Morbidly Obese Mutants

12346

Comments

  • No. Any reason for asking?

    BC I have sat next to a gigantic man before on a plane as 'soulsinging' was describing and was totally pissed. I didnt care what emotional problem he had or why he was fat- just that he should have been more considerate. I dont know why anyone who isnt fat would defend that.
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    Like I said, the above is your problem, not theirs.

    technically if they can't fit into the seat that they purchased, it is their problem. So yes it is someones problem if they are annoyed by someone spilling over into their seat, but the root of the problem is the size of the person. No one would be upset if they fit into their seat.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Like I said, the above is your problem, not theirs.

    but i am not allowed to do anything about my problem. is someone allowed to molest me on the street or rape me? becos really... it's MY problem that i dont like it isnt it? it's not THEIR problem for impinging on my person. that is the very nature of battery... an unconsented touching. i dont like strangers putting their body on mine and that is a legally protected interest. yet i have no recourse when a fat guy sits next to me. why? becos we've got people out there who insist we cannot ever hurt anyone's feelings by telling them they're overweight. if this was a thin person next to me groping me, id be allowed to say something. but becos it's a fat person, i have to pretend i dont mind lest i hurt THEIR feelings. that is how it is their problem. cos it's their ego being hurt by their decisions. if you wanna be fat, fine. but dont raise a stink when i tell you to keep your rolls off my body in public.
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    Jammin909 wrote:
    BC I have sat next to a gigantic man before on a plane as 'soulsinging' was describing and was totally pissed. I didnt care what emotional problem he had or why he was fat- just that he should have been more considerate. I dont know why anyone who isnt fat would defend that.
    This reminds me of what Ahnimus pointed out about attribution: We think the problem is the other person....
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    but i am not allowed to do anything about my problem. is someone allowed to molest me on the street or rape me? becos really... it's MY problem that i dont like it isnt it? it's not THEIR problem for impinging on my person. that is the very nature of battery... an unconsented touching. i dont like strangers putting their body on mine and that is a legally protected interest. yet i have no recourse when a fat guy sits next to me. why? becos we've got people out there who insist we cannot ever hurt anyone's feelings by telling them they're overweight. if this was a thin person next to me groping me, id be allowed to say something. but becos it's a fat person, i have to pretend i dont mind lest i hurt THEIR feelings. that is how it is their problem. cos it's their ego being hurt by their decisions. if you wanna be fat, fine. but dont raise a stink when i tell you to keep your rolls off my body in public.
    Do you realize that you taking measures to protect your rights and boundaries is entirely differently than trying to change people? The former you are entitled to. The latter shows others need protection from you. All this grandstanding about serial killers and child molesters is a ludicrous smokescreen.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Jammin909 wrote:
    BC I have sat next to a gigantic man before on a plane as 'soulsinging' was describing and was totally pissed.

    I might be pissed too. But that's not the "gigantic man's" fault.
    I didnt care what emotional problem he had or why he was fat- just that he should have been more considerate.

    I really don't care what emotional problems he had either. I am wondering now what emotional problems you have to get pissed just because a "gigantic man" happens to be in your space for a couple of hours.
    I dont know why anyone who isnt fat would defend that.

    Defend what? The guy's right to buy an airplane seat based on the rules of the airline???? Defending that is also defending your right to do the same.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    I'm going to have to go back to farfromglorified's earlier comment in this thread: how is a person's lifestyle choices any of your business? If you have an issue with obese people overstepping your boundaries, such as on airplanes, there are productive channels to go through to make positive change. If you are looking to change people, that is not in the bounds of "help". I could discuss the experts, and how that understanding and help is available for those who need it. I've personally appreciated the wonderful help out there, from programs to books, etc. The bottom line is I know the help is there for people who want it, and I have every faith in people and their decisions. I trust the process 100%. I support people acting when they want to and I support them not acting when they don't want to. I support their choices, and I have understanding and compassion of them, whichever options seem to be in their best interests at the time.

