What if they don't know the way and they seek guidance?
You need to offer them something.
...
Well... I did that already. To me... the Guides were basically full of shit and followed a well scripted line of crap. I tried... a couple of three or four times... I really did... but, no... not for me.
That's why I figured, I need to find God in my own way. The ones I've already asked for directions have lead me to the same dead end. I believe God wants me to find Him... eventually. I just think He wants me to make new discoveries along the way.
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
15"But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,"
in other words, be prepared to share your faith with all who ask, but don't beat folks about the head with it or in other ways be a dick about it. You are coming across as self righteous and holier than thou. Easy, tiger
Gentleness and respect, yes, but this was no reason to be silent. No one is coming off self-righteous or holier than thou except for the guy who misuses scripture to further secular humanist ends. That's the desecration.
Peter and the apostles were martyred (except for John) for the Gospel. They did not go gently into that good night. They brazenly preached to the Sanhedrin.
These were not hippies. By gentleness and respect, they meant that you would not spread your faith by the point of a sword. Peter was talking to the early oppressed christian community in that scripture, if you cared to include the context.
They would indicate that they were Christians in public so they could be executed as martyrs. What is "gentle" about that?
I don't come off nearly as self-righteous as Peter does, don't you think?
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
**GASP** A suicide mission ?????? I thought the terrorists were heathens for committing suicide for their religion?
If by "committing suicide for their religion" you mean saying "I'm a Christian" and then being burned alive by pagans, well yes. Martyrdom. Not blowing yourself up in a crowded restaurant.
I haven't heard about Muslims doing that, but perhaps you can inform the debate on some level besides the vapid or anecdotal.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
If by "committing suicide for their religion" you mean saying "I'm a Christian" and then being burned alive by pagans, well yes. Martyrdom. Not blowing yourself up in a crowded restaurant.
I haven't heard about Muslims doing that, but perhaps you can inform the debate on some level besides the vapid or anecdotal.
it's the way you phrased it. you made it sound like christians voluntarily spoke about their beliefs so they could willingly be martyred. like a person that willingly walks onto oncoming traffic.
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
If by "committing suicide for their religion" you mean saying "I'm a Christian" and then being burned alive by pagans, well yes. Martyrdom.
Like christians did to witches?
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
It's easy to toss out accusations when you belong to nothing except yourself. A common thread in all of liberalism. "I Am Mine" sounds good but when you cast off any traditional ties, that's when you really lose your identity.
You're just an example of liberalism's suicide of western culture.
Liberals purposely demonize western culture so they can uproot it. Somehow, Christianity is no longer righteous because a few "witches" were burned alive 500 years ago, "so why don't we just get rid of religion altogether!" is their obvious solution. That is why their beliefs are suicidal for a nation.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
It's easy to toss out accusations when you belong to nothing except yourself. A common thread in all of liberalism. "I Am Mine" sounds good but when you cast off any traditional ties, that's when you really lose your identity.
You're just an example of liberalism's suicide of western culture.
Liberals purposely demonize western culture so they can uproot it. Somehow, Christianity is no longer righteous because a few "witches" were burned alive 500 years ago, "so why don't we just get rid of religion altogether!" is their obvious solution. That is why their beliefs are suicidal for a nation.
Oh this is good. I feel like I'm watching Fox.
Look at your constitution...what's left of it.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
i'm kinda surprised that an atheist would believe in spiritual things.... i'm also kinda surprised that an atheist would agree that they might be wrong and don't have all the answers. i always get atheists who are merely convinced that there's absolutely as a matter of fact no God. would you consider yourself an agnostic rather than an atheist? and how do you rationalize that emotions are not merely chemicals in our bodies?
No. Your question is fair and understandable. I am however, an atheist. I don't believe that a god exists and I am STRONGLY anti-organised religion. I merely accept that I might be wrong. that doesn't make me a fence-sitter does it? I'm just not so arrogant that I proclaim to KNOW the answer, even though I can never have proof.
With regards to the emotions thing, why must such feelings be godly? why is it that all non-rational things have to be linked to religion? I don't believe in an existential, interventionist god. That doesn't mean that there can't be some higher energy.
"I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
It's easy to toss out accusations when you belong to nothing except yourself. A common thread in all of liberalism. "I Am Mine" sounds good but when you cast off any traditional ties, that's when you really lose your identity.
You're just an example of liberalism's suicide of western culture.
Liberals purposely demonize western culture so they can uproot it. Somehow, Christianity is no longer righteous because a few "witches" were burned alive 500 years ago, "so why don't we just get rid of religion altogether!" is their obvious solution. That is why their beliefs are suicidal for a nation.
