Abortion ultrasound-viewing advances in S.C.

Options
1…6791112…24

Comments

  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    soulsinging wrote:
    then why dont you vote for more women? men dont have the votes to own every office unless some women are voting for them. get your sisters in line ;)

    We don't get a lot of women standing here ss. I mean we are certainly getting a lot more than we used to but how can you vote for them if they don't even stand in your electorate? Or if they do they are standing for a party that you wouldn't even consider supporting? And that's before you even get them into the main game. :)
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Jeanie wrote:
    We don't get a lot of women standing here ss. I mean we are certainly getting a lot more than we used to but how can you vote for them if they don't even stand in your electorate? Or if they do they are standing for a party that you wouldn't even consider supporting? And that's before you even get them into the main game. :)

    then run for office yourself ;)
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    soulsinging wrote:
    i like the fact that your egocentric arrogance makes me look like a model of humility around here. i've seen few people who are so unjustifiably smug. it makes me feel like less of a douchebag. thanks.

    Your narcisissism speaks for itself.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    gue_barium wrote:
    Your narcisissism speaks for itself.

    id rather be an honest narcissist than a delusional and vain fool. you had nothing on ffg and he ran circles around you so now you're trying to play some sad little game to rebuild your ego after he owned you. why dont you stop playing the hotshot and just give out this definition of tax that "ffg doesn't even know the answer to"? cos it robs you of your petty little chance to be condescending.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    soulsinging wrote:
    id rather be an honest narcissist than a delusional and vain fool. you had nothing on ffg and he ran circles around you so now you're trying to play some sad little game to rebuild your ego after he owned you. why dont you stop playing the hotshot and just give out this definition of tax that "ffg doesn't even know the answer to"? cos it robs you of your petty little chance to be condescending.

    well, you read into things however you want. i'm only partly here for the contest, and you're no competition so mind your own affairs. ffg can stand up for himself without you, and he'd probably prefer it.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    gue_barium wrote:
    i asked the question, knowing the answer that ffg does not.

    Hehe...what the hell is this? If I take the above literally, it's hillarious. Why would you ask me a question while thinking I don't know the response? Furthermore, why ask a question for only which you have the response? Is it possible that you've become more insecure since your last moniker on this board?

    I'm not sure what question you even asked. The "what are taxes" question? Taxes are simply the ransom paid on your liberty. But I gave up bitching about taxes for lent.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    farfromglorified wrote:
    But I gave up bitching about taxes for lent.

    and we're all very grateful for it ;)

    what was the last moniker? im always slow on that uptake...
  • surferdude
    surferdude Posts: 2,057
    catefrances wrote:
    LMAO. you have to be kidding. the western world is run by men. there is no denying that. we do indeed live in a patriarchal society.
    It's run by the people that women want running it. As I believe in equality of the sexes it really makes no difference if it's men or women.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • VictoryGin
    VictoryGin Posts: 1,207
    gue_barium wrote:
    Your narcisissism speaks for itself.

    i love you.
    if you wanna be a friend of mine
    cross the river to the eastside
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    VictoryGin wrote:
    i love you.

    don't worry darlin, you'll warm up to me one day ;)
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    farfromglorified wrote:
    Hehe...what the hell is this? If I take the above literally, it's hillarious. Why would you ask me a question while thinking I don't know the response? Furthermore, why ask a question for only which you have the response? Is it possible that you've become more insecure since your last moniker on this board?

    I'm not sure what question you even asked. The "what are taxes" question? Taxes are simply the ransom paid on your liberty. But I gave up bitching about taxes for lent.

    And liberty is a common goal. It is no ransom, it is a shared responsibilty. (albeit a most abused one at the present moment). You can play the naked Tarzan all you want, hunting and gathering, but that isn't the reality anymore.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    gue_barium wrote:
    And liberty is a common goal.

    Hehe...don't be ridiculous. Liberty is not a common goal, at least not in the context of the United State of America. If liberty were a common goal, this thread wouldn't exist because a) people wouldn't be forcing others to have ultrasounds and b) people wouldn't be forcing others to pay for their abortions.

    Furthermore, this entire board probably wouldn't exist, since its purpose seems to be deciding whom we should force and what we should force out of them.
    It is no ransom, it is a shared responsibilty. (albeit a most abused one at the present moment).

