thats because the whole truth movement ignores THE BIG FUCKING QUESTION? WHO STOOD TO GAIN WHAT AND WHY RISK THIS FOR THAT GAIN?
i want you , right now, to tell me exactly who stood to benefit from 9/11 and then tell me exactly how they actually have benefited from 9/11
in other words, just like every other crime investigation in the history of the world, lets start with the MOTIVE of the crime
go for it
Who stands to gain from complete societal control in fighting an invisible enemy that can never be won?
uhhh...nobody I guess....
no global power structure scenario to be found there..
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
isnt that exactly what the entire 9/11 "truth" movement is doing?
by the way, i am not suprised "truthers" will not and cannot answer those very simple questions... because it is obvious... this grand crime and conspiracy some are buying into WAS NOT WORTH THE RISK. why risk everything? for iraq and the middle east? if so then why not plant WMD's to easily continue the quest for golabal military hegemony?
terrorism is real my friend, check out the munich olympics if you get a chance
Laws of physics, ongoing lies and deceptions, and withholding of evidence?
Ongoing findings of the 9/11 commissions shoddy and quite frankly pathetic investigation. Not quite the same.
You have a short memory on the WMD thing. That's already been put to rest.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Is it too much to ask that people also concede that Islamic fudnamentalists may also played a role?
Yeah, I tend to believe the guys who, you know, have admitted doing such a thing.
If Osama bin Laden knew that people refused to believe that he was the one responsible for 9/11, he would be so pissed off ... I mean, if Osama wasn't an actor paid for by the CIA, that is.
everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do
Just because it's on the Internet doesn't mean it is true.
From a mainstream source....
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
A mainstream Jewish news outlet is not mainstream?
hmm.... what color is the sky where you are? is there only one sun and moon like on planet earth?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
business and pleasure so they say. but again, is your head empty?
it would seem so.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
As an actual working journalist, I trust it about as much as I trust Al-Jazeera ...
Yeah I bet you've written a lot of articles on 9/11...got em all published did ya?
If it's not on Fox...it never happened...
rofl..
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
isnt that exactly what the entire 9/11 "truth" movement is doing?
by the way, i am not suprised "truthers" will not and cannot answer those very simple questions... because it is obvious... this grand crime and conspiracy some are buying into WAS NOT WORTH THE RISK. why risk everything? for iraq and the middle east? if so then why not plant WMD's to easily continue the quest for golabal military hegemony?
terrorism is real my friend, check out the munich olympics if you get a chance
I believe someone has already answered your WMD's question on the boards.
What are your thoughts on the messages sent that are talked about in the original post? Just some mad coincidence or just a lie?
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
Just because it's on the Internet doesn't mean it is true.
And just because the newspaper tells you that it was the Islamic fundamentalists who hung out in strip bars prior to the attacks doesn't make it true either.
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
Seems a lot of countries benefitted from 9/11, a green light to attack whatever rebels a country labeled terrorist. Russia with its Chechnya occupation, Israel with its Palestinian, Turkey, Colombia.
Also, American public opinion was overwhelmingly behind Israel after the attacks, acccording to an aid to former p minister Netanyahu. Not to mention the invasion of 1 of its neighbors, now maybe even Iran. And the billions of dollars in military equipment kept going, probably increased.
You have a short memory on the WMD thing. That's already been put to rest.
oh really, hows that?
please explain to me how the masterminds of the greatest crime in world history were not smart enough or able enough to justify their war by simply planting WMD's in Iraq
you do realize that if WMD were found in iraq the war would have been massivle approved of and "they" would have been able to moveonto the next target...
Seems a lot of countries benefitted from 9/11, a green light to attack whatever rebels a country labeled terrorist. Russia with its Chechnya occupation, Israel with its Palestinian, Turkey, Colombia.
