Odigo says workers warned of 9/11 two hours before it happened

slightofjeff

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

A mainstream Jewish news outlet is not mainstream?

hmm.... what color is the sky where you are? is there only one sun and moon like on planet earth?

As an actual working journalist, I trust it about as much as I trust Al-Jazeera ...

slightofjeff

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

business and pleasure so they say. but again, is your head empty?

it would seem so.

Touche. That was awesome!

RolandTD20Kdrummer

slightofjeff wrote:

As an actual working journalist, I trust it about as much as I trust Al-Jazeera ...

Yeah I bet you've written a lot of articles on 9/11...got em all published did ya?

If it's not on Fox...it never happened...

rofl..

RolandTD20Kdrummer

slightofjeff wrote:

Touche. That was awesome!

meh... I didn't too get excited over it myself.

NMyTree

my2hands wrote:

thats because the whole truth movement ignores THE BIG FUCKING QUESTION? WHO STOOD TO GAIN WHAT AND WHY RISK THIS FOR THAT GAIN?

i want you , right now, to tell me exactly who stood to benefit from 9/11 and then tell me exactly how they actually have benefited from 9/11

in other words, just like every other crime investigation in the history of the world, lets start with the MOTIVE of the crime


go for it

You mean to tell me that since 9/11/2001, you can't see who it is that has benefited from attacks?

Are you kidding me?

Holy shit!

Eyes wide shut, lips covered, ears sealed tight.

Three monkeys in a row...... See no evil, speak no evil......hear no evil.

spiral out

my2hands wrote:

isnt that exactly what the entire 9/11 "truth" movement is doing?

by the way, i am not suprised "truthers" will not and cannot answer those very simple questions... because it is obvious... this grand crime and conspiracy some are buying into WAS NOT WORTH THE RISK. why risk everything? for iraq and the middle east? if so then why not plant WMD's to easily continue the quest for golabal military hegemony?


terrorism is real my friend, check out the munich olympics if you get a chance

I believe someone has already answered your WMD's question on the boards.

What are your thoughts on the messages sent that are talked about in the original post? Just some mad coincidence or just a lie?

spiral out

slightofjeff wrote:

How do you know these are facts?

Just because it's on the Internet doesn't mean it is true.

And just because the newspaper tells you that it was the Islamic fundamentalists who hung out in strip bars prior to the attacks doesn't make it true either.

Commy

my2hands wrote:

how has Israel benefitted from 9/11?

Seems a lot of countries benefitted from 9/11, a green light to attack whatever rebels a country labeled terrorist. Russia with its Chechnya occupation, Israel with its Palestinian, Turkey, Colombia.

Also, American public opinion was overwhelmingly behind Israel after the attacks, acccording to an aid to former p minister Netanyahu. Not to mention the invasion of 1 of its neighbors, now maybe even Iran. And the billions of dollars in military equipment kept going, probably increased.

my2hands

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

You have a short memory on the WMD thing. That's already been put to rest.

oh really, hows that?


please explain to me how the masterminds of the greatest crime in world history were not smart enough or able enough to justify their war by simply planting WMD's in Iraq

you do realize that if WMD were found in iraq the war would have been massivle approved of and "they" would have been able to moveonto the next target...

my2hands

NMyTree wrote:

You mean to tell me that since 9/11/2001, you can't see who it is that has benefited from attacks?

Are you kidding me?

Holy shit!

Eyes wide shut, lips covered, ears sealed tight.

Three monkeys in a row...... See no evil, speak no evil......hear no evil.

then it should be easy for you to answer clearly as opossed to attacking me with childish worn out cliche's


please enlighten me. clearly and to the point. how would they and have they benefited

my2hands

Commy wrote:

Seems a lot of countries benefitted from 9/11, a green light to attack whatever rebels a country labeled terrorist. Russia with its Chechnya occupation, Israel with its Palestinian, Turkey, Colombia.

Also, American public opinion was overwhelmingly behind Israel after the attacks, acccording to an aid to former p minister Netanyahu. Not to mention the invasion of 1 of its neighbors, now maybe even Iran. And the billions of dollars in military equipment kept going, probably increased.

so 9/11 was an inside job so Russia would have cart blanche in Chechnya? i dont think so, next

and so Israel could continue to oppress Palestinians? they didnt need a resaon to do that, that conflict has been going on since day 1. so, that doesnt work.

Columbia? they have been the front for ther war on drugs and there is no need to risk 9/11 to give them more power. they do what they want as it is

and lastly, public opinion for Israel? so they risked everything to swing public support to Israel? i dotn think so


there is somwething called "risk vs. reward"


and i have not seen a scenario yet that works IMO

Open

my2hands maybe you missed this earlier in the thread


M2H :

1) Let's see the guy that actually sent missles towards Israel is now dead
2) Israel has had pretty much free reign since 9/11
3) I dont know this as a fact, but if you look at the number of attacks in Israel, im sure they've dropped. (Fight them there, so we dont fight them here wasnt referring to the US)

my2hands

Open wrote:

my2hands maybe you missed this earlier in the thread


M2H :

1) Let's see the guy that actually sent missles towards Israel is now dead
2) Israel has had pretty much free reign since 9/11
3) I dont know this as a fact, but if you look at the number of attacks in Israel, im sure they've dropped. (Fight them there, so we dont fight them here wasnt referring to the US)

1. what are you talking about?