    Ahhh..."shared responsibility". I see. That makes a lot of sense. Try checking your own tax return some time and see how that worked out.
    You can play the naked Tarzan all you want, hunting and gathering, but that isn't the reality anymore.

    I'll call your bluff.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    farfromglorified wrote:
    Hehe...don't be ridiculous. Liberty is not a common goal, at least not in the context of the United State of America. If liberty were a common goal, this thread wouldn't exist because a) people wouldn't be forcing others to have ultrasounds and b) people wouldn't be forcing others to pay for their abortions.
    Then I am to assume you prefer the controlled. Control is where it's at.
    Furthermore, this entire board probably wouldn't exist, since its purpose seems to be deciding whom we should force and what we should force out of them.
    not sure i follow this one.
    Ahhh..."shared responsibility". I see. That makes a lot of sense. Try checking your own tax return some time and see how that worked out.

    there ya go with a typical, easy response.
    I'll call your bluff.

    If you yourself aren't responsible for the progression of liberty then i've got to assume you have no concept of liberty at all.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    gue_barium wrote:
    Then I am to assume you prefer the controlled. Control is where it's at.

    The controlled what? People? No, I don't prefer "the controlled". I prefer those who understand their natural sphere of control -- their own lives, their own minds, and the thoughts and actions that extend from them.
    not sure i follow this one.

    Just take a sample of every thread started on this board next week. Ask yourself a basic question:

    Is this person looking to control their own lives, or control the lives of others?

    Add up all the positives and add up all the negatives. Compare.
    there ya go with a typical, easy response.

    It was very easy, yes. It also disproves your contention about "shared responsibility".
    If you yourself aren't responsible for the progression of liberty then i've got to assume you have no concept of liberty at all.

    I am responsible for the "progression of liberty". And because of that I stand opposed to those who wish to destroy it.
  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    soulsinging wrote:
    then run for office yourself ;)

    Don't you start!! :p Sound like Mum!!! hehe!! :D

    I'm not sure that the political arena is the place for me ss!

    Would require me to participate in team sports if you like. Not my thing.

    Think I'll stick to agitating as the will takes me or the situation requires it. ;)

    And supporting wherever I can or would want. :)
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    farfromglorified wrote:
    The controlled what? People? No, I don't prefer "the controlled". I prefer those who understand their natural sphere of control -- their own lives, their own minds, and the thoughts and actions that extend from them.

    Just take a sample of every thread started on this board next week. Ask yourself a basic question:
    Is this person looking to control their own lives, or control the lives of others?
    Add up all the positives and add up all the negatives. Compare.
    It was very easy, yes. It also disproves your contention about "shared responsibility".
    I am responsible for the "progression of liberty". And because of that I stand opposed to those who wish to destroy it.

    In my opinion, you're putting the business of making money ahead of the people that make it happen, and that is the way you think it works. Liberty reaches beyond the confines of money, and as much as you want to laugh at me on that, I'll be here to battle you every step of the way.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    surferdude wrote:
    It's run by the people that women want running it. As I believe in equality of the sexes it really makes no difference if it's men or women.

    surferdude, seriously, do take a wee look outside your own world.
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    gue_barium wrote:
    In my opinion, you're putting the business of making money ahead of the people that make it happen, and that is the way you think it works.

    Ok, I'll put the business of making money behind everything. I'll make no money. And since those that collect that money simply "make it happen", that should pose absolutely no problem to them.
    Liberty reaches beyond the confines of money, and as much as you want to laugh at me on that, I'll be here to battle you every step of the way.

    Liberty does reach beyond the confines of money. Liberty is what actually makes money possible, que_barium.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Jeanie wrote:
    Don't you start!! :p Sound like Mum!!! hehe!! :D

    I'm not sure that the political arena is the place for me ss!

    Would require me to participate in team sports if you like. Not my thing.

    Think I'll stick to agitating as the will takes me or the situation requires it. ;)

    And supporting wherever I can or would want. :)

    fair enough. i hope to one day myself. im born for it... able to argue both sides of all issues without ever really committing to any of them ;)
  • Jeanie
    Jeanie Posts: 9,446
    soulsinging wrote:
    fair enough. i hope to one day myself. im born for it... able to argue both sides of all issues without ever really committing to any of them ;)


    hehe!! :D Yes!!! You'd be PERFECT for it!! ;)
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift

Categories