How can Ed and others be so blind?

1235

Comments

  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    NMyTree wrote:
    Parents who truely love their children and want a real future full of personal freedom and opportunities, want real change from the status quo. Not smoke and mirrors.

    A future full of real changes where my children won't be dragged into trumped-up, phoney wars that benefit the military industrial complex, elite oil tycoons and other corporate interests.

    A future where their country/government does not hold hypocritical, double-standards to countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan; all for their own selfish interests.

    A future where the international community will respect the United States of America for NOT supporting ruthless, murdering dictators and viloent regimes; because it just so happens to suit their greedy agenda. While condemning and attacking those that do not suit their agenda.

    A future where all Americans are treated equally. A future where the " elite and privilege " are held to the same laws that apply to everyone else.

    A future of real change.

    Not future full some slick-talking, game show host double-talk posturing and sales pitches.

    Real change for those of use who truely love our children.
    Agreed.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    just posted this in the "obama is approaching" thread, and it just occurred to me... for those of you confounded by ed's support of obama- a mainstream candidate!- maybe it's because he's a father now and has come to realize that there are certain things in life more important than perfection, especially in a candidate.

    you see, in my experience, once you become a parent, your view of everything radically changes. suddenly, you are responsible for this little life, and you need to do whatever it takes to nurture and protect them. but you also realize that there are some things that used to seem monumentally important to you that really don't anymore. or their importance is diminished by your understanding of the need to filter everything through a "what really makes a difference?" screen. and supporting a candidate like nader, who cannot ever, ever, ever win the general election, now seems like an exercise in mental masturbation. sure, it makes you feel all tingly, but there's no real change in your life because of it.

    maybe in obama, ed sees a future that's brighter, a path that can lead to an enlightened america, one that is respected again by the world and by its own citizens. maybe in obama, ed sees his daughter growing up in a world that has more tolerance, more compassion, more hope. i know i do.


    AWESOME post!
  • sweetpotatosweetpotato Posts: 1,278
    _outlaw wrote:
    not in this particular case. I'm just one in general. doesn't affect this though.

    trust me, it affects everything. even this.
    "Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."

    "Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore

    "i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
    ~ed, 8/7
  • sweetpotatosweetpotato Posts: 1,278
    _outlaw wrote:
    Again, that's not exactly true. you vote for who will change this country because that affects you in some ways, but of course at the end of the day, it's mainly about the country as a whole, not you personally.

    :confused:
    why do you say stuff like this as if you KNOW it's a fact? "but of course..." that's just stupid. you sound childish making such a naive claim.
    "Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."

    "Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore

    "i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
    ~ed, 8/7
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    trust me, it affects everything. even this.

    :confused:
    why do you say stuff like this as if you KNOW it's a fact? "trust me..." that's just stupid. you sound childish making such a naive claim.
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    :confused:
    why do you say stuff like this as if you KNOW it's a fact? "but of course..." that's just stupid. you sound childish making such a naive claim.
    if Barack Obama wins the presidency, is he going to come into your house and feed your child?

    No.

    he's going to affect the country and its policies towards you, but not you DIRECTLY. it is a fact. this isn't even debatable.
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    NMyTree wrote:
    Parents who truely love their children and want a real future full of personal freedom and opportunities, want real change from the status quo. Not smoke and mirrors.

    A future full of real changes where my children won't be dragged into trumped-up, phoney wars that benefit the military industrial complex, elite oil tycoons and other corporate interests.

    A future where both Israel and Palestine are equally held accountable and responsible for their actions and contributions to a neverending parade of violence, murder and discrimination.

    A future where their country/government does not hold hypocritical, double-standards to countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan; all for their own selfish interests.

    A future where the international community will respect the United States of America for NOT supporting ruthless, murdering dictators and viloent regimes; because it just so happens to suit their greedy agenda. While condemning and attacking those that do not suit their agenda.

    A future where all Americans are treated equally. A future where the " elite and privileged " are held to the same laws that apply to everyone else.

    A future of real change.

    Not a future full of some slick-talking, game show host double-talk posturing and sales pitches.

    Real change for those of use who truely love our children.
    Very nice, my friend...and insightful...and totally right on! :)
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    I cant think of many people I respect more than Uncle Bruce, Uncle Neil, Dylan, Ed, Bright Eyes, etc...

    They exhude class and integrity in a world of fake and lies.

    Which makes their support of Obama all the more head scratching.

    Matt Taibbi talked about the 2 possible options. Either Obama really is a person who will change things, or he is the epitome of the disturbing lenghts to which the system continues to reinvent and package itself as something it isnt.

    Obama isnt radical. He is a centrist. He isnt even antiwar. He will continue to keep troops in the middle east. Every single person I listed above is for pulling ALL troops out of the war. Many were antiwar before the war even began. Uncle Bruce was saying "Impeach Bush" and "bring em home" in 2003.