2. israel had free reign pre 9/11... and your saying they pulled 9/11 to take out a nuclear site in Syria and get int oa short squabble with Lebanon? i dont think so.

3. what does that mean? 9/11 was an inside job so terror attacks in Israel would sow

that was the weakest attemot i have seen yet to explain how "they" have gained from pulling off the biggest crime in world history...


some people need to stop watching internet bullshit conspiracy doc's and think for themseleves and ask the BIG questions first


if you are going to accuse people of a mass murder and crime, you better have your shit in order... alex jones isnt here to answer questions for you guys

Commy

my2hands wrote:

so 9/11 was an inside job so Russia would have cart blanche in Chechnya? i dont think so, next

didn't say Russia was behind 9/11, just that they took advantage of the politcal environment at the time, like many other countries.

and so Israel could continue to oppress Palestinians? they didnt need a resaon to do that, that conflict has been going on since day 1. so, that doesnt work.

true they are in violation of more UN resolutions than just about any other country-they never really cared before. post 9/11 it was ok to kill their the palestinian people.

Columbia? they have been the front for ther war on drugs and there is no need to risk 9/11 to give them more power. they do what they want as it is

again, was just pointing out that countries were given a green light to fight terrorism post 9/11, namely Israel, but many took advantage of the environment.

and lastly, public opinion for Israel? so they risked everything to swing public support to Israel? i dotn think so

Just one of many motives.

and i have not seen a scenario yet that works IMO

Who do you think was behind 9/11? just curious.

my2hands

Commy wrote:

didn't say Russia was behind 9/11, just that they took advantage of the politcal environment at the time, like many other countries.

true they are in violation of more UN resolutions than just about any other country-they never really cared before. post 9/11 it was ok to kill their the palestinian people.

again, was just pointing out that countries were given a green light to fight terrorism post 9/11, namely Israel, but many took advantage of the environment.

Just one of many motives.

i understand some countries took advantage of a "green light" so to speak.. russia being one.. but that was afterwards and were clearly not part of some scheme for global domination

public support if israel? as a motive for a mass murder in front of the world?

Who do you think was behind 9/11? just curious.

Al Queda


not the US government or the Israeli government, thats for sure

RolandTD20Kdrummer

my2hands wrote:

1. what are you talking about?

2. israel had free reign pre 9/11... and your saying they pulled 9/11 to take out a nuclear site in Syria and get int oa short squabble with Lebanon? i dont think so.

3. what does that mean? 9/11 was an inside job so terror attacks in Israel would sow

that was the weakest attemot i have seen yet to explain how "they" have gained from pulling off the biggest crime in world history...


some people need to stop watching internet bullshit conspiracy doc's and think for themseleves and ask the BIG questions first


if you are going to accuse people of a mass murder and crime, you better have your shit in order... alex jones isnt here to answer questions for you guys

So you think a global war on terrorism could have been started how exactly?

for hating Saddam because he was a dictator?

eeks scary...

Open

my2hands wrote:

1. what are you talking about?

2. israel had free reign pre 9/11... and your saying they pulled 9/11 to take out a nuclear site in Syria and get int oa short squabble with Lebanon? i dont think so.

3. what does that mean? 9/11 was an inside job so terror attacks in Israel would sow

that was the weakest attemot i have seen yet to explain how "they" have gained from pulling off the biggest crime in world history...


some people need to stop watching internet bullshit conspiracy doc's and think for themseleves and ask the BIG questions first


if you are going to accuse people of a mass murder and crime, you better have your shit in order... alex jones isnt here to answer questions for you guys

1) If you had your shit together # 1 would be pretty obvious: Sadaam shooting scud missles at Israel during the first gulf war.

2) Just b/c you dont think so? i guess i shouldnt think for myself or look at the facts that a post 9/11 Israel can get away with a lot more, without as much justification.

3) Iraq took the attention away from Israel; pretty simple.

If you would take off your blinders you would be able to understand a lot more than you do now.

Commy

my2hands wrote:

not the US government or the Israeli government, thats for sure

So it was a huge failure in a military sense? They were kicked out of Afghanistan, lost thousands of men and are now hiding out in Iraq and the hills of Afghanistan? Basically forced underground? According to this version it was a terrible move on al quaeda's part.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

my2hands wrote:

oh really, hows that?


please explain to me how the masterminds of the greatest crime in world history were not smart enough or able enough to justify their war by simply planting WMD's in Iraq

you do realize that if WMD were found in iraq the war would have been massivle approved of and "they" would have been able to moveonto the next target...

Mission accomplished ring any bells. As in the threat is gone?

We have to fight the new WMD now...terrorism...not WMD's and Saddam.

You see when you fix a problem. In the public eye, and by general understanding, it's solved. It's over. As in resolved.

my2hands

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

So you think a global war on terrorism could have been started how exactly?

for hating Saddam because he was a dictator?

eeks scary...

so 9/11 was done to invade iraq?


then why not plant WMD to legitimize the war and move onto the next target? that seems so simple to me it is not even funny... they can pull off 9/11 but not plant evidence? i dont buy that for 1 second...