#46 President Joe Biden

1307308310312313602

Comments

  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,385
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    Loser? The dude is POTUS. I'd say the guy who comes onto a Pearl Jam message board to throw shit at the wall and see what sticks is a better example.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,887
    edited October 2022
    benjs said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    Loser? The dude is POTUS. I'd say the guy who comes onto a Pearl Jam message board to throw shit at the wall and see what sticks is a better example.
    No way, this guy definitely has a better resume than congressman, youngest senator in US history, VP and now President.  Don't you @Out of My Mind and Time   I'm defending you here, prove me right and tell us all what you do for a living that makes you a winner and Biden a loser.  
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    www.myspace.com
  • This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,887
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
  • mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,849
    mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    Probably….maybe in the trump thread :)
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,957
    Don’t worry about creepy Joe, because republicans gained four points in the latest times poll, gaining mostly with….women. So we’ll be getting an impeachment per week soon @Out of My Mind and Time

    FFS they WANT to be treated like this? Don’t want to hear one woman blame a man for this treatment if Dems lose the midterms.

    Because, tax cuts will save the world for the global economy. Damn elections are so stupid, might as well have an authoritarian dictator, because womens rights and climate mean nothing to independents deciding elections 
  • mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
    What is wrong with asking him a question? I legitimately want to see one of these people attempt to answer it at some point. If they don't, so be it.
    www.myspace.com
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
    I'm not glossing anything over, that person isn't here for a good faith conversation, and people are justifiably pushing back. 

    Why not just ignore the responses as well as the original post? 
      

    Someone's trolling, people are justifiably telling the troll where to go, and you're calling out the latter only. 

    Yeah, that comes across as a tacit defense. 
  • mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
    I'm not glossing anything over, that person isn't here for a good faith conversation, and people are justifiably pushing back. 

    Why not just ignore the responses as well as the original post? 
      

    Someone's trolling, people are justifiably telling the troll where to go, and you're calling out the latter only. 

    Yeah, that comes across as a tacit defense. 
    Whatever, I said it's low lying fruit.  It is.
  • mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
    What is wrong with asking him a question? I legitimately want to see one of these people attempt to answer it at some point. If they don't, so be it.
    I do miss the older posters that would at least engage with everyone.

    Those days are now over...  It's hit and run now on here it seems.
  • nicknyr15
    nicknyr15 Posts: 9,268
    mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
    What is wrong with asking him a question? I legitimately want to see one of these people attempt to answer it at some point. If they don't, so be it.
    I do miss the older posters that would at least engage with everyone.

    Those days are now over...  It's hit and run now on here it seems.
    I’m not defending the OP because it’s obvious trolling, but it can be exhausting trying to defend your point to 7 different people at once on a website so it’s no surprise it doesn’t happen anymore. 
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,552
    nicknyr15 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
    What is wrong with asking him a question? I legitimately want to see one of these people attempt to answer it at some point. If they don't, so be it.
    I do miss the older posters that would at least engage with everyone.

    Those days are now over...  It's hit and run now on here it seems.
    I’m not defending the OP because it’s obvious trolling, but it can be exhausting trying to defend your point to 7 different people at once on a website so it’s no surprise it doesn’t happen anymore. 
    haha, totally. been there. it's even worse when people don't read your responses to other posters, constantly rehashing the same point over and over. 

    but yeah, that dude is obviously trolling. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    nicknyr15 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?
    You think we can have an argument about whether the 11th circuit court of appeals is going to throw out the special master, reaffirming the Harris v Nelson decision that states a target of an investigation may not file civil actions to delay a criminal investigation?  Think Mr. Meme will be able to make the argument that the Warren court decided that case in error?
    This guy is such a loser. Creepy joe at it again

    hi @Out of My Mind and Time  --what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents?
    Why are any of you grabbing the low lying fruit?

    I don't disagree with your overall point, I try to ignore the trolls as much as possible, and respond even less... with that being said, why aren't you asking the troll why they are doing what they are doing? 

    I miss the old days when shitty behavior was called out, not the way people react to shitty behavior. 
    It's the pile on gang mentality that I don't care for.  It's an easy target so why bother?  It's not a person that is going to engage in anything meaningful would be my guess?

    I mean the Creepy Biden thing again?  Really?  That's the angle they want to do?
    My point stands, the reactions to that shitty behavior aren't worse than the shitty behavior, but you're only calling out the former.

    It's a tacit defense of the original shitty behavior.
    No, no.  I am merely saying why even bother?  That was my point.  You're not going to get anything out of it from them which you chose to gloss over.

    Look I'm with you on calling it out but when 5 people do it and no response from the first 2 people I think it's safe to say you can divert energy elsewhere.

    And I'm defending them? oh boy...
    What is wrong with asking him a question? I legitimately want to see one of these people attempt to answer it at some point. If they don't, so be it.
    I do miss the older posters that would at least engage with everyone.

    Those days are now over...  It's hit and run now on here it seems.
    I’m not defending the OP because it’s obvious trolling, but it can be exhausting trying to defend your point to 7 different people at once on a website so it’s no surprise it doesn’t happen anymore. 
    What point would he be defending? 
    www.myspace.com
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    There’s no shortage of instances in this forum (& elsewhere) where the point you guys are making totally applies… I just don’t think this is one of them.  
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,552
    There’s no shortage of instances in this forum (& elsewhere) where the point you guys are making totally applies… I just don’t think this is one of them.  
    for sure, nick was responding to tempo's general comment about dissenting opinions. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.