In the United States, the age of sexual consent varies by state, territory/district, or federal law, and typically ranges from 16 to 18 years.
State-legislated age of consent laws and marriage age laws are inconsistent in relation to one another. In some states, it is possible for a minor to legally marry even if they are below the age of consent in that state. Between 2000 and 2015, at least 200,000 minors were legally married in the United States. 86% of those marriages were between that minor and an adult. About 5% of the minors were aged 15 or younger, meaning they would be under the age of consent in all United States territories.[31]
In some cases, judges who approve an underage marriage, for example because the minor is pregnant, may be approving a marriage between a rapist and their statutory victim.[64]
GROSS
"every society honours its live conformists and its dead troublemakers"
This is child abuse. It’s disgusting. I know it’s been posted before but dear god a child’s skull doesn’t even fully fuse until early to mid 20’s (difference of opinion on exact age). It’s like one step forward three steps back in this country.
Just think, all this crazy ass shit, crazy ass ideas that these sick men and woman have were just lying in wait until someone gave them permission to show their true selves. And the most disgusting part is that there’s soooo many who are ok with this shit. I guess all these supporters would be ok with their daughters participating? Crazy, crazy stuff.
Trump aide seeking NH House seat voted in 2 states in 2016
By BRIAN SLODYSKO and HOLLY RAMER
Today
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A former Trump administration official now running for Congress in New Hampshire voted twice during the 2016 primary election season, potentially violating federal voting law and leaving him at odds with the Republican Party’s intense focus on “election integrity."
Matt Mowers, a leading Republican primary candidate looking to unseat Democratic Rep. Chris Pappas, cast an absentee ballot in New Hampshire's 2016 presidential primary, voting records show. At the time, Mowers served as the director of former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's presidential campaign in the pivotal early voting state.
Four months later, after Christie's bid fizzled, Mowers cast another ballot in New Jersey's Republican presidential primary, using his parents' address to re-register in his home state, documents The Associated Press obtained through a public records request show.
Legal experts say Mowers' actions could violate a federal law that prohibits “voting more than once” in “any general, special, or primary election." That includes casting a ballot in separate jurisdictions “for an election to the same candidacy or office.” It also puts Mowers, who was a senior adviser in Donald Trump's administration and later held a State Department post, in an awkward spot at a time when much of his party has embraced the former president's lies about a stolen 2020 election and has pushed for restrictive new election laws.
“What he has done is cast a vote in two different states for the election of a president, which on the face of it looks like he’s violated federal law,” said David Schultz, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School who specializes in election law. ”You get one bite at the voting apple."
Mowers' campaign declined to make him available for an interview. In a brief statement that did not address the double-voting, campaign spokesman John Corbett cited Mowers' work for Trump's 2016 campaign.
“Matt was proud to work for President Trump as the GOP establishment was working to undermine his nomination,” Corbett said. “Matt moved for work and was able to participate in the primary in support of President Trump and serve as a delegate at a critical time for the Republican Party and country.”
There is little chance Mowers could face prosecution. The statute of limitations has lapsed, and there is no record of anyone being prosecuted under this specific section of federal election law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, which tracks the issue.
Mowers is just the latest former Trump administration official to draw scrutiny for potentially violating voting laws.
Mark Meadows, a former North Carolina congressman who served as Trump's chief of staff, was registered in two states and listed a mobile home he did not own — and may never have visited — as his legal residence weeks before casting a ballot in the 2020 election. North Carolina state officials are investigating.
Not everyone agrees Mowers' situation is a clear-cut case of voter fraud. For starters, it’s an undeveloped area of law. Any court would have to contend with complicated issues such as whether a primary could be viewed as a public election or as an event held by a private organization that is administered with government help.
“With the right set of facts, it could be construed as a violation, but it's just not at all obvious to me that it is,” said Steven Huefner, an Ohio State University law school professor who specializes in election law. “It is a pretty murky question.”
Charlie Spies, a Republican election lawyer who contacted the AP at the request of Mowers' campaign, called the matter “silly." He said the double-voting was “at worst a gray area" of the law and “not the sort of issue anybody would spend time on.”
That may not matter in a congressional primary that has drawn a half-dozen Republican candidates, some of whom stepped their criticism of Mowers on Tuesday.
Karoline Leavitt, a former Trump White House assistant press secretary, said Mowers owed voters “an honest answer." She said he “potentially violated election law and his initial reaction is to hide behind his attorney.”
