"Dark Matter" and its tracks on the charts

1121314151618»

Comments

  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 49,495
    igotid88 said:
    I still think they can release a new single. Like I said possibly around when the tour starts back up
    Won't Tell would be a good one
    www.myspace.com
  • T-Bone 82T-Bone 82 Posts: 420
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    "Darkness comes in waves, tell me, why invite it to stay?"
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 28,171
    igotid88 said:
    I still think they can release a new single. Like I said possibly around when the tour starts back up
    Won't Tell would be a good one
    If they listen Little Stevie. Hopefully it can crossover. I thought Wreckage would. 
    I miss igotid88
  • T-Bone 82T-Bone 82 Posts: 420
    At 3:25, I think Won't Tell would have more crossover appeal than Wreckage. Wreckage is a great pop-rock song, IMO, but it clocks in at 5 mins. 

    Won't Tell feels like a journey and soars in the chorus and outro, but packs it all in to 3:25. Great bridge, too.

    I just love the song and feel like the structure would work well at radio. 
    "Darkness comes in waves, tell me, why invite it to stay?"
  • vedpunkvedpunk Posts: 929
    edited February 12
    I still find in very odd that WFS fell completely off all charts one week after being close/in the top 10.  Wouldn’t be surprised if it reappears next week.  Or another single is locked and loaded.
    Post edited by vedpunk on
  • BF25394BF25394 Posts: 4,746
    BF25394 said:
    What a shame that WFS dropped off the charts so quickly. Maybe it's time for a new single. Which song would work best - Won't Tell, Setting Sun, or perhaps Got to Give?


    Edit: I just realised that WFS is already the 4th single. So perhaps it's time to close that Dark Matter chapter and move on. 
    IF METALLICAS THE BLACK ALBUM COULD HAVE A MILLION SINGLES AND STAY AT THE CHARTS FOR YEARS THEN SO CAN DARK MATTER
    You just compared Dark Matter, which wasn't even one of the 200 most-consumed albums in 2024, to Metallica, which is the single biggest-selling album since 1991. It's also a weird comparison because there were five singles from Metallica, which is more than average but not any kind of record. (Off the top of my head, Thriller had seven singles, and that album only had nine songs.)

    Anyway, like Thriller, they kept issuing singles from Metallica because it was massively popular and there was an audience and appetite for more. Dark Matter is great-- maybe Pearl Jam's best album, in my opinion-- but there is not a huge audience for it. Every radio station in the country simultaneously dumping "Waiting for Stevie" from their playlists is not a signal that mainstream audiences are clamoring for more Pearl Jam.
    ....pretty sure you didn't pick up on Spirtual's sarcasm there lol...
    I definitely didn't! I guess I'm used to his being serious as a heart attack when it comes to climate. The All-CAPS should have tipped me off.
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • BF25394BF25394 Posts: 4,746
    edited February 12
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • vedpunkvedpunk Posts: 929
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
  • BF25394BF25394 Posts: 4,746
    vedpunk said:
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
    First of all, it's a joke. And I don't know what to tell you if you actually believe that that's an accurate description of what's happening. It's the opposite of that. They are actually paving the way for corruption on a scale not seen since the 19th century. You won't read this, but you should: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/12/us/politics/trump-musk-corruption.html.

    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • vedpunk said:
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
    I feel so sad for you
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • marumarukomarumaruko Posts: 291
    edited February 13
    I think it's just as likely that the song was played less because demand decreased. I like WFS a lot, but without the solo at the end, it's just a regular good song. Hundreds of new "regular good" rock songs come out every week—there's no need to hold onto one that doesn't stand out.

