No offense, but I think you are being gullable (sp).
The Right and Left DO NOT want the same things for their country. At least not the Right as it's being portrayed in DC these days.
It's obvious that we both dont want balanced budgets.
It's obvious that we dont share the same opinion on taxation formulas and trickle-down economic theory.
It's obvious that we disagree on how to defeat Islamic Fundementalism.
It's obvious that we disagree on how far the Constitutional protections should go when it comes to "homeland security".
It's obvious that we have different opinions when it comes to the treatment of prisoners of war and suspected terrorists.
It's obvious that we dont agree when it comes to bringing faith into the science class.
It's obvious that we dont agree on matters of a womans right to choose, the right to die in the manner you so wish, or the research on stem cells.
It's obvious which side we are on when it comes to environmental protections versus the interests of the corporate economy.
Id say we really dont agree on much. At all. We've long crossed the Rubicon of bipartisanship, now there are two very very different roads we can take. The lines have been drawn and the battle engaged. It's so very clear that the current occupant of 1600 Penn Ave has no desire for compromise and therefore neither should we.
You cant play fair when the game is rigged.
All that said, Ill be glad to debate any topic any time, or if someone would prefer, to resort to flame wars and name calling. It's all good
these are the stances that the current administation takes, but many people who consider themselves Republicans or Conservatives don't necessarily agree with many, some, or all of this. You we do have some differences, but if you really look at what people truely want out of life, we have much more in common. We all want financial security, a safe environment to raise a family, decent healthcare so that the financial burden for medical care doesn't fall on our loved one, a good education for our children, and enough cahnge left in our pocket at the end of our working lifes to be able to enjoy retirement. Neither party really cares about that so we have to and we have to work together to make sure that our government initiates policies that are beneficial to us, not just their campaign supporters. Once we finally have a government that truely cares and respects it's constituants, then let's worry about our differences.
"When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
The Right and Left DO NOT want the same things for their country.
In my2hands defense, the common folk should not be identified with the Right and Left. Most people are in the middle, and do share common goals.
They do agree something should be done to stop Islamic fundamentalism, but can be misled as to what to do about it.
They agree that people have rights, but are (unfortunately) willing to give them up if it means that we can stop terrorism.
They agree life is precious, but don't know what that means in terms of a fetus, or a quadraplegic who might need stem cell research to achieve a life that we all take for granted.
So the goals are very much the same, in the broad sense.
these are the stances that the current administation takes, but many people who consider themselves Republicans or Conservatives don't necessarily agree with many, some, or all of this. You we do have some differences, but if you really look at what people truely want out of life, we have much more in common. We all want financial security, a safe environment to raise a family, decent healthcare so that the financial burden for medical care doesn't fall on our loved one, a good education for our children, and enough cahnge left in our pocket at the end of our working lifes to be able to enjoy retirement. Neither party really cares about that so we have to and we have to work together to make sure that our government initiates policies that are beneficial to us, not just their campaign supporters. Once we finally have a government that truely cares and respects it's constituants, then let's worry about our differences.
I would say to increase our say in government affairs and policy. I'm sure 100% of here would agree that the government for the most part does not act in our best interest.
I can support this. I say it SHOULD be game on...like Paster JeffD said...but it needs to be game on in the form that mammasan is talking about. We can argue all day on a stupid message board...but when it comes down to it...we need to be uniting and fighting these elected officials to do what we have asked them to do. No one is above fucking any of us over, simply because they have a D or R in front of their name while they appear on TV. The problem is finding issues that we can all unite on, or that we can all talk about in a nice manner. It's hard to do, emotions run high. Corruption runs rampant in our government too.
MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
Low Traffic CIO MIW
Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
I've certainly noticed how most LEFT leaners think they're RIGHT.
Well, it all depends on what "right" means, neo cons thought it was right to invade iraq, the left felt it was wrong, turns out the left was right.
unless the neo con feels that its right (the war), which doesnt matter because they would still be wrong because based on their claims before the war now 2 or whatever years later its been proven that iraq had no WMD thus proving that they were wrong and wont admit that the left was right.
