9/11 video question

brandon_scott9

How many of you guys actually believe that the United States Government actually had the towers demolished?

DarkStar

brandon_scott9 wrote:

How many of you guys actually believe that the United States Government actually had the towers demolished?

it wasn't the US Govt...it was a shadow govt. a conspiracy, wrapped within a plot, hiding in plain sight... http://www.newamericancentury.org/

ds

brandon_scott9

i think people are just grasping for straws there...

hsewif

brandon_scott9 wrote:

How many of you guys actually believe that the United States Government actually had the towers demolished?

Isn't 1 too many?

brandon_scott9

one tower? or one believer?

DarkStar

brandon_scott9 wrote:

one tower? or one believer?

i believe it was one believer. made sense to me.

ds

bryanfury

brandon_scott9 wrote:

How many of you guys actually believe that the United States Government actually had the towers demolished?

i believe that a select group of people in and out of our gvt could have made this happen. Its a theory, with about as many facts as the "official" theory being given to us.

it IS possible though, and if you accept that, then you can look at this objectively.

brandon_scott9

but if a group outside our government made it happen, then it is a terrorist attack, which is exactly what we thought it was to begin with.

DarkStar

brandon_scott9 wrote:

but if a group outside our government made it happen, then it is a terrorist attack, which is exactly what we thought it was to begin with.

dare i say that we didn't think anything...that we were told what to think and supplied evidence that bolstered what we were told to think. anyway, a terrorist attack is not what we were told to think it was; rather, we were told specifically to think it was a terrorist attack by islamic militants. the difference from this and what is being postulated by some in this thread is that one lays blame on a group known to desire absolute control of the world via a perverted form of islam...and the other lays blame on a group known to desire absolute control of the world through a perverted ideology called neoconservatism.

ds

bootlegger10

Watching too many episodes of 24 here.

brandon_scott9

would most people backing the theory of a neoconservative terrorist, consider the present administration to be the ones behind the attack?

hsewif

brandon_scott9 wrote:

but if a group outside our government made it happen, then it is a terrorist attack, which is exactly what we thought it was to begin with.

I brought up a point along those lines...

I said something like "if bombs were indeed planted and detonated, how can anyone prove that our government did it and not terrorists?"

Only one person responded and not directly. It was their thought that the terrorists would be rubbing it in our faces that they were able to plant bombs.

I think the exact opposite (if in fact bombs were planted....which I'm not convinced that they were).

Terrorists would rather let a huge chunk of our population assume that their government did it.

Which is more effective overall? To tell all of your secrets or let the human mind wonder? (and divide a country?)

and something else----if our government did plant bombs and all of this evidence is coming out proving it....wouldn't it be safe to assume that in the future, our morally corrupt government will step forward and say that terrorists planted bombs? To divert the attention away from themselves? Isn't that the next logical step? (fine-they've busted us on the explosives....let's point our fingers at Osama)

ha-does that make sense?

sonicreducer

oops, double post.

sonicreducer

hsewif wrote:

I brought up a point along those lines...

I said something like "if bombs were indeed planted and detonated, how can anyone prove that our government did it and not terrorists?"

Only one person responded and not directly. It was their thought that the terrorists would be rubbing it in our faces that they were able to plant bombs.

I think the exact opposite (if in fact bombs were planted....which I'm not convinced that they were).

Terrorists would rather let a huge chunk of our population assume that their government did it.

Which is more effective overall? To tell all of your secrets or let the human mind wonder? (and divide a country?)

and something else----if our government did plant bombs and all of this evidence is coming out proving it....wouldn't it be safe to assume that in the future, our morally corrupt government will step forward and say that terrorists planted bombs? To divert the attention away from themselves? Isn't that the next logical step? (fine-they've busted us on the explosives....let's point our fingers at Osama)

ha-does that make sense?

ok, that is your theory. respectable. but don't rule out any other possible theories because you made your own. not saying you would, just be openminded.

if the truth is an inside job, then it is all about money. so, follow the money.

DarkStar

hsewif wrote:

and something else----if our government did plant bombs and all of this evidence is coming out proving it....wouldn't it be safe to assume that in the future, our morally corrupt government will step forward and say that terrorists planted bombs? To divert the attention away from themselves? Isn't that the next logical step? (fine-they've busted us on the explosives....let's point our fingers at Osama)

ha-does that make sense?

i'm not so sure that the words "morally corrupt govt" and "step forward" really belong in the same sentence...and i think your proposed ideas may be over-thinking the situation. there is no need for the govt to deny anything or point fingers at terrorists for activities that a large majority of the public will never buy into unless someone in power is caught red-handed...and by that i mean caught on video or audio tape admitting to activities surrounding the planning and implementation of the 9/11 attacks.

ds

hsewif

DarkStar wrote:

i'm not so sure that the words "morally corrupt govt" and "step forward" really belong in the same sentence...and i think your proposed ideas may be over-thinking the situation. there is no need for the govt to deny anything or point fingers at terrorists for activities that a large majority of the public will never buy into unless someone in power is caught red-handed...and by that i mean caught on video or audio tape admitting to activities surrounding the planning and implementation of the 9/11 attacks.

ds

my ideas are over-thought?

You could be right....it's easier to believe that holographic missiles were somehow involved.

and you're right about the government not stepping forward. My point was that when and if the evidence is overwhelming (which it ISN'T at this point) they might come forward and point fingers.

Abookamongstthemany

hsewif wrote:

my ideas are over-thought?

You could be right....it's easier to believe that holographic missiles were somehow involved.

and you're right about the government not stepping forward. My point was that when and if the evidence is overwhelming (which it ISN'T at this point) they might come forward and point fingers.

I haven't heard about holographic missles yet.

sonicreducer

Abookamongstthemany wrote:

I haven't heard about holographic missles yet.

yeah, there are some pretty ridiculous theories out there.

Ahnimus

Abookamongstthemany wrote:

I haven't heard about holographic missles yet.

http://gallerize.com/911_home.htm

spiral out

brandon_scott9 wrote:

but if a group outside our government made it happen, then it is a terrorist attack, which is exactly what we thought it was to begin with.

Well, isn't the question who are the terrorists?