    (and I know we hate to face that truth as PJ fans) 
    ------------------------------

    2005 - Calgary, Winnipeg, Thunder Bay, Kitchener, Montréal, Ottawa
    2006 - Verona, Torino, Pistoia
    2007 - Munich
    2013 - Calgary
    2014 - Vienna
    2016 - Quebec, Ottawa, Toronto N1, Toronto N2, Pemberton
    2018 - Padova
    2022 - Frankfurt, Krakow, Quebec, Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto  

  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 49,495
    vedpunk said:
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
    The gov just awarded his company $400 million for fucking tesla army trucks. Get your head out of your ass. 
    www.myspace.com
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 28,171
    vedpunk said:
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
    The gov just awarded his company $400 million for fucking tesla army trucks. Get your head out of your ass. 
    You can't really argue with these people. They put in a guy in office who stole from his charity. 
    I miss igotid88
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 49,495
    igotid88 said:
    vedpunk said:
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
    The gov just awarded his company $400 million for fucking tesla army trucks. Get your head out of your ass. 
    You can't really argue with these people. They put in a guy in office who stole from his charity. 
    Something that should have disqualified him 10 YEARS AGO. Funny how people just have forgotten that now. 
    www.myspace.com
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 28,171
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    I've probably said this before. But when I listen to the songs on rock radio. Yeah some are good or decent. But when I see they're on the charts for a long time. While Pearl Jam songs are sometimes gone within weeks. Makes me scratch my head
    I miss igotid88
  • BF25394BF25394 Posts: 4,746
    I think it's just as likely that the song was played less because demand decreased. I like WFS a lot, but without the solo at the end, it's just a regular good song. Hundreds of new "regular good" rock songs come out every week—there's no need to hold onto one that doesn't stand out.

    (and I know we hate to face that truth as PJ fans) 
    So it turns out that what happened is that the song fell out of the top 20 and, under the recurrent rules for the Mainstream Rock Airplay chart, if a song has been on the chart for more than 20 weeks and is below the top 20, it is removed from the chart. This is because the chart is intended to be a ranking of "current" songs. (If they didn't do this, the chart would be led by "Mr. Brightside" and "Seven Nation Army" and all of those perennial chestnuts that get played all the time on rock radio.)

    This should have occurred to me. I don't pay much attention to this chart if I'm not tracking Pearl Jam on it, but it should have occurred to me that it has recurrent rules like the Hot 100. The song that was right behind "Waiting for Stevie" on Mainstream Rock Airplay at No. 12 last week-- "TokSik" by Starset-- also plummeted directly out of the top 40 (and 23 weeks, and from its peak). And then the week before, "What Remains" by Pop Evil, fell off the chart from No. 7 after 23 weeks and "Liar" by Jelly Roll fell off from No. 13 after 23 weeks. All of these moves were because of the recurrent rules.

    Sorry for wildly speculating about conspiratorial reasons for the drop (but not sorry for blaming Elon Musk, who I still think could be behind this).
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • spankyMPspankyMP NY to NC to NH Posts: 1,962
    BF25394 said:
    I think it's just as likely that the song was played less because demand decreased. I like WFS a lot, but without the solo at the end, it's just a regular good song. Hundreds of new "regular good" rock songs come out every week—there's no need to hold onto one that doesn't stand out.

    (and I know we hate to face that truth as PJ fans) 
    So it turns out that what happened is that the song fell out of the top 20 and, under the recurrent rules for the Mainstream Rock Airplay chart, if a song has been on the chart for more than 20 weeks and is below the top 20, it is removed from the chart. This is because the chart is intended to be a ranking of "current" songs. (If they didn't do this, the chart would be led by "Mr. Brightside" and "Seven Nation Army" and all of those perennial chestnuts that get played all the time on rock radio.)

    This should have occurred to me. I don't pay much attention to this chart if I'm not tracking Pearl Jam on it, but it should have occurred to me that it has recurrent rules like the Hot 100. The song that was right behind "Waiting for Stevie" on Mainstream Rock Airplay at No. 12 last week-- "TokSik" by Starset-- also plummeted directly out of the top 40 (and 23 weeks, and from its peak). And then the week before, "What Remains" by Pop Evil, fell off the chart from No. 7 after 23 weeks and "Liar" by Jelly Roll fell off from No. 13 after 23 weeks. All of these moves were because of the recurrent rules.

