This guy links a headline and not the actual story...
lol, yeah, this guy, the one who had a heart attack and is attributing it to the vaccine with many more in the hospital he is at... Keep looking at that headline though...
So what’s the medical consensus or am I supposed to take one guys opinion because he had a heart attack?
Tweet sharing and surface thoughts are the way of the day, don't you know?
I read the link to the actual article that doesn’t support the BS at all.
Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
0
Options
F Me In The Brain
this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 30,664
This guy links a headline and not the actual story...
lol, yeah, this guy, the one who had a heart attack and is attributing it to the vaccine with many more in the hospital he is at... Keep looking at that headline though...
So what’s the medical consensus or am I supposed to take one guys opinion because he had a heart attack?
Tweet sharing and surface thoughts are the way of the day, don't you know?
I read the link to the actual article that doesn’t support the BS at all.
Yeah, I posted it with insight to the same end point. Total fucking bullshit to share in that fashion....but that is the way some people like to do it, these days. Surface thoughts only!
This guy links a headline and not the actual story...
lol, yeah, this guy, the one who had a heart attack and is attributing it to the vaccine with many more in the hospital he is at... Keep looking at that headline though...
So what’s the medical consensus or am I supposed to take one guys opinion because he had a heart attack?
Tweet sharing and surface thoughts are the way of the day, don't you know?
I read the link to the actual article that doesn’t support the BS at all.
Yeah, I posted it with insight to the same end point. Total fucking bullshit to share in that fashion....but that is the way some people like to do it, these days. Surface thoughts only!
Trained to consume news and expect it to be delivered with nuance in 140 characters or less. Gotta love it.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Employees in BC are now eligible for 3 hours of paid time off to get vaccinated. A helpful support in my opinion, though people may also need paid time off to deal with side effects if they are hard hit, as some are.
My wife's grandfather had a stroke a couple of weeks ago. He is had been 100% healthy his whole life. He was going to get the vaccine a week before the stroke but decided to procrastinate and get it later. What if he did get that vaccine a week before though? Would he have made the headlines for having a stroke after getting the shot? Vaccinated such a large number of the population are we not going to have these scary headlines since this stuff just naturally happens to even healthy people and would of happened anyways shot or not?
I am really curious if her grandfather would of got that shot and had a stroke what the fall out would have been.
It's a fact that strokes and heart attacks and communism and sex changes are caused by the covid vaccine.
It's good your wife's grandfather didn't get the vaccine otherwise he would be your socialist grandmother.
hope he's doing ok, btw.
He is now out of the hospital and thanks. I guess I should of clarified by fall out I meant with our inner circle. It is pretty divided as it is and something like that would definitely of swayed some on the fence family members and friends to not get the vaccine. We have a couple of people just waiting for something like that to happen to shove it in peoples faces and say I told you so. I do not think it would of made headlines but I know some would complain that it had not. It might seem like a small thing but I am so damn happy he did not get that shot yet.
My wife's grandfather had a stroke a couple of weeks ago. He is had been 100% healthy his whole life. He was going to get the vaccine a week before the stroke but decided to procrastinate and get it later. What if he did get that vaccine a week before though? Would he have made the headlines for having a stroke after getting the shot? Vaccinated such a large number of the population are we not going to have these scary headlines since this stuff just naturally happens to even healthy people and would of happened anyways shot or not?
I am really curious if her grandfather would of got that shot and had a stroke what the fall out would have been.
It's a fact that strokes and heart attacks and communism and sex changes are caused by the covid vaccine.
It's good your wife's grandfather didn't get the vaccine otherwise he would be your socialist grandmother.
hope he's doing ok, btw.
He is now out of the hospital and thanks. I guess I should of clarified by fall out I meant with our inner circle. It is pretty divided as it is and something like that would definitely of swayed some on the fence family members and friends to not get the vaccine. We have a couple of people just waiting for something like that to happen to shove it in peoples faces and say I told you so. I do not think it would of made headlines but I know some would complain that it had not. It might seem like a small thing but I am so damn happy he did not get that shot yet.
Unfortunately there is a lot of this. Anti-vaxxers waiting for the "I told you so" moment with the supposed vaccine risks. Folks that don't want things to open up waiting for the "I told you so" moment after a ballgame or a concert they feel happened too fast. It has become quite a shit show.
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
Wrong, again.
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data • Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory.
• For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and
GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
Wrong, again.
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data • Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory.