    what are those channels? cos far as i can tell, it's forbidden to say anything that might hurt their feelings. it would cause a huge shitstorm to demand that people over X weight have to buy two seats. i support them in their chocicies too, as long as they are willing to accept the consequences of their choices. if they see nothing wrong with their lifestyle, more power to them. but that also means you have to accept the fact that you need 2 seats on an airplane. if you want to live your life and feel you shouldnt have to abide by the consequences though, oyu get no sympathy from me.

    the judge did not let me off the hook for drunk driving just becos i was an alcoholic and couldnt control my compulsions. i had to live with those consequences and i did. and when it got bad enough, i changed. but until then, i didnt whine about how unfair it was that people wanted to hold me accountable for my choices.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    This reminds me of what Ahnimus pointed out about attribution: We think the problem is the other person....

    then what is jammin's problem? the fact that he doesn't like being touched by strangers? can i fondle your breats? cos if you dont like it, it's not cos IM the problem... it's cos you have a problem with what im doing to you right?
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    what are those channels? cos far as i can tell, it's forbidden to say anything that might hurt their feelings. it would cause a huge shitstorm to demand that people over X weight have to buy two seats. i support them in their chocicies too, as long as they are willing to accept the consequences of their choices. if they see nothing wrong with their lifestyle, more power to them. but that also means you have to accept the fact that you need 2 seats on an airplane. if you want to live your life and feel you shouldnt have to abide by the consequences though, oyu get no sympathy from me.

    the judge did not let me off the hook for drunk driving just becos i was an alcoholic and couldnt control my compulsions. i had to live with those consequences and i did. and when it got bad enough, i changed. but until then, i didnt whine about how unfair it was that people wanted to hold me accountable for my choices.
    You're an adult. It's up to you to make things happen for yourself. If all of your cultural systems are telling you your behaviour is inappropriate in your demands, maybe someday you'll figure it out. After all, you are for socially muscling obesity out of existence. Fair is fair. Why can't society muscle people's own emotional issues into their own backyard where they belong?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    Do you realize that you taking measures to protect your rights and boundaries is entirely differently than trying to change people? The former you are entitled to. The latter shows others need protection from you. All this grandstanding about serial killers and child molesters is a ludicrous smokescreen.

    and im not claiming i want anything more than protection of my interests. but i cannot get it. what part of that do you not understand? i dont care how much someone weighs, as long as they accept that and live accordingly. if they want to change, im happy to help. if not, i couldnt care less, it's their problem. but if they sit next to me on a plane and they're basically sitting on my lap... then i have an issue. but they're not asking for equality, they're asking for special consideration. they're demanding that i adapt to their lifestyle rather than them being accountable for their lifestyle.
  • but i am not allowed to do anything about my problem.

    Sure you are. Lobby the airline to make roomier airplanes or charge fat people double. Don't fly. Get up and sit in a different seat and tell the stewardess to fuck off if she challenges you. Sit in the aisle or go take a nap in the bathroom. Tell the fat guy that you have violent diarrhea and his safety sitting next to you might be "a little iffy". Make whale calls and ask him if he's mated recently. Your allowed to do all sorts of things.
    is someone allowed to molest me on the street or rape me?

    No. But if you bought a ticket on rape and molest airlines and then complained about it, I might think differently.
    becos really... it's MY problem that i dont like it isnt it?

    Yes.
    it's not THEIR problem for impinging on my person.

    Their problem is being morbidly obese. You taking issue with their right to be morbidly obese is your problem.
    that is the very nature of battery... an unconsented touching.

    So if I'm sitting next to you on the airplane and you brush by me on the way to the bathroom, can I go Patriot Act on your ass too?
    i dont like strangers putting their body on mine and that is a legally protected interest. yet i have no recourse when a fat guy sits next to me. why?

