I have no doubt trump himself is expecting the result to change... but everyone around him knows
They are just going through the motions to placate a fat spoiled child
I think he knows....he's just using this to raise funds. At some point they will get through to him that he is just damaging his legacy.
They will convince him that conceding will make a 2024 run possible and that he can claim glorious victory then.
Hopefully by 2023 he will be damaged enough to just go away.
There will be a whole wing of his library about how he FOUGHT for you, the true and real ‘Murica people and not those radical leftists “others” that stole PA and the election from him.
Are you literally advocating for the government to oversee the news?
You think that's a good idea?
Terrible idea. Some serious tweaking of the telecommunications act as well as reinstating ownership caps would do a lot more to diversify and self regulate our news than a politically controlled oversight committee.
Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,536
Are you literally advocating for the government to oversee the news?
You think that's a good idea?
Terrible idea. Some serious tweaking of the telecommunications act as well as reinstating ownership caps would do a lot more to diversify and self regulate our news than a politically controlled oversight committee.
Yeah. I'd really want to see him expand on his thoughts on how government controlled news is better than a free market. Unless I misunderstood his point...
Are you literally advocating for the government to oversee the news?
You think that's a good idea?
Terrible idea. Some serious tweaking of the telecommunications act as well as reinstating ownership caps would do a lot more to diversify and self regulate our news than a politically controlled oversight committee.
Yeah. I'd really want to see him expand on his thoughts on how government controlled news is better than a free market. Unless I misunderstood his point...
Who has said anything about government controlled news?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,536
Are you literally advocating for the government to oversee the news?
You think that's a good idea?
Terrible idea. Some serious tweaking of the telecommunications act as well as reinstating ownership caps would do a lot more to diversify and self regulate our news than a politically controlled oversight committee.
Yeah. I'd really want to see him expand on his thoughts on how government controlled news is better than a free market. Unless I misunderstood his point...
Who has said anything about government controlled news?
I have no doubt trump himself is expecting the result to change... but everyone around him knows
They are just going through the motions to placate a fat spoiled child
I think he knows....he's just using this to raise funds. At some point they will get through to him that he is just damaging his legacy.
They will convince him that conceding will make a 2024 run possible and that he can claim glorious victory then.
Hopefully by 2023 he will be damaged enough to just go away.
There will be a whole wing of his library about how he FOUGHT for you, the true and real ‘Murica people and not those radical leftists “others” that stole PA and the election from him.
His library has to have that Sharpie-doctored hurricane map on display too, right?
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
I think America would be well served to have a similar service.
What do you consider NPR?
And PBS. I think the major difference is the difference in libel laws and what one has to do or be able to prove to win in court. EU versus ‘Murica, slander/libel versus freedumb of speech. The Hunter Biden laptop stunt would never be attempted in the EU due to the ramifications of serious financial penalties, and maybe some jail time, against those perpetrating such a myth.
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
I have no doubt trump himself is expecting the result to change... but everyone around him knows
They are just going through the motions to placate a fat spoiled child
I think he knows....he's just using this to raise funds. At some point they will get through to him that he is just damaging his legacy.
They will convince him that conceding will make a 2024 run possible and that he can claim glorious victory then.
Hopefully by 2023 he will be damaged enough to just go away.
There will be a whole wing of his library about how he FOUGHT for you, the true and real ‘Murica people and not those radical leftists “others” that stole PA and the election from him.
His library has to have that Sharpie-doctored hurricane map on display too, right?
LOL Kat you are very feisty today!
Post edited by Kat on
0
Options
Kat
There's a lot to be said for nowhere. Posts: 4,782
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
federally funded news in america would never fly. we get enough "defund the cbc" bullshit here from right wing nutters thinking it's an arm of trudeau (but magically, it wasn't for harper).
Oversight and control are different things...Twitter oversees the Toddler-In-Chief, but they don't control him.
Yeah, I'm genuinely curious how it works though. lol He's avoiding that question for some reason.
More fun seeing the predatory market economy koolaid-drinkers going crazy and running wild with one could mean.
I think the swedish system is pretty good. I believe UK has pretty much the same system. Granskningsnämnden in Sweden. In The UK Ofcom. Keeping an eye on the news being impartial, non-biased, accurate etc.
Ben De Pear is the editor of the prestigious Channel 4 news program in the U.K. And he joins us now to explain. Thanks for being on.
