don't need a mythical character to help us....we look within and deal, cope with our situations.....as what was posted in first page of this thread...religion is a coping mechanism...not that its a bad thing....just what ever it takes I guess to get through the day.....its just when others use religion to be mean...that sucks.
are we discussing religion when we discuss god?
love ya...too...
grateful just to listen and to learn and maybe put out a question to provoke some more...
god is part of peace; god is part of war;
what cha think?
all insanity:
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
nah, i was trying to allow space as opposed to confinement
yeah, when you begin to understand me, it can be a scary thing...i am grateful
and since i have you on a thread, i would love to include your piece of poetry as an example of god...i mean, even the niroshima bomb is counted in my new revelations about this god thing...i used to htink that god is only the good...this is where i was way off key....becasue if all particles in the universe are a creation of this Divine, then we have to look at yin/yang; darkness/light; positive/negative; love/hate; open/close, etc...gotta run...
please do not.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
true...they are seperate....just put them in same bag...as most that believe in god...also support religion....which supports intollerance...
yet, religion is one's practice...
intollerance is supported by elite "ism"....and that's becasue we fail to let all the dominoes of circumstances or events fall into a natural pattern. we, as humans, (i am biggest offender) project interference....
all insanity:
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
Thank You for that.. I didnt want to get on my high horse... (which is a shetland pony btw...) I was gonna say you all were asleep in your western civ class when they talked about gilgamesh and noah.... blah blah blah...
I'll go w/ the fairly tales. anything else is lies.
robert price on Acharya's book (zeitgeists primary information)
"She is quick to state as bald fact what turn out to be, once one chases down her sources, either wild speculation or complex inference from a chain of complicated data open to many interpretations. One of the most intriguing claims made repeatedly in these books is that among the mythical predecessors of Jesus as a crucified god were the Buddha, the blue-skinned Krishna, and Dionysus. Is there any basis to these claims, which Murdock just drops like a ton of bricks? Again, she does not explain where they come from, much less why no available book on Buddha, Krishna, or Dionysus contains a crucifixion account. . . . When Murdock speaks of the ‘Christ Conspiracy,’ she means it. She really believes that ‘people got together and cooked up’ early Christianity like a network sitcom. And who were these conspirators? The, er, Masons (pp. 334 ff.). It is remarkable how and where some people’s historical skepticism comes crashing to a halt. But it gets much, much weirder than that. We start, in the last chapters, reading bits and pieces drawn from James Churchward, promoter of the imaginary lost continent of Mu; Charles Berlitz, apologist for sunken Atlantis; Zechariah Sitchen, advocate of flying saucers in ancient Akkadia; and of course all that stuff about the maps of the ancient sea kings. The Christ Conspiracy is a random bag of (mainly recycled) eccentricities, some few of them worth considering, most dangerously shaky, many outright looney."(123)
free inquiry summer 2001
i tried to google it and it has been removed but it did appear in that issue and both Acharya and Price acknowledge it.
make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
robert price on Acharya's book (zeitgeists primary information)
"She is quick to state as bald fact what turn out to be, once one chases down her sources, either wild speculation or complex inference from a chain of complicated data open to many interpretations. One of the most intriguing claims made repeatedly in these books is that among the mythical predecessors of Jesus as a crucified god were the Buddha, the blue-skinned Krishna, and Dionysus. Is there any basis to these claims, which Murdock just drops like a ton of bricks? Again, she does not explain where they come from, much less why no available book on Buddha, Krishna, or Dionysus contains a crucifixion account. . . . When Murdock speaks of the ‘Christ Conspiracy,’ she means it. She really believes that ‘people got together and cooked up’ early Christianity like a network sitcom. And who were these conspirators? The, er, Masons (pp. 334 ff.). It is remarkable how and where some people’s historical skepticism comes crashing to a halt. But it gets much, much weirder than that. We start, in the last chapters, reading bits and pieces drawn from James Churchward, promoter of the imaginary lost continent of Mu; Charles Berlitz, apologist for sunken Atlantis; Zechariah Sitchen, advocate of flying saucers in ancient Akkadia; and of course all that stuff about the maps of the ancient sea kings. The Christ Conspiracy is a random bag of (mainly recycled) eccentricities, some few of them worth considering, most dangerously shaky, many outright looney."(123)
free inquiry summer 2001
i tried to google it and it has been removed but it did appear in that issue and both Acharya and Price acknowledge it.
The link I provieded mentions none of this...it is about Jesus Christ. And also, attacking the source without discussing the information is typical when you can't refute the evidence, which seems to be the case here.