Iraq in now a terrorist ground, iraq didnt have WMD,been more terror attacks around the world since the war.
I can support this. I say it SHOULD be game on...like Paster JeffD said...but it needs to be game on in the form that mammasan is talking about. We can argue all day on a stupid message board...but when it comes down to it...we need to be uniting and fighting these elected officials to do what we have asked them to do. No one is above fucking any of us over, simply because they have a D or R in front of their name while they appear on TV. The problem is finding issues that we can all unite on, or that we can all talk about in a nice manner. It's hard to do, emotions run high. Corruption runs rampant in our government too.
the PEOPLE must take back this democracy, because it is currently an auction
I can support this. I say it SHOULD be game on...like Paster JeffD said...but it needs to be game on in the form that mammasan is talking about. We can argue all day on a stupid message board...but when it comes down to it...we need to be uniting and fighting these elected officials to do what we have asked them to do. No one is above fucking any of us over, simply because they have a D or R in front of their name while they appear on TV. The problem is finding issues that we can all unite on, or that we can all talk about in a nice manner. It's hard to do, emotions run high. Corruption runs rampant in our government too.
Just to illustrate some examples; eminent domain. I'm sure all of us on this board, regardless of political ideology, call bullshit on this. Who the hell wants the government, weither it be federal, state, or municiple, taking their homes to put up a hotel or strip mall. Another is minimum wage. The Federal minimum wage has not change since 1997, yet the cost of living has. Also in that same time frame, the same politicians who have decided that minimumwage does not need to be increase have given themselves a 27% increase in pay. Again it doesn't matter what political party or ideology you align yourself with, this is just bullshit. Politicians from both parties are not serving our interests. This was a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Now it seems that it is a government above the people and for corporate interest.
"When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
Just to illustrate some examples; eminent domain. I'm sure all of us on this board, regardless of political ideology, call bullshit on this. Who the hell wants the government, weither it be federal, state, or municiple, taking their homes to put up a hotel or strip mall. Another is minimum wage. The Federal minimum wage has not change since 1997, yet the cost of living has. Also in that same time frame, the same politicians who have decided that minimumwage does not need to be increase have given themselves a 27% increase in pay. Again it doesn't matter what political party or ideology you align yourself with, this is just bullshit. Politicians from both parties are not serving our interests. This was a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Now it seems that it is a government above the people and for corporate interest.
applauds post... obviously one of the many talented, educated people of this board... great post...
The ruling on eminent domain opened up Pandora's box, I feel. The government can now take your home b/c it wants to build anything at all, public or private.
Take with it the ruling that they want to be able to take away your home and car if you declare bankruptcy. Since you need a credit check to rent a place anymore where will you live and how will you get to work if you live in a place w/o mass transit?
Add in our old friend the Patriot Act where the gov't canamong other things incarcerate you w/o due process.
Mix well and bake for 1 hour and what do you get?
Certainly not a government of the people, for the people and by the people.
The ruling on eminent domain opened up Pandora's box, I feel. The government can now take your home b/c it wants to build anything at all, public or private.
Take with it the ruling that they want to be able to take away your home and car if you declare bankruptcy. Since you need a credit check to rent a place anymore where will you live and how will you get to work if you live in a place w/o mass transit?
Add in our old friend the Patriot Act where the gov't canamong other things incarcerate you w/o due process.
Mix well and bake for 1 hour and what do you get?
Certainly not a government of the people, for the people and by the people.
absolutely on point good friend... and i assume that our friends on the right would agree with this as well...
Certainly not a government of the people, for the people and by the people.
