Biden vs Trump 2020 - vote now and discuss!
Comments
-
One only need to look to the history of Augusta and the crack that collard greens will be on the menu after Tiger won.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I’ll be sure to bring my chainsaw, my axe if I think I need to be quieter.Meltdown99 said:In case Trump wins...we are preparing.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Bidenmcgruff10 said:
No bri you are from California so I wanted to see that “special mask” Trump is talking about. I know you didn’t say anything about a special mask. Lolbrianlux said:mcgruff10 said:Dumber by the day. This one is classic Donnie. He said this at a campaign stop in Arizona yesterday:“In California, you have a special mask. You cannot under any circumstances take it off. You have to eat through the mask,” Trump said. “It’s a very complex mechanism, and they don’t realize those germs, they go through it like nothing. They look at you with that contraption and they say that’s an easy one, I’m going right through with the food.”
“Now, how about California, though, where you’re supposed to eat with the mask, can’t take it off,” he continued. “You see people and boy, you know, when you have spaghetti and meat sauce, that mask is not looking — you walk out, it looks like you got into a fight with [UFC President] Dana White.”
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-latest-whopper-california-requires-224753761.html
@brianlux Can you please post a photo of your "special mask?"
Hey there, McG. Honestly, I don't remember saying anything about a special mask. But if you say I did, I can believe it, lol! All the masks I have are very ordinary- 3 black cloth, 1 blue cloth, and a regular light blue hospital looking thing.Ah yes, lol, I see! He must be refering (one "r", get it?) to this:
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/29/politics/minnesota-mail-in-ballots/index.html
Federal appeals court rules mailed ballots must be received by Election Day in Minnesota, cutting weeklong window
By Katelyn Polantz and Taylor Romine, CNNUpdated 10:52 PM ET, Thu October 29, 2020(CNN)A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that mailed-in ballots in Minnesota must be received by elections officials no later than Election Day and suggested voters consider other options for casting their ballots.The 2-1 ruling -- a win for the Republican challengers to the state's plans -- cuts off a weeklong window after Election Day where state officials had planned to receive ballots that had lingered in the mail. The court found the Minnesota secretary of state's accommodation went against a state law that said ballots delivered by mail to elections officials after 8 p.m. on Election Day should be marked late."The Secretary's instructions to count mail-in ballots received up to seven days after Election Day stand in direct contradiction to Minnesota election law governing presidential elections," the ruling stated.The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals urged voters to consider voting in other ways, because the court has not yet decided if votes that come in via mail after Election Day are legal."Better to put those voters on notice now while they still have at least some time to adjust their plans and cast their votes in an unquestionably lawful way," the appeals court said in its ruling.Voters in Minnesota can turn in their absentee ballot at designated drop-off locations by 3 p.m. on Election Day. They can also go vote in person even if they have requested absentee ballots; voters can track their ballots online and if they haven't been received by Election Day they are allowed to vote in person and their mail-in ballots will no longer count.The appeals court said that the ballots received by officials after Election Day should be set aside separately from ballots that were received on time, and not counted.The decision tackles absentee ballot deadlines in a battleground state a day after the US Supreme Court declined to wade into plans in Pennsylvania and North Carolina to continue to accept ballots after Election Day.The Trump campaign had sided with cutting off the receipt of ballots by Election Day.The decision on Thursday night potentially throws into chaos the plans of Minnesota voters who have not yet mailed their absentee ballots. It sets up the possibility those votes may not be counted if they are postmarked in the coming days.In a news conference Thursday night, Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon said he didn't know yet if the ruling would be appealed.Simon noted that while ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day must be segregated, it is undecided whether those votes ultimately will count toward the election total. Election officials are still allowed to count but not tabulate ballots received after the deadline, so it is possible that