    Sorry for wildly speculating about conspiratorial reasons for the drop (but not sorry for blaming Elon Musk, who I still think could be behind this).
    I heard it here in NH last week and was pleasantly surprised that they played the album version. Figured that might give it a boost, oh well.
    Randall's Island 9/29/96, Continental Arena 9/8/98, MSG 9/10/98, Jones Beach 8/23/00, 8/24/00, 8/25/00, Nassau Coliseum 4/30/03, MSG 7/8/03, 7/9/03, Continental Arena 6/1/06, 6/3/06, MSG 6/24/08, 6/25/08, Spectrum 10/30/09, 10/31/09, MSG 5/20/10, 5/21/10, PJ20 9/3/11, 9/4/11, Charlottesville 10/29/13, Charlotte 10/30/13, Global Citizen 9/26/15, Raleigh 4/20/16 :( Baltimore 3/28/20 :( Austin 9/18/23, 9/19/23, Forum 5/21/24, Baltimore 9/12/24, Fenway 9/17/24
  • vedpunkvedpunk Posts: 929
    igotid88 said:
    vedpunk said:
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
    The gov just awarded his company $400 million for fucking tesla army trucks. Get your head out of your ass. 
    You can't really argue with these people. They put in a guy in office who stole from his charity. 
    Really sad that people continue to believe the legacy media after repeatedly lying to the public and being funded by our tax dollars to spew false narratives.  

    And the Tesla truck deal was in the works during the last administration.  Why?  Because Tesla trucks are the best product at the lowest price.  
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 49,495
    vedpunk said:
    igotid88 said:
    vedpunk said:
    BF25394 said:
    T-Bone 82 said:
    That's kind of bizarre that it just fell off, isn't it? Usually songs just kind of work their way down the charts slowly and fade. Weird to see it be around top 10 and then just disappear.

    But, then again, I know nothing about this...
    In the old days of physical singles, it used to be common that a single would be "deleted"-- i.e., removed from retailers' shelves on the order of the distributor-- to make room for the next song the label wanted to boost up the chart, whether by the same artist or, more often, by a different artist. But things don't work that way anymore, in part because physical singles have largely disappeared. Songs now stay on the charts for multiples of what they used to. A song that spent 16 weeks in the top 40 in 1987 was an unusually long-running hit. Now you have songs that spend more than 30 weeks just in the top ten. "Blinding Lights" stayed in the top ten for 57 weeks!

    In this instance, I can think of two possible explanations, although both would be unusual. The first is that there was some sort of glitch  whereby either the encoded song-specific identifier that tracks airplay malfunctioned and no spins were recorded. The second is that there was somehow a reporting error that resulted in the song's airplay metrics being omitted from the Luminate data. I guess it's also possible that there was a corporate decision at iHeartRadio to pull the song across their channels, thus cratering its overall airplay totals.

    Or it could be that Elon Musk has stuck his nose somewhere else it doesn't belong...
    Really had to add that at the end?  It’s just sooooo horrible that somebody is actually trying to expose government corruption and a misallocation of our tax dollars.  
    The gov just awarded his company $400 million for fucking tesla army trucks. Get your head out of your ass. 
    You can't really argue with these people. They put in a guy in office who stole from his charity. 
    Really sad that people continue to believe the legacy media after repeatedly lying to the public and being funded by our tax dollars to spew false narratives.  

    And the Tesla truck deal was in the works during the last administration.  Why?  Because Tesla trucks are the best product at the lowest price.  
    Ah, yeah, so.......regarding blatant conflicts of interest and corruption, then......eh never mind. Gonna go directly over your head again I suppose....
    www.myspace.com
  • BF25394BF25394 Posts: 4,746
    vedpunk said:

    Really sad that people continue to believe the legacy media after repeatedly lying to the public and being funded by our tax dollars to spew false narratives.  

