messed up

    30 different people can call one and any one of the 10 refs can grant u one ,,its weird

    that being said they won the game ..period

    who knows who was calling it, it was probably more than one guy. I'm sure refs are well versed on when to allow a time out to be called.

    The other thing, it seemed like some of the Pats players heard the call, I don't think the play was truly legit. The same is true for the false start. Those plays could of turned out different if they were run normally. It's splitting hairs at this point. There are dozens of incidences like this that happen every game. These just get scrutinized because of the situation. It's part of the game. Just like stalled drives, dropped passes and dropped INT's. The Pats left more points on the table than did the Ravens. It seemed that the Pats should of taken the lead earlier in the 4th.

    What it comes down to, is that someone has to play a near perfect game to beat the Pats. Eagles and Ravens nearly did that, but just not quite there.
    "This guy back here is giving me the ole one more....one more back to you buddy."

    - Mr. Edward Vedder 7/11/03


  • NY PJ1NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    who knows who was calling it, it was probably more than one guy. I'm sure refs are well versed on when to allow a time out to be called.

    The other thing, it seemed like some of the Pats players heard the call, I don't think the play was truly legit. The same is true for the false start. Those plays could of turned out different if they were run normally. It's splitting hairs at this point. There are dozens of incidences like this that happen every game. These just get scrutinized because of the situation. It's part of the game. Just like stalled drives, dropped passes and dropped INT's. The Pats left more points on the table than did the Ravens. It seemed that the Pats should of taken the lead earlier in the 4th.

    What it comes down to, is that someone has to play a near perfect game to beat the Pats. Eagles and Ravens nearly did that, but just not quite there.

    everyone seems to think it was the def. cord , but i dont know
    personally ,,i think it sould be set rules
    these people can call it and these people can grant it
    no line judges 50 ft. away from the play
  • NY PJ1 wrote:
    everyone seems to think it was the def. cord , but i dont know
    personally ,,i think it sould be set rules
    these people can call it and these people can grant it
    no line judges 50 ft. away from the play

    the fact is that the Ravens wanted the timeout. Patriot haters and those who look for them to lose like to make ridiculous points on why they should of lost. It's out of control.

    If you look at the Pats playoff losses to Denver and Indy the last 2 years, you can find real legitimate blown calls and home team pressure bullshit calls made by the refs against the Pats. Just recall the way the Pats handled those losses with class and respect. The Ravens are a disgrace.
    "This guy back here is giving me the ole one more....one more back to you buddy."

    - Mr. Edward Vedder 7/11/03


  • NY PJ1NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    the fact is that the Ravens wanted the timeout. Patriot haters and those who look for them to lose like to make ridiculous points on why they should of lost. It's out of control.

    If you look at the Pats playoff losses to Denver and Indy the last 2 years, you can find real legitimate blown calls and home team pressure bullshit calls made by the refs against the Pats. Just recall the way the Pats handled those losses with class and respect. The Ravens are a disgrace.


    i could care less,,the ravens are a bunch of thugs anyway

    but im just saying,, MAKE SET RULES IN REGARDS TO TIMEOUTS

    you see it all the time ,, timeouts being called from out of the blue

    when u have 10 refs and linejudges spread out over 100 yards or whatever
    it can be alittle confusing
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,529
    NY PJ1 wrote:
    i could care less,,the ravens are a bunch of thugs anyway

    but im just saying,, MAKE SET RULES IN REGARDS TO TIMEOUTS

    you see it all the time ,, timeouts being called from out of the blue

    when u have 10 refs and linejudges spread out over 100 yards or whatever
    it can be alittle confusing

    i agree with this. never liked allowing coaches to call timeouts - leave it to the players on the field to call them, easier to control. it's become a fiasco this year with coaches calling timeouts right as the plays are being run.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    NOCODE#1 wrote:
    even the baltimore paper was impartial enough to realize the ravens choked

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/football/bal-sp.steele04dec04,0,6714779.column?coll=bal_tab01_layout

    On paper, though, they shouldn't have even been in this one.
    That was a fun game to watch.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    NOCODE#1 wrote:
    its funny how in the first three quarters you werent impartial enough to post that the ravens were getting away with holding calls.
    lol at getting away with calls - Ravens had 13 penalties...
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    the fact is that the Ravens wanted the timeout. Patriot haters and those who look for them to lose like to make ridiculous points on why they should of lost. It's out of control.