    These are all intelligent rockers, intelligent individuals, who, I think I am not alone in saying this, helped in some way to shape my outlook on politics and life in general.

    Obama's wearing the "mellencamp and uncle bruce" rolled up shirts is laughable. Bruce speaks to me and to us.

    All Obama and Mccain want is our votes. There isnt gold at the end of the Election 2008 rainbow. Obama is a liar, all politicians are.

    What doesnt make sense is why people act like obama is something different? We have hundreds of years of history, and every single election have been let down. Politicians are liars, BY NATURE. Why is obama exempt?

    The war wont end by voting politicians into office. Nothing has ever changed by that action. The real power lies in people getting pissed and doing something to stop the madness. I dont put trust in politicians.

    But this website has been ground zero for the past 12 months for the Obama change wagon. Now that you all realized you been suckered you wanna blame Ed? Cmon now.
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    rocketman wrote:
    But this website has been ground zero for the past 12 months for the Obama change wagon. Now that you all realized you been suckered you wanna blame Ed? Cmon now.

    Nah, several of us have seen the Obama campaign for what it really is, all along. Several of us were not seduced at all. And we have often shared those thoughts and opinions, here.
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    NMyTree wrote:
    Nah, several of us who have seen the Obama campaign for what it really is, all along. Several of us were not seduced at all. And we have often shared those thoughts and opinions, here.
    How would someone with only 15 posts know what this site was like for the last year? Only posts once a month?

    I smell a McCain plant.

    Oh, and the Obama campaign is pretty much playing out as I, a supporter, expected. The paradigm of starry-eyed, rapturous, lovey-dovey idealists being the primary support for Senator Obama is a media creation, as opposed to the idea that Obama is a media creation himself. According to an independent study, the vast majority of Obama's coverage - over 70% - has been negative. McCain's coverage has been slightly negative, but closer to 50/50.
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    RainDog wrote:
    How would someone with only 15 posts know what this site was like for the last year? Only posts once a month?

    I smell a McCain plant.

    You could be right. But there are other possibilities.

    As for McCain, I have no love for him or his campaign. Clinton, too.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    NMyTree wrote:
    You could be right. But there are other possibilities.

    As for McCain, I have no love for him or his campaign. Clinton, too.


    are there any politicians you like or support? any at all? if so, who?
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    my2hands wrote:
    are there any politicians you like or support? any at all? if so, who?

    You already know the answer to those questions. But I'll play along, this time.

    1) Yes.

    2) Didn't you see my answer the first time? :D Yes, of course.

    3) Dennis Kucinich, Ralph Nader, Matt Gonzalez. Hell, I'd even take Ron Paul over any of the Three Mainstream Stooges.


    You? Other than Obama, what other politicians do you like or support?
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    angelica wrote:
    Very nice, my friend...and insightful...and totally right on! :)


    Why thank you, sweetie.
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    RainDog wrote:
    According to an independent study, the vast majority of Obama's coverage - over 70% - has been negative. McCain's coverage has been slightly negative, but closer to 50/50.
    Not that I don't believe you, but do you mind giving me more information as to where this independent study may be? Like a link or something?
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    Blinded By The Light


    Madman drummers bummers and Indians in the summer with a teenage diplomat
    In the dumps with the mumps as the adolescent pumps his way into his hat
    With a boulder on my shoulder feelin' kinda older I tripped the merry-go-round
    With this very unpleasing sneezing and wheezing the calliope crashed to the ground
    Some all-hot half-shot was headin' for the hot spot snappin' his fingers clappin' his hands
    And some fleshpot mascot was tied into a lover's knot with a whatnot in her hand
    And now young Scott with a slingshot finally found a tender spot and throws his lover in the sand
    And some bloodshot forget-me-not whispers daddy's within earshot save the buckshot turn up the band

    And she was blinded by the light
    Cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night
    Blinded by the light
    She got down but she never got tight, but she'll make it alright

    Some brimstone baritone anti-cyclone rolling stone preacher from the east
    He says: "Dethrone the dictaphone, hit it in its funny bone, that's where they expect it least"
    And some new-mown chaperone was standin' in the corner all alone watchin' the young girls dance
    And some fresh-sown moonstone was messin' with his frozen zone to remind him of the feeling of romance

    Yeah he was blinded by the light
    Cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night
    Blinded by the light
    He got down but she never got tight, but he's gonna make it tonight