• For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and
GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
Damn, I was waiting for catturd's explanation of the data and links because I knew the OP wasn't going to provide it. Thanks for ruining my afternoon.
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
Wrong, again.
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data • Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory.
• For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and
GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
Damn, I was waiting for catturd's explanation of the data and links because I knew the OP wasn't going to provide it. Thanks for ruining my afternoon.
Not to worry, I'm sure more will be coming soon.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Oh look, new deflection after bullshit debunked! You have no shame or are incapable of embarrassment. It's very impressive.
Whenever one point is proven wrong, it's just on to the next! A fun game for some I'm sure.
I only reply now when I think that the other folks here might be interested in accurate info. I am under no illusions that it will influence the wave of bs at all.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
Wrong, again.
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data • Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory.
• For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and
GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
Are they implying that a specimen testing above this cycle cannot be reliably sequenced, therefore suggesting just "dead nucleotides'? Does that not undermine the entire narrative from the past year and really make it look like a "case"demic?
Oh look, new deflection after bullshit debunked! You have no shame or are incapable of embarrassment. It's very impressive.
Whenever one point is proven wrong, it's just on to the next! A fun game for some I'm sure.
I only reply now when I think that the other folks here might be interested in accurate info. I am under no illusions that it will influence the wave of bs at all.
I, for one, often, appreciate the info. thanks!
Flight Risk out NOW!
www.headstonesband.com
0
Options
F Me In The Brain
this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 30,664
Oh look, new deflection after bullshit debunked! You have no shame or are incapable of embarrassment. It's very impressive.
Whenever one point is proven wrong, it's just on to the next! A fun game for some I'm sure.
I only reply now when I think that the other folks here might be interested in accurate info. I am under no illusions that it will influence the wave of bs at all.
A troll's troll. Sure it is all about trying to get as many of us to respond with some level of sincerity to the most ridiculous things he can find while sitting on a toilet during a break in the day.
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
Wrong, again.
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data • Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory.
• For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and
GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
Are they implying that a specimen testing above this cycle cannot be reliably sequenced, therefore suggesting just "dead nucleotides'? Does that not undermine the entire narrative from the past year and really make it look like a "case"demic?
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
Wrong, again.
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data • Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory.
• For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and
GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
Are they implying that a specimen testing above this cycle cannot be reliably sequenced, therefore suggesting just "dead nucleotides'? Does that not undermine the entire narrative from the past year and really make it look like a "case"demic?
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
Wrong, again.
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data • Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory.
• For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and
GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
Are they implying that a specimen testing above this cycle cannot be reliably sequenced, therefore suggesting just "dead nucleotides'? Does that not undermine the entire narrative from the past year and really make it look like a "case"demic?
hedonist
standing on the edge of forever Posts: 24,524
Pffft.
This dude has no power over anyone.
He doesn’t want a vax? Fine. Wants to boast about it? Sure! Gets off on belittling others for (oh my GOD) having a reasonable, fact-based approach? Again, A-OK. Wants to shower us with misinformation? I think most here see through that tripe.
So one dose isn’t completely effective and we don’t know if all t he people that got covid even had a vax. What’s the point you are trying to make here?
Comments
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
Yeah, I posted it with insight to the same end point. Total fucking bullshit to share in that fashion....but that is the way some people like to do it, these days. Surface thoughts only!
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
https://www.citynews1130.com/2021/04/28/bc-workers-paid-leave-covid-19-immunizations/
The full link from the tweets from the cdc regarding breakthrough cases...
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf
And the standards that we have been using the past year...
The CDC says that it will do genomic sequencing on samples with an RT-PCR ct value less than 28, not that it won't count the cases.
It's amazing what you would learn if you read what you posted.
SARS-CoV-2 sequence data
• Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory. • For cases with sequence data that are already available, please provide the SARS-CoV-2 lineage and GISAID or GenBank accession number to the state health department.
Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing • Specimen selection o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not to worry, I'm sure more will be coming soon.
Whenever one point is proven wrong, it's just on to the next! A fun game for some I'm sure.
I only reply now when I think that the other folks here might be interested in accurate info. I am under no illusions that it will influence the wave of bs at all.
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
This dude has no power over anyone.
He doesn’t want a vax? Fine. Wants to boast about it? Sure! Gets off on belittling others for (oh my GOD) having a reasonable, fact-based approach? Again, A-OK. Wants to shower us with misinformation? I think most here see through that tripe.
His stupidi —his obstinance? His choice.
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
Stop feeding the troll.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©