The US govt is trying to tank the economy on purpose

RolandTD20Kdrummer

So they can introduce the Amero and form the North American Union.

"When the U.S. currency collapses, it will take with it, both the Canadian dollar and Mexican Peso because both countries are so heavily invested in the U.S. dollar through trade with the US.

During such a collapse, when hundreds of millions of average citizens face absolute destitution because their currencies have been wiped out, these Conspirators will turn to 'The People" of each nation and say "your only hope is to merge all three countries and make a new start." "

This NAU deal is not some myth folks...it's coming. It's here. Notice the date on the coins?

http://halturnershow.com/20AmeroCoin.jpg
http://halturnershow.com/100AmeroCoin.jpg
http://halturnershow.com/PureSilver100AmeroCoin.jpg

newspaper article:
http://www.sfu.ca/~grubel/images/FP%209.8.02%20amero%20time0017.JPG

Google Vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hiPrsc9g98

RolandTD20Kdrummer

If you have the time...kind of a cheesy show, but the content is very informative:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxzs46Nxohk&mode=related&search=

Ahnimus

What about the beaver and the blue nose? I don't want a fucking bald eagle on my coin.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

Ahnimus wrote:

What about the beaver and the blue nose? I don't want a fucking bald eagle on my coin.

I don't think anyone's going like much of anything Bush is planning...

RolandTD20Kdrummer

In an interview with CNBC, a vice president for a prominent London investment firm yesterday urged a move away from the dollar to the "amero," a coming North American currency, he said, that "will have a big impact on everybody's life, in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico."

Steve Previs, a vice president at Jefferies International Ltd., explained the Amero "is the proposed new currency for the North American Community which is being developed right now between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico."

The aim, he said, according to a transcript provided by CNBC to WND, is to make a "borderless community, much like the European Union, with the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso being replaced by the amero."

Previs told the television audience many Canadians are "upset" about the amero. Most Americans outside of Texas largely are unaware of the amero or the plans to integrate North America, Previs observed, claiming many are just "putting their head in the sand" over the plans.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53124

drivingrl

How's about a credible source?

JOEJOEJOE

I Amouro the Amero!

RolandTD20Kdrummer

drivingrl wrote:

How's about a credible source?

I've also had the leaders of two political parties in Canada confirm what I am saying.

The official site:
http://www.spp.gov/

RolandTD20Kdrummer

JOEJOEJOE wrote:

I Amouro the Amero!

That person that actually says that should be slapped into consciousness.

JOEJOEJOE

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

That person that actually says that should be slapped into consciousness.

or perhaps the person who believes the news about the Amero needs an even bigger slap!

Lets make a wager; if the Amero happens, I will give you 100 crisp one Amero bills, and if it doesn't happen, you give me 100 crisp $1 bills.

Deal?

RolandTD20Kdrummer

JOEJOEJOE wrote:

or perhaps the person who believes the news about the Amero needs an even bigger slap!

Lets make a wager; if the Amero happens, I will give you 100 crisp one Amero bills, and if it doesn't happen, you give me 100 crisp $1 bills.

Deal?

It's not some conspiracy BS if that's what you think.

The NAU/SPP/Amero deal is reality.

Welcome to reality here in 2007. How bout I buy you a cup of coffee for you to drink?

Hartydog

The amount of conspiracy theories on the Moving Train board is amazing.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

The contents of two PDF files sent to me by Jack Layton leader of the NDP party addressing the NAU/SPP deal. I must have imagined all this....riiiight...


July 27, 2007
The Right Honourable Stephen Harper, P.C., M.P.
Prime Minister of Canada
Langevin Block, 80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2
Dear Prime Minister,
I am writing to express grave concern over actions by your government that have lead to the cancellation of a workshop scheduled for August 19 in Papineauville, Quebec on the subject of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
This event, organized by the Council of Canadians, was an educational forum for citizens to engage in dialogue. Undue pressure by the RCMP, the Surete du Quebec, and the US Army led to the refusal by the Municipality of Papineauville to rent its community centre to the Council for this event. This represents an abuse of government power and a profound disrespect for the Charter right to freedom of assembly.
The Municipality of Papineauville is about six kilometres from Montebello and this peaceful event would have posed no threat whatsoever to the meetings taking place in Montebello. Your government’s decision to implement a security perimeter 25km around the Montebello summit is a disappointing attempt at silencing public debate on an issue where your government has failed to be transparent.
I urge you to reconsider your Government’s decision.