    Some silicone sister with her manager's mister told me I got what it takes
    She said I'll turn you on sonny, to something strong if you play that song with the funky break,
    And go-cart Mozart was checkin' out the weather chart to see if it was safe to go outside
    And little Early-Pearly came in by her curly-wurly and asked me if I needed a ride,
    Oh, some hazard from Harvard was skunked on beer playin' backyard bombardier
    Yes and Scotland Yard was trying hard, they sent a dude with a calling card,
    he said, do what you like, but don't do it here
    Well I jumped up, turnedaround, spit in the air, fell on the ground
    Asked him which was the way back home
    He said take a right at the light, keep goin' straight until night, and then boy, you're on your own

    And now in Zanzibar a shootin' star was ridin' in a side car hummin' a lunar tune
    Yes, and the avatar said blow the bar but first remove the cookie jar we're gonna teach those boys to laugh too soon

    And some kidnapped handicap was complainin' that he caught the clap from some mousetrap he bought last night,

    Well I unsnapped his skull cap and between his ears I saw
    a gap but figured he'd be all right

    He was just blinded by the light
    Cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night
    Blinded by the light
    Mama always told me not to look into the sights of the sun
    Oh but mama that's where the fun is


    Copyright © Bruce Springsteen (ASCAP)
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    _outlaw wrote:
    Not that I don't believe you, but do you mind giving me more information as to where this independent study may be? Like a link or something?
    Here is an LA Times piece about it. The independent study was done by The Center for Media and Public Affairs.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-onthemedia27-2008jul27,0,6802141.story?page=1
  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    NMyTree wrote:
    Nah, several of us have seen the Obama campaign for what it really is, all along. Several of us were not seduced at all. And we have often shared those thoughts and opinions, here.
    Im sure you were. I think its hysterical when you back a few months time on this board and look at all the Obama lovin and Hillary bashin that was goin on. Now that it is apparent that Obama is just another politician doing what all politicans do, lie to get elected, that lot is now in hiding or lurking in shame.
  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    RainDog wrote:
    How would someone with only 15 posts know what this site was like for the last year? Only posts once a month?

    I smell a McCain plant.

    Oh, and the Obama campaign is pretty much playing out as I, a supporter, expected. The paradigm of starry-eyed, rapturous, lovey-dovey idealists being the primary support for Senator Obama is a media creation, as opposed to the idea that Obama is a media creation himself. According to an independent study, the vast majority of Obama's coverage - over 70% - has been negative. McCain's coverage has been slightly negative, but closer to 50/50.
    And so what if I am a McCain supporter? If you must know I WAS a Clinton supporter and thought Obama was lying through his teeth to get nominated. I was right. So keep the conspiracy theories to yourself. They are baseless.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    NMyTree wrote:

    3) Dennis Kucinich, Ralph Nader, Matt Gonzalez. Hell, I'd even take Ron Paul over any of the Three Mainstream Stooges.


    You? Other than Obama, what other politicians do you like or support?

    1. Ralph Nader is not a politician. he has never, and will never hold an elected public office

    2. Matt Gonzalez? he was like a city councilman for 5 minutes and lost the mayors race? not sure i would consider him a politician yet... Dennis is the man

    surely there are more then that you like?

    Just off the top if my head here are some senators I like and support, with a house member or 2 thrown in:
    Barbara Boxer (she is AWESOME)
    Pat Leahy
    Bernie Sanders (Independent socialist from Vermont)
    Ted Kennedy
    Carl Levin
    Jon Tester
    Claire McCaskill
    Jim Webb
    Robert Byrd
    Barack Obama
    Carl Levin
    Joe Biden
    Dennis Kucinich (House)
    Charles Rangel (House)
    Hillary Clinton

    i am sure there are more.. if i think of them i will post them...


    I get the feeling that alot of folks around here dont really follow things closely, or comprehend them... i always see folks posting about the democrat controlled senate (bullshit) and that there are no good politicians and such... like they are all evil and not to be trusted... there are some tremendous politicians out there that i agree with on alot of issues and like the issues they fight for and vote for... Like Obama's bill to end the war by March 08 that passed the house and senate and was VETO'd by the president
  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    my2hands wrote:
    1. Ralph Nader is not a politician. he has never, and will never hold an elected public office

    2. Matt Gonzalez? he was like a city councilman for 5 minutes and lost the mayors race? not sure i would consider him a politician yet... Dennis is the man

    surely there are more then that you like?