BEN DE PEAR: Thank you.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So Ofcom come does many things. But I am particularly interested here in its role as an arbiter of bias. How does that work?
DE PEAR: So Ofcom was set up by statute in the United Kingdom. Broadcasting has always been regulated by a regulatory body which is independent of the government but also independent of the broadcasters. And what it does is it really regulates and rules on three different areas. One is accuracy. One is bias. And the other is impartiality. Those three things Ofcom regulates television news in particular so that the journalists have a requirement under law here to be objective and nonpolitical.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: All right. Give me an example of how that plays out. Say I'm watching a news show, and I am - as a viewer, don't like what I'm hearing. I can call in and write to complain, and Ofcom investigates?
DE PEAR: Yes. So, obviously, Ofcom is a huge pain. It's a sort of thorn in our side. But I'm very glad it exists. I mean, we've breached accuracy twice in the last two years. We named someone as being dead who was actually dead, but the police hadn't named he was dead. And naming as dead is an official recognition here. So we had to apologize on air. We had to say we were very sorry, and we breached one of Ofcom's guidelines, which is a very important one, which is accuracy.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: But what about bias? One man's bias is another man's truth. How does Ofcom decide something like that?
DE PEAR: So when we are reporting an election here, we have to give exactly the same amount of time to each political party, especially the main parties. And Ofcom goes to the extent of pretty much timing how much time you have if they receive a complaint. So during elections, we are very careful in making sure that we give free and unbiased representation to each of the political parties. We still hold them to account. We give them very fierce and rigorous interviews. But we can't have one party on without the other. And one thing that cannot happen here is that any reporter or journalist or presenter who represents or works for the broadcasting organization cannot give any sense of their political beliefs or support. They have to remain absolutely impartial at all times.
I also do not have a problem with tax-funded public television/radio as in Sweden, or the UK etc. Or the NPR I guess, which the interview above is taken from.
Think that. Publicly funded news. My god. THAT BROAD GOVERNMENT REACH!
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
Oversight and control are different things...Twitter oversees the Toddler-In-Chief, but they don't control him.
Yeah, I'm genuinely curious how it works though. lol He's avoiding that question for some reason.
More fun seeing the predatory market economy koolaid-drinkers going crazy and running wild with one could mean.
I think the swedish system is pretty good. I believe UK has pretty much the same system. Granskningsnämnden in Sweden. In The UK Ofcom. Keeping an eye on the news being impartial, non-biased, accurate etc.
Ben De Pear is the editor of the prestigious Channel 4 news program in the U.K. And he joins us now to explain. Thanks for being on.
BEN DE PEAR: Thank you.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So Ofcom come does many things. But I am particularly interested here in its role as an arbiter of bias. How does that work?
DE PEAR: So Ofcom was set up by statute in the United Kingdom. Broadcasting has always been regulated by a regulatory body which is independent of the government but also independent of the broadcasters. And what it does is it really regulates and rules on three different areas. One is accuracy. One is bias. And the other is impartiality. Those three things Ofcom regulates television news in particular so that the journalists have a requirement under law here to be objective and nonpolitical.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: All right. Give me an example of how that plays out. Say I'm watching a news show, and I am - as a viewer, don't like what I'm hearing. I can call in and write to complain, and Ofcom investigates?
DE PEAR: Yes. So, obviously, Ofcom is a huge pain. It's a sort of thorn in our side. But I'm very glad it exists. I mean, we've breached accuracy twice in the last two years. We named someone as being dead who was actually dead, but the police hadn't named he was dead. And naming as dead is an official recognition here. So we had to apologize on air. We had to say we were very sorry, and we breached one of Ofcom's guidelines, which is a very important one, which is accuracy.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: But what about bias? One man's bias is another man's truth. How does Ofcom decide something like that?
DE PEAR: So when we are reporting an election here, we have to give exactly the same amount of time to each political party, especially the main parties. And Ofcom goes to the extent of pretty much timing how much time you have if they receive a complaint. So during elections, we are very careful in making sure that we give free and unbiased representation to each of the political parties. We still hold them to account. We give them very fierce and rigorous interviews. But we can't have one party on without the other. And one thing that cannot happen here is that any reporter or journalist or presenter who represents or works for the broadcasting organization cannot give any sense of their political beliefs or support. They have to remain absolutely impartial at all times.