The link I provieded mentions none of this...it is about Jesus Christ. And also, attacking the source without discussing the information is typical when you can't refute the evidence, which seems to be the case here.
your name says everything I need to know about you
Comments
love ya...too...
grateful just to listen and to learn and maybe put out a question to provoke some more...
god is part of peace; god is part of war;
what cha think?
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
please do not.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
i forgot these terms: acceptance/denial!!!!
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
i prefer to see my words as mine. from me. no one else. i write to exorcise my demons. to get things straight in my head.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
**catefrances: thank you. i almost cried when i read that last post.
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
really? and here's me thinking it was an upbeat post.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Did I not say something to the fact "Whom says the Bible is correct..." ?????
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
true...they are seperate....just put them in same bag...as most that believe in god...also support religion....which supports intollerance...
So my takeaway from that statement is that atheists are tolerant of non-atheists?
intollerance is supported by elite "ism"....and that's becasue we fail to let all the dominoes of circumstances or events fall into a natural pattern. we, as humans, (i am biggest offender) project interference....
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
lmao
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZfocZ_LDQc
PEARL JAM~San Antonio, TX. 4~5~03
INCUBUS~Houston, TX. 1~19~07
INCUBUS~Denver, CO. 2~8~07
Lollapalooza~Chicago, IL. 8~5~07
INCUBUS~Austin, TX. 9~3~07
Bonnaroo~Manchester, TN 6~14~08
That was SOOOOOO unFUNNY
He's an evangelist now?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNf-P_5u_Hw&feature=related
I have watched that several times. Good stuff.
i'd agree that Zeitgeist is the greatest story ever fabricated.
they cite Acharaya S as the special contributor to the religion section (or at least acknowledge her assistance) Here's a decent critique of her book that they used to base a lot of the information on. http://www.risen-jesus.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22&Itemid=109
Lies.....
PEARL JAM~San Antonio, TX. 4~5~03
INCUBUS~Houston, TX. 1~19~07
INCUBUS~Denver, CO. 2~8~07
Lollapalooza~Chicago, IL. 8~5~07
INCUBUS~Austin, TX. 9~3~07
Bonnaroo~Manchester, TN 6~14~08
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
bump
PEARL JAM~San Antonio, TX. 4~5~03
INCUBUS~Houston, TX. 1~19~07
INCUBUS~Denver, CO. 2~8~07
Lollapalooza~Chicago, IL. 8~5~07
INCUBUS~Austin, TX. 9~3~07
Bonnaroo~Manchester, TN 6~14~08
I'll go w/ the fairly tales. anything else is lies.
robert price on Acharya's book (zeitgeists primary information)
"She is quick to state as bald fact what turn out to be, once one chases down her sources, either wild speculation or complex inference from a chain of complicated data open to many interpretations. One of the most intriguing claims made repeatedly in these books is that among the mythical predecessors of Jesus as a crucified god were the Buddha, the blue-skinned Krishna, and Dionysus. Is there any basis to these claims, which Murdock just drops like a ton of bricks? Again, she does not explain where they come from, much less why no available book on Buddha, Krishna, or Dionysus contains a crucifixion account. . . . When Murdock speaks of the ‘Christ Conspiracy,’ she means it. She really believes that ‘people got together and cooked up’ early Christianity like a network sitcom. And who were these conspirators? The, er, Masons (pp. 334 ff.). It is remarkable how and where some people’s historical skepticism comes crashing to a halt. But it gets much, much weirder than that. We start, in the last chapters, reading bits and pieces drawn from James Churchward, promoter of the imaginary lost continent of Mu; Charles Berlitz, apologist for sunken Atlantis; Zechariah Sitchen, advocate of flying saucers in ancient Akkadia; and of course all that stuff about the maps of the ancient sea kings. The Christ Conspiracy is a random bag of (mainly recycled) eccentricities, some few of them worth considering, most dangerously shaky, many outright looney."(123)
free inquiry summer 2001
i tried to google it and it has been removed but it did appear in that issue and both Acharya and Price acknowledge it.
sending grace to all in need of a good thought
peace.
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
The link I provieded mentions none of this...it is about Jesus Christ. And also, attacking the source without discussing the information is typical when you can't refute the evidence, which seems to be the case here.
your name says everything I need to know about you
PEARL JAM~San Antonio, TX. 4~5~03
INCUBUS~Houston, TX. 1~19~07
INCUBUS~Denver, CO. 2~8~07
Lollapalooza~Chicago, IL. 8~5~07
INCUBUS~Austin, TX. 9~3~07
Bonnaroo~Manchester, TN 6~14~08
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
a derivitive of nature.
nature is god
god is love
love is light
Or do you just spend all your time hating?