    Just off the top if my head here are some senators I like and support, with a house member or 2 thrown in:
    Barbara Boxer (she is AWESOME)
    Pat Leahy
    Bernie Sanders (indendent socialist from vermont)
    Ted Kennedy
    Carl Levin
    Jon Tester
    Claire McCaskill
    Jim Webb
    Robert Byrd
    Barack Obama
    Carl Levin
    Joe Biden
    Dennis Kucinich (House)
    Charles Rangel (House)
    Hillary Clinton


    I get the feeling that alot of folks around here dont really follow things closely, or comprehend them... i always see folks posting about the democrat controlled senate (bullshit) and that there are no good politicians and such... like they are are evil and not to be trusted... there are some tremendous politicians out there that i agree with on alot of issues and like the issues they fight for and vote for... Like Obama's bill to end the war by March 08 that passed the house and senate and was VETO'd by the president

    All very qualified.
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    rocketman wrote:
    All very qualified.
    You did see that Obama's on that list, right? ;)
  • AnonAnon Posts: 11,175
    rocketman wrote:
    Im sure you were. I think its hysterical when you back a few months time on this board and look at all the Obama lovin and Hillary bashin that was goin on. Now that it is apparent that Obama is just another politician doing what all politicans do, lie to get elected, that lot is now in hiding or lurking in shame.
    Who's hiding or lurking in shame?
  • Smellyman2Smellyman2 Posts: 689
    RainDog wrote:
    Here is an LA Times piece about it. The independent study was done by The Center for Media and Public Affairs.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-onthemedia27-2008jul27,0,6802141.story?page=1

    The center for Media and Public Affairs is far from independent and unbiased...


    but I suspect you already knew that.
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    Smellyman wrote:
    The center for Media and Public Affairs is far from independent and unbiased...


    but I suspect you already knew that.
    Actually I didn't. Looking into it, though, if it leans in any direction, it's to the right. That makes the study even more interesting, imo.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Media_and_Public_Affairs
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    RainDog wrote:
    Here is an LA Times piece about it. The independent study was done by The Center for Media and Public Affairs.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-onthemedia27-2008jul27,0,6802141.story?page=1



    that IS very interesting since many seem to see him as the media's 'golden boy.' especially interesting if, as you pointed out, that the center if it indeed has a bias, is more right-leaning. hmmmmm.



    it's funny really, b/c i DON'T watch tv, so i don't get bombarded with media at all. IF i do turn on the tv, it's b/c there is something i specifically want to see, and that is rare. so i get the bulk of my information thru online and print media. of course bias exists in all forms, but i think not being bombarded with visual/auditory messages, it is different. for me, i prefer it this way.


    few highlights from the linked article above:

    The Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University, where researchers have tracked network news content for two decades, found that ABC, NBC and CBS were tougher on Obama than on Republican John McCain during the first six weeks of the general-election campaign.

    You read it right: tougher on the Democrat.

    During the evening news, the majority of statements from reporters and anchors on all three networks are neutral, the center found. And when network news people ventured opinions in recent weeks, 28% of the statements were positive for Obama and 72% negative.

    Network reporting also tilted against McCain, but far less dramatically, with 43% of the statements positive and 57% negative, according to the Washington-based media center.


    ***

    I wrote last week that the networks should do more to better balance the air time. But I also suggested that much of the attention to Obama was far from glowing.

    That earned a spasm of e-mails that described me as irrational, unpatriotic and . . . somehow . . . French.

    But the center's director, RobertLichter, who has won conservative hearts with several of his previous studies, told me the facts were the facts.

    "This information should blow away this silly assumption that more coverage is always better coverage," he said.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • sweetpotatosweetpotato Posts: 1,278
    _outlaw wrote:
    :confused:
    why do you say stuff like this as if you KNOW it's a fact? "trust me..." that's just stupid. you sound childish making such a naive claim.


    i can make that claim because you ARE being an a$$hole, and therefore it affects EVEN THIS.

    not real complicated, hunnybunny.
    "Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."

    "Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore

    "i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
    ~ed, 8/7
  • sweetpotatosweetpotato Posts: 1,278
    _outlaw wrote:
    if Barack Obama wins the presidency, is he going to come into your house and feed your child?

    No.

    he's going to affect the country and its policies towards you, but not you DIRECTLY. it is a fact. this isn't even debatable.


    you're not staying on track with what i said. i said that, in my experience, people vote in their own best interests. why are you having such a hard time following this bouncing ball? how people VOTE and how those votes ultimately AFFECT THEM are two separate things. one is the action, the other is the result. clearer now??
    "Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."

    "Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore

    "i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
    ~ed, 8/7
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    you're not staying on track with what i said. i said that, in my experience, people vote in their own best interests. why are you having such a hard time following this bouncing ball? how people VOTE and how those votes ultimately AFFECT THEM are two separate things. one is the action, the other is the result. clearer now??
    no.

    people vote in terms of how the candidate will affect this country, which affects them. the candidate does not directly affect the person who votes for him (unless you're a lobbyist).

    GET IT?!?@!??!?!?
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    i can make that claim because you ARE being an a$$hole, and therefore it affects EVEN THIS.

    not real complicated, hunnybunny.
    calling me an asshole and hunnybunny at the same time?

    what are you, bipolar?

    ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.