Free-Will
Ahnimus
Posts: 10,560
Doing some reasearch on Free-will while discussing in on the obesity thread. I've come across some interesting research, but I will start with a quote from Albert Einstein.
"I don’t believe in the freedom of the will. Schopenhauer’s saying, that a human can very well do what he wants, but can not will what he wants, accompanies me in all of life’s circumstances and reconciles me with the actions of humans, even when they are truly distressing. This knowledge of the non-freedom of the will protects me from losing my good humor and taking much too seriously myself and my fellow humans as acting and judging individuals."
~Albert Einstein
"I don’t believe in the freedom of the will. Schopenhauer’s saying, that a human can very well do what he wants, but can not will what he wants, accompanies me in all of life’s circumstances and reconciles me with the actions of humans, even when they are truly distressing. This knowledge of the non-freedom of the will protects me from losing my good humor and taking much too seriously myself and my fellow humans as acting and judging individuals."
~Albert Einstein
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
"Libet found that the unconscious brain activity leading up to the conscious decision by the subject to flick his or her wrist began approximately half a second before the subject consciously felt that she had decided to move."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will#Neuroscience_and_free_will
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
How is it fascistic to suggest that our decisions are the result of a complex dynamical system as opposed to free-will, and that free-will is merely and illusion projected onto our conscious to make us aware of our actions and decisions?
The issue I have is with the evolutionary nature of consciousness in this regard. Without free-will, I haven't found an advantage to being conscious.
How do you mean?
Murder, Rape, Racism, take your pick. This theory proposes that all of our actions are the result of a complex system within our brains and we do not make decisions dependant of our consciousness.
Perhaps this is one of those evolutionary disadvantages.
If nothing else you're certainly honest. Thank you.
Would it be incumbent upon you to ask instead, "i find no evolutionary advantage to being conscious."?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
I think making a topic too general dilutes it to the point that it doesn't really have as much value.
For example, if we were talking about murder...there are probably plenty of examples of people with poor impulse control that could be held up as good examples for a lack of free will...
But actually, my own personal preference is to talk about something focused. I usually just find specifics more interesting.
Even animals display the same patterns, routines and characteristics. We can observe an animal long enough to predict it's actions, we can also predict peoples actions. This theory of Chaos explains things such as Deja Vu and Preminitions, because those events will happen based on specific criteria. If our brains are as powerful as is believed, processing 400 billion bits of information per second and we are only aware of 2000, perhaps are brains are telling us the future based on the deterministic nature of reality.
Hmm, well, the problem lies in being specific. This is a universal constant. Looking at specifics is like cutting a line in half over and over, you never get to the end. You have to perceive the line as a whole.
That's a pretty good response.
Well, I could give you an example, I guess, but it's going to be rough.
Two women, one's name is Laurana Bobbett...
Both of these women's husbands cheat on them, but only Laurana decides to cut her husband's penis off, why?
Why did she make that decision?
I don't know much about the story. Do you have a theory?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
This reads like a little bio under a photo.
I guess I'm just not in the mood to argue tonight.
Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, basically stimulating neurons non-invasively by a magnet, scientists can control what you do and you believe you made the choice.
And yet, that sounds so hokey doesn't it? Like those old films of Russian spoon-benders.
Well, that was a film. But at the same time, Start Trek had those flat-panel LCD monitors that seemed pretty hokey 20 years ago.
If one has no free will, does one have moral responsibility? Can't have one without the other.
There are things which are unique to humans and therefor allow us to be free agents - among them intellect and volition or will.
I think morallity is subjective.
I simply theorize that we are all machines, it is referred to as Hard Determinism.
I was reading Chaos Theory earlier and I got into Cellular Automaton. I won't go into to many details, but it's actually believed that small fragments of machine code are generate where they have no purpose, but are relative to the instructional code. Almost like a level of awareness, this has led to much speculation of the consciousness of computers. Prior to reading that scientific research, I never considered machines having consciousness. But this theory is actually the basis for the movie "I, Robot" amazing how scientifically informed Sci-Fi writers are.
Where does intellect come from? Is it generated from absolute nothingness?
What does will, intellect and volition depend on to make it so variable from person to person?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
I thought that was Lust
Irrelevant. Cognition exists in us.
Reason, desire, perception.
It is, but I can kind of see his point.