Interesting you say that. I definitely agree; however, if you want evidence of how some don't agree (or just confuse things) check out Barroom Hero's post in the Sheehan thread.
if you wanna be a friend of mine
cross the river to the eastside
really? I'm a Con. I want those things. I'd prob disagree with the vehicle to do those things. But as it's been said before, that's where the difference is.
make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
Yes, we do. We just have different ideas on how to accomplish it.
i understand that average american conservatives have these goals, the problem is that the elite conservatives actions show a much different story, and distort the view us liberals have of the average conservative... especially this current group of people in power...their actions are speaking volumes...and we liberals are lead to believe that the average joe conservative is on board with these actions such as dismantling enviromental protections, imminent domain, and equal rights (gay rights is the 21st century version of this attempt to set the masses out against each other on a relatively non-issue)... i hope i made my point ?
Yes, we do. We just have different ideas on how to accomplish it.
Oh, really? Well, let's hear 'em!
How about you give me a better way to find a cure for deadly diseases than stem cell research? How about a con actually say that there just might be a problem with global warming instead of just dismissing it as whiny liberal rhetoric? How about the cons stop whining about their precious tax dollars going to the welfare system? (Not all poor folks take advantage of the system.)
Can't we people in the middle just go throw all the Conservatives AND Liberals out of power and put some new (YOUNGER) people in there?
i really don't understand how an 80 year old can speak for ANYONE in this country except his own age group.
We need more 30 year olds in there. People who are NOT career politicans. People who know what the hell is going on, know what people think and feel, and then represent the REAL people when they vote.
Sorry elderly, but you had your chance in the last 50 years to change the country and you just fucked it up. Time for some new generations to give it a try.
How about you give me a better way to find a cure for deadly diseases than stem cell research? How about a con actually say that there just might be a problem with global warming instead of just dismissing it as whiny liberal rhetoric? How about the cons stop whining about their precious tax dollars going to the welfare system? (Not all poor folks take advantage of the system.)
I don't have anything against stem cell research but why does it need public funding? Private stem cell research isn't banned like most people think.
There is a problem but how about we try to find a plan that takes into account countries like China...
Why can't we reform the system so that the people that truly need it can get it instead of people like ODB from the WUTang clan being able to pick up checks? Why can't we reform it to include some educational assistance so people can get training and not have to be kept on welfare indefinitely?
Yes, we do. We just have different ideas on how to accomplish it.quote]
Yeah, and Democrats on the Federal and State level have been calling for a raise in the minimum wage for a long time - or "worse" yet, a "living wage" to the cat-calls of 'SOCIALIST' by the vast majority on the Right.
The Patriot Act, the majority of Dems are for suspending it while it gets reviewed point-by-point, the majority of Republicans - just extend it - and EXPAND it.
The GOP wants the Private Sector to oversee our education, our environment, and our industrial regulation. Yeah, and the Private Sector just comes across as such a caring bunch - look at Enron, Wal-Mart, or Exxon. Great bunch of guys and gals*.
Also, you cant not say that you are against the corporate cronyism going on in the country and then say you are proud to be a Republican.
The GOP today IS the party of Corporate cronyism. Shit, it's the Corporate Party. Take a look at the soft money they take (it's about 70-30 in favor of the GOP) from mega-corporations, look at the bills they sponser, it's pretty easy to figure out.
By the way, I am in no-way defending the modern Democratic Party, they are enslaved by their own private interest masters. However, they are at least not happy to be enslaved by the corporations that truely run our "democracy".
*you might say "well that's better than a bloated government handling these things" to which Id say that government doesnt have to be bloated to ensure the welfare of the people and to regulate the industries -- you just have to balance the books, something Bush and his ilk are laughably unable to do.
I don't have anything against stem cell research but why does it need public funding? Private stem cell research isn't banned like most people think.
Why can't we reform the system so that the people that truly need it can get it instead of people like ODB from the WUTang clan being able to pick up checks? Why can't we reform it to include some educational assistance so people can get training and not have to be kept on welfare indefinitely?
Because the dollars arent there in Private research, not to the extent that is needed. Stem cell research could REVOLUTIONIZE medicine, it's the future, we either lead, follow, or get out of the way.
And we do have programs to get people educated -- Headstart, Pell Grants, all sorts of assistance - only problem is the GOP cuts the heart out of these programs every chance it gets (I have first hand knowledge of this - not myself but many friends).
