#46 President Joe Biden
Comments
-
They already are.mace1229 said:If Trump ran against Biden today, I think both parties would be asking, really, this is the best we got?www.myspace.com0 -
They were asking that in 2016 and 2020. (Actually some in every election I remember but Hillary / Trump caused that to skyrocket).mace1229 said:If Trump ran against Biden today, I think both parties would be asking, really, this is the best we got?
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
I legitimately don't know who the Dems would run if Biden didn't run, though. The well is really, really dry. Yeah, the GOP well is not dry because it's full of sewage, but that sewage motivates that particular base. What Democrat is going to get people to the polls?1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
Someone named Not Trump is enough to get most of them there.OnWis97 said:I legitimately don't know who the Dems would run if Biden didn't run, though. The well is really, really dry. Yeah, the GOP well is not dry because it's full of sewage, but that sewage motivates that particular base. What Democrat is going to get people to the polls?0 -
Well, Biden probably doesn't beat, say Mitt Romney in 2020. So "voting against Trump" was a factor. I really wish the Dems could have a pull-factor though and not just the Trump push factor.mace1229 said:
Someone named Not Trump is enough to get most of them there.OnWis97 said:I legitimately don't know who the Dems would run if Biden didn't run, though. The well is really, really dry. Yeah, the GOP well is not dry because it's full of sewage, but that sewage motivates that particular base. What Democrat is going to get people to the polls?1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
They will in '28. Lots of quality candidates that are not quite ready right now but should be by then.OnWis97 said:
Well, Biden probably doesn't beat, say Mitt Romney in 2020. So "voting against Trump" was a factor. I really wish the Dems could have a pull-factor though and not just the Trump push factor.mace1229 said:
Someone named Not Trump is enough to get most of them there.OnWis97 said:I legitimately don't know who the Dems would run if Biden didn't run, though. The well is really, really dry. Yeah, the GOP well is not dry because it's full of sewage, but that sewage motivates that particular base. What Democrat is going to get people to the polls?www.myspace.com0 -
I'll be curious to see who. There are some Dems I like...but it seems like while the ideal GOP candidate has gone from "guy you want to have a beer with" to "miserable curmudgeon who hates the right people," the Dems still need something more akin to the "beer" candidate; someone that really energizes people. Obama did this. Clinton did, too. All other Dems in my memory (Mondale) have not done this and they've all lost with the exception of the one that went against Trump. Now, since Trump is probably going to be the next candidate, that may give Joe a chance. But I really would love to see them get their next Obama.The Juggler said:
They will in '28. Lots of quality candidates that are not quite ready right now but should be by then.OnWis97 said:
Well, Biden probably doesn't beat, say Mitt Romney in 2020. So "voting against Trump" was a factor. I really wish the Dems could have a pull-factor though and not just the Trump push factor.mace1229 said:
Someone named Not Trump is enough to get most of them there.OnWis97 said:I legitimately don't know who the Dems would run if Biden didn't run, though. The well is really, really dry. Yeah, the GOP well is not dry because it's full of sewage, but that sewage motivates that particular base. What Democrat is going to get people to the polls?
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
NewsomeOnWis97 said:I legitimately don't know who the Dems would run if Biden didn't run, though. The well is really, really dry. Yeah, the GOP well is not dry because it's full of sewage, but that sewage motivates that particular base. What Democrat is going to get people to the polls?
Whitmer
Shapiro
Any of these three would be good, particularly the last two who have shown themselves as being able to win big in a purple state.0 -
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.I'm like an opening band for your mom.0 -
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.www.myspace.com0 -
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.I'm like an opening band for your mom.0 -
You're completely untethered from reality.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.0 -
Yup, and so are many millions of other ‘Muricans.Merkin Baller said:
You're completely untethered from reality.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
And to think, for one brief shining moment, I thought I was replying to someone who was making a rational comment for once.Merkin Baller said:
You're completely untethered from reality.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.
www.myspace.com0 -
"it was a perfect call".RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
This was what inspired my 'untethered from reality' reply.HughFreakingDillon said:
"it was a perfect call".RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.
The phone call was text book extortion right down to the quid pro quo.
0 -
i kind of like it when trump says "it was a perfect call". i mean, this is a fuckin dude who has never done anything perfectly in his life. always taking shortcuts, always cheating people that work for him, everything he has done has just been "good enough". you think he is going to make multiple "perfect" phone calls to world leaders and election officials in georgia? as far as i can tell seasoned politicians have never made anything "perfect" because everything they do is based on some sort of compromise usually.Merkin Baller said:
This was what inspired my 'untethered from reality' reply.HughFreakingDillon said:
"it was a perfect call".RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.
The phone call was text book extortion right down to the quid pro quo."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
You know better than this. tRump controlled the DOJ for four years so don't act like he wouldn't have done something if he could. They had the fucking laptop and all that other bullshit under his dumbass reign.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.
Of course nothing will come of this because it's bullshit. That is why no major news organization is even mentioning it.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Every time Comer is asked if he has any evidence Biden committed some kind of crime he says no. You want to talk about witch hunts, this is the definition. They're just hoping and praying they eventually find a crime. It's actually kind of funny.Gern Blansten said:
You know better than this. tRump controlled the DOJ for four years so don't act like he wouldn't have done something if he could. They had the fucking laptop and all that other bullshit under his dumbass reign.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.
Of course nothing will come of this because it's bullshit. That is why no major news organization is even mentioning it.www.myspace.com0 -
So he should be impeached for actions by his family that occurred before he took office?RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
No, nothing about it is full of shit- those were subpoenaed documents that show the transactions. The issue is the DOJ does the dems bidding, so they won’t prosecute. The GOP, unless they’re involved themselves (?!) should take a page out of the dem playbook and draft articles of impeachment. Of course he won’t get removed from office, but just as they did with trump over a phone call, the spectacle and lining up of the Biden family folks involved for all to see is damaging enough in the eyes of the court of public opinion. And I say they should do it unless they’re involved because for all we know the big asshats in the GOP may have been involved in one way or another over those years.The Juggler said:
When you've lost Mr. RolemodelsinBlood, you know it's entirely full of shit. hahaRoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Exactly- no one will prosecute this. They’ll have to look through the rest of the families tax returns and see if they declared the money. It’s obviously unethical but when has that ever stopped a politician?mrussel1 said:
Hi. Can you identify the actual crime for me in this article? Comer said they "appear" to be attempting to hide the source. That's not a crime. Comer said it may be influence peddling. That's not an actual crime. So tell me what the crime is?TJ25487 said:Looks like we may not need Hunter's laptop after all.............
If it is real crimes like money laundering, tax evasion and wire fraud, they would have known by now. It's pretty easy to investigate if these funds showed up on tax returns.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help