Let me state that I'm not calling you personally an idiot. I am simply stating my belief that only an Idiot would believe that Israel is a victim in all of this. Israel has been engaged in a brutal military occupation for the past 40 years and is supported 100% by the worlds only superpower. They are oppressing a people who are struggling to feed themselves, and who are living in a state of extreme poverty and desperation. Therefore: only an Idiot would believe that Israel is a victim in all of this. I hope this brand of logic doesn't get me banned again.
hamas is the elected government. their charter states that it wants the destruction of Israel.
if the charter stated "the destruction of Israel" (only in the occupied lands). I'd say you have more of an argument.
you are only playing the victim card because one side is much stronger then the other. just because you are weak doesn't automatically make you the victim.
hamas is the elected government. their charter states that it wants the destruction of Israel.
if the charter stated "the destruction of Israel" (only in the occupied lands). I'd say you have more of an argument.
you are only playing the victim card because one side is much stronger then the other. just because you are weak doesn't automatically make you the victim.
So just because Israel doesn't outright say they want to destroy Palestine but then do everything they can to actually do it...it lets them off the hook??? Because the place looks pretty damn destroyed.
If you are way bigger than you're opponent and use much greater force on them and their innocents....then you are a bully. You've lost any right to be the victim.
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
So just because Israel doesn't outright say they want to destroy Palestine but then do everything they can to actually do it...it lets them off the hook??? Because the place looks pretty damn destroyed.
really? they can make the gaza strip a parking lot if they wanted. or dont put any blame on the corruption of hamas and palastinian authority for the misfortune's of the people. . I'm sure they only look out for the best for everybody.
If you are way bigger than you're opponent and use much greater force on them and their innocents....then you are a bully. You've lost any right to be the victim.
there are many innocent victims on both sides. i think they both qualify
hamas is the elected government. their charter states that it wants the destruction of Israel.
if the charter stated "the destruction of Israel" (only in the occupied lands). I'd say you have more of an argument.
you are only playing the victim card because one side is much stronger then the other. just because you are weak doesn't automatically make you the victim.
Israel has no claim of legitimacy until it withdraws to the 1967 borders and begins complying with international law. If after that happens certain elements of the Palestinians continue to attack Israelis I guarantee you that you will hear me criticizing these Palestinian elements just as vehemently.
Israel has no claim of legitimacy until it withdraws to the 1967 borders and begins complying with international law. If after that happens certain elements of the Palestinians continue to attack Israelis I guarantee you that you will hear me criticizing these Palestinian elements just as vehemently.
disagree on first sentence, agree on second. I'll take a split anyday!!
really? they can make the gaza strip a parking lot if they wanted. or dont put any blame on the corruption of hamas and palastinian authority for the misfortune's of the people. . I'm sure they only look out for the best for everybody.
there are many innocent victims on both sides. i think they both qualify
Both sides are guilty and both have innocent victims. But one side is using too much force on an already terribly crippled opponent.
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
if the aim of it was to instill hatred and the will to harm innocents into those children, then yes, it is a big problem....
now, where do you stand on the videos and article about the letters i posted?
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
so teaching some sort of pride in your country is bad thing?
no, but don't whitewash it...don't act like we are the holy savior for democracy, humanity and all that is good that does no wrong and the world should bow at our feet and thank us for 'protecting' them
kids are taught and encouraged to speak their minds.
are you talking about kindergarten-high school???? if so, then i say hahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa there is a certain line that must be towed, a certain order and schedule that must be obeyed
and continues throughout their education....your telling me, college professors teach that america is the all powerful? you are way off on this one. escpically when trying to compare it to the video in question. NOT EVEN
CLOSE.
if you are talking college and higher eductaion then, yes, those things are certainly taught...but your common sense should tell you how obviously far more go to kindergarten-high school where those things on average are NOT taught than go to college
what about the nationalizm when we commit crimes like the invasion of panama?
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
personally, I think what you wrote is a bunch of bullshit. history is history......its up to the reader to find out more, locate different sources, opinions, etc.
like I said, go to any college campus in america and you will find professors teaching how wrong and evil our country can be.
History isn't history. Most books written about George Armstrong Custer praise him as an American hero. The truth of the matter is that even his own men despised him, and he was a rapist and murderer of pregnant women and children. Howard Zinn's history isn't the same history as you find in most orthodox text books.
Intellectuals have a responsibility to tell it from as many angles as they can. Ultimately they have a responsibility to tell the truth. It isn't right that a lecturer or author of a textbook should omit certain things and focus on others to the detriment of the truth. That is tantamount to lying.