Yours truly,
Jack Layton MP (Toronto-Danforth)
Leader, New Democratic

---

Q-2282 — May 30, 2007 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster)
— With respect to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP): (a) when did unofficial negotiations on the SPP agenda begin prior to March 2005 and which Ministers, Deputy Ministers, and government departments were involved; (b) which Ministers, Deputy Ministers, and branches of which departments are tasked with developing and implementing strategies to advance the SPP agenda; (c) how often do meetings transpire between Ministers or Deputy Ministers and members of the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), what were the dates and locations of these meetings, who was present at each one of these meetings and what were the topics of discussion at each meeting; (d) what financial resources are estimated to be required to adequately fulfill the SPP on an annual basis; (e) how much money has the government committed to the SPP in the last five years; (f) were these funding announcements made public, and, if so, on what dates were these funding announcements made; (g) of these funds, what amount has actually been disbursed annually, and from which government department budget were these funds disbursed; (h) how many person-hours in government departments are dedicated to advancing the agenda of the SPP, working groups included; (i) has an intranet system been establish to facilitate day-to-day communications between participating countries and the NACC; (j) what is the relationship between NAFTA and the SPP; (k) is the SPP considered an extension of NAFTA; (l) have NAFTA committees been folded into the SPP groups and, if so, why and how; (m) what is the most up-to-date impact assessment of SPP negotiations on Canadian regulations and standards in (i) health, (ii) food, food products and food safety, (iii) transport safety, (iv) privacy, (v) energy, (vi) water, (vii) natural resources, (viii) chemical products, including pesticides and herbicides, (ix) financial services and monetary policy, (x) border security, (xi) outsourcing and jobs, (xii) the environment, (xiii) electronic trade, (xiv) the process of building up and maintaining Canada’s no-fly list; (n) what is the status of these negotiations, have some been suspended, and if some have been completed, what regulations were changed as a result; (o) how would those negotiations affect Canada’s public policy space; (p) are any mutual recognition agreements being negotiated under the SPP; (q) what are all the SPP working groups, their focus, the members of these working groups (including members of the government and civil service), and the minutes of their meetings; (r) is it the position of the government that the SPP is beneficial to Canadian sovereignty; (s) what plans does the government have to conduct a public debate of the SPP process, including public consultations with civil society groups, a full legislative review, and a vote in Parliament; and (t) what plans does the government have to brief Parliamentarians on the SPP, if not, why not, and, if so, how regular will such briefings be?
Q-2282 — 30 mai 2007 — M. Julian (Burnaby— New Westminster)

RolandTD20Kdrummer

Hartydog wrote:

The amount of conspiracy theories on the Moving Train board is amazing.

Watch, read, and learn...

Hartydog

In 5 years when the dollar is still being used in the US I think you'll feel differently. And the government has very little to do with the turmoil that is going on in the economy at the moment.

g under p

The way this administration works this and more is to come, I could never put it past em. They have to leave office with a bang either through lost wars or trampling the US economy so they can profit in the end.

I hear The Bush family is buying 100,000 acre in Paraguay. Didn't some of Hitler's SS offocer's head to South America when all hell broke loose in Germany?

Peace

Boston MA

Hartydog wrote:

In 5 years when the dollar is still being used in the US I think you'll feel differently. And the government has very little to do with the turmoil that is going on in the economy at the moment.

The dollar may be used but you'll need $100+ for a value meal at McDonalds.

No shit a private corporation called the federal reserve owns them. The only way to save the US is to lower interest rates, if they do that the dollar will eventually collapse and inflation will go through the roof. It's a great place to be having to use worthless paper money not backed by anything and a private banking corporation controlling it all. Great deal we got.

g under p

These private-issue fantasy pattern coins will be struck as an annual series, starting in the latter part of 2007.

You can order them here

Peace

RolandTD20Kdrummer

g under p wrote:

These private-issue fantasy pattern coins will be struck as an annual series, starting in the latter part of 2007.

You can order them here

Peace

Someone's fantasy...that's for sure...

JOEJOEJOE

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

It's not some conspiracy BS if that's what you think.

The NAU/SPP/Amero deal is reality.

Welcome to reality here in 2007. How bout I buy you a cup of coffee for you to drink?

Sure, but I live in the real world, so driving here from conspiracyville may take you some time.

MLC2006

there's been a lot that RolandTD20k has said over time that I don't agree with, but I don't see this as some kind of made up fantasy or conspiracy. over the years, it has been proposed (at different times) to merge Mexico and Canada with the US. then you have NAFTA. then you have up to 20 million Mexicans already living in the US illegally and the government doing nothing to try to even slow it down. and you already basically have no border. I believe this was already proposed 3 or 4 years ago, but I'm not sure if it was called the North American Union or what. but if you don't believe this is an agenda that's being pushed for, I think you're pretty blind.

now, what would be the benefits and cons of this? population wise, Canada is about a third the size of Mexico, and Mexico is about a third the size of the US. Canadian and Mexico money already trades lower the US money and US money is lower than the Euro. so what exactly would it benefit?