Gail Huff Brown said Republicans "cannot nominate someone who has engaged in voter fraud and expect to be taken seriously on the topic.” She is married to Scott Brown, a former Massachusetts senator who was Trump's ambassador to New Zealand.
State Rep. Tim Baxter jabbed at “Jersey Mowers” and said the double-vote was “the exact election fraud problem voters across America are sick of.”
Mowers' campaign website features a section dedicated to “election integrity," stating that new laws are needed to “provide every American citizen with the certainty that their vote counts.”
He also echoes the long-standing Republican criticism about out-of-state voters, endorsing an efforts by the state's legislature to make sure “only legal residents of New Hampshire are entitled to vote."
This isn't the first run Mowers, who is in his early 30s, has made for the seat, which is a top Republican target in the 2022 midterm elections. In 2020, he earned Trump's endorsement and won the Republican nomination before losing to Pappas by 5 percentage points.
This time could be different, though. Biden's flagging approval rating has made Republicans bullish on their prospects. And thanks to a once-in-a-decade redrawing of congressional districts, Republicans who now control the state legislature and governor's office, are poised to approve more advantageous maps.
Mowers promotes his time living in New Hampshire with his wife and young child. But he is not a native to the state, spending much of his life in New Jersey.
A graduate of Rutgers, he came up through New Jersey politics, working for Christie's gubernatorial administration, as well as Christie's reelection campaign. That led to an appearance in the 2016 “Bridgegate” trial, where Mowers testified about his unsuccessful attempts to prod a Democratic mayor to endorse Christie, which resulted in acts of retribution and ultimately two convictions of close Christie allies. Mowers was not accused of wrongdoing in the case.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin 2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
Obama signed the ACA into
law in 2010. Today, 31 million Americans have healthcare coverage thanks to it.
They can’t be denied coverage because of preexisting conditions. The ACA has
lowered prescription drug costs for 12 million seniors, and it has enabled
young people to stay on their parents’ insurance until they’re 26. It’s
eliminated lifetime limits on benefits.
But I'm still waiting for that better, cheaper, more beautiful healthcare plan from the repubs. Double ha! Or is it ha, ha, ha?
Obama signed the ACA into
law in 2010. Today, 31 million Americans have healthcare coverage thanks to it.
They can’t be denied coverage because of preexisting conditions. The ACA has
lowered prescription drug costs for 12 million seniors, and it has enabled
young people to stay on their parents’ insurance until they’re 26. It’s
eliminated lifetime limits on benefits.
But I'm still waiting for that better, cheaper, more beautiful healthcare plan from the repubs. Double ha! Or is it ha, ha, ha?
I’m still waiting for which Easter FF meant that covid would be gone. Not 2020, 2021, 2022….for all the things FF lied about he deserves more like hahahahahahahaha…..
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
I beg of you, monsieur. Watch yourself. Be on guard. This Internet is full of Russia. Russia everywhere. Everywhere!
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
I beg of you, monsieur. Watch yourself. Be on guard. This Internet is full of Russia. Russia everywhere. Everywhere!
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
It seems to me that way to many people in this country, and some on here, didn't care that someone lied tens of thousands of times over a span of 5+ years. That too many cable "news" organizations propagated those lies and supported the distribution of misinformation through various channels. That elected officials supported those lies and the spread of misinformation. And continue to do so to this very day. So to care about one stupid picture from a social media source seems to be, at a minimum, hypocritical.
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
It seems to me that way to many people in this country, and some on here, didn't care that someone lied tens of thousands of times over a span of 5+ years. That too many cable "news" organizations propagated those lies and supported the distribution of misinformation through various channels. That elected officials supported those lies and the spread of misinformation. And continue to do so to this very day. So to care about one stupid picture from a social media source seems to be, at a minimum, hypocritical.
So does to NOT care about it.
You're not a submental human, and yet you were mis-/disinformed enough to post misinformation. That's concerning.
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
It seems to me that way to many people in this country, and some on here, didn't care that someone lied tens of thousands of times over a span of 5+ years. That too many cable "news" organizations propagated those lies and supported the distribution of misinformation through various channels. That elected officials supported those lies and the spread of misinformation. And continue to do so to this very day. So to care about one stupid picture from a social media source seems to be, at a minimum, hypocritical.
So does to NOT care about it.
You're not a submental human, and yet you were mis-/disinformed enough to post misinformation. That's concerning.
