Odigo says workers warned of 9/11 two hours before it happened

12346

Comments

  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    hmm...what would you say?

    I would look up, see that the sky was blue, and logically assume that, in this instance, I was being told the truth.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • MrSmith wrote:
    thats not proof. Saying they are capable of doing it isnt a valid basis for arguing that they did do it. Provide proof and a valid explanation for what really happened or admit you have no fucking clue what you are talking about. The burden of proof is on you.


    Oh right, murdering hundreds of thousands of Arabs based on TOTAL LIES are all conscience free murders.

    I forgot.

    I needed to switch into war mongering psychopath mode there for a sec to see it clearly.

    my bad.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    MrSmith wrote:
    thats not proof. Saying they are capable of doing it isnt a valid basis for arguing that they did do it. Provide proof and a valid explanation for what really happened or admit you have no fucking clue what you are talking about. The burden of proof is on you.

    Thanks. That's what I meant to say.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • I would look up, see that the sky was blue, and logically assume that, in this instance, I was being told the truth.


    I would tune into Fox news to see what they said first.

    Then I would repeat whatever I heard from them.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    Oh right, murdering hundreds of thousands of Arabs based on TOTAL LIES are all conscience free murders.

    I forgot.

    I need to switch into war mongering psychopath mode there for a sec to see it clearly.

    my bad.

    You're not understanding. Just because someone *could* do something, doesn't mean that they did.

    Just because O.J. killed his wife doesn't make him guilty of every murder in the world.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    I would tune into Fox news to see what they said first.

    Then I would repeat whatever I heard from them.

    It must suck to go through life paranoid, frightened and crazy.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • It must suck to go through life paranoid, frightened and crazy.

    I suppose, I wouldn't know.

    you?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • You're not understanding. Just because someone *could* do something, doesn't mean that they did.

    Just because O.J. killed his wife doesn't make him guilty of every murder in the world.


    Dude Iraq was a fucking lie... people died on a pre meditated and fabricated lie....get it into your head. It's a few years in the making already.

    The mental ability is there...no ifs, ands, or buts.

    realize that if anything.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    Dude Iraq was a fucking lie... people died on a pre meditated and fabricated lie....get it into your head. It's a few years in the making already.

    The mental ability is there...no ifs, ands, or buts.

    realize that if anything.

    For the last time: THAT DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING ABOUT 9/11.

    Seriously. You have to be putting me on. You can't possibly be this dense.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • For the last time: THAT DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING ABOUT 9/11.

    Seriously. You have to be putting me on. You can't possibly be this dense.

    I wondering who is dense here. When did I say that solved 9/11?

    whoa...

    You want to counter two posts up with some more of your stunning logic?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • For the last time: THAT DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING ABOUT 9/11.

    Seriously. You have to be putting me on. You can't possibly be this dense.
    just give up. he knows what the point is, he's just dodging it.
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    ...
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    I wondering who is dense here. When did I say that solved 9/11?

    whoa...

    You want to counter two posts up with some more of your stunning logic?

    Jesus Christ. Now you really are just fucking with me.

    I don't know where I got the 9.11 stuff from ... EXCEPT IT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS THREAD.

    You said: "The government lied about Iraq, ergo they must be lying about 9-11."
    They would never ever allow 3000 people to be killed and allow 2 buildings to be blown up..never.

    It's almost as crazy as saying they would allow 600,000 people to be murdered and allow hundreds upon hundreds of buildings to be blown up in Iraq.

    It's all so different.

    I (and others) said: "Just because there were lies about Iraq doesn't prove 9-11 was an inside job."

    And yet you KEPT arguing the point. I think you need to confine yourself to one thread at once. You're confusing yourself.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    MrSmith wrote:
    just give up. he knows what the point is, he's just dodging it.

    I really need to. But I'm kind of fascinated. It's like poking a monkey in a zoo.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • Jesus Christ. Now you really are just fucking with me.

    I don't know where I got the 9.11 stuff from ... EXCEPT IT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS THREAD.

    You said: "The government lied about Iraq, ergo they must be lying about 9-11."



    I (and others) said: "Just because there were lies about Iraq doesn't prove 9-11 was an inside job."

    And yet you KEPT arguing the point. I think you need to confine yourself to one thread at once. You're confusing yourself.

    I'm saying these people lie like shit in a shit factory, and don't care if people die one way or the other period. Point proven.

    Next..

    I'd like to hear you ramble some about this reality you were so sure of earlier.
    http://forums.pearljam.com/showpost.php?p=5524227&postcount=148
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    I'm saying these people lie like shit in a shit factory, and don't care if people die one way or the other period. Point proven.

    Next..

    I'd like to hear you ramble some about this reality you were so sure of earlier.
    http://forums.pearljam.com/showpost.php?p=5524227&postcount=148

    What exactly would you like to know?
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • What exactly would you like to know?

    agree or disagree?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    agree or disagree?

    With what? That it would be difficult to plant WMD? I've already agreed to that premise elsewhere on this thread.

    Point?
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • With what? That it would be difficult to plant WMD? I've already agreed to that premise elsewhere on this thread.

    Point?


    You had said:
    So this administration was smart enough to plan and execute the murder of 3,000 of its own civilians, with the help of a bunch of Islamic fascists sworn to hate us, plan it down to the tiniest detail and keep the whole thing under wraps for seven years ... but too stupid to be able to throw some WMD out in the desert?

    Give me a break.