there will be two final tallies: ballots that made it in before 8 p.m. and those that didn't, he said.As of Thursday evening, a little under 400,000 absentee ballots that had been requested by and sent to voters had not been received by election officials, Simon said."The consequences of this order are not lost on us," the court's opinion said. "We acknowledge and understand the concerns over voter confusion, election administration issues, and public confidence in the election. ... With that said, we conclude the challenges that will stem from this ruling are preferable to a postelection scenario where mail-in votes, received after the statutory deadline, are either intermingled with ballots received on time or invalidated without prior warning."The appeals court sided with two of the Republican Party's nominees for its Electoral College slate in Minnesota. The two electors challenged the Minnesota secretary of state's decision to add a week for the state to receive ballots after Election Day.US Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, told voters to not mail in their ballots after the ruling."Because of LAST MINUTE ruling, Minnesota DO NOT put ballots in mail any more," Klobuchar said on Twitter. "In the middle of a pandemic, the Republican Party is doing everything to make it hard for you to vote. Stand up for YOUR rights: Vote in-person or take mail-in ballot directly to ballot box."Minnesota Republican Party Chairwoman Jennifer Carnahan said in a statement that the party was pleased with the decision."We applaud the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for upholding the integrity of the election and affirming Election Day as November 3rd," she said. "The pandemic has caused upheaval in many areas of life but hiding behind the pandemic to manipulate the election process is not democratic, and we appreciate that our laws and interpretation of those laws matter."Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, in an appearance on CNN's "Erin Burnett OutFront" slammed Republicans for bringing the case and bemoaned their praise of the decision."It speaks volumes when your goal is to make it more difficult for people to vote," Walz said. "It probably speaks that they are not really happy with your policies, so here in Minnesota, we will still count all the votes, the system is still secure, those ballots will be segregated and I think this will obviously go up further through the judiciary to get a decision. But at this point in time, people can avoid all this by simply going and dropping their ballots off in person."0 -
I don’t see a big deal about this. If you plan to vote by mail then know the rules of your state. Really not a big sea to mail them in time or drop them off in person if you want your vote to count.cutz said:https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/29/politics/minnesota-mail-in-ballots/index.htmlFederal appeals court rules mailed ballots must be received by Election Day in Minnesota, cutting weeklong window
By Katelyn Polantz and Taylor Romine, CNNUpdated 10:52 PM ET, Thu October 29, 2020(CNN)A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that mailed-in ballots in Minnesota must be received by elections officials no later than Election Day and suggested voters consider other options for casting their ballots.The 2-1 ruling -- a win for the Republican challengers to the state's plans -- cuts off a weeklong window after Election Day where state officials had planned to receive ballots that had lingered in the mail. The court found the Minnesota secretary of state's accommodation went against a state law that said ballots delivered by mail to elections officials after 8 p.m. on Election Day should be marked late."The Secretary's instructions to count mail-in ballots received up to seven days after Election Day stand in direct contradiction to Minnesota election law governing presidential elections," the ruling stated.The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals urged voters to consider voting in other ways, because the court has not yet decided if votes that come in via mail after Election Day are legal."Better to put those voters on notice now while they still have at least some time to adjust their plans and cast their votes in an unquestionably lawful way," the appeals court said in its ruling.Voters in Minnesota can turn in their absentee ballot at designated drop-off locations by 3 p.m. on Election Day. They can also go vote in person even if they have requested absentee ballots; voters can track their ballots online and if they haven't been received by Election Day they are allowed to vote in person and their mail-in ballots will no longer count.The appeals court said that the ballots received by officials after Election Day should be set aside separately from ballots that were received on time, and not counted.The decision tackles