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
It seems to me that way to many people in this country, and some on here, didn't care that someone lied tens of thousands of times over a span of 5+ years. That too many cable "news" organizations propagated those lies and supported the distribution of misinformation through various channels. That elected officials supported those lies and the spread of misinformation. And continue to do so to this very day. So to care about one stupid picture from a social media source seems to be, at a minimum, hypocritical.
So does to NOT care about it.
You're not a submental human, and yet you were mis-/disinformed enough to post misinformation. That's concerning.
It's true I was. Not hard to admit that. But what I noticed first off was his effort to show "I have black friends". Its one thing to post a photoshopped image. It's another to believe that the election was stolen and to further tha conspiracy theory repeatedly.
Photos hopped or not this is just another version of " "I have black friends" The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
Character judgements aside. What’s worse, starting the spread of misinformation or knowingly supporting and continuing it?
I’m going to say voting for it and supporting it
Yup There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
Not sure I am following you here. Somehow this shifted to voting, and listing some of the words from your go-to posts. I can only assume you saying "so I say go for it", is an endorsement for the spread of misinformation. I have to be honest, I would expect this response more from a republican than a democrat. However, this is yet another example of social media getting in the way of real change, and that doesn’t surprise me one bit.
It seems to me that way to many people in this country, and some on here, didn't care that someone lied tens of thousands of times over a span of 5+ years. That too many cable "news" organizations propagated those lies and supported the distribution of misinformation through various channels. That elected officials supported those lies and the spread of misinformation. And continue to do so to this very day. So to care about one stupid picture from a social media source seems to be, at a minimum, hypocritical.
Unfortunately, I am well aware of the soap opera-esque fascination this country has with shit information sources. Just imagine how many times a day this happens to otherwise well-informed people, now imagine if those people who choose to participate were a bit more responsible before continuing the cycle. If this isn't something most people can get on board with, good luck with the whole political mess.
Comments
Underage marriage and sexual consent[edit]
In the United States, the age of sexual consent varies by state, territory/district, or federal law, and typically ranges from 16 to 18 years.
State-legislated age of consent laws and marriage age laws are inconsistent in relation to one another. In some states, it is possible for a minor to legally marry even if they are below the age of consent in that state. Between 2000 and 2015, at least 200,000 minors were legally married in the United States. 86% of those marriages were between that minor and an adult. About 5% of the minors were aged 15 or younger, meaning they would be under the age of consent in all United States territories.[31]
In some cases, judges who approve an underage marriage, for example because the minor is pregnant, may be approving a marriage between a rapist and their statutory victim.[64]
GROSS
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A former Trump administration official now running for Congress in New Hampshire voted twice during the 2016 primary election season, potentially violating federal voting law and leaving him at odds with the Republican Party’s intense focus on “election integrity."
Matt Mowers, a leading Republican primary candidate looking to unseat Democratic Rep. Chris Pappas, cast an absentee ballot in New Hampshire's 2016 presidential primary, voting records show. At the time, Mowers served as the director of former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's presidential campaign in the pivotal early voting state.
Four months later, after Christie's bid fizzled, Mowers cast another ballot in New Jersey's Republican presidential primary, using his parents' address to re-register in his home state, documents The Associated Press obtained through a public records request show.
Legal experts say Mowers' actions could violate a federal law that prohibits “voting more than once” in “any general, special, or primary election." That includes casting a ballot in separate jurisdictions “for an election to the same candidacy or office.” It also puts Mowers, who was a senior adviser in Donald Trump's administration and later held a State Department post, in an awkward spot at a time when much of his party has embraced the former president's lies about a stolen 2020 election and has pushed for restrictive new election laws.
2022 MIDTERM ELECTIONS
New Mexico Democrats seek tax rebates ahead of election
Georgia lawmakers push through election probe regulation
Pritzker: Group's ad attacking Irvin is 'telling the truth'
House approves divestment in Russia over Ukraine war
The issue could have particular resonance in New Hampshire, where Republicans have long advocated for tighter voting rules to prevent short-term residents, namely college students, from participating in its first-in-the-nation presidential primary.
“What he has done is cast a vote in two different states for the election of a president, which on the face of it looks like he’s violated federal law,” said David Schultz, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School who specializes in election law. ”You get one bite at the voting apple."
Mowers' campaign declined to make him available for an interview. In a brief statement that did not address the double-voting, campaign spokesman John Corbett cited Mowers' work for Trump's 2016 campaign.
“Matt was proud to work for President Trump as the GOP establishment was working to undermine his nomination,” Corbett said. “Matt moved for work and was able to participate in the primary in support of President Trump and serve as a delegate at a critical time for the Republican Party and country.”
