North American Union Protests coming up in the next few days

floyd1975

godpt3 wrote:

See, that's the beauty of the burden. I don't have to prove they're wrong. They have to prove they're right.

Or you could do it the easier way. Film yourself saying that anyone who believes in these outlandish claims is a lunatic. Then post it on youtube, link to the video here and you have irrefutable proof. You could even go a step further and create a wikipedia page about it. It's always good to have multiple sources.

godpt3

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Well all I see are repetitive and pithy jerk off comments that 10 year old could make, so I highly doubt the "Oh I'm the top of the game big world talker.."

"Quad Ruby", National Forensics League
http://www.nflonline.org/

jlew24asu

floyd1975 wrote:

Or you could do it the easier way. Film yourself saying that anyone who believes in these outlandish claims is a lunatic. Then post it on youtube, link to the video here and you have irrefutable proof. You could even go a step further and create a wikipedia page about it. It's always good to have multiple sources.

excellent advice.

surferdude

angelica wrote:

Do you realize this union stuff is happening outside of the political scope? It is happening on the outside of "Canada" technically agreeing. Therefore it is happening outside any democratic process.

But it's not. The Three Amigos meetings taking place are in the current news and making front page of Canada.com. Harper, our elected Prime Minister is at these meetings. How much more deomcratic do we need to get? When Roland emailed Harper there was no hiding agendas by the government. They pointed him to the website with public information. When Harper signs anything it is the end result of a very democratic process. For better or worse the democratic process we've signed up for gives leaders near unlimited power for short periods of time. Harper's working within the rules and as I see it that makes it as democratic as Canada can get.

surferdude

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Well all I see are repetitive and pithy jerk off comments that 10 year old could make, so I highly doubt the "Oh I'm the top of the game big world talker.."

No offense, but gmab...what utter bullshit.

Not sure if you were being funny or not. But if you weren't;

"topic integrity please...thanks.This site has PM"

RolandTD20Kdrummer

surferdude wrote:

Why has all this loss of sovereign countries not happened in the EU? England is still England, France has not gone away, even the smaller countries have maintained their uniqueness.

You've mentioned that EU was the first experiment fo rthis 50 years ago. Yet they don't get embroiled in the ongoing wars in the middle east. I wonder why you think they can stay out but Canada would not be able to. I think you do a disservice to just about everyone by seemingly acting as if we are Jews happily going to the gas chambers. I get the impression that you think if someone does not react to the news in the same manner as you that they either uneducated on the subject, don't care or are stupid. Sorry but I find that insulting.

The NAU is inevitable. It's the UN on a more limited scope. NATO for trade purposes. Yes, it will mean change but I don't see the change as near perpetual war. A world with less borders is a good thing.

Europe isn't physically attached to the US, which happens to be the country that is radically changing the world at the moment.

Physical separation by land mass accounts for a lot more than you think.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

surferdude wrote:

Not sure if you were being funny or not. But if you weren't;

"topic integrity please...thanks.This site has PM"

Pardon me? I am the one being attacked here this is my thread in case you didn't realize.

Feel free to start your own and say whatever.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

godpt3 wrote:

"Quad Ruby", National Forensics League
http://www.nflonline.org/

If you could actually say something of importance related to this thread please.

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Pardon me? I am the one being attacked here this is my thread in case you didn't realize.

Feel free to start your own and say whatever.

http://www.therogers5.com/Image/Rogers%20Family/04-13-2002/Chloe%20Crying.JPG

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

If you could actually say something of importance related to this thread please.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

Jlew why are you just being a jackass? It's pretty sad man I hope the admins here delete the crap you guys are just barfing up like pretend scholars.

Did you miss the first post? How short is your memory span?

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Jlew why are you just being a jackass? It's pretty sad man I hope the admins here delete the crap you guys are just barfing up like pretend scholars.

Did you miss the first post? How short is your memory span?