absentee ballot deadlines in a battleground state a day after the US Supreme Court declined to wade into plans in Pennsylvania and North Carolina to continue to accept ballots after Election Day.The Trump campaign had sided with cutting off the receipt of ballots by Election Day.The decision on Thursday night potentially throws into chaos the plans of Minnesota voters who have not yet mailed their absentee ballots. It sets up the possibility those votes may not be counted if they are postmarked in the coming days.In a news conference Thursday night, Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon said he didn't know yet if the ruling would be appealed.Simon noted that while ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day must be segregated, it is undecided whether those votes ultimately will count toward the election total. Election officials are still allowed to count but not tabulate ballots received after the deadline, so it is possible that there will be two final tallies: ballots that made it in before 8 p.m. and those that didn't, he said.As of Thursday evening, a little under 400,000 absentee ballots that had been requested by and sent to voters had not been received by election officials, Simon said."The consequences of this order are not lost on us," the court's opinion said. "We acknowledge and understand the concerns over voter confusion, election administration issues, and public confidence in the election. ... With that said, we conclude the challenges that will stem from this ruling are preferable to a postelection scenario where mail-in votes, received after the statutory deadline, are either intermingled with ballots received on time or invalidated without prior warning."The appeals court sided with two of the Republican Party's nominees for its Electoral College slate in Minnesota. The two electors challenged the Minnesota secretary of state's decision to add a week for the state to receive ballots after Election Day.US Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, told voters to not mail in their ballots after the ruling."Because of LAST MINUTE ruling, Minnesota DO NOT put ballots in mail any more," Klobuchar said on Twitter. "In the middle of a pandemic, the Republican Party is doing everything to make it hard for you to vote. Stand up for YOUR rights: Vote in-person or take mail-in ballot directly to ballot box."Minnesota Republican Party Chairwoman Jennifer Carnahan said in a statement that the party was pleased with the decision."We applaud the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for upholding the integrity of the election and affirming Election Day as November 3rd," she said. "The pandemic has caused upheaval in many areas of life but hiding behind the pandemic to manipulate the election process is not democratic, and we appreciate that our laws and interpretation of those laws matter."Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, in an appearance on CNN's "Erin Burnett OutFront" slammed Republicans for bringing the case and bemoaned their praise of the decision."It speaks volumes when your goal is to make it more difficult for people to vote," Walz said. "It probably speaks that they are not really happy with your policies, so here in Minnesota, we will still count all the votes, the system is still secure, those ballots will be segregated and I think this will obviously go up further through the judiciary to get a decision. But at this point in time, people can avoid all this by simply going and dropping their ballots off in person."0 -
BidenMail-in voters are gonna be the butterfly ballot voters is 2020.1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
Somebody should let KingJeremy know he has been duped...dignin said:0 -
Biden
Niiiiiice!!!!brianlux said:mcgruff10 said:
No bri you are from California so I wanted to see that “special mask” Trump is talking about. I know you didn’t say anything about a special mask. Lolbrianlux said:mcgruff10 said:Dumber by the day. This one is classic Donnie. He said this at a campaign stop in Arizona yesterday:“In California, you have a special mask. You cannot under any circumstances take it off. You have to eat through the mask,” Trump said. “It’s a very complex mechanism, and they don’t realize those germs, they go through it like nothing. They look at you with that contraption and they say that’s an easy one, I’m going right through with the food.”
“Now, how about California, though, where you’re supposed to eat with the mask, can’t take it off,” he continued. “You see people and boy, you know, when you have spaghetti and meat sauce, that mask is not looking — you walk out, it looks like you got into a fight with [UFC President] Dana White.”
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-latest-whopper-california-requires-224753761.html
@brianlux Can you please post a photo of your "special mask?"