    If you look at the Pats playoff losses to Denver and Indy the last 2 years, you can find real legitimate blown calls and home team pressure bullshit calls made by the refs against the Pats. Just recall the way the Pats handled those losses with class and respect. The Ravens are a disgrace.
    class and respect??? LOL!! So I guess dancing on the 50 yd-line on the Chargers field is class and respect...
  • ryan198ryan198 Posts: 1,015
    The pats won, plain and simple. Refs have terrible games now and then, and last night was definitely one of them. However, when you give them a reason to by having a history of beating up the other teams receivers then you will get crappy calls against you. The funny thing is that the Pats put this "no touching the receivers" league rule in motion a few years ago by manhandling marvin harrison.

    Anyway finally a team bit the bullet and did what I have suggested you could do to the Patriots all year run the ball down their throat until they choke on themselves. Unfortunately the Ravens have no passing game to speak of, however the Steelers do, the Colts do, the Browns do, the Chargers could in the AFC and the Cowboys in the NFC should take note on what the Ravens did today. Unfortunately, none of those teams have the type of Defense that will beat the crap out of the Pats the way the Ravens did last night.
  • NY PJ1NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    pjhawks wrote:
    i agree with this. never liked allowing coaches to call timeouts - leave it to the players on the field to call them, easier to control. it's become a fiasco this year with coaches calling timeouts right as the plays are being run.


    its been happening with the game winning field goals all year , call timeout as the ball is being snapped wtf is that? stupid shit

    so the kicker has to make it 2 or 3 x
  • NY PJ1 wrote:
    i could care less,,the ravens are a bunch of thugs anyway

    but im just saying,, MAKE SET RULES IN REGARDS TO TIMEOUTS

    you see it all the time ,, timeouts being called from out of the blue

    when u have 10 refs and linejudges spread out over 100 yards or whatever
    it can be alittle confusing

    your whining again. you wished that the refs didn't honor a timeout the team wanted because it would likely cost the Pats the game. how pathetic.
    "This guy back here is giving me the ole one more....one more back to you buddy."

    - Mr. Edward Vedder 7/11/03


  • NY PJ1 wrote:
    its been happening with the game winning field goals all year , call timeout as the ball is being snapped wtf is that? stupid shit

    so the kicker has to make it 2 or 3 x

    it was 4th and 1, no huddle after the previous play. the timeout call was legitimate, just before the snap. the coaches and players where jumping up and down on the sideline trying to call time.

    are you guys serious?
    "This guy back here is giving me the ole one more....one more back to you buddy."

    - Mr. Edward Vedder 7/11/03


  • ryan198 wrote:
    The pats won, plain and simple. Refs have terrible games now and then, and last night was definitely one of them. However, when you give them a reason to by having a history of beating up the other teams receivers then you will get crappy calls against you. The funny thing is that the Pats put this "no touching the receivers" league rule in motion a few years ago by manhandling marvin harrison.

    Anyway finally a team bit the bullet and did what I have suggested you could do to the Patriots all year run the ball down their throat until they choke on themselves. Unfortunately the Ravens have no passing game to speak of, however the Steelers do, the Colts do, the Browns do, the Chargers could in the AFC and the Cowboys in the NFC should take note on what the Ravens did today. Unfortunately, none of those teams have the type of Defense that will beat the crap out of the Pats the way the Ravens did last night.

    last night was not a bad game by the refs, no way. every single Baltimore penalty was legitimate, no marginal calls. they were mauling the receivers.

    do you people watch the same game? you guys don't know football.
    "This guy back here is giving me the ole one more....one more back to you buddy."

    - Mr. Edward Vedder 7/11/03


  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    it was 4th and 1, no huddle after the previous play. the timeout call was legitimate, just before the snap. the coaches and players where jumping up and down on the sideline trying to call time.

    are you guys serious?
    according to NFL rules, a coordinator CAN NOT call a T.O. Either way, the Ravens, combined with some bogus calls, lost the game
  • class and respect??? LOL!! So I guess dancing on the 50 yd-line on the Chargers field is class and respect...

    I was talking about Pats losses.

    Shawn Merriam deserves that every time the Chargers lose. People like Merriam and Ray Lewis don't deserve respect from any opponent.
    "This guy back here is giving me the ole one more....one more back to you buddy."

    - Mr. Edward Vedder 7/11/03


  • dg1979usdg1979us Posts: 568
    it was 4th and 1, no huddle after the previous play. the timeout call was legitimate, just before the snap. the coaches and players where jumping up and down on the sideline trying to call time.

    are you guys serious?

    Head coach has to call it, not the DC. It shouldnt have been recognized.
Sign In or Register to comment.