Free-Will
Comments
-
gue_barium wrote:Absolutely wrong.
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evo101/IIIC2aCasestudy.shtml
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Ok, I can see how the statement was wrong. Obviously the mutation was not because of malaria.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0
-
Ahnimus wrote:Ok, I can see how the statement was wrong. Obviously the mutation was not because of malaria.
Obviously, AND you forgot about adaptation.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Ahnimus. Do you have sickle cell anemia?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:Ahnimus. Do you have sickle cell anemia?
Nope, I'm not black, though in some ways I would have preferred it.
I'm quoting this from berkely.edu
"This is a chain of causation. What happens at the DNA level propagates up to the level of the complete organism. This example illustrates how a single mutation can have a large effect, in this case, both a positive and a negative one. But in many cases, evolutionary change is based on the accumulation of many mutations, each having a small effect. Whether the mutations are large or small, however, the same chain of causation applies: changes at the DNA level propagate up to the phenotype."
I guess I'll have to sue berkely university
Damn it, you can't trust anyone.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Ahnimus wrote:Nope, I'm not black, though in some ways I would have preferred it.
I'm quoting this from berkely.edu
"This is a chain of causation. What happens at the DNA level propagates up to the level of the complete organism. This example illustrates how a single mutation can have a large effect, in this case, both a positive and a negative one. But in many cases, evolutionary change is based on the accumulation of many mutations, each having a small effect. Whether the mutations are large or small, however, the same chain of causation applies: changes at the DNA level propagate up to the phenotype."
I guess I'll have to sue berkely university
Damn it, you can't trust anyone.
Well, thank goodness.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:Well, thank goodness.
Yea, I attended evolution class at http://evolution.berkely.edu
I mean, I learned a bit from high-school, but not much. I learned more in 10 minutes on that website.
So, is the website really wrong?I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
LOL.Ahnimus wrote:Yea, I attended evolution class at http://evolution.berkely.edu
I mean, I learned a bit from high-school, but not much. I learned more in 10 minutes on that website.
So, is the website really wrong?
This looking-for-explanations shtick. C'mon, dude.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:LOL.
This looking-for-explanations shtick. C'mon, dude.
I'm confused, I can't find a certain definition of adaptation vs evolutionary change.
I have to tell you, if someone tells me I'm wrong I have to investigate, I have to know the truth.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Ahnimus wrote:I'm confused, I can't find a certain definition of adaptation vs evolutionary change.
I have to tell you, if someone tells me I'm wrong I have to investigate, I have to know the truth.
I'm sure you do. There is no debate on Evolution and Adaptation.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:I'm sure you do. There is no debate on Evolution and Adaptation.
Ok, well this is the best I can do
"A biological adaptation is an anatomical structure, physiological process or behavioral trait of an organism that has evolved over a period of time by the process of natural selection such that it increases the expected long-term reproductive success of the organism. The term adaptation is also sometimes used as a synonym for natural selection, but most biologists discourage this usage."
A prerequisite for natural selection to result in adaptive evolution, novel traits and speciation, is the presence of heritable genetic variation that results in fitness differences.
"Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: -ary"
From Regina Bailey,
Definition: Suffix (-ary) - of or relating to
I'm so confused. So, one source says one thing, the next source something else. So, in order for it to be an "evolutionary change" which there is no definition for, it has to include speciation?
But, berkely eludes to sickle-cell anemia as "evolutionary change".I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Ahnimus wrote:Ok, well this is the best I can do
"A biological adaptation is an anatomical structure, physiological process or behavioral trait of an organism that has evolved over a period of time by the process of natural selection such that it increases the expected long-term reproductive success of the organism. The term adaptation is also sometimes used as a synonym for natural selection, but most biologists discourage this usage."
A prerequisite for natural selection to result in adaptive evolution, novel traits and speciation, is the presence of heritable genetic variation that results in fitness differences.
"Biology Prefixes and Suffixes: -ary"
From Regina Bailey,
Definition: Suffix (-ary) - of or relating to
I'm so confused. So, one source says one thing, the next source something else. So, in order for it to be an "evolutionary change" which there is no definition for, it has to include speciation?
But, berkely eludes to sickle-cell anemia as "evolutionary change".
I caught that. The Berkley thing.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Check out Finsburys show. If you start now, we'll be in sync.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Regarding the thread topic.
I called my Dad, called My bro and talked to my friend Mandy. I mentioned the concept to 5 other peoples between work, Tim Horton's and the gas station.
One person said: Absolutely, there is no disputing it.
One person said: It's intriguing
Two people said: Nothing
Four people said: I feel like I have free-will
That's not a very good sample-size, but it's indicative.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
gue_barium wrote:Check out Finsburys show. If you start now, we'll be in sync.
What is a "Finsburys show"?I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Oh , ow. :cool:
"Rat's dream, when they run around in a labyrinth all day, that's what they dream of." ~ Christof KochI necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Ahnimus wrote:Oh , ow. :cool:
"Rat's dream, when they run around in a labyrinth all day, that's what they dream of." ~ Christof Koch
Not really. You get to hear protestation of life and death, in Richard's way, I suppose. You get to hear Chance, You get to hear a troubadour profess his love for someone many miles away. None of this has to do with a labyrinth.
It's honest poetry, song writing.
I hope Julie hears the call.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:Not really. You get to hear protestation of life and death, in Richard's way, I suppose. You get to hear Chance, You get to hear a troubadour profess his love for someone many miles away. None of this has to do with a labyrinth.
It's honest poetry, song writing.
I hope Julie hears the call.
Huh?I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Anyone read John Gray's book - 'Straw dogs - On humans and other animals'? The section on free will. It's damn interesting. I'll try to find a link.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help