Hey there, McG. Honestly, I don't remember saying anything about a special mask. But if you say I did, I can believe it, lol! All the masks I have are very ordinary- 3 black cloth, 1 blue cloth, and a regular light blue hospital looking thing.Ah yes, lol, I see! He must be refering (one "r", get it?) to this:I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Biden
I actually didn't even see your comment. I'm just say I like Jack but it didn't surprise me.HughFreakingDillon said:
i was obviously not referring to those who golf as a hobby. come on.mrussel1 said:
I love Jack. I'm from Ohio and am a Buckeye through and through. It doesn't surprise me that Jack supports him. I'm also a white golfer. Doesn't matter.bootlegger10 said:
I am white and a golfer and voted for Biden today. Nicklaus had done a ton for charity over the years and is a class act guy. Surprised he would support Trump but I don’t think it is because of him being rich.HughFreakingDillon said:a white rich golfer voting for a racist? gee, didn't see that one coming.0 -
It’s all about the $$$$ Jack’s foundations received a nice chunk of change from this administration, you have to kiss the ring if you take the $$$$mrussel1 said:
I actually didn't even see your comment. I'm just say I like Jack but it didn't surprise me.HughFreakingDillon said:
i was obviously not referring to those who golf as a hobby. come on.mrussel1 said:
I love Jack. I'm from Ohio and am a Buckeye through and through. It doesn't surprise me that Jack supports him. I'm also a white golfer. Doesn't matter.bootlegger10 said:
I am white and a golfer and voted for Biden today. Nicklaus had done a ton for charity over the years and is a class act guy. Surprised he would support Trump but I don’t think it is because of him being rich.HughFreakingDillon said:a white rich golfer voting for a racist? gee, didn't see that one coming.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
The big deal is the Secretary of State instructed ballots to be counted seven days after election day, as long as they were postmarked on election day.mace1229 said:
I don’t see a big deal about this. If you plan to vote by mail then know the rules of your state. Really not a big sea to mail them in time or drop them off in person if you want your vote to count.cutz said:https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/29/politics/minnesota-mail-in-ballots/index.htmlFederal appeals court rules mailed ballots must be received by Election Day in Minnesota, cutting weeklong window
By Katelyn Polantz and Taylor Romine, CNNUpdated 10:52 PM ET, Thu October 29, 2020(CNN)A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that mailed-in ballots in Minnesota must be received by elections officials no later than Election Day and suggested voters consider other options for casting their ballots.The 2-1 ruling -- a win for the Republican challengers to the state's plans -- cuts off a weeklong window after Election Day where state officials had planned to receive ballots that had lingered in the mail. The court found the Minnesota secretary of state's accommodation went against a state law that said ballots delivered by mail to elections officials after 8 p.m. on Election Day should be marked late."The Secretary's instructions to count mail-in ballots received up to seven days after Election Day stand in direct contradiction to Minnesota election law governing presidential elections," the ruling stated.The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals urged voters to consider voting in other ways, because the court has not yet decided if votes that come in via mail after Election Day are legal."Better to put those voters on notice now while they still have at least some time to adjust their plans and cast their votes in an unquestionably lawful way," the appeals court said in its ruling.Voters in Minnesota can turn in their absentee ballot at designated drop-off locations by 3 p.m. on Election Day. They can also go vote in person even if they have requested absentee ballots; voters can track their ballots online and if they haven't been received by Election Day they are allowed to vote in person and their mail-in ballots will no longer count.The appeals court said that the ballots received by officials after Election Day should be set aside separately from ballots that were received on time, and not counted.The decision tackles absentee ballot deadlines in a battleground state a day after the US Supreme Court declined to wade into plans in Pennsylvania and North Carolina to continue to accept ballots after Election Day.The Trump campaign had sided with cutting off the receipt of ballots by Election Day.The decision on Thursday night potentially throws into chaos the plans of Minnesota voters who have not yet mailed their absentee ballots. It sets up the possibility those votes may not be counted if they are postmarked in the coming days.In a news conference Thursday night, Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon said he didn't know yet if the ruling would be appealed.Simon noted that while ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day must be segregated, it is undecided whether those votes ultimately will count toward the election total. Election officials are still allowed to count but not tabulate ballots received after the deadline, so it is possible that there will be two final tallies: ballots that made it in before 8 p.m. and those that didn't, he said.As of Thursday evening, a little under 400,000 absentee ballots that had been requested by and sent to voters had not been received by election officials, Simon