    Fox News paid nearly $800 million for promoting false stories about the 2020 election. Your president lies to you over and over and over again, as he has done throughout his entire public life for nearly 50 years, and you deem him credible.

    The bit about the "legacy media... being funded by our tax dollars to spew false narratives" is such a giveaway as to how far down the rabbit hole you are.
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • SeaSea Posts: 3,073
    Let’s get this thread back on topic please.  Thank you.

  • JimFletcherPearlJamJimFletcherPearlJam Posts: 376
    edited February 19
    Can't we all just get along? 


    Post edited by JimFletcherPearlJam on
  • vedpunkvedpunk Posts: 929
    edited February 19
    Derailing topic integrity. Post deleted. See the Posting Guidelines. https://community.pearljam.com/discussion/228366/forum-posting-guidelines

    Post edited by Sea on
  • BF25394BF25394 Posts: 4,746
    As of the charts for the week ending February 22, 2025, neither Dark Matter nor any of its tracks are on any Billboard chart. There had been at least on Dark Matter track on a chart for the past 52 weeks.
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 49,495
    edited February 19
    BF25394 said:
    As of the charts for the week ending February 22, 2025, neither Dark Matter nor any of its tracks are on any Billboard chart. There had been at least on Dark Matter track on a chart for the past 52 weeks.
    Well that's a bummer. 

    How's this compare to Gigaton?


    www.myspace.com
  • igotid88igotid88 Posts: 28,171
    edited February 19
    BF25394 said:
    As of the charts for the week ending February 22, 2025, neither Dark Matter nor any of its tracks are on any Billboard chart. There had been at least on Dark Matter track on a chart for the past 52 weeks.
    Well that's a bummer. 

    How's this compare to Gigaton?


    I would say better because DOTC was the only single that had more of an impact. SBWM and Quick Escape did okay. Thought the latter 2 would do better. Especially QE since that's the one that didn't get any hate. Maybe some stations didn't want to play it because he called out agent orange? I don't know.

    If they had toured in 2020 maybe the Gigaton songs do better on the charts. I thought they should have released Take the Long Way as a single. That felt like a song rock radio would play. 
    Post edited by igotid88 on
    I miss igotid88
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 49,495
    igotid88 said:
    BF25394 said:
    As of the charts for the week ending February 22, 2025, neither Dark Matter nor any of its tracks are on any Billboard chart. There had been at least on Dark Matter track on a chart for the past 52 weeks.
    Well that's a bummer. 

    How's this compare to Gigaton?


    I would say better because DOTC was the only single that had more of an impact. SBWM and Quick Escape did okay. Thought the latter 2 would do better. Especially QE since that's the one that didn't get any hate. Maybe some stations didn't want to play it because he called out agent orange? I don't know.

    If they had toured in 2020 maybe the Gigaton songs do better on the charts. I thought they should have released Take the Long Way as a single. That felt like a song rock radio would play. 
    Take the Long Way stinks haha

    Funny Who Ever Said came on my spotify randomly as I'm reading your post. Thought back then that might've been an okay single tool. Definitely surprised Quick Escape didn't do better. Love that one. 
    www.myspace.com
  • demetriosdemetrios Posts: 94,057
    BF25394 said:
    As of the charts for the week ending February 22, 2025, neither Dark Matter nor any of its tracks are on any Billboard chart. There had been at least on Dark Matter track on a chart for the past 52 weeks.


  • BF25394BF25394 Posts: 4,746
    BF25394 said:
    As of the charts for the week ending February 22, 2025, neither Dark Matter nor any of its tracks are on any Billboard chart. There had been at least on Dark Matter track on a chart for the past 52 weeks.
    Well that's a bummer. 

    How's this compare to Gigaton?


    From the original post:

    For comparison to Gigaton and its tracks, see https://community.pearljam.com/discussion/284234/gigaton-and-its-tracks-on-the-charts/p1.
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
Sign In or Register to comment.