Also, American public opinion was overwhelmingly behind Israel after the attacks, acccording to an aid to former p minister Netanyahu. Not to mention the invasion of 1 of its neighbors, now maybe even Iran. And the billions of dollars in military equipment kept going, probably increased.
so 9/11 was an inside job so Russia would have cart blanche in Chechnya? i dont think so, next
and so Israel could continue to oppress Palestinians? they didnt need a resaon to do that, that conflict has been going on since day 1. so, that doesnt work.
Columbia? they have been the front for ther war on drugs and there is no need to risk 9/11 to give them more power. they do what they want as it is
and lastly, public opinion for Israel? so they risked everything to swing public support to Israel? i dotn think so
my2hands maybe you missed this earlier in the thread
M2H :
1) Let's see the guy that actually sent missles towards Israel is now dead
2) Israel has had pretty much free reign since 9/11
3) I dont know this as a fact, but if you look at the number of attacks in Israel, im sure they've dropped. (Fight them there, so we dont fight them here wasnt referring to the US)
my2hands maybe you missed this earlier in the thread
M2H :
1) Let's see the guy that actually sent missles towards Israel is now dead
2) Israel has had pretty much free reign since 9/11
3) I dont know this as a fact, but if you look at the number of attacks in Israel, im sure they've dropped. (Fight them there, so we dont fight them here wasnt referring to the US)
1. what are you talking about?
2. israel had free reign pre 9/11... and your saying they pulled 9/11 to take out a nuclear site in Syria and get int oa short squabble with Lebanon? i dont think so.
3. what does that mean? 9/11 was an inside job so terror attacks in Israel would sow
that was the weakest attemot i have seen yet to explain how "they" have gained from pulling off the biggest crime in world history...
some people need to stop watching internet bullshit conspiracy doc's and think for themseleves and ask the BIG questions first
if you are going to accuse people of a mass murder and crime, you better have your shit in order... alex jones isnt here to answer questions for you guys
so 9/11 was an inside job so Russia would have cart blanche in Chechnya? i dont think so, next
didn't say Russia was behind 9/11, just that they took advantage of the politcal environment at the time, like many other countries.
and so Israel could continue to oppress Palestinians? they didnt need a resaon to do that, that conflict has been going on since day 1. so, that doesnt work.
true they are in violation of more UN resolutions than just about any other country-they never really cared before. post 9/11 it was ok to kill their the palestinian people.
Columbia? they have been the front for ther war on drugs and there is no need to risk 9/11 to give them more power. they do what they want as it is
again, was just pointing out that countries were given a green light to fight terrorism post 9/11, namely Israel, but many took advantage of the environment.
and lastly, public opinion for Israel? so they risked everything to swing public support to Israel? i dotn think so
didn't say Russia was behind 9/11, just that they took advantage of the politcal environment at the time, like many other countries.
true they are in violation of more UN resolutions than just about any other country-they never really cared before. post 9/11 it was ok to kill their the palestinian people.
again, was just pointing out that countries were given a green light to fight terrorism post 9/11, namely Israel, but many took advantage of the environment.
Just one of many motives.
i understand some countries took advantage of a "green light" so to speak.. russia being one.. but that was afterwards and were clearly not part of some scheme for global domination
public support if israel? as a motive for a mass murder in front of the world?
Who do you think was behind 9/11? just curious.
Al Queda
not the US government or the Israeli government, thats for sure
2. israel had free reign pre 9/11... and your saying they pulled 9/11 to take out a nuclear site in Syria and get int oa short squabble with Lebanon? i dont think so.
3. what does that mean? 9/11 was an inside job so terror attacks in Israel would sow
that was the weakest attemot i have seen yet to explain how "they" have gained from pulling off the biggest crime in world history...
some people need to stop watching internet bullshit conspiracy doc's and think for themseleves and ask the BIG questions first
if you are going to accuse people of a mass murder and crime, you better have your shit in order... alex jones isnt here to answer questions for you guys
So you think a global war on terrorism could have been started how exactly?
for hating Saddam because he was a dictator?
eeks scary...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
2. israel had free reign pre 9/11... and your saying they pulled 9/11 to take out a nuclear site in Syria and get int oa short squabble with Lebanon? i dont think so.
