Feminism

24567

Comments

  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    chopitdown wrote:
    i have no issue with feminism as long as they don't look down on women who stay home with their kids and not enter the workforce
    I agree. I've been frowned upon by many people in society by being a stay at home mom. Not just feminists. But I do get very annoyed when feminists become the enemy to women and attempt to limit choice.
    and as long as they're for EQUAL rights.
    So you can't accept when they are for women's rights?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • qtegirlqtegirl Posts: 321
    chopitdown wrote:
    i have no issue with feminism as long as they don't look down on women who stay home with their kids and not enter the workforce and as long as they're for EQUAL rights.
    I agree with you. I don't think feminists look down on women who decide to stay home. But the families with the resources to allow a woman to do this are few and far between.

    Feminists are fighting so that if women do choose to stay home, they are compensated for this valuable work. And if they choose to go back to work, they can find affordable, high quality child care.
  • angelica wrote:
    So you can't accept when they are for women's rights?

    What the hell is a "woman's right"? What does the word "woman" add to that?
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    What the hell is a "woman's right"? What does the word "woman" add to that?
    Alright, how about "for women's empowerment"?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    angelica wrote:
    I agree. I've been frowned upon by many people in society by being a stay at home mom. Not just feminists. But I do get very annoyed when feminists become the enemy to women and attempt to limit choice.

    So you can't accept when they are for women's rights?

    I guess what i was more implying with my second statement was they aren't for hosing men just to get ahead...as men shouldn't be about hosing women to get ahead. I'm all for maternal / paternal leave. I'm all for women's rights; I think we as a society should respect that we have men and women and whether we want to agree with it or not there are certain roles that only one gender can perform and society should support those roles and not penalize people.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • angelica wrote:
    Alright, how about "for women's empowerment"?

    Empowerment over what?
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    Empowerment over what?
    Personal empowerment. Being empowered. Authentically. Minus the "over what". Kinda how you like empowerment in your life and dislike being limited by infringing external forces that are not authentically based.

    You're barking up the wrong tree on the "rights" thing here. My slant here, is much more psychological and vague by general standards.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    angelica wrote:
    Alright, how about "for women's empowerment"?

    Isn't that a personal thing? Can't we all have equal rights and all be empowered?:confused:
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    cutback wrote:
    Isn't that a personal thing? Can't we all have equal rights and all be empowered?:confused:
    Sure.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • angelica wrote:
    Personal empowerment. Being empowered. Authentically. Minus the "over what". Kinda how you like empowerment in your life and dislike being limited by infringing external forces that are not authentically based.

    You're barking up the wrong tree on the "rights" thing here. My slant here, is much more psychological and vague by general standards.

    Personal empowerment would mean having power over yourself. And I'm completely down with that as a basic human right. However, some feminists don't want to stop there. They want power over others, as well as themselves. That's where they lose me.
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    qtegirl wrote:
    Feminists are fighting so that if women do choose to stay home, they are compensated for this valuable work. And if they choose to go back to work, they can find affordable, high quality child care.


    i agree, society needs to do something to help parents. We have a generation of kids who really can't be reared by their parents for one reason or another. It's a shame that we as society can't figure something reasonable out.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    cutback wrote:
    Isn't that a personal thing? Can't we all have equal rights and all be empowered?:confused:
    Sure, just don't look to the feminist movement to provide this or try to provide this. Much like a patriarchal society doesn't provide or try to provide equality, neither does/would a feminist society.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    Personal empowerment would mean having power over yourself. And I'm completely down with that as a basic human right. However, some feminists don't want to stop there. They want power over others, as well as themselves. That's where they lose me.
    Okay. I'm totally with you about personal power being having authentic inner power. Most or maybe all of the "women's issues" I've had stemmed from not having this inner authentic power. Therefore that's what my focus is about--authentic power.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    angelica wrote:
    Sure.

    I thought that's what you meant, but the post, to me, seemed a little vague.:)
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    qtegirl wrote:
    Man, you're really talking from the point of view of the dominant group.

    This whole thing that men help women out of the goodness of their hearts, not because they're trying to get something out of it? Really? Is that why it took so long for women to get the right to vote? Is that why it took a WHOLE movement to do it? Men didn't do it out of the goodness of their heart, they did it because women wouldn't be silenced anymore!
    Cough, cough,***bullshit***, cough. Feminism can't even speak with a unified voice for themselves but you feel you can speak for all men. Gine me a break.