said."The consequences of this order are not lost on us," the court's opinion said. "We acknowledge and understand the concerns over voter confusion, election administration issues, and public confidence in the election. ... With that said, we conclude the challenges that will stem from this ruling are preferable to a postelection scenario where mail-in votes, received after the statutory deadline, are either intermingled with ballots received on time or invalidated without prior warning."The appeals court sided with two of the Republican Party's nominees for its Electoral College slate in Minnesota. The two electors challenged the Minnesota secretary of state's decision to add a week for the state to receive ballots after Election Day.US Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, told voters to not mail in their ballots after the ruling."Because of LAST MINUTE ruling, Minnesota DO NOT put ballots in mail any more," Klobuchar said on Twitter. "In the middle of a pandemic, the Republican Party is doing everything to make it hard for you to vote. Stand up for YOUR rights: Vote in-person or take mail-in ballot directly to ballot box."Minnesota Republican Party Chairwoman Jennifer Carnahan said in a statement that the party was pleased with the decision."We applaud the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for upholding the integrity of the election and affirming Election Day as November 3rd," she said. "The pandemic has caused upheaval in many areas of life but hiding behind the pandemic to manipulate the election process is not democratic, and we appreciate that our laws and interpretation of those laws matter."Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, in an appearance on CNN's "Erin Burnett OutFront" slammed Republicans for bringing the case and bemoaned their praise of the decision."It speaks volumes when your goal is to make it more difficult for people to vote," Walz said. "It probably speaks that they are not really happy with your policies, so here in Minnesota, we will still count all the votes, the system is still secure, those ballots will be segregated and I think this will obviously go up further through the judiciary to get a decision. But at this point in time, people can avoid all this by simply going and dropping their ballots off in person."
Those were the rules of the state.
Now the Republicans have petitioned the judges to change that rule at the last minute. Now ballots have to be received by election day. That's a big change 5 days before the election when so many are voting by mail. Not to mention the thousands of people who don't have the luxury to vote in person, or drop their ballots off: such as military or people living abroad, elderly, people with multiple jobs, or without access to transportation.
Why do Republicans always want to make it more difficult for people to vote? Why do they have to lie cheat and steal to win an election?0 -
Don’t believe these articles from news agencies who lied to us all for three years. The emails and Biden’s China deals are 100% real. That’s not the question. The question is if anyone in the swamp cares at all about corruption within our govt. I think we all know the answer to that.PJNB said:
Somebody should let KingJeremy know he has been duped...dignin said:I'm like an opening band for your mom.0 -
Biden
Where is the proof? You know the corroborated kind verified by a third party? Also where are trump’s taxes?RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Don’t believe these articles from news agencies who lied to us all for three years. The emails and Biden’s China deals are 100% real. That’s not the question. The question is if anyone in the swamp cares at all about corruption within our govt. I think we all know the answer to that.PJNB said:
Somebody should let KingJeremy know he has been duped...dignin said:Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
Oh yeah? Which news agencies can we believe then?RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Don’t believe these articles from news agencies who lied to us all for three years. The emails and Biden’s China deals are 100% real. That’s not the question. The question is if anyone in the swamp cares at all about corruption within our govt. I think we all know the answer to that.PJNB said:
Somebody should let KingJeremy know he has been duped...dignin said:
Let me guess, only the ones you agree with.
0 -
Biden
Newsmax? Seriously?KingJeremyD said:
No links from...
infowars?
daily caller?
daily stormer?
focksnooze?
washington times?
ru?
on?
breitbart?
nypost?
any and all sinclair properties?
0 -
Biden
They were entering lawsuit territory...sounds like Fox lawyers must have issued a STFU orderdignin said:Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Biden
so if they're real, why haven't they come out already? if it would mean the death knell of the biden campaign, either it's:RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
Don’t believe these articles from news agencies who lied to us all for three years. The emails and Biden’s China deals are 100% real. That’s not the question. The question is if anyone in the swamp cares at all about corruption within our govt. I think we all know the answer to that.PJNB said:
Somebody should let KingJeremy know he has been duped...dignin said:
-not real, or
-a massive fuckup by the trump-controlled justice department not to take care of it prior to the election
which is it?
if fox news is backing off, if TUCKER FUCKING CARLSON is backing off, what can you possibly be still clinging to?Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help