3. what does that mean? 9/11 was an inside job so terror attacks in Israel would sow
that was the weakest attemot i have seen yet to explain how "they" have gained from pulling off the biggest crime in world history...
some people need to stop watching internet bullshit conspiracy doc's and think for themseleves and ask the BIG questions first
if you are going to accuse people of a mass murder and crime, you better have your shit in order... alex jones isnt here to answer questions for you guys
1) If you had your shit together # 1 would be pretty obvious: Sadaam shooting scud missles at Israel during the first gulf war.
2) Just b/c you dont think so? i guess i shouldnt think for myself or look at the facts that a post 9/11 Israel can get away with a lot more, without as much justification.
3) Iraq took the attention away from Israel; pretty simple.
If you would take off your blinders you would be able to understand a lot more than you do now.
not the US government or the Israeli government, thats for sure
So it was a huge failure in a military sense? They were kicked out of Afghanistan, lost thousands of men and are now hiding out in Iraq and the hills of Afghanistan? Basically forced underground? According to this version it was a terrible move on al quaeda's part.
please explain to me how the masterminds of the greatest crime in world history were not smart enough or able enough to justify their war by simply planting WMD's in Iraq
you do realize that if WMD were found in iraq the war would have been massivle approved of and "they" would have been able to moveonto the next target...
Mission accomplished ring any bells. As in the threat is gone?
We have to fight the new WMD now...terrorism...not WMD's and Saddam.
You see when you fix a problem. In the public eye, and by general understanding, it's solved. It's over. As in resolved.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
So you think a global war on terrorism could have been started how exactly?
for hating Saddam because he was a dictator?
eeks scary...
so 9/11 was done to invade iraq?
then why not plant WMD to legitimize the war and move onto the next target? that seems so simple to me it is not even funny... they can pull off 9/11 but not plant evidence? i dont buy that for 1 second...
Comments
Who stands to gain from complete societal control in fighting an invisible enemy that can never be won?
uhhh...nobody I guess....
no global power structure scenario to be found there..
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
How do you know these are facts?
Just because it's on the Internet doesn't mean it is true.
for the least they could possibly do
Laws of physics, ongoing lies and deceptions, and withholding of evidence?
Ongoing findings of the 9/11 commissions shoddy and quite frankly pathetic investigation. Not quite the same.
You have a short memory on the WMD thing. That's already been put to rest.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Yeah, I tend to believe the guys who, you know, have admitted doing such a thing.
If Osama bin Laden knew that people refused to believe that he was the one responsible for 9/11, he would be so pissed off ... I mean, if Osama wasn't an actor paid for by the CIA, that is.
for the least they could possibly do
From a mainstream source....
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
You must be real fun at parties.
for the least they could possibly do
Hardly ...
for the least they could possibly do
A mainstream Jewish news outlet is not mainstream?
hmm.... what color is the sky where you are? is there only one sun and moon like on planet earth?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
business and pleasure so they say. but again, is your head empty?
it would seem so.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
As an actual working journalist, I trust it about as much as I trust Al-Jazeera ...
for the least they could possibly do
Touche. That was awesome!
for the least they could possibly do
Yeah I bet you've written a lot of articles on 9/11...got em all published did ya?
If it's not on Fox...it never happened...
rofl..
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
meh... I didn't too get excited over it myself.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
You mean to tell me that since 9/11/2001, you can't see who it is that has benefited from attacks?
Are you kidding me?
Holy shit!
Eyes wide shut, lips covered, ears sealed tight.
Three monkeys in a row...... See no evil, speak no evil......hear no evil.
I believe someone has already answered your WMD's question on the boards.
What are your thoughts on the messages sent that are talked about in the original post? Just some mad coincidence or just a lie?