    So it appeared you were saying the opposite.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    You had said:



    So it appeared you were saying the opposite.

    I backed off that later in the thread. Or didn't you notice?
    I'm willing to admit that it probably would be difficult to plant W.M.D. in Iraq ... but more difficult than the U.S. government conspiring with Al Qaeda to blow up the WTC towers, hit the Pentagon, kill 3,000 people and keep it all under wraps in the planning, execution and cover-up stages?

    Some people actually do admit when they've overstated something. Present company excluded, of course.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • I backed off that later in the thread. Or didn't you notice?



    Some people actually do admit when they've overstated something. Present company excluded, of course.

    Ah. Ok.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Some people actually do admit when they've overstated something. Present company excluded, of course.
    i dont think you were overstating it, really. how hard could it be? Certainly a lot, LOT easier than planning 9/11

    probably just hard enough that the administration was afraid of gettting caught, and in that case the same gov't wouldnt have had the balls to orchestrate 9/11.
  • MrSmith wrote:
    i dont think you were overstating it, really. how hard could it be? Certainly a lot, LOT easier than planning 9/11


    Easier by far...but consequentially as complicated and disastrous if unraveled.

    Forget about the towers and the semantics of all that, collapsing, bombs, explosions, airplanes whatever...all distractions to the actual point.

    The point is...even if there was one iota of complicity, or looking the other way on certain aspects, it provides indication of an inside job.

    Be nice to see those put options traced.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • makes ya wonder...obvious satire of course.

    http://homo-sapien-underground.blogspot.com/2008/06/w-hes-not-just-sniveling-cowardhes.html

    "I call George W. Bush a coward because when America was betrayed by Israel on September 11, 2001, his response was cowardice and treason. I would have thought that if on September 11, five Israelis were picked up in New Jersey with maps indicating a foreknowledge of the attacks, and with a videotape of them at Liberty Park celebrating as the towers burned behind them, a strong response would be required. We now know W had knowledge of these events because Christopher Ketcham told us so.

    The former CIA counterterrorism officer told me: "There was no question but that [the order to close down the investigation] came from the White House. It was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11. Bear in mind that this was a political issue, not a law enforcement or intelligence issue. If somebody says we don't want the Israelis implicated in this *- we know that they've been spying the hell out of us, we know that they possibly had information in advance of the attacks, but this would be a political nightmare to deal with."

    Okay so Mossad spies had been sitting on top of the hijackers for a year and a few in our intelligence agencies were pissed off that there was no real investigation of these Jackals. We also know someone in the cowardly and treasonous Bush administration called off the investigation. And lets get this straight, 3,000 Americans were murdered and our half witted President thought this was a political matter?

    But the extent to which out government would go to avoid a reasonable investigation of this matter is phenomenal.

    A few days ago I wrote how the employer of the Mossad spies, Domick Suter of Urban Moving Company, was available to greet future hijackers Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi when they arrived in Los Angeles(they are pictured above). He would eventually follow them to New Jersey. Of course he had to skedaddle back to Israel after a brief interview with the FBI a day after 9/11. In a document later leaked by our Government, his name would appear on a list of wanted terrorists. But how badly did our Government want him? And if they wanted him, why didn't they show us a picture of him. Any one seen a picture of him in a post office. Of course not, he is an Israeli.

    We have pictures of Almihdhar and Alhazmi, all kinds of them. Where are the pictures of Suter? Are they classified by our Government too, like the video tapes of the celebrating Mossad movers? Wouldn't a guy that owned a moving company have to have a drivers license with a picture ID? Like this one for example?

    Yes, George W. Bush is a sniveling coward and you have been betrayed."
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    NMyTree wrote:
    It's funny how nothing ever means anything.

    No matter how many oddities.....how many coincidences........how many blatant neglects .........how many pecular instances of failures to respond appropriately and professionally..........

    ....it all means nothing. Just tin-foil wearing, lunatic ravings from kooks.

    Oh man.
    book your flight already :) we need drinks!
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    my2hands wrote:
    thats because the whole truth movement ignores THE BIG FUCKING QUESTION? WHO STOOD TO GAIN WHAT AND WHY RISK THIS FOR THAT GAIN?

    i want you , right now, to tell me exactly who stood to benefit from 9/11 and then tell me exactly how they actually have benefited from 9/11

    in other words, just like every other crime investigation in the history of the world, lets start with the MOTIVE of the crime


    go for it
    That might well be the easiest question ever posed on this board :) thank you :)
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    So why not plant WMDs if you're going to lie about them? We could have this circular argument all day.
    what if Saddam were to find them before the 'right people' found them? That could be interesting. You're gonna have to get marines to guard them until they're 'found' and then you simply have too many 'lower' people involved. That would be stupid! It's much easier to say they're there and hope the UN inspectors give in to your bullying... and then hey if they not found... we can just remind people how it was Saddam who did 9/11 anyway, enough time will have passed... either way we get what we want :cool:
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    We don't have a single person in America who knows how to paint the letters "W," "M" and "D" in Arabic? Jesus, we're more fucked than I thought.
    :D if it were Bush's idea... it would be spelt wrong :D try explaining THAT to all the countries watching and waiting... 'uh... we found these DMW's by the side of the road' :o
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    If the U.S. government told you the sky was blue, you'd argue, wouldn't you?

    Answer honestly.
    Of course... it's black ya feckin eejit :p
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
Sign In or Register to comment.