There is little chance Mowers could face prosecution. The statute of limitations has lapsed, and there is no record of anyone being prosecuted under this specific section of federal election law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, which tracks the issue.
Mowers is just the latest former Trump administration official to draw scrutiny for potentially violating voting laws.
Mark Meadows, a former North Carolina congressman who served as Trump's chief of staff, was registered in two states and listed a mobile home he did not own — and may never have visited — as his legal residence weeks before casting a ballot in the 2020 election. North Carolina state officials are investigating.
Not everyone agrees Mowers' situation is a clear-cut case of voter fraud. For starters, it’s an undeveloped area of law. Any court would have to contend with complicated issues such as whether a primary could be viewed as a public election or as an event held by a private organization that is administered with government help.
“With the right set of facts, it could be construed as a violation, but it's just not at all obvious to me that it is,” said Steven Huefner, an Ohio State University law school professor who specializes in election law. “It is a pretty murky question.”
Charlie Spies, a Republican election lawyer who contacted the AP at the request of Mowers' campaign, called the matter “silly." He said the double-voting was “at worst a gray area" of the law and “not the sort of issue anybody would spend time on.”
That may not matter in a congressional primary that has drawn a half-dozen Republican candidates, some of whom stepped their criticism of Mowers on Tuesday.
Karoline Leavitt, a former Trump White House assistant press secretary, said Mowers owed voters “an honest answer." She said he “potentially violated election law and his initial reaction is to hide behind his attorney.”
Gail Huff Brown said Republicans "cannot nominate someone who has engaged in voter fraud and expect to be taken seriously on the topic.” She is married to Scott Brown, a former Massachusetts senator who was Trump's ambassador to New Zealand.
State Rep. Tim Baxter jabbed at “Jersey Mowers” and said the double-vote was “the exact election fraud problem voters across America are sick of.”
Mowers' campaign website features a section dedicated to “election integrity," stating that new laws are needed to “provide every American citizen with the certainty that their vote counts.”
He also echoes the long-standing Republican criticism about out-of-state voters, endorsing an efforts by the state's legislature to make sure “only legal residents of New Hampshire are entitled to vote."
This isn't the first run Mowers, who is in his early 30s, has made for the seat, which is a top Republican target in the 2022 midterm elections. In 2020, he earned Trump's endorsement and won the Republican nomination before losing to Pappas by 5 percentage points.
This time could be different, though. Biden's flagging approval rating has made Republicans bullish on their prospects. And thanks to a once-in-a-decade redrawing of congressional districts, Republicans who now control the state legislature and governor's office, are poised to approve more advantageous maps.
Mowers promotes his time living in New Hampshire with his wife and young child. But he is not a native to the state, spending much of his life in New Jersey.
A graduate of Rutgers, he came up through New Jersey politics, working for Christie's gubernatorial administration, as well as Christie's reelection campaign. That led to an appearance in the 2016 “Bridgegate” trial, where Mowers testified about his unsuccessful attempts to prod a Democratic mayor to endorse Christie, which resulted in acts of retribution and ultimately two convictions of close Christie allies. Mowers was not accused of wrongdoing in the case.
continues....
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
https://www.joshmandel.com/news/us-senate-candidate-and-marine-corps-veteran-josh-mandel-releases-first-ad-of-senate-campaign
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
The guy worships tfg and is a verified piece of shit
https://www.newsweek.com/former-trump-aide-sentenced-12-years-requesting-videos-babies-1696205?amp=1
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
Obama signed the ACA into law in 2010. Today, 31 million Americans have healthcare coverage thanks to it. They can’t be denied coverage because of preexisting conditions. The ACA has lowered prescription drug costs for 12 million seniors, and it has enabled young people to stay on their parents’ insurance until they’re 26. It’s eliminated lifetime limits on benefits.
But I'm still waiting for that better, cheaper, more beautiful healthcare plan from the repubs. Double ha! Or is it ha, ha, ha?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
hahahahahahahaha…..
There's way to many people who vote and support homophobic, lying, racist, xenophobic insurrectionists so I say go for it.
So to care about one stupid picture from a social media source seems to be, at a minimum, hypocritical.
You're not a submental human, and yet you were mis-/disinformed enough to post misinformation. That's concerning.
Its one thing to post a photoshopped image.
It's another to believe that the election was stolen and to further tha conspiracy theory repeatedly.