He’s incredibly affable and seems like a decent empathetic human who’s had normal life experiences before turning to politics. He’s probably the most relatable politician on the National stage.
I mean, every election people talk about the candidate you’d have a beer with. Like, he is THAT dude. Just normcore as fuck (outside of running a US state)
He’s incredibly Affable and seems like a decent empathetic human who’s had normal life experiences before turning to politics. He’s probably the most relatable politician on the National stage.
Agreed, & it's very refreshing after the last 8 years.
Trump is exhausting after 10 years of him being a known political quantity. I think both sides, people don’t want to be exhausted anymore. I get why he was the pick. He’s just normal and has that Dad energy. He’s not exhausting. You can be “hey man thanks so much”, or “whatever dad” and go about your life.
I mean, every election people talk about the candidate you’d have a beer with. Like, he is THAT dude. Just normcore as fuck (outside of running a US state)
And the same people that used to make fun of that around these parts are all for it now. He is not a very good candidate.
It is crazy to me that people care more about 1 gaffe than any substance or policy. Now, if the gaffes continue (like Biden), then you start to worry about a person.
I mean, every election people talk about the candidate you’d have a beer with. Like, he is THAT dude. Just normcore as fuck (outside of running a US state)
And the same people that used to make fun of that around these parts are all for it now. He is not a very good candidate.
I think people made fun of it because NONE of the people would be nice to have a beer with. This dude seems like your neighbor.
I mean, yeah Pete is a better communicator. Shapiro may have helped more in PA. I didn’t see what’s wrong with pick a dude who is Midwest as hell. He’s closer to the median voter than Pete or Josh or any other VP candidate name tossed about.
In my reassessing the situation, Kamala clear should have picked Pete.
What cohort would Pete have helped secure that are at risk of being swayed towards Trump? With Tim Walz, I suspect it’s suburbs and rural America in some regions.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
People need to remember the VP only hurts the candidate. Never helps. Waltz doesn't hurt Harris. He has the highest likability of ALL the candidates on the ballot.
This was an odd exchange for sure. Immediately after saying he's "focused on the future" he asks a question (a stupid one) about four years ago.
Vance did well. His strategy was clearly to poke at Harris instead of be a rabid dog. But I think he lost all he gained right here.
Someone I follow on twitter compared this to giving up a grand slam in the 9th after pitching a 2 hit shutout through 8.
All of the lies aside (that Walz should have done a better job of calling him out on), Vance did well acting like a normal politician, but you lose this debate if you cannot admit Trump lost in 2020. Also this will likely be the only real clip that stands out from last night.
I wonder if all the news about Vance performing better than Trump will eat at Trump's ego and force him into attending the next debate...
This was an odd exchange for sure. Immediately after saying he's "focused on the future" he asks a question (a stupid one) about four years ago.
Vance did well. His strategy was clearly to poke at Harris instead of be a rabid dog. But I think he lost all he gained right here.
Someone I follow on twitter compared this to giving up a grand slam in the 9th after pitching a 2 hit shutout through 8.
All of the lies aside (that Walz should have done a better job of calling him out on), Vance did well acting like a normal politician, but you lose this debate if you cannot admit Trump lost in 2020. Also this will likely be the only real clip that stands out from last night.
I wonder if all the news about Vance performing better than Trump will eat at Trump's ego and force him into attending the next debate...
That would be insane can you imagine trumpollini on another debate right before the election 😂 I’d love to see him go nuts
If anything it forces the country to have a dialog about it for a few weeks and makes people have an opinion on it or at least draws the line in the sand. People who aren't ok with gayness were never gonna vote D anyway.
Over 70% of Americans are fine with same sex marriage (so assume homosexuality too), it probably won’t be that big of an issue.
My issue is Pete has Ivy League airs. CA lawyer + ivy leaguer who worked at think tanks, come across as elitist which Dems definitely have an issue with.
He is still the best communicator for the admin and campaign. So he’s doing the job he needs to do anyway.
This was an odd exchange for sure. Immediately after saying he's "focused on the future" he asks a question (a stupid one) about four years ago.
Vance did well. His strategy was clearly to poke at Harris instead of be a rabid dog. But I think he lost all he gained right here.
Someone I follow on twitter compared this to giving up a grand slam in the 9th after pitching a 2 hit shutout through 8.