    Common sense, that's why.
    becos we've got people out there who insist we cannot ever hurt anyone's feelings by telling them they're overweight. if this was a thin person next to me groping me, id be allowed to say something. but becos it's a fat person, i have to pretend i dont mind lest i hurt THEIR feelings. that is how it is their problem. cos it's their ego being hurt by their decisions. if you wanna be fat, fine. but dont raise a stink when i tell you to keep your rolls off my body in public.

    Dude, I don't care whose feelings you hurt. I just care whose rights you violate in your attempt to "fix" something that has a lot more to do with you than it does with them.
  • I might be pissed too. But that's not the "gigantic man's" fault.

    I really don't care what emotional problems he had either. I am wondering now what emotional problems you have to get pissed just because a "gigantic man" happens to be in your space for a couple of hours.

    The fat man bought a ticket for one seat and should only take up one seat. I don't think that is being unreasonable or reflects anything about me except that I don't want to share the specific space I paid for.
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    then what is jammin's problem? the fact that he doesn't like being touched by strangers? can i fondle your breats? cos if you dont like it, it's not cos IM the problem... it's cos you have a problem with what im doing to you right?
    You've grasped at every sexual assault/molestation and killer issue as support, whether directly or by support and association. The point is, your irrelevent analogies remain irrelevent. Including in terms of any attempt to continually try throwing obesity into a deviant-behaviour light.

    When people talk and act inconsiderate, and then accuse others of being inconsiderate, I have a hard time not alluding to Ahnimus' point about pointing the finger.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Jammin909 wrote:
    The fat man bought a ticket for one seat and should only take up one seat.

    I highly doubt that's the rule of the airline in your hypothetical example, so no.
    I don't think that is being unreasonable or reflects anything about me except that I don't want to share the specific space I paid for.

    You didn't pay for specific space. You paid for a seat on an airline.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    You're an adult. It's up to you to make things happen for yourself. If all of your cultural systems are telling you your behaviour is inappropriate in your demands, maybe someday you'll figure it out. After all, you are for socially muscling obesity out of existence. Fair is fair. Why can't society muscle people's own emotional issues into their own backyard where they belong?

    they can. and this will play out. but this thread began with the assertion that society doesn't accept or understand obese people. so the majority is on my side and the majority wants obese people to either change, or accept the consequences of their lifestyle. but a minority of emotional activists blowing smoke about their self-esteem have made it impossible to do so. im not into muscling them out of existence. im into making them be accountable for their lifestyle just like everyone else is, rather than getting special accomadation.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    So if I'm sitting next to you on the airplane and you brush by me on the way to the bathroom, can I go Patriot Act on your ass too?

    yes. that is american common law.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    You've grasped at every sexual assault/molestation and killer issue as support, whether directly or by support and association. The point is, your irrelevent analogies remain irrelevent. Including in terms of any attempt to continually try throwing obesity into a deviant-behaviour light.

    When people talk and act inconsiderate, and then accuse others of being inconsiderate, I have a hard time not alluding to Ahnimus' point about pointing the finger.

    it is not irrelevant. you are claiming that the problem is that i dont like to be touched. none of us do. i notice you dont seem keen on my groping you. so why should fat people get a special exemption from this just becos they're fat?
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    they can. and this will play out. but this thread began with the assertion that society doesn't accept or understand obese people. so the majority is on my side and the majority wants obese people to either change, or accept the consequences of their lifestyle. but a minority of emotional activists blowing smoke about their self-esteem have made it impossible to do so. im not into muscling them out of existence. im into making them be accountable for their lifestyle just like everyone else is, rather than getting special accomadation.
    I guess I'd be frustrated, too, if the minority with awareness had the power to influence the majority as they currently do.

    I am personally quite fine with it, in terms of that it is about expecting those acting ignorantly to own their ignorance and face it.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    I guess I'd be frustrated, too, if the minority with awareness had the power to influence the majority as they currently do.