    I have no power over generations of men long dead. So I accept no responsibility for their actions, much like I don't expect women to accept responsibility for ever letting it become unequal.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    chopitdown wrote:
    I guess what i was more implying with my second statement was they aren't for hosing men just to get ahead...as men shouldn't be about hosing women to get ahead. I'm all for maternal / paternal leave. I'm all for women's rights; I think we as a society should respect that we have men and women and whether we want to agree with it or not there are certain roles that only one gender can perform and society should support those roles and not penalize people.
    I agree. (except for the "hosing" part since it's an expression I'm not overly familiar with. ;))
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • VictoryGinVictoryGin Posts: 1,207
    surferdude wrote:
    Sure, just don't look to the feminist movement to provide this or try to provide this. Much like a patriarchal society doesn't provide or try to provide equality, neither does/would a feminist society.

    feminism is about equality. patriarchy is about the subordination of those who are not male.
    if you wanna be a friend of mine
    cross the river to the eastside
  • VictoryGin wrote:
    feminism is about equality.

    Can I see your draft card?

    ;)
  • VictoryGinVictoryGin Posts: 1,207
    Can I see your draft card?

    ;)

    well we aren't in that feminist society quite yet, eh?
    if you wanna be a friend of mine
    cross the river to the eastside
  • VictoryGin wrote:
    well we aren't in that feminist society quite yet, eh?

    Touche :)
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    cutback wrote:
    I thought that's what you meant, but the post, to me, seemed a little vague.:)
    Yeah, my issue in this debate is that some people seem to be saying that we need to seek equal rights or else being for women's rights is somehow invalidated. I see it's valid to look at the context of women's empowerment without also looking at men's empowerment because there are many contexts where this "look" is needed. And then it becomes another issue looking at men's empowerment, where needed, or human empowerment in general. It depends on the context and any productive movement is valid and constructive in my view.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Can I see your draft card?

    ;)

    Did you sign up at 18? My brother never did.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Did you sign up at 18?

    Of course. Many guns assured that I did:

    http://www.sss.gov/FSbenefits.htm

    :)
    My brother never did.

    Cool.
  • angelica wrote:
    Yeah, my issue in this debate is that some people seem to be saying that we need to seek equal rights or else being for women's rights is somehow invalidated. I see it's valid to look at the context of women's empowerment without also looking at men's empowerment because there are many contexts where this "look" is needed. And then it becomes another issue looking at men's empowerment, where needed, or human empowerment in general. It depends on the context and any productive movement is valid and constructive in my view.

    I think movements like femenism, civil rights, etc. come about because people are concerned about what is affecting THEM. So it just makes sense to focus your efforts on what affects you the most. Nothing wrong with that, and it makes more sense. You cannot seriously fight against every type of injustice affecting every type of person. You have to focus somewhere, and let other people focus on other areas. That usually leads to some kind of synergy where multiple groups will eventually combine their efforts in some way to help all their situations. The 60's is a good example of this...many players involved there like femenists, blacks, environmentalists, students, etc....and some fairly large changes were made, even though those in power try to downplay their accomplishments in the history books.
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    Saturnal wrote:
    I think the way movements like femenism, civil rights, etc. come about because people are concerned about what is affecting THEM. So it just makes sense to focus your efforts on what affects you the most. Nothing wrong with that, and it makes more sense. You cannot seriously fight against every type of injustice affecting every type of person. You have to focus somewhere, and let other people focus on other areas. That usually leads to some kind of synergy where multiple groups will eventually combine their efforts in some way to help all their situations. The 60's is a good example of this...many players involved there like femenists, blacks, environmentalists, students, etc....and some fairly large changes were made, even though those in power try to downplay their accomplishments in the history books.
    I completely agree.

    And that synergy can become an amazing power when people are working constructively and therefore moving in the right direction. Even the synergy within constructive, authentically empowering groups before joining forces with other groups.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    VictoryGin wrote:
    feminism is about equality. patriarchy is about the subordination of those who are not male.

    women do rule.......the kitchen
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • Of course. Many guns assured that I did:

    http://www.sss.gov/FSbenefits.htm

    :)

    They never did anything to my brother.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • So you chose to sign for the benefit of owning many unloaded guns. :)

    Hehe...I didn't see that on their list of "benefits". It is nice to know that in exchange for signing over my body to act as bullet fodder, I get to participate in "The Workforce Investment Act" wherein I can learn to be an auto mechanic!
    They never did anything to my brother.

    Let's hope it stays that way.
  • Hehe...I didn't see that on their list of "benefits". It is nice to know that in exchange for signing over my body to act as bullet fodder, I get to participate in "The Workforce Investment Act" wherein I can learn to be an auto mechanic!



    Let's hope it stays that way.


    For a minute there I thought you were saying you had to sign to buy a gun...but then I thought there's no way, so I looked. :D
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    miller8966 wrote:
    women do rule.......the kitchen
    Obviously trying to start a fight. Obviously a male chauvanist.
Sign In or Register to comment.