34th annual March for Life on the 22nd
Options
Comments
-
CorporateWhore wrote:Roe v. Wade will be overturned in the next 20 years.
Those pictures are pretty grotesque. I can't imagine supporting that "choice." Why do you support that?
I totally agree. The tide is definitely turning. With the technology we have now to see all the stages of human development it's getting harder and harder for abortion advocates to convince people it's not a human life. 35 years ago who knew exactly what was growing in there? Not so now.
It's not even a religious cause anymore. I have agnostic friends who think abortion is evil based on scientific fact more than anything.
The baby-boom generation that pushed the lies of "choice" soon won't be in control anymore and that will be a great day.So this life is sacrifice...
6/30/98 Minneapolis, 10/8/00 East Troy (Brrrr!), 6/16/03 St. Paul, 6/27/06 St. Paul0 -
Jeanie wrote:Are there any women here on this thread? Or have they all been silenced yet again by some boys and their moralizing?"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 19630
-
hippiemom wrote:Not silenced, just refraining from indulging some of our more obnoxious board members in their quest for attention
Yes, hippiemom! As I suspected, smarter than the average bear!
It has become apparent that this is not going to be a reasoned, rational debate. Just the same old boring diatribe. As if there isn't more than enough opportunity in the world for women to have to listen to the rabid pontificating of the righteous and indignant. No chance of learning anything new here. It's got witch hunt written all over it! Shame really. Be good to hear what real people with real opinions thought.NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
miller8966 wrote:It disgusts me when i hear of women( if thats what you want to call them) having 2-3 abortions. I can see someone making a mistake in life and having 1 abortion but i really wish in general it would be illegal.
I'm pro-choice but when women start having abortions as birth control that's just sick (unless we're talking about special circumstances).THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
Jeanie wrote:Are there any women here on this thread? Or have they all been silenced yet again by some boys and their moralizing?
but my opinion? tho i'm pro-choice, i agree roe vs wade will eventually be overturned. not because some think it's morally wrong or evil...but because it's badly written. that doesn't mean a new one won't be written to take it's place tho.
( ok...flame away n tell me how ignorant i am now. thanks. enjoyed it.)
0 -
tooferz wrote:no not silenced. there is no point in posting. they don't want an opinion. they just want to argue n call names.
but my opinion? tho i'm pro-choice, i agree roe vs wade will eventually be overturned. not because some think it's morally wrong or evil...but because it's badly written. that doesn't mean a new one won't be written to take it's place tho.
( ok...flame away n tell me how ignorant i am now. thanks. enjoyed it.)
Do you think that if it is overturned there will be a ground swell of support for new legislation there? I just wonder. I mean I've been very heartened by the unity shown by many of our politicians here when it comes to women's fertility control but I wonder if push comes to shove if they will prevail. I guess the brow beating that's been going on here by Tony Abbott, Little Johnny and brethren has really made me nervous. And the current generation seems to take much of this stuff for granted. Not having a go at them, just they've always had the options available to them. I think back to the bad old days. I would hate to see a return to that. I mean in a perfect world no child would be born unwanted and no pregnancy would be unwanted. But we don't live in a perfect world. And I'm really sick and tired of everybody having an opinion about women's bodies. From abortion, to sex, to weight, to hair color, breast size, what to eat, how to bring up children, what to think, blah, blah blah! Far too much time is still spent telling women how to live in their skins. I don't think you'll be too vilified by your post now anyway. At least for a couple of days. Me thinks it's marching time!NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
darthvedder81 wrote:I totally agree. The tide is definitely turning. With the technology we have now to see all the stages of human development it's getting harder and harder for abortion advocates to convince people it's not a human life. 35 years ago who knew exactly what was growing in there? Not so now.
It's not even a religious cause anymore. I have agnostic friends who think abortion is evil based on scientific fact more than anything.
The baby-boom generation that pushed the lies of "choice" soon won't be in control anymore and that will be a great day.
Amen.