And the welfare problem goes FAR beyond handing out checks and doing so wastefully. Shit, Id reckon that NAFTA (and other FTA) has done more harm to the working family (and our economy) than any amout of welfare paid out or welfare waste.
I must add, I am totally against welfare fraud - I think the penelties should be much harsher for people that fuck the system. However, I did read somewhere, a while ago, that it's cheaper for the government just to lose the money via fraud than it would be to oversee and correct the problem.
In the end, we need to get people OFF of welfare - true, but holding the minimum wage at 5.15, cutting after-school and educational programs, and letting ALL jobs be outsourced is NOT the way to do it.
Talk about enemies to freedom. It ain't the terrorists.
It's this kind of attitude is what makes us 'cons' believe you really do hate America. It ain't the terrorists...sheesh! You really need to watch the 9/11 documentary on the National Geographic Channel. It is you who needs to wake up.
It's this kind of attitude is what makes us 'cons' believe you really do hate America. It ain't the terrorists...sheesh! You really need to watch the 9/11 documentary on the National Geographic Channel. It is you who needs to wake up.
Not to speak for anyone, but I think what he means is that freedom can be destroyed by more than one enemy in more ways than one.
In my opinion, the Patriot Act destorys our freedoms... or has the dangerous potential to do so. Bush's "free speech zones" certainly casts doubt upon our freedoms. Shit, the sorry ass state of our press and their control by their corporate masters aint too good for our freedom either. Neither is voting machines that can not be audited.
But, yeah, fuck the terrorists too. Just wish we'd go after the ones that carried out 9/11.
The right does not believe that it is ok for people to live in poverty, they just have a different solvency then the left. The problem is that the loudest voices are often the most idiotic ridiculous mother fuckers, and we spend to much time attacking and defending them, while the logical people should just ignore them and fix things for themselves. Great post though, and you are right.
Ill agree with the second half of the above statement. However, I think it's not too far from true that Conservatives have a much more Darwinistic approach to social issues - "pull yourself up by the boot straps" type attitude... and it's only the effort given in most cases that decides who wins and who loses.
Look how often they associate welfare with people being lazy or abusing the system.
Im not saying that they WANT people to live in poverty, but I do think it doesnt rank as high on their priority list as it does for people on the Left. And, yea, maybe the Left spends too much time making excuses for the actual people that ARE lazy and DO rip off the system.
But I think it's falacy that we want the same thing - jezzus, how many times do I have to say it. The Patriot Act, abortion, flag burning, dissent against the war, stem cells, religion in public schools, public assistance programs.
Read beyond the headlines, listen beyond the soundbytes, and it's easy to see that the Left and the Right have TWO VERY DIFFERENT visions for America.
Now, I am applying this to the current leadership of both parties - not to people here that call them selves either Left or Right. But if you vote one way, you advocate the policies of the parties. You vote for Bush, you advocate the War in Iraq, deficit spending, banning stem cells, teachin ID in schools, etc...
Ill agree with the second half of the above statement. However, I think it's not too far from true that Conservatives have a much more Darwinistic approach to social issues - "pull yourself up by the boot straps" type attitude... and it's only the effort given in most cases that decides who wins and who loses.
Look how often they associate welfare with people being lazy or abusing the system.
Im not saying that they WANT people to live in poverty, but I do think it doesnt rank as high on their priority list as it does for people on the Left. And, yea, maybe the Left spends too much time making excuses for the actual people that ARE lazy and DO rip off the system.
But I think it's falacy that we want the same thing - jezzus, how many times do I have to say it. The Patriot Act, abortion, flag burning, dissent against the war, stem cells, religion in public schools, public assistance programs.
Read beyond the headlines, listen beyond the soundbytes, and it's easy to see that the Left and the Right have TWO VERY DIFFERENT visions for America.
Now, I am applying this to the current leadership of both parties - not to people here that call them selves either Left or Right. But if you vote one way, you advocate the policies of the parties. You vote for Bush, you advocate the War in Iraq, deficit spending, banning stem cells, teachin ID in schools, etc...
I can get past that.