Lighten up Francis...
I'm not demonzing anything here, I just threw in a little comment about intolerance, and how everyone is guilty of it.
Just because I don't belong to your one specific club means that I belong to nothing except myself?
I have no interest in uprooting western culture or getting rid of religion altogether, but without a persecution complex I guess that would hurt a religions' fundraising and recruiting efforts.
Different religions or lack of religions have nothing to do with the failure or success of a nation... if anything a variety of beliefs is the best thing for a nation. Look at the incredible advances our nation has made in it's short existence.
I grew up in a religions family and have turned agnostic because of organized religions... I'm sure there is a higher power, but I have absolutely no idea what it is, and a book of stories written by people decades after Jesus died isn't going to do anymore to answer the questions than lying in the grass staring at the sky wondering if there is life anywhere out there.
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
After clicking that, have you checked out some of the links in the scroll area to the right....like the 4th vid down lol...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Bottom line... for me... my relationship with God is personal. Yeah, I can tell you all about it, but I will not ask you to participate. You can find your own personal relationship with God (there's plenty of Him to go around). Whether you find that relationship within the confines or religion... or even in the absence of belief... it's up to you.
As for me? Me and God are doing just fine.
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
I'm going to try not to get involved in this, as I've been around this particular circuit on the Train more times than I can count.
Just an observation really....
CorporateWhore seems very confused and rather self-deluded.When you start criticising a whole set of people for a particular way of thinking or acting, and then proceed with that self-same way of thinking or acting yourself - well, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that that instantly discredits your entire position.
Anyway, I'll leave y'all to keep talking in circles...
93: Slane
96: Cork, Dublin
00: Dublin
06: London, Dublin
07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
09: Manchester, London
10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
11: San José
12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
If ignorance is a drug, people are addicted to it.
They like the high..
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
After clicking that, have you checked out some of the links in the scroll area to the right....like the 4th vid down lol...
Dude... that's not right!
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Different religions or lack of religions have nothing to do with the failure or success of a nation... if anything a variety of beliefs is the best thing for a nation.
That's not true at all. You think diversity automatically equals good. That's simply not the case though. Look at history...
Japan. It's successful today not through heterogeneity. It has the same religion. It has mostly the same beliefs. It has the same ethnic group. It is a case in point that diversity does not necessarily make a country better. Show me a heterogenous country that isn't also experiencing or has experienced great social turmoil.
Religion greatly impacts the success of a nation. One need only consider history. Northern European countries that were not run by the Catholic Church developed respect for democratic principles sooner than Southern European countries that were led by Rome. England split from the church and became protestant. What happened? It became democratic. What happened to Catholic France? It remained aristocratic until a groundbreaking revolution that injured it severely. I would argue France STILL does not have a legitimate democracy, but I digress...
Northern European countries became democratic and Southern European countries remained monarchies for a long time. The reason? Religion. The Northern European countries were then able to conquer the world. That is success. Spain and Portugal faded in comparison to Britain.
The point is: religion has massive implications for a society. Write it off at your peril.
Our nation is based on Christianity. That faith leads the people morally. The vast majority of Americans consider themselves Christians and that's not going to change for awhile; therefore, you must reconcile yourself to the fact that law will reflect Christian moral teaching frequently.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
If by "committing suicide for their religion" you mean saying "I'm a Christian" and then being burned alive by pagans, well yes. Martyrdom. Not blowing yourself up in a crowded restaurant.
I haven't heard about Muslims doing that, but perhaps you can inform the debate on some level besides the vapid or anecdotal.
Well, if they did it like YOU SAID so they WOULD BE KILLED then yes it is a suicide mission. Get your Jesus panties out of your ass.
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
That's not true at all. You think diversity automatically equals good. That's simply not the case though. Look at history...
Japan. It's successful today not through heterogeneity. It has the same religion. It has mostly the same beliefs. It has the same ethnic group. It is a case in point that diversity does not necessarily make a country better. Show me a heterogenous country that isn't also experiencing or has experienced great social turmoil.
Religion greatly impacts the success of a nation. One need only consider history. Northern European countries that were not run by the Catholic Church developed respect for democratic principles sooner than Southern European countries that were led by Rome. England split from the church and became protestant. What happened? It became democratic. What happened to Catholic France? It remained aristocratic until a groundbreaking revolution that injured it severely. I would argue France STILL does not have a legitimate democracy, but I digress...
Northern European countries became democratic and Southern European countries remained monarchies for a long time. The reason? Religion. The Northern European countries were then able to conquer the world. That is success. Spain and Portugal faded in comparison to Britain.