Anyone who's ever seen an abortion performed would agree. Every officer in my campus's Students for Life club is a woman. They invite homosexual groups, minority groups, and others to discuss the evils of abortion. Abortion is simply not a religious issue at all. Anyone who respects life can be pro-life.
Here is a homosexual pro-life organization:
http://www.plagal.org/index.htmlAll I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
tooferz wrote:no not silenced. there is no point in posting. they don't want an opinion. they just want to argue n call names.
but my opinion? tho i'm pro-choice, i agree roe vs wade will eventually be overturned. not because some think it's morally wrong or evil...but because it's badly written. that doesn't mean a new one won't be written to take it's place tho.
( ok...flame away n tell me how ignorant i am now. thanks. enjoyed it.)
Roe v. Wade's terms are based on antiquated notions of the birth process. I too look forward to the day it is overturned and when the people will be able to decide whether abortion is right or wrong.All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
CorporateWhore wrote:Roe v. Wade's terms are based on antiquated notions of the birth process. I too look forward to the day it is overturned and when the people will be able to decide whether abortion is right or wrong.
People will never be able to decide whether abortion is right or wrong, there are shades of grey.
I believe in some cases it's the most selfish, disgusting thing and in other cases it is, in my opinion, the only option.THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
Collin wrote:I believe in some cases it's the most selfish, disgusting thing and in other cases it is, in my opinion, the only option.
Well I might agree with you in that regard.
In my opinion, the only time it is an option is to save the life of the mother.All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
CorporateWhore wrote:Well I might agree with you in that regard.
In my opinion, the only time it is an option is to save the life of the mother.
What about rape and incest?
I don't like abortion, but I am pro-choice. I just think it should be an option to those who want it.Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V0 -
keeponrockin wrote:What about rape and incest?
I don't like abortion, but I am pro-choice. I just think it should be an option to those who want it.
What did the baby do? Nobody can force a woman to die for her child. Some women HAVE chosen to die so that their baby might be born, and God Bless them for that. Nonetheless, legally, it would be immoral to require that mothers die so their children could live.
In the case of rape and incest, no one's life is in danger. The baby is just unwanted. It is not a special case. The baby is not causing the death of the mother; therefore, it doesn't need to be aborted.All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
CorporateWhore wrote:What did the baby do? Nobody can force a woman to die for her child. Some women HAVE chosen to die so that their baby might be born, and God Bless them for that. Nonetheless, legally, it would be immoral to require that mothers die so their children could live.
In the case of rape and incest, no one's life is in danger. The baby is just unwanted. It is not a special case. The baby is not causing the death of the mother; therefore, it doesn't need to be aborted.
What is your opinion if the rapist is an illegal immigrant?War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength0 -
Collin wrote:and the raped girl is your 14 year old sister?
I think we all know the answer to that.0 -
CorporateWhore wrote:What did the baby do? Nobody can force a woman to die for her child. Some women HAVE chosen to die so that their baby might be born, and God Bless them for that. Nonetheless, legally, it would be immoral to require that mothers die so their children could live.
In the case of rape and incest, no one's life is in danger. The baby is just unwanted. It is not a special case. The baby is not causing the death of the mother; therefore, it doesn't need to be aborted.
who the fuck do you think you are?0 -
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
Scratchin a Letter wrote:Exactly. Should a child have to be put through pregnancy and birth, even when the conception was forced?
I think we all know the answer to that.
Yes we do:
Yes.
Two wrongs don't make a right. That's like saying we should give the death penalty to someone if they murder another person. Killing the killer doesn't solve any problems.
Aborting the fetus doesn't solve any problems either. It merely creates more.All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
Rushlimbo wrote:What is your opinion if the rapist is an illegal immigrant?
The illegal immigrant should be sent back to wherever they came from since they weren't supposed to be here in the first place - but that is a separate issue entirely.All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell0 -
CorporateWhore wrote:CorporateWhore.
now you are. although you were known by other names before being banned. it's no secret that you like to come on here and play your little role to get a rise out of people or to get a laugh...whatever your reasons may be. what a waste it is to see people like you here, when others actually wouldn't mind having reasonable conversations. a sad and pathetic kid is what you are.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help