I'm sure you can see as well that MANY people do abuse the welfare system. I've seen many people do it personally. Here are two examples:
One couple I know with three children receive welfare checks, food stamps, WIC and medi-cal (state funded medical coverage). They drive a brand new Chevy Tahoe and only shop at Abercrombie and Fitch. Neither of them are disabled (in fact they work out at the gym four times a week) and neither of them work.
The other couple with one child do both work, also collect WIC and medi-cal and own not one but two homes!! Also the state pays for their day-care. The kid is there nine hours a day, five days a week and with a babysitter on the weekends.
This behavior drives me insane!! In the meantime I am still paying the hospital for the baby I had eight months ago. All together the cost of that pregnancy and delivery cost $5900. You would not believe how often I heard "You should go on medi-cal." I'm not having a child if I can't pay for it myself. This country would be a lot less populated if we all had those same morals.
I don't agree that ODB should sum up everyone that's on welfare, even though he was a legend r.i.p.
Nobody here can pinpoint who exactly these "terrorists" we seem to conveniently encounter. I'm not talking about the media-reported identity of the actual bomber, I'm referring to the infrastructure behind it. Who really has that kind of organization in the underworld to pull off these huge events (9-11, Spain and UK train/bus bombings, Bali, etc...)?
Besides all the DC misconduct, we are even more slighted by the national media. The way they take these meaningless stories (in the grand scheme of things) and run with them, it's such bullshit and no one seems to mind. Athletes on steriods, Natalie Holloway, MJ and his ongoing saga,.... How in the hell does this affect anyone's day-to-day life?
Until the media and subsequently everyone else starts taking our gov't process seriously year-round, then this cycle of petty R v. D issues will continue.
Comments
these are the stances that the current administation takes, but many people who consider themselves Republicans or Conservatives don't necessarily agree with many, some, or all of this. You we do have some differences, but if you really look at what people truely want out of life, we have much more in common. We all want financial security, a safe environment to raise a family, decent healthcare so that the financial burden for medical care doesn't fall on our loved one, a good education for our children, and enough cahnge left in our pocket at the end of our working lifes to be able to enjoy retirement. Neither party really cares about that so we have to and we have to work together to make sure that our government initiates policies that are beneficial to us, not just their campaign supporters. Once we finally have a government that truely cares and respects it's constituants, then let's worry about our differences.
In my2hands defense, the common folk should not be identified with the Right and Left. Most people are in the middle, and do share common goals.
They do agree something should be done to stop Islamic fundamentalism, but can be misled as to what to do about it.
They agree that people have rights, but are (unfortunately) willing to give them up if it means that we can stop terrorism.
They agree life is precious, but don't know what that means in terms of a fetus, or a quadraplegic who might need stem cell research to achieve a life that we all take for granted.
So the goals are very much the same, in the broad sense.
AKA...corporations rule the day
I can support this. I say it SHOULD be game on...like Paster JeffD said...but it needs to be game on in the form that mammasan is talking about. We can argue all day on a stupid message board...but when it comes down to it...we need to be uniting and fighting these elected officials to do what we have asked them to do. No one is above fucking any of us over, simply because they have a D or R in front of their name while they appear on TV. The problem is finding issues that we can all unite on, or that we can all talk about in a nice manner. It's hard to do, emotions run high. Corruption runs rampant in our government too.
High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
Low Traffic CIO MIW
Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
Well, it all depends on what "right" means, neo cons thought it was right to invade iraq, the left felt it was wrong, turns out the left was right.
unless the neo con feels that its right (the war), which doesnt matter because they would still be wrong because based on their claims before the war now 2 or whatever years later its been proven that iraq had no WMD thus proving that they were wrong and wont admit that the left was right.
Iraq in now a terrorist ground, iraq didnt have WMD,been more terror attacks around the world since the war.