I asked how I can help protest since I cant make it to seattle.

ps. this is a message board. you are king of trolling and cracking jokes at people. chill the fuck out. booo wooo for this being your thread.

angelica

surferdude wrote:

But it's not. The Three Amigos meetings taking place are in the current news and making front page of Canada.com. Harper, our elected Prime Minister is at these meetings. How much more deomcratic do we need to get? When Roland emailed Harper there was no hiding agendas by the government. They pointed him to the website with public information. When Harper signs anything it is the end result of a very democratic process. For better or worse the democratic process we've signed up for gives leaders near unlimited power for short periods of time. Harper's working within the rules and as I see it that makes it as democratic as Canada can get.

When Harper signs his bank loan it's Canada being democratic?

This is the key point here: They are walking fine lines and are not accountable for the actions they are making, to their countries at this point. That is why they can deny everything. They are just "talking" and "cooperating". This is the point about how they have the foot in the door, and they have people either generally entirely ignorant to what is happening or, they have them docile-like completely going along for the ride.

When Roland emailed, the agendas may be out in the open, however, they are still not committed in any way that they can be held to account yet. And by the time it moves into the realm of being countries committing, we will be so there alongside them, because we've psychologically acquiesced all along. It's the old bait and switch. Like how Sadam got switched in place of Osama Bin Laden. No one seemed to really notice how that happened--we decided to accept that terrorists were interchangeable, even though it makes no sense whatsover. This is the power of psychological ploys. by the time our government needs our consent, we'll be there ready to hand it to them. Unless we pay attention to what their agendas are as well, and thereby see the big picture.


So, again, do you prefer actions taken on behalf of your country to be part of a democratic process?

godpt3

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

If you could actually say something of importance related to this thread please.

fine... prove, in one paragraph or less, that the "North American Union" is real and not just the figment of a delusional imagination.


Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a meeting of the Flat Earth Society to attend.

surferdude

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Pardon me? I am the one being attacked here this is my thread in case you didn't realize.

Feel free to start your own and say whatever.

I am not attacking you. I'm asking questions because you see the effect the NAU as something all together different than me. Maybe your take is right, but in order for me to assess this I have to ask questions to get more information.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

godpt3 wrote:

fine... prove, in one paragraph or less, that the "North American Union" is real and not just the figment of a delusional imagination.

I guess you don't read anything at all except the title of the thread before you start sarcastically commenting on it. shame.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

I asked how I can help protest since I cant make it to seattle.

ps. this is a message board. you are king of trolling and cracking jokes at people. chill the fuck out. booo wooo for this being your thread.

Hey Jlew why don't you start a serious discussion that really matters so I can act like a shit in it...

It would really give me the shits and giggles...

sometimes things in life get serious son...sorry to be the one

godpt3

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

I guess you don't read anything at all except the title of the thread before you start sarcastically commenting on it. shame.

all I've seen are a bunch of links and posts from conspiracy-theory oriented websites. None of which are credible or backed up with concrete proof. And the coin was already debunked.

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Hey Jlew why don't you start a serious discussion that really matters so I can act like a shit in it...

It would really give me the shits and giggles...

sometimes things in life get serious son...sorry to be the one

I've asked you twice now how I can protest since I cant go to seattle.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

surferdude wrote:

But it's not. The Three Amigos meetings taking place are in the current news and making front page of Canada.com. Harper, our elected Prime Minister is at these meetings. How much more deomcratic do we need to get? When Roland emailed Harper there was no hiding agendas by the government. They pointed him to the website with public information. When Harper signs anything it is the end result of a very democratic process. For better or worse the democratic process we've signed up for gives leaders near unlimited power for short periods of time. Harper's working within the rules and as I see it that makes it as democratic as Canada can get.

Yeah but where's the media? I was informed strictly out of legal obligation to the public. There are changes being proposed will that affect hundreds of millions of people. You would think it would sell a few newspapers, or cause listeners to tune in.