GOP

1910121415283

Comments

  • tbergstbergs Posts: 9,883
    cutz said:
    i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is. 

    if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something. 
    In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here? 
    roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time. 

    She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered? 

    I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing. 

    But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell. 
    There was someone that did this to a congresswoman or senator, asked for a selfie then he proceeded to tell her to "Go Fuck Herself".

    I thought that was classy, no matter how much you disagree with them should you do this...
    That was done to that QAnon psycho. Her name needs to quit getting press.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 37,359
    cutz said:
    i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is. 

    if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something. 
    In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here? 
    roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time. 

    She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered? 

    I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing. 

    But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell. 
    So the entire admin is guilty. got it. 
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 37,359
    edited February 2021
    i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour. 

    how interesting. :how_interesting:
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • Merkin BallerMerkin Baller Posts: 11,603
    edited February 2021
    cutz said:
    i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is. 

    if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something. 
    In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here? 
    roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time. 

    She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered? 

    I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing. 

    But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell. 
    So the entire admin is guilty. got it. 
    Your suggestion that she wouldn't have taken the picture if she knew who Enrique Torres was doesn't hold much water. 

    If SHB had a problem with white supremacists, she wouldn't have taken on the role of press secretary for this administration. 

    EDIT: 'trump's' administration 
    Post edited by Merkin Baller on
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,836
    i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour. 

    how interesting. :how_interesting:
    Did Michelle take that picture after it was known that he was a rapist?
  • Both sides are the same. Got it.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Both sides are the same. Got it.
    Seriously. 
  • Both sides are the same. Got it.
    Seriously. 
    According to some.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour. 

    how interesting. :how_interesting:
    Had the Clintons or Obamas defended Epstein or Weinstein as 'very fine people' after allegations of their conduct was made known to the public, I might see your point, but to my knowledge they didn't. 

    Also, proud boys are a real thing, pizzagate isn't. 
  • static111static111 Posts: 4,889
    cutz said:
    i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is. 

    if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something. 
    In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here? 
    roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time. 

    She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered? 

    I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing. 

    But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell. 
    So the entire admin is guilty. got it. 
    Yes
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Oh no 


  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 37,359
    Both sides are the same. Got it.
    Seriously. 
    According to some.
    nope. just keepin' people honest, which can be difficult 'round these parts sometimes. 
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 37,359
    mrussel1 said:
    i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour. 

    how interesting. :how_interesting:
    Did Michelle take that picture after it was known that he was a rapist?
    no, that's exactly my point. people are painting everyone on the right, when a picture of them next to some racist sleezebag, as some "evidence" of them being of the same ilk, it's nonsense. because that proud boy leader wasn't exactly a well known face until the last 6 months or so. that picture was most likely taken well before that. 

    had she taken that picture with him recently, then I would agree with the assessment 100%. 

    and for the record, I think she's a disgusting pig of a human. but the picture alone doesn't prove she's a white supremacist. 
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,836
    mrussel1 said:
    i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour. 

    how interesting. :how_interesting:
    Did Michelle take that picture after it was known that he was a rapist?
    no, that's exactly my point. people are painting everyone on the right, when a picture of them next to some racist sleezebag, as some "evidence" of them being of the same ilk, it's nonsense. because that proud boy leader wasn't exactly a well known face until the last 6 months or so. that picture was most likely taken well before that. 

    had she taken that picture with him recently, then I would agree with the assessment 100%. 

    and for the record, I think she's a disgusting pig of a human. but the picture alone doesn't prove she's a white supremacist. 
    Yes, her shame that can’t be washed is working for the Trump admin, at the very top of the tower of lies.  It’s not the picture that damns her, it’s everything else.
  • mrussel1 said:
    i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour. 

    how interesting. :how_interesting:
    Did Michelle take that picture after it was known that he was a rapist?
    no, that's exactly my point. people are painting everyone on the right, when a picture of them next to some racist sleezebag, as some "evidence" of them being of the same ilk, it's nonsense. because that proud boy leader wasn't exactly a well known face until the last 6 months or so. that picture was most likely taken well before that. 

    had she taken that picture with him recently, then I would agree with the assessment 100%. 

    and for the record, I think she's a disgusting pig of a human. but the picture alone doesn't prove she's a white supremacist. 
    Whole lot of speculatin’ for keeping ‘em honest.  
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,836
    Crazy day

    1. MTG apologizes to her caucus
    2. House votes 145-61 to keep Cheney in leadership

    Both of these developments surprise me. 
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,836
    Oh and it was a secret vote.  Clever by Mccarthy.  I guarantee the results would be opposite in a public vote. They should mage the senate impeachment vote secret. 
  • tbergstbergs Posts: 9,883
    mrussel1 said:
    Oh and it was a secret vote.  Clever by Mccarthy.  I guarantee the results would be opposite in a public vote. They should mage the senate impeachment vote secret. 
    Good point. Too bad integrity doesn't exist with these spineless losers.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • This is the GOP in 2021.