All of the lies aside (that Walz should have done a better job of calling him out on), Vance did well acting like a normal politician, but you lose this debate if you cannot admit Trump lost in 2020. Also this will likely be the only real clip that stands out from last night.
I wonder if all the news about Vance performing better than Trump will eat at Trump's ego and force him into attending the next debate...
No, Harris has slipped the last few days in the betting markets from 57 to 54% on the dollar. It’s insane how close this election is considering everything trump has done and how competent the Harris campaign has been, last night may have been its first slip. Very mediocre Walz performance and let Vance look reasonable and likable. Did not make the obvious policy attacks for the majority of the debate.
This was an odd exchange for sure. Immediately after saying he's "focused on the future" he asks a question (a stupid one) about four years ago.
Vance did well. His strategy was clearly to poke at Harris instead of be a rabid dog. But I think he lost all he gained right here.
Someone I follow on twitter compared this to giving up a grand slam in the 9th after pitching a 2 hit shutout through 8.
All of the lies aside (that Walz should have done a better job of calling him out on), Vance did well acting like a normal politician, but you lose this debate if you cannot admit Trump lost in 2020. Also this will likely be the only real clip that stands out from last night.
I wonder if all the news about Vance performing better than Trump will eat at Trump's ego and force him into attending the next debate...
No, Harris has slipped the last few days in the betting markets from 57 to 54% on the dollar. It’s insane how close this election is considering everything trump has done and how competent the Harris campaign has been, last night may have been its first slip. Very mediocre Walz performance and let Vance look reasonable and likable. Did not make the obvious policy attacks for the majority of the debate.
I wouldn't say he "let" Vance look reasonable. Vance definitely took that approach which was the best decision his dumbass campaign has made so far.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
This was an odd exchange for sure. Immediately after saying he's "focused on the future" he asks a question (a stupid one) about four years ago.
Vance did well. His strategy was clearly to poke at Harris instead of be a rabid dog. But I think he lost all he gained right here.
Someone I follow on twitter compared this to giving up a grand slam in the 9th after pitching a 2 hit shutout through 8.
All of the lies aside (that Walz should have done a better job of calling him out on), Vance did well acting like a normal politician, but you lose this debate if you cannot admit Trump lost in 2020. Also this will likely be the only real clip that stands out from last night.
I wonder if all the news about Vance performing better than Trump will eat at Trump's ego and force him into attending the next debate...
No, Harris has slipped the last few days in the betting markets from 57 to 54% on the dollar. It’s insane how close this election is considering everything trump has done and how competent the Harris campaign has been, last night may have been its first slip. Very mediocre Walz performance and let Vance look reasonable and likable. Did not make the obvious policy attacks for the majority of the debate.
No what? He won't debate because his betting odds have improved a little bit over the last couple days (due, likely, to a lot of right leaning polls coming out lately)? From 538 to Silver to the Economist etc etc etc....the race has hardly changed in the last month +. Harris remains a slight ( all around 55%) favorite to win.
Some good swing state polling for Harris this morning too...
If anything, last night was bad for Trump personally, because it demonstrated just how normal politics can be, and that he is an outlier with his excessiveness and his rambling.
I never put stock in the betting markets anyway. Its just driven peoples vibes.
They tend to swing wildly on a daily basis.Tim Simmons said:
If anything, last night was bad for Trump personally, because it demonstrated just how normal politics can be, and that he is an outlier with his excessiveness and his rambling.
One thing universally agreed on last night was how civil it was. It was a normal debate. I mentioned this the other day that this is what we can look forward to after Trump is defeated once and for all.
Comments
This was an odd exchange for sure. Immediately after saying he's "focused on the future" he asks a question (a stupid one) about four years ago.
Vance did well. His strategy was clearly to poke at Harris instead of be a rabid dog. But I think he lost all he gained right here.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
I mean, yeah Pete is a better communicator. Shapiro may have helped more in PA. I didn’t see what’s wrong with pick a dude who is Midwest as hell. He’s closer to the median voter than Pete or Josh or any other VP candidate name tossed about.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
www.headstonesband.com
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
All of the lies aside (that Walz should have done a better job of calling him out on), Vance did well acting like a normal politician, but you lose this debate if you cannot admit Trump lost in 2020. Also this will likely be the only real clip that stands out from last night.
I wonder if all the news about Vance performing better than Trump will eat at Trump's ego and force him into attending the next debate...
this is the only valuable metric from the night of any importance.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Some good swing state polling for Harris this morning too...