The point is: religion has massive implications for a society. Write it off at your peril.
Our nation is based on Christianity. That faith leads the people morally. The vast majority of Americans consider themselves Christians and that's not going to change for awhile; therefore, you must reconcile yourself to the fact that law will reflect Christian moral teaching frequently.
Where do you get this doomsday crap? "Write if off at your peril"??? seriously?
I'm not totally sure that I understand your examples/arguments because you give an example of Japan, who became successful because of it's homogenous society, but then you say southern Europe struggled because of it.
Anyway, I know that the thought would never enter your brain, but do you think that "christian" morals are really any different than human, non-religious morals? Can you give me some examples of laws that reflect only christian morals and not morals that humans, or even advanced animals naturally have?
I'm not sure your definition of "great social termoil", but has Canada experienced it? Australia? New Zealand?
Sure, you can give a few examples of countries that have flourished under a dominant religion, but I can give you just as many examples of ones who have struggled (Mexico, many in Latin & South America, most of the middle east, etc). In my opinion religion isn't as important to the success of a country that you think.
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
You don't commit suicide when someone independently kills you, genius.
It is suicide when you know your actions will result in someone killing you for that action and you have no desire to protect yourself. Suicide by cop is an example. Do you just play stupid or are you an example of what happens to people who read and listen to rightist propaganda? You seem to have read the bible -- you need to do more than just read it dumbass.
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
No. Your question is fair and understandable. I am however, an atheist. I don't believe that a god exists and I am STRONGLY anti-organised religion. I merely accept that I might be wrong. that doesn't make me a fence-sitter does it? I'm just not so arrogant that I proclaim to KNOW the answer, even though I can never have proof.
I can absolutely agree with this and this is what makes a lot more sense than anything else.... most atheist would argue that they are fully aware there is no god which doesn't make sense... especially coming from an atheist.
With regards to the emotions thing, why must such feelings be godly? why is it that all non-rational things have to be linked to religion? I don't believe in an existential, interventionist god. That doesn't mean that there can't be some higher energy.
i was asking how do you rationalize the idea that your emotions don't necessarily have to be the chemicals processed in our brains?
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
i was asking how do you rationalize the idea that your emotions don't necessarily have to be the chemicals processed in our brains?
oh, don't get me wrong, I am aware that the sensations we experience as a result of certain emotions are in fact because of chemical processes but the stimuli for these processes can be totally irrational and arbitrary, and so are our reactions to them before the chemical stage. Since we, as functioning animals, work entirely by chemical processes of course our emotions will come under that as well but it doesn't mean that they are meaningless and entirely explainable by science.
"I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
Comments
Well... I did that already. To me... the Guides were basically full of shit and followed a well scripted line of crap. I tried... a couple of three or four times... I really did... but, no... not for me.
That's why I figured, I need to find God in my own way. The ones I've already asked for directions have lead me to the same dead end. I believe God wants me to find Him... eventually. I just think He wants me to make new discoveries along the way.
Hail, Hail!!!
Gentleness and respect, yes, but this was no reason to be silent. No one is coming off self-righteous or holier than thou except for the guy who misuses scripture to further secular humanist ends. That's the desecration.
Peter and the apostles were martyred (except for John) for the Gospel. They did not go gently into that good night. They brazenly preached to the Sanhedrin.
These were not hippies. By gentleness and respect, they meant that you would not spread your faith by the point of a sword. Peter was talking to the early oppressed christian community in that scripture, if you cared to include the context.
They would indicate that they were Christians in public so they could be executed as martyrs. What is "gentle" about that?
I don't come off nearly as self-righteous as Peter does, don't you think?
-Enoch Powell
**GASP** A suicide mission ?????? I thought the terrorists were heathens for committing suicide for their religion?
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
If by "committing suicide for their religion" you mean saying "I'm a Christian" and then being burned alive by pagans, well yes. Martyrdom. Not blowing yourself up in a crowded restaurant.
I haven't heard about Muslims doing that, but perhaps you can inform the debate on some level besides the vapid or anecdotal.
-Enoch Powell
Like christians did to witches?
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
It's easy to toss out accusations when you belong to nothing except yourself. A common thread in all of liberalism. "I Am Mine" sounds good but when you cast off any traditional ties, that's when you really lose your identity.
You're just an example of liberalism's suicide of western culture.
Liberals purposely demonize western culture so they can uproot it. Somehow, Christianity is no longer righteous because a few "witches" were burned alive 500 years ago, "so why don't we just get rid of religion altogether!" is their obvious solution. That is why their beliefs are suicidal for a nation.
-Enoch Powell
Oh this is good. I feel like I'm watching Fox.