How was the war right?
the PEOPLE must take back this democracy, because it is currently an auction
Just to illustrate some examples; eminent domain. I'm sure all of us on this board, regardless of political ideology, call bullshit on this. Who the hell wants the government, weither it be federal, state, or municiple, taking their homes to put up a hotel or strip mall. Another is minimum wage. The Federal minimum wage has not change since 1997, yet the cost of living has. Also in that same time frame, the same politicians who have decided that minimumwage does not need to be increase have given themselves a 27% increase in pay. Again it doesn't matter what political party or ideology you align yourself with, this is just bullshit. Politicians from both parties are not serving our interests. This was a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Now it seems that it is a government above the people and for corporate interest.
applauds post... obviously one of the many talented, educated people of this board... great post...
Take with it the ruling that they want to be able to take away your home and car if you declare bankruptcy. Since you need a credit check to rent a place anymore where will you live and how will you get to work if you live in a place w/o mass transit?
Add in our old friend the Patriot Act where the gov't canamong other things incarcerate you w/o due process.
Mix well and bake for 1 hour and what do you get?
Certainly not a government of the people, for the people and by the people.
absolutely on point good friend... and i assume that our friends on the right would agree with this as well...
Interesting you say that. I definitely agree; however, if you want evidence of how some don't agree (or just confuse things) check out Barroom Hero's post in the Sheehan thread.
cross the river to the eastside
really? I'm a Con. I want those things. I'd prob disagree with the vehicle to do those things. But as it's been said before, that's where the difference is.
Yes, we do. We just have different ideas on how to accomplish it.
We are trying to have a reasoned discussion here. if you have nothing to add then please move along.
I think its important to seperate conservatives from the neo conservatives, so going around saying con, is not quite accurate,
i understand that average american conservatives have these goals, the problem is that the elite conservatives actions show a much different story, and distort the view us liberals have of the average conservative... especially this current group of people in power...their actions are speaking volumes...and we liberals are lead to believe that the average joe conservative is on board with these actions such as dismantling enviromental protections, imminent domain, and equal rights (gay rights is the 21st century version of this attempt to set the masses out against each other on a relatively non-issue)... i hope i made my point ?
How about you give me a better way to find a cure for deadly diseases than stem cell research? How about a con actually say that there just might be a problem with global warming instead of just dismissing it as whiny liberal rhetoric? How about the cons stop whining about their precious tax dollars going to the welfare system? (Not all poor folks take advantage of the system.)
i really don't understand how an 80 year old can speak for ANYONE in this country except his own age group.
We need more 30 year olds in there. People who are NOT career politicans. People who know what the hell is going on, know what people think and feel, and then represent the REAL people when they vote.
Sorry elderly, but you had your chance in the last 50 years to change the country and you just fucked it up. Time for some new generations to give it a try.
I don't have anything against stem cell research but why does it need public funding? Private stem cell research isn't banned like most people think.
There is a problem but how about we try to find a plan that takes into account countries like China...
Why can't we reform the system so that the people that truly need it can get it instead of people like ODB from the WUTang clan being able to pick up checks? Why can't we reform it to include some educational assistance so people can get training and not have to be kept on welfare indefinitely?
Because the dollars arent there in Private research, not to the extent that is needed. Stem cell research could REVOLUTIONIZE medicine, it's the future, we either lead, follow, or get out of the way.
And we do have programs to get people educated -- Headstart, Pell Grants, all sorts of assistance - only problem is the GOP cuts the heart out of these programs every chance it gets (I have first hand knowledge of this - not myself but many friends).
And the welfare problem goes FAR beyond handing out checks and doing so wastefully. Shit, Id reckon that NAFTA (and other FTA) has done more harm to the working family (and our economy) than any amout of welfare paid out or welfare waste.
I must add, I am totally against welfare fraud - I think the penelties should be much harsher for people that fuck the system. However, I did read somewhere, a while ago, that it's cheaper for the government just to lose the money via fraud than it would be to oversee and correct the problem.
In the end, we need to get people OFF of welfare - true, but holding the minimum wage at 5.15, cutting after-school and educational programs, and letting ALL jobs be outsourced is NOT the way to do it.
Not by a long shot.