    I am personally quite fine with it, in terms of that it is about expecting those acting ignorantly to own their ignorance and face it.

    so im ignorant eh? now who's throwing around the judgment calls?

    im perfectly ok with owning my ignorance as long as everyone is held to the same standard and obese people have to own their body size.

    and while we're talking about minorities... 2/3 of americans are overweight. so that means i AM the minority. why should i have to adjust for their selfish desires if we're going to preach about accepting the minority?
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    it is not irrelevant. you are claiming that the problem is that i dont like to be touched. none of us do. i notice you dont seem keen on my groping you. so why should fat people get a special exemption from this just becos they're fat?
    Irrelevent remains irrelevent. I don't doubt you are upset. It also looks like you are not willing to own and face your own feelings and the personal nature of them. I don't doubt you have not found workable recourse. As farfromglorified pointed out, you can look for your recourse when you want to. When you seek a particular solution. I will add that I don't think this is about your recourse or about solving your "problem", but rather it seems it's about your perceived victimhood. (or it could be that you are at least milking the victim-stance for your argument) If you are for real here, victim-stances are not an excuse for bias, stigma, ignorance and abuse of power. That's the imbalance inherent in this type of false-victimhood.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    so im ignorant eh? now who's throwing around the judgment calls?

    im perfectly ok with owning my ignorance as long as everyone is held to the same standard and obese people have to own their body size.

    and while we're talking about minorities... 2/3 of americans are overweight. so that means i AM the minority. why should i have to adjust for their selfish desires if we're going to preach about accepting the minority?
    Based on understanding the dynamics of compulsive eating issues, and your seeming complete lack of understanding, yes, my opinion is that you are ignorant in this regard.

    If obese people have to own their body size, don't you also have to own your "buying the airline ticket under the conditions entailed"? Aren't you contracting for your own "problem" as farfromglorified essentially has pointed to?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    Irrelevent remains irrelevent. I don't doubt you are upset. It also looks like you are not willing to own and face your own feelings and the personal nature of them. I don't doubt you have not found workable recourse. As farfromglorified pointed out, you can look for your recourse when you want to. When you seek a particular solution. I will add that I don't think this is about your recourse or about solving your "problem", but rather it seems it's about your perceived victimhood. (or it could be that you are at least milking the victim-stance for your argument) If you are for real here, victim-stances are not an excuse for bias, stigma, ignorance and abuse of power. That's the imbalance inherent in this type of false-victimhood.

    im mostly milking it. i honestly dont really give a shit about any of this. i just find it slightly annoying and completely hypocritical and ridiculous that obese people get a free pass for all their behaviors becos we want to spare their feelings. if you're mean to someone becos you're obese, you're an asshole. if you pass judgment or lecture them, you're an asshole. if you're overweight and squeeze into one seat thus putting your neighbor in a very uncomfortable position, you're an asshole. it applies universally. accept who you are, who others are, and be considerate to others. that applies universally.
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    and while we're talking about minorities... 2/3 of americans are overweight. so that means i AM the minority. why should i have to adjust for their selfish desires if we're going to preach about accepting the minority?
    In my post I alluded to the minority who had the information and understanding of the situation. So therefore pointing out you are a minority puts you into a different category--you are not of the minority I mean: who understand this issue. By their understanding, they therefore have rightness, and natural authority on their side. They are aligned with evolution, hence their power.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    Based on understanding the dynamics of compulsive eating issues, and your seeming complete lack of understanding, yes, my opinion is that you are ignorant in this regard.

    If obese people have to own their body size, don't you also have to own your "buying the airline ticket under the conditions entailed"? Aren't you contracting for your own "problem" as farfromglorified essentially has pointed to?

    i am. but im also entitled to be annoyed that they weren't very considerate in their purchase.

    im well aware of the dynamics of compulsive behavior, and compulsive eating in particular. so dont play that game with me. but i also am aware that there are ways to combat it and a significant number of people have no interest in even trying. they get no sympathy from me. if you want help, ill support you 100%. if you dont, then dont ask for special accomadation from me.
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    im mostly milking it. i honestly dont really give a shit about any of this. i just find it slightly annoying and completely hypocritical and ridiculous that obese people get a free pass for all their behaviors becos we want to spare their feelings. if you're mean to someone becos you're obese, you're an asshole. if you pass judgment or lecture them, you're an asshole. if you're overweight and squeeze into one seat thus putting your neighbor in a very uncomfortable position, you're an asshole. it applies universally. accept who you are, who others are, and be considerate to others. that applies universally.