Look at your constitution...what's left of it.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
With regards to the emotions thing, why must such feelings be godly? why is it that all non-rational things have to be linked to religion? I don't believe in an existential, interventionist god. That doesn't mean that there can't be some higher energy.
Lighten up Francis...
I'm not demonzing anything here, I just threw in a little comment about intolerance, and how everyone is guilty of it.
Just because I don't belong to your one specific club means that I belong to nothing except myself?
I have no interest in uprooting western culture or getting rid of religion altogether, but without a persecution complex I guess that would hurt a religions' fundraising and recruiting efforts.
Different religions or lack of religions have nothing to do with the failure or success of a nation... if anything a variety of beliefs is the best thing for a nation. Look at the incredible advances our nation has made in it's short existence.
I grew up in a religions family and have turned agnostic because of organized religions... I'm sure there is a higher power, but I have absolutely no idea what it is, and a book of stories written by people decades after Jesus died isn't going to do anymore to answer the questions than lying in the grass staring at the sky wondering if there is life anywhere out there.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
perhaps it's 'cause they don't give a shit...it's not like they're going to Hell or anything...
After clicking that, have you checked out some of the links in the scroll area to the right....like the 4th vid down lol...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
As for me? Me and God are doing just fine.
Hail, Hail!!!
Just an observation really....
CorporateWhore seems very confused and rather self-deluded.When you start criticising a whole set of people for a particular way of thinking or acting, and then proceed with that self-same way of thinking or acting yourself - well, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that that instantly discredits your entire position.
Anyway, I'll leave y'all to keep talking in circles...
96: Cork, Dublin
00: Dublin
06: London, Dublin
07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
09: Manchester, London
10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
11: San José
12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
correction:
"God and me...."
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
They like the high..
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Dude... that's not right!
Correction:
"God and I..."
"I am..." "God and I are..."
Damned subjective pronouns!
That's not true at all. You think diversity automatically equals good. That's simply not the case though. Look at history...
Japan. It's successful today not through heterogeneity. It has the same religion. It has mostly the same beliefs. It has the same ethnic group. It is a case in point that diversity does not necessarily make a country better. Show me a heterogenous country that isn't also experiencing or has experienced great social turmoil.
Religion greatly impacts the success of a nation. One need only consider history. Northern European countries that were not run by the Catholic Church developed respect for democratic principles sooner than Southern European countries that were led by Rome. England split from the church and became protestant. What happened? It became democratic. What happened to Catholic France? It remained aristocratic until a groundbreaking revolution that injured it severely. I would argue France STILL does not have a legitimate democracy, but I digress...
Northern European countries became democratic and Southern European countries remained monarchies for a long time. The reason? Religion. The Northern European countries were then able to conquer the world. That is success. Spain and Portugal faded in comparison to Britain.
The point is: religion has massive implications for a society. Write it off at your peril.
Our nation is based on Christianity. That faith leads the people morally. The vast majority of Americans consider themselves Christians and that's not going to change for awhile; therefore, you must reconcile yourself to the fact that law will reflect Christian moral teaching frequently.
-Enoch Powell
Well, if they did it like YOU SAID so they WOULD BE KILLED then yes it is a suicide mission. Get your Jesus panties out of your ass.
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
You don't commit suicide when someone independently kills you, genius.
-Enoch Powell
Funny! That's not what you were implying the other day to me on that other thread about guns. :rolleyes:
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift
Where do you get this doomsday crap? "Write if off at your peril"??? seriously?
I'm not totally sure that I understand your examples/arguments because you give an example of Japan, who became successful because of it's homogenous society, but then you say southern Europe struggled because of it.
Anyway, I know that the thought would never enter your brain, but do you think that "christian" morals are really any different than human, non-religious morals? Can you give me some examples of laws that reflect only christian morals and not morals that humans, or even advanced animals naturally have?
I'm not sure your definition of "great social termoil", but has Canada experienced it? Australia? New Zealand?
Sure, you can give a few examples of countries that have flourished under a dominant religion, but I can give you just as many examples of ones who have struggled (Mexico, many in Latin & South America, most of the middle east, etc). In my opinion religion isn't as important to the success of a country that you think.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
It is suicide when you know your actions will result in someone killing you for that action and you have no desire to protect yourself. Suicide by cop is an example. Do you just play stupid or are you an example of what happens to people who read and listen to rightist propaganda? You seem to have read the bible -- you need to do more than just read it dumbass.
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
i was asking how do you rationalize the idea that your emotions don't necessarily have to be the chemicals processed in our brains?
No. It is "God and me...." in the sentence that he used.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.