It's this kind of attitude is what makes us 'cons' believe you really do hate America. It ain't the terrorists...sheesh! You really need to watch the 9/11 documentary on the National Geographic Channel. It is you who needs to wake up.
Not to speak for anyone, but I think what he means is that freedom can be destroyed by more than one enemy in more ways than one.
In my opinion, the Patriot Act destorys our freedoms... or has the dangerous potential to do so. Bush's "free speech zones" certainly casts doubt upon our freedoms. Shit, the sorry ass state of our press and their control by their corporate masters aint too good for our freedom either. Neither is voting machines that can not be audited.
But, yeah, fuck the terrorists too. Just wish we'd go after the ones that carried out 9/11.
We haven't already?
Yeah, we're in Iraq too, but we haven't stopped in Afgahnistan.
Ill agree with the second half of the above statement. However, I think it's not too far from true that Conservatives have a much more Darwinistic approach to social issues - "pull yourself up by the boot straps" type attitude... and it's only the effort given in most cases that decides who wins and who loses.
Look how often they associate welfare with people being lazy or abusing the system.
Im not saying that they WANT people to live in poverty, but I do think it doesnt rank as high on their priority list as it does for people on the Left. And, yea, maybe the Left spends too much time making excuses for the actual people that ARE lazy and DO rip off the system.
But I think it's falacy that we want the same thing - jezzus, how many times do I have to say it. The Patriot Act, abortion, flag burning, dissent against the war, stem cells, religion in public schools, public assistance programs.
Read beyond the headlines, listen beyond the soundbytes, and it's easy to see that the Left and the Right have TWO VERY DIFFERENT visions for America.
Now, I am applying this to the current leadership of both parties - not to people here that call them selves either Left or Right. But if you vote one way, you advocate the policies of the parties. You vote for Bush, you advocate the War in Iraq, deficit spending, banning stem cells, teachin ID in schools, etc...
I can get past that.
Well, we let Bin Laden escape in Tora Bora. We've allowed much of the country to be run by poppy growing war-lords, the Talliban has crept back in.
The border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is fuckin rife with Al Queda -- we havent near the troops there to really stomp them out.
Come on, we BOTH know where our priorities are. Dont jerk me around and say that we've got our eyes equally on both theaters of combat.
And I never bash America - I love my country - I only "bash" people and things that I think are hurting the country I love (que Star Spangled Banner).
I'm sure you can see as well that MANY people do abuse the welfare system. I've seen many people do it personally. Here are two examples:
One couple I know with three children receive welfare checks, food stamps, WIC and medi-cal (state funded medical coverage). They drive a brand new Chevy Tahoe and only shop at Abercrombie and Fitch. Neither of them are disabled (in fact they work out at the gym four times a week) and neither of them work.
The other couple with one child do both work, also collect WIC and medi-cal and own not one but two homes!! Also the state pays for their day-care. The kid is there nine hours a day, five days a week and with a babysitter on the weekends.
This behavior drives me insane!! In the meantime I am still paying the hospital for the baby I had eight months ago. All together the cost of that pregnancy and delivery cost $5900. You would not believe how often I heard "You should go on medi-cal." I'm not having a child if I can't pay for it myself. This country would be a lot less populated if we all had those same morals.
I don't agree that ODB should sum up everyone that's on welfare, even though he was a legend r.i.p.
Nobody here can pinpoint who exactly these "terrorists" we seem to conveniently encounter. I'm not talking about the media-reported identity of the actual bomber, I'm referring to the infrastructure behind it. Who really has that kind of organization in the underworld to pull off these huge events (9-11, Spain and UK train/bus bombings, Bali, etc...)?
Besides all the DC misconduct, we are even more slighted by the national media. The way they take these meaningless stories (in the grand scheme of things) and run with them, it's such bullshit and no one seems to mind. Athletes on steriods, Natalie Holloway, MJ and his ongoing saga,.... How in the hell does this affect anyone's day-to-day life?
Until the media and subsequently everyone else starts taking our gov't process seriously year-round, then this cycle of petty R v. D issues will continue.