    Im pretty sick of fat people getting free passes.

    "Its not my fault its my kidneys". Oh yea, that big mac and fries has nothing to do with it?

    Go on a treadmill and put the fork down.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    angelica wrote:
    In my post I alluded to the minority who had the information and understanding of the situation. So therefore pointing out you are a minority puts you into a different category--you are not of the minority I mean: who understand this issue. By their understanding, they therefore have rightness, and natural authority on their side. They are aligned with evolution, hence their power.

    oh i see, you're a higher authority than me. of course, i should have known it was foolish for me to contradict your superior evolutionary state. sadly, you're way off base becos i have a deep understanding of the issues at play here. but im also aware that there are more than one. there is biology, there is compulsivity, there is just plain apathy. just becos i look at the spectrum of issues and come to a conclusion that is different from your "higher evolutionary authority" does not make me wrong or ignorant, nor does it make you right or more enlightened. get over yourself and off your high horse.
  • You 2 can go back and fourth all day about this.....
    fact is... Ed hates fat people... and if he hates them they have to be bad!!!

    Now which version of Leash is better???
    A pessimist is a man who thinks all women are bad. An optimist is one who hopes they are.
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    oh i see, you're a higher authority than me. of course, i should have known it was foolish for me to contradict your superior evolutionary state. sadly, you're way off base becos i have a deep understanding of the issues at play here. but im also aware that there are more than one. there is biology, there is compulsivity, there is just plain apathy. just becos i look at the spectrum of issues and come to a conclusion that is different from your "higher evolutionary authority" does not make me wrong or ignorant, nor does it make you right or more enlightened. get over yourself and off your high horse.
    I don't see the airlines adopting your guidelines, nor do I see other cultural norms filtering down from you. Actually it's the opposite. While there are many people who openly espouse the views you've put forth here, we are moving away from them. It seems to irritate you. I really have very little say in the matter personally. It is what it is. My understanding is that natural forces will expect individuals to adapt. If we don't consciously, we'll be put through situations that will cause us to adapt. Or we can be prematurely taken out of the game of life, for a time out, maybe, or in other cases, permanently. This happens in numerous evolutionary ways. It's our choice really, so they say.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • im mostly milking it. i honestly dont really give a shit about any of this. i just find it slightly annoying and completely hypocritical and ridiculous that obese people get a free pass for all their behaviors becos we want to spare their feelings. if you're mean to someone becos you're obese, you're an asshole. if you pass judgment or lecture them, you're an asshole. if you're overweight and squeeze into one seat thus putting your neighbor in a very uncomfortable position, you're an asshole. it applies universally. accept who you are, who others are, and be considerate to others. that applies universally.

    First...so what if someone thinks you're an asshole for judging a fat guy? That someone is doing the same thing you're doing...making a judgment. There's nothing wrong with making judgments.

    Second...I understand your annoyance at fat people getting a "free pass". But your examples having nothing to do with free passes. They're simply operating on the same rules you are.

    Third...I can't really accept your "considerate" statements. While true, I think you're violating them more than the average fat person.


    Fat people are completely accountable for their actions -- that's why they're fat. Nature isn't going to give a free pass to somebody who doesn't excercise or eats too much or whose body is simply unable to correctly metabolize. Let nature run its course and, if you want, help those who want your help. Live and let live man. It's not that hard.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    I don't trust fat people....never have...

    ...of course I don't trust a lot of people ;)
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
Sign In or Register to comment.