History isn't history. Most books written about George Armstrong Custer praise him as an American hero. The truth of the matter is that even his own men despised him, and he was a rapist and murderer of pregnant women and children. Howard Zinn's history isn't the same history as you find in most orthodox text books.
Intellectuals have a responsibility to tell it from as many angles as they can. Ultimately they have a responsibility to tell the truth. It isn't right that a lecturer or author of a textbook should omit certain things and focus on others to the detriment of the truth. That is tantamount to lying.
It is lying.
There is another point of view on the writing of political history, and I don't remember who said it. It was said: "History should be re-written every 20 years."
disagree on first sentence, agree on second. I'll take a split anyday!!
The land belongs to palestine not Isreal, So what claim does Isreal have? It's an illegal occupation full stop.
If Isreal wanted peace they wouldn't steal peoples land, what is wrong with what they were given?
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
There is another point of view on the writing of political history, and I don't remember who said it. It was said: "History should be re-written every 20 years."
trying to offer the Middle East nearly 800 years of Western enlightenment stretching all the way back to the Magna Carta is horrific?????
That made me laugh... 800 years of western enlightenment! Try checking out western history before making those claims! Looks like the western world is trying to impose THEIR values on the eastern world (history repeating itself...).
Western culture and values are no better or worse than eastern culture and values.... Also, looking back centuries, try checking out how much our western culture (including arts, science, maths, language, etc. ) owes to 'eastern enlightenment' - you will be surprised.
If Isreal wanted peace they wouldn't steal peoples land,
And continue to expand their 'settlements', depriving palestinian families of their land & home (I mean personal land - orchards, fields and family homes being destroyed...), infrastructure (roads blocked and no longer accessible bar for israelis, water being diverted to the settlements, leaving palestinian homes high and dry, etc...) These are just a couple of examples.... the list is long. One cannot be surprised that these actions propagate hatred.
It's not quite like that though is it. Only an idiot would believe that Israel is a victim in all of this.
Let me state that I'm not calling you personally an idiot. I am simply stating my belief that only an Idiot would believe that Israel is a victim in all of this. Israel has been engaged in a brutal military occupation for the past 40 years and is supported 100% by the worlds only superpower. They are oppressing a people who are struggling to feed themselves, and who are living in a state of extreme poverty and desperation. Therefore: only an Idiot would believe that Israel is a victim in all of this. I hope this brand of logic doesn't get me banned again.
No worries Byrnzie i can definitely be an idiot, i used to be a massive patriot so you wouldnt be way off the mark.
You definitely wouldnt be way off the mark if i actually meant what i wrote, however for an Englishman you're not very good at picking up on piss taking:p
I was just holding up a mirror to the thread starter its all i can be bothered with regarding that shit anymore.
No worries Byrnzie i can definitely be an idiot, i used to be a massive patriot so you wouldnt be way off the mark.
You definitely wouldnt be way off the mark if i actually meant what i wrote, however for an Englishman you're not very good at picking up on piss taking:p
I was just holding up a mirror to the thread starter its all i can be bothered with regarding that shit anymore.
Relax man. I knew your post was a piss take. I also knew that some here would take the gist of it seriously.
i wonder if you will get a reply? maybe he'll just claim it's a single child/incident like before?
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
I already told you. I support Israel going back to the 1967 borders. or some sort of compromise with Israel giving up land back to the palastinians. I will never support a people who encourage, teach, condone, killing of innocent people.
I already told you. I support Israel going back to the 1967 borders. or some sort of compromise with Israel giving up land back to the palastinians. I will never support a people who encourage, teach, condone, killing of innocent people.
not so fast I support Israel going back to the borders, but doesnt mean I think they should. I believe they have to defend themselves from hamas who states that they want Israel destroyed. and several of its neighbors who have no problem attacking them.
not so fast I support Israel going back to the borders, but doesnt mean I think they should. I believe they have to defend themselves from hamas who states that they want Israel destroyed. and several of its neighbors who have no problem attacking them.
What does their right to defend themselves have to do with them moving or not moving back to the 1967 borders? They will have more legitimacy in defending themselves within the internationally recognized borders pre 1967. An occupying army has no rights to anything.
What does their right to defend themselves have to do with them moving or not moving back to the 1967 borders? They will have more legitimacy in defending themselves within the internationally recognized borders pre 1967. An occupying army has no rights to anything.
a war was fought. borders changed. in order for peace, compromises with have to come from both sides. I think abbas was the only chance at peace in the near future. and as of today, he is gone.
a war was fought. borders changed. in order for peace, compromises with have to come from both sides. I think abbas was the only chance at peace in the near future. and as of today, he is gone.