    A party of lies & conspiracy & sedition. 

  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 39,422
     11:16 a.m.
    McConnell congratulates Rep. Cheney, has nothing to say about Rep. Greene
    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) offered hearty congratulations Thursday to Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) for retaining her leadership positions but was mum on another matter decided by House Republicans: that no action would be taken against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).
    Both matters were discussed during a lengthy closed-door meeting Wednesday.
    Asked Thursday what his reaction was to what transpired, McConnell said: “I congratulate Liz Cheney on a landslide victory. It must be very satisfying to her, and it was a great win.”
    Asked about Republicans letting Greene keep her committee assignments, McConnell declined to answer.
    During the meeting, House Republicans voted 145 to 61 to reject a call for Cheney’s resignation from the No. 3 leadership post — a move demanded by Trump loyalists upset by her vote to impeach the former president.
    While Republicans decided not to discipline Greene, the full House is expected to vote Thursday on a Democratic-led measure to remove her from her committee assignments in response to repeated extremist rhetoric.
    By John Wagner and Mike

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • BentleyspopBentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 10,822
    Here is the gop platform

    Fear
    Hate
    Ignorance 
    Jealousy 
    Lies
    Do and say nothing about racist xenophobes

  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 39,422
     https://news.yahoo.com/embarrassing-marjorie-taylor-greene-tests-130433733.html

    SUMMERVILLE, Ga. — Billy Martin does not care much for politicians. But the retired teacher and coach liked what he heard from Marjorie Taylor Greene, who prom...

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • The party of personal responsibility



  • Nice look, GOP. 


  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,836
    Anyone know if she still had the "Trump won" mask on when talking about her trip down the rabbit hole?
  • tbergstbergs Posts: 9,883
    mrussel1 said:
    Anyone know if she still had the "Trump won" mask on when talking about her trip down the rabbit hole?
    No, a much classier free speech one instead. Fucking liar. What a joke. Someone told her to recant even though her beliefs haven't changed. Another closet Nazi fuck.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • tbergs said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Anyone know if she still had the "Trump won" mask on when talking about her trip down the rabbit hole?
    No, a much classier free speech one instead. Fucking liar. What a joke. Someone told her to recant even though her beliefs haven't changed. Another closet Nazi fuck.
    Yup

    I hesitate to throw around the term Nazi, but she would have fit right in w/ the 3rd Reich, as would many in the current GOP. 
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,836
    tbergs said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Anyone know if she still had the "Trump won" mask on when talking about her trip down the rabbit hole?
    No, a much classier free speech one instead. Fucking liar. What a joke. Someone told her to recant even though her beliefs haven't changed. Another closet Nazi fuck.
    Free speech, what a bunch of crap.  Last I check she isn't in jail for her lies.  Free speech doesn't mean free from consequences.  From what I can tell, she will be removed with a majority.  If her speech was intended to win over some D's so she doesn't lose, that facemask is counter productive for sure.  From what I read every D plus 10 to 15 R will vote to remove her.  
  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 20,678
    mrussel1 said:
    tbergs said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Anyone know if she still had the "Trump won" mask on when talking about her trip down the rabbit hole?
    No, a much classier free speech one instead. Fucking liar. What a joke. Someone told her to recant even though her beliefs haven't changed. Another closet Nazi fuck.
    Free speech, what a bunch of crap.  Last I check she isn't in jail for her lies.  Free speech doesn't mean free from consequences.  From what I can tell, she will be removed with a majority.  If her speech was intended to win over some D's so she doesn't lose, that facemask is counter productive for sure.  From what I read every D plus 10 to 15 R will vote to remove her.  
    I hope so...she needs to go away
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    wisconsin republicans repealed dem governor mask mandate.

    wisconsin republicans are the ed gein of republicans.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Sign In or Register to comment.