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
And just because the newspaper tells you that it was the Islamic fundamentalists who hung out in strip bars prior to the attacks doesn't make it true either.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
Also, American public opinion was overwhelmingly behind Israel after the attacks, acccording to an aid to former p minister Netanyahu. Not to mention the invasion of 1 of its neighbors, now maybe even Iran. And the billions of dollars in military equipment kept going, probably increased.
oh really, hows that?
please explain to me how the masterminds of the greatest crime in world history were not smart enough or able enough to justify their war by simply planting WMD's in Iraq
you do realize that if WMD were found in iraq the war would have been massivle approved of and "they" would have been able to moveonto the next target...
then it should be easy for you to answer clearly as opossed to attacking me with childish worn out cliche's
please enlighten me. clearly and to the point. how would they and have they benefited
so 9/11 was an inside job so Russia would have cart blanche in Chechnya? i dont think so, next
and so Israel could continue to oppress Palestinians? they didnt need a resaon to do that, that conflict has been going on since day 1. so, that doesnt work.
Columbia? they have been the front for ther war on drugs and there is no need to risk 9/11 to give them more power. they do what they want as it is
and lastly, public opinion for Israel? so they risked everything to swing public support to Israel? i dotn think so
there is somwething called "risk vs. reward"
and i have not seen a scenario yet that works IMO
M2H :
1) Let's see the guy that actually sent missles towards Israel is now dead
2) Israel has had pretty much free reign since 9/11
3) I dont know this as a fact, but if you look at the number of attacks in Israel, im sure they've dropped. (Fight them there, so we dont fight them here wasnt referring to the US)
1. what are you talking about?
2. israel had free reign pre 9/11... and your saying they pulled 9/11 to take out a nuclear site in Syria and get int oa short squabble with Lebanon? i dont think so.
3. what does that mean? 9/11 was an inside job so terror attacks in Israel would sow
that was the weakest attemot i have seen yet to explain how "they" have gained from pulling off the biggest crime in world history...
some people need to stop watching internet bullshit conspiracy doc's and think for themseleves and ask the BIG questions first
if you are going to accuse people of a mass murder and crime, you better have your shit in order... alex jones isnt here to answer questions for you guys
didn't say Russia was behind 9/11, just that they took advantage of the politcal environment at the time, like many other countries.
true they are in violation of more UN resolutions than just about any other country-they never really cared before. post 9/11 it was ok to kill their the palestinian people. again, was just pointing out that countries were given a green light to fight terrorism post 9/11, namely Israel, but many took advantage of the environment. Just one of many motives.
Who do you think was behind 9/11? just curious.
i understand some countries took advantage of a "green light" so to speak.. russia being one.. but that was afterwards and were clearly not part of some scheme for global domination
public support if israel? as a motive for a mass murder in front of the world?
Al Queda
not the US government or the Israeli government, thats for sure
So you think a global war on terrorism could have been started how exactly?
for hating Saddam because he was a dictator?
eeks scary...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
1) If you had your shit together # 1 would be pretty obvious: Sadaam shooting scud missles at Israel during the first gulf war.
2) Just b/c you dont think so? i guess i shouldnt think for myself or look at the facts that a post 9/11 Israel can get away with a lot more, without as much justification.
3) Iraq took the attention away from Israel; pretty simple.
If you would take off your blinders you would be able to understand a lot more than you do now.
So it was a huge failure in a military sense? They were kicked out of Afghanistan, lost thousands of men and are now hiding out in Iraq and the hills of Afghanistan? Basically forced underground? According to this version it was a terrible move on al quaeda's part.
Mission accomplished ring any bells. As in the threat is gone?
We have to fight the new WMD now...terrorism...not WMD's and Saddam.
You see when you fix a problem. In the public eye, and by general understanding, it's solved. It's over. As in resolved.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
so 9/11 was done to invade iraq?
then why not plant WMD to legitimize the war and move onto the next target? that seems so simple to me it is not even funny... they can pull off 9/11 but not plant evidence? i dont buy that for 1 second...