Borders didn't change though. Just as France's borders didn't change after Germany's defeat. The only countries who think the borders changed are Israel and the U.S.
Borders didn't change though. Just as France's borders didn't change after Germany's defeat. The only countries who think the borders changed are Israel and the U.S.
well according to the little map you posted, they changed.
Comments
if the charter stated "the destruction of Israel" (only in the occupied lands). I'd say you have more of an argument.
you are only playing the victim card because one side is much stronger then the other. just because you are weak doesn't automatically make you the victim.
So just because Israel doesn't outright say they want to destroy Palestine but then do everything they can to actually do it...it lets them off the hook??? Because the place looks pretty damn destroyed.
If you are way bigger than you're opponent and use much greater force on them and their innocents....then you are a bully. You've lost any right to be the victim.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
there are many innocent victims on both sides. i think they both qualify
Israel has no claim of legitimacy until it withdraws to the 1967 borders and begins complying with international law. If after that happens certain elements of the Palestinians continue to attack Israelis I guarantee you that you will hear me criticizing these Palestinian elements just as vehemently.
Both sides are guilty and both have innocent victims. But one side is using too much force on an already terribly crippled opponent.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
if the aim of it was to instill hatred and the will to harm innocents into those children, then yes, it is a big problem....
now, where do you stand on the videos and article about the letters i posted?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
that;s a pretty subjective term...they are taught history book history
are you ok w/ some schools punishing kids for not stand for the pledge of allegience?
no, but don't whitewash it...don't act like we are the holy savior for democracy, humanity and all that is good that does no wrong and the world should bow at our feet and thank us for 'protecting' them
are you talking about kindergarten-high school???? if so, then i say hahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa there is a certain line that must be towed, a certain order and schedule that must be obeyed
if you are talking college and higher eductaion then, yes, those things are certainly taught...but your common sense should tell you how obviously far more go to kindergarten-high school where those things on average are NOT taught than go to college
what about the nationalizm when we commit crimes like the invasion of panama?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
History isn't history. Most books written about George Armstrong Custer praise him as an American hero. The truth of the matter is that even his own men despised him, and he was a rapist and murderer of pregnant women and children. Howard Zinn's history isn't the same history as you find in most orthodox text books.
Intellectuals have a responsibility to tell it from as many angles as they can. Ultimately they have a responsibility to tell the truth. It isn't right that a lecturer or author of a textbook should omit certain things and focus on others to the detriment of the truth. That is tantamount to lying.
It is lying.
There is another point of view on the writing of political history, and I don't remember who said it. It was said: "History should be re-written every 20 years."
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
The land belongs to palestine not Isreal, So what claim does Isreal have? It's an illegal occupation full stop.
If Isreal wanted peace they wouldn't steal peoples land, what is wrong with what they were given?
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
I'd go along with that.
That made me laugh... 800 years of western enlightenment! Try checking out western history before making those claims! Looks like the western world is trying to impose THEIR values on the eastern world (history repeating itself...).
Western culture and values are no better or worse than eastern culture and values.... Also, looking back centuries, try checking out how much our western culture (including arts, science, maths, language, etc. ) owes to 'eastern enlightenment' - you will be surprised.
No worries Byrnzie i can definitely be an idiot, i used to be a massive patriot so you wouldnt be way off the mark.
You definitely wouldnt be way off the mark if i actually meant what i wrote, however for an Englishman you're not very good at picking up on piss taking:p
I was just holding up a mirror to the thread starter its all i can be bothered with regarding that shit anymore.
Relax man. I knew your post was a piss take. I also knew that some here would take the gist of it seriously.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lq6ccvwbvfY&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzNPZf-5aO4
NO I WONT F*"%ING RELAX!!!!
ok i will......
i kind of liked being called an idiot anyway, fuck it i like being an idiot.
In answer to your question. Yes, it does.
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?t=7254
I'll let this picture answer that comment...
http://arab.sa.utoronto.ca/map99.PAL.land-loss.jpg
i wonder if you will get a reply? maybe he'll just claim it's a single child/incident like before?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
So we are in agreement then.
What does their right to defend themselves have to do with them moving or not moving back to the 1967 borders? They will have more legitimacy in defending themselves within the internationally recognized borders pre 1967. An occupying army has no rights to anything.
Borders didn't change though. Just as France's borders didn't change after Germany's defeat. The only countries who think the borders changed are Israel and the U.S.