I also do not have a problem with tax-funded public television/radio as in Sweden, or the UK etc. Or the NPR I guess, which the interview above is taken from.
Think that. Publicly funded news. My god. THAT BROAD GOVERNMENT REACH!
Oversight and control are different things...Twitter oversees the Toddler-In-Chief, but they don't control him.
Yeah, I'm genuinely curious how it works though. lol He's avoiding that question for some reason.
More fun seeing the predatory market economy koolaid-drinkers going crazy and running wild with one could mean.
I think the swedish system is pretty good. I believe UK has pretty much the same system. Granskningsnämnden in Sweden. In The UK Ofcom. Keeping an eye on the news being impartial, non-biased, accurate etc.
Ben De Pear is the editor of the prestigious Channel 4 news program in the U.K. And he joins us now to explain. Thanks for being on.
BEN DE PEAR: Thank you.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So Ofcom come does many things. But I am particularly interested here in its role as an arbiter of bias. How does that work?
DE PEAR: So Ofcom was set up by statute in the United Kingdom. Broadcasting has always been regulated by a regulatory body which is independent of the government but also independent of the broadcasters. And what it does is it really regulates and rules on three different areas. One is accuracy. One is bias. And the other is impartiality. Those three things Ofcom regulates television news in particular so that the journalists have a requirement under law here to be objective and nonpolitical.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: All right. Give me an example of how that plays out. Say I'm watching a news show, and I am - as a viewer, don't like what I'm hearing. I can call in and write to complain, and Ofcom investigates?
DE PEAR: Yes. So, obviously, Ofcom is a huge pain. It's a sort of thorn in our side. But I'm very glad it exists. I mean, we've breached accuracy twice in the last two years. We named someone as being dead who was actually dead, but the police hadn't named he was dead. And naming as dead is an official recognition here. So we had to apologize on air. We had to say we were very sorry, and we breached one of Ofcom's guidelines, which is a very important one, which is accuracy.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: But what about bias? One man's bias is another man's truth. How does Ofcom decide something like that?
DE PEAR: So when we are reporting an election here, we have to give exactly the same amount of time to each political party, especially the main parties. And Ofcom goes to the extent of pretty much timing how much time you have if they receive a complaint. So during elections, we are very careful in making sure that we give free and unbiased representation to each of the political parties. We still hold them to account. We give them very fierce and rigorous interviews. But we can't have one party on without the other. And one thing that cannot happen here is that any reporter or journalist or presenter who represents or works for the broadcasting organization cannot give any sense of their political beliefs or support. They have to remain absolutely impartial at all times.
I also do not have a problem with tax-funded public television/radio as in Sweden, or the UK etc. Or the NPR I guess, which the interview above is taken from.
Think that. Publicly funded news. My god. THAT BROAD GOVERNMENT REACH!
We have the same thing in the US. The FCC ensures equal time is given to major party candidates.
federally funded news in america would never fly. we get enough "defund the cbc" bullshit here from right wing nutters thinking it's an arm of trudeau (but magically, it wasn't for harper).
That's exactly what NPR and PBS are... federally funded news. And the same shit from the right here on it.
I think the CBC model has worked really well here in Canada.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
they are indeed standing by
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
He's going to more than double HRC's margin.
You think that's a good idea?
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
He's avoiding that question for some reason.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French: Société Radio-Canada), branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian federal Crown corporation that serves as the national public broadcaster for both radio and television.[4] The English- and French-language service units of the corporation are commonly known as CBC and Radio-Canada, respectively.
CBC is the oldest existing broadcasting network in Canada. The CBC was established on November 2, 1936.
The CBC's federal funding is supplemented by revenue from commercial advertising on its television broadcasts.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Broadcasting_Corporation
I think America would be well served to have a similar service.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-163.html
www.headstonesband.com
I think the swedish system is pretty good. I believe UK has pretty much the same system. Granskningsnämnden in Sweden. In The UK Ofcom. Keeping an eye on the news being impartial, non-biased, accurate etc.
I also do not have a problem with tax-funded public television/radio as in Sweden, or the UK etc. Or the NPR I guess, which the interview above is taken from.
Think that. Publicly funded news. My god. THAT BROAD GOVERNMENT REACH!
“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”