Rumsfeld Gone!!!!!!!!!!

robbierobbie Posts: 883
edited November 2006 in A Moving Train
watching msnbc..... rumsfeld resigns!!!!!!!
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1345

Comments

  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    I don't think it matters much, he's already helped fuck things up so much.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    God damn you beat me to it. This is even greater news than the Republicans losing the House.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • lgtlgt Posts: 720
    Seriously?!!!

    In that case:

    WOO HOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    Holy Shit. I just looked at the CNN and MSNBC websites, and the "breaking news" states that Rumsfeld 'may' be stepping down, inside sources say.

    If he is, do you think it's 'cause he's skeer'd?
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    mammasan wrote:
    God damn you beat me to it. This is even greater news than the Republicans losing the House.

    Why is it great news?

    I do not support or oppose him, but I wonder if you could list your reasons.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • robbierobbie Posts: 883
    lgt wrote:
    Seriously?!!!

    In that case:

    WOO HOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D



    i would NEVER joke about such WONDERFUL NEWS!!!!!!!
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    Listed as breaking news atop CNN.com............."sources say"....may not be true, yet.
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • robbie wrote:
    watching msnbc..... rumsfeld resigns!!!!!!!



    Thank God!


    I still want this guy pay for all the shit he has done. He has to much blood on his hands to just walk away.
  • mybe he's just going into hiding and plans on being the whitemans Osama?
    >>>>
    >
    ...a lover and a fighter.
    "I'm at least half a bum" Rocky Balboa

    http://www.videosift.com/video/Obamas-Message-To-American-Indians

    Edmonton, AB. September 5th, 2005
    Vancouver, BC. April 3rd, 2008
    Calgary,AB. August 8th, 2009
  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    tybird wrote:
    Listed as breaking news atop CNN.com............."sources say"....may not be true, yet.

    it's been confirmed.
    Bush is to speak at 1
  • robbierobbie Posts: 883
    i never "smoke" before 10 am...... but it is 9:56 and this is a special occasion........!!!!!!
  • Hot Damn! What a great day to be a Democrat!
  • lgtlgt Posts: 720
    robbie wrote:
    i would NEVER joke about such WONDERFUL NEWS!!!!!!!

    EXCELLENT!!!!

    Today is ending (European time) on an even better note than when it started! :)
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    I'm speechless!! Been waiting to hear this for 6 years. But unfortunately, the damage is done.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    know1 wrote:
    Why is it great news?

    I do not support or oppose him, but I wonder if you could list your reasons.



    you have to be kidding
  • robbie wrote:
    i never "smoke" before 10 am...... but it is 9:56 and this is a special occasion........!!!!!!


    I’d say this, coupled with the Dems taking back (what looks to be both houses) it’s time to break out the Champaign.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    my2hands wrote:
    you have to be kidding

    Nope. I think the people calling for his resignation are mainly doing so because that's what they think they are supposed to do.

    I'd honestly like someone to list why they are happy he's gone.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    know1 wrote:
    Why is it great news?

    I do not support or oppose him, but I wonder if you could list your reasons.

    Reasons:

    1. Unwilling to listen to pre-war strategist about troop numbers needed for post-war occupation.

    2. Having no real exit strategy before, during, and even after the invasion.

    3. Sending troops into battle without all the necessary equipment and then having the gall to say you go to war with the army you have.

    Those are just off off the top of my head. I am thankful that he is gone.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • lgtlgt Posts: 720
    robbie wrote:
    i would NEVER joke about such WONDERFUL NEWS!!!!!!!

    It's breaking news on the Italian online media too now.

    Nothing on the BBC yet.

    SUCH FANTASTIC NEWS!!!!

    Who said that nothing would change with the Democrats winning?!!

    It's starting already!
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    That's the best news i've heard all day!
  • aNiMaLaNiMaL Posts: 7,117
    That is fucking AWESOME!!!!!!
  • lgtlgt Posts: 720
    mammasan wrote:
    Reasons:

    1. Unwilling to listen to pre-war strategist about troop numbers needed for post-war occupation.

    2. Having no real exit strategy before, during, and even after the invasion.

    3. Sending troops into battle without all the necessary equipment and then having the gall to say you go to war with the army you have.

    Those are just off off the top of my head. I am thankful that he is gone.

    If I can add to your list above...

    4. Lying about WMD and therefore using a false pretext for a war, that had no legitimate basis
  • Dr Bob Gates will replace him.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    know1 wrote:
    Why is it great news?

    I do not support or oppose him, but I wonder if you could list your reasons.

    do you think he should stay...and if so, why...?
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    mammasan wrote:
    Reasons:

    1. Unwilling to listen to pre-war strategist about troop numbers needed for post-war occupation.

    2. Having no real exit strategy before, during, and even after the invasion.

    3. Sending troops into battle without all the necessary equipment and then having the gall to say you go to war with the army you have.

    Those are just off off the top of my head. I am thankful that he is gone.


    So what would you have done differently?

    1. After you listened, what would you have done - sent more troops? Didn't we win the battle portion of the war very, very easily?

    2. Do you know there's no exit strategy, or is it just that it hasn't been explained to you?

    3. Necessary equipment is highly debatable. Again, wasn't the battle over in just a matter of days? How would more troops or different equipment change that?
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    know1 wrote:
    So what would you have done differently?


    not invade....
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    And the Dems have won the Montana senate seat!!
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    know1 wrote:
    Again, wasn't the battle over in just a matter of days?
    WTF?!?!?!?
Sign In or Register to comment.