I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
Perhaps 10c should have used the messaging verified fan did.
We expect the demand for tickets to see Pearl Jam to be overwhelming.
Instead of this messaging:
“Although we feel confident we’ll be able to meet the demand of most, if not all Ten Club ticket requests, we recommend that members also register for the Ticketmaster Verified Fan®“
I’m guessing they were a tad optimistic.
Seems to me like MOST people did get tickets. There is a fairly vocal minority that did not. I would say that overall 80%+ of people got their #1 pick. Now, if your #1 pick was MSG GA only, you likely did not get tickets. Most of the complaints are coming out of MSG and BAL. That doesn't represent the entire tour.
Yes, most of those were NYC and Baltimore, which are not surprising, with a sprinkling of rejections in the other cities. And those seem to be GAs and lower priorities.
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
In your example, the user error could very well be on the person who claimed they got tickets at priority #5 (when they didn't explicitly rank priorities). So, still user error, just not yours...
I don't believe anyone that claims to have been filled at 4+ has provided proof of their priority.
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
A hell of a lot of people did get tickets for this portion of the tour, but i've been keeping up on this thread, and it is a whole lot more than just MSG and BAL that got rejections. Not nearly as many, and not nearly as vocal, but WAAAAAYYY more than should be possible, even at something like 80%. Unless everyone that still has tickets outstanding and hasnt gotten the denial email ends up getting tickets, then that will change things a lot.
2006: Gorge 1
2009: Seattle 1
2013: Seattle
2016: Wrigley 1 & 2
2018: Seattle 1&2, Montana
2020: San Diego, LA 1&2, Oakland 1&2
2022: San Diego, LA 1&2, Fresno, Sacramento, Las Vegas, Denver
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
That is likely a very key detail.
I specifically remember somewhere in the verbiage it said that the number of tickets requested would not effect your odds of winning.
Edit, yup.
TEN CLUB TICKET OPTIONS
Single Tickets: Ten Club members are no longer required to purchase tickets in pairs for this tour. You may now request a single ticket to the show(s) you want to attend. Requesting a single ticket does NOT change your odds of being confirmed.
Post edited by Saltzy23 on
'I know I was born and I know that I'll die, the in between is mine.'
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
There is a lot of frustration out there tonight, but there is still the verified fan sale and the fan to fan sale. As long as I have been following things on here, everybody who ever wanted to get into a show got in eventually. And on top of that there's new music coming up! Good luck to all who still need tickets. You will get them somehow. And if not, there is also still the promise of a fall tour. Hang in there, folks
I thank you for sharing your wisdom. We've missed you!
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
In your example, the user error could very well be on the person who claimed they got tickets at priority #5 (when they didn't explicitly rank priorities). So, still user error, just not yours...
I don't believe anyone that claims to have been filled at 4+ has provided proof of their priority.
I had LA1 filled at priority 7 for Reserved seats; will update with a pic...
A hell of a lot of people did get tickets for this portion of the tour, but i've been keeping up on this thread, and it is a whole lot more than just MSG and BAL that got rejections. Not nearly as many, and not nearly as vocal, but WAAAAAYYY more than should be possible, even at something like 80%. Unless everyone that still has tickets outstanding and hasnt gotten the denial email ends up getting tickets, then that will change things a lot.
Again, vocal minority. How many tickets do you think 10c had for each show? 3-5k? That is 48-80k tickets in total (or 24-40k pairs of tickets). At the low side of 24k pairs of tickets, that means at 80% 19k people got tickets and 5k did not. Chances are many of the 19k that won are silently enjoying their tickets. 5k is a lot of denials with a relatively small amount of complaints on the board. And it is likely that I have underestimated how many tickets 10c had.
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
That is likely a very key detail.
I specifically remember somewhere in the verbiage it said that the number of tickets requested would not effect your odds of winning.
Edit, yup.
TEN CLUB TICKET OPTIONS
Single Tickets: Ten Club members are no longer required to purchase tickets in pairs for this tour. You may now request a single ticket to the show(s) you want to attend. Requesting a single ticket does NOT change your odds of being confirmed.
No, but I think of it this way:
Everyone in priority #2 requested 2 tickets. There are 30 singles left. No one in #2 will get them. 20 people in priority #3 requested singles. 20 people will get them 20 people in priority #4 requested singles. 10 people will get them
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
Actually so did I, so explain that.
Don't ask us. Ask TM and 10C. We are extremely interested in the answer to this question.
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.
That is likely a very key detail.
I specifically remember somewhere in the verbiage it said that the number of tickets requested would not effect your odds of winning.
Edit, yup.
TEN CLUB TICKET OPTIONS
Single Tickets: Ten Club members are no longer required to purchase tickets in pairs for this tour. You may now request a single ticket to the show(s) you want to attend. Requesting a single ticket does NOT change your odds of being confirmed.
No, but I think of it this way:
Everyone in priority #2 requested 2 tickets. There are 30 singles left. No one in #2 will get them. 20 people in priority #3 requested singles. 20 people will get them 20 people in priority #4 requested singles. 10 people will get them
There shouldn't be seats that are "single seats" only. 10C said they would split a pair of seats over 2 rows (the 2 on the end) so that some pairs may be one in front of the other. I think that minimizes the chance that a single seat has any advantage.
I have 3 other confirmed emails for LA1, Oak1, Oak2
But where’s your user error? You must have screwed something up!
What does "I have 3 other confirmed emails for LA1, Oak1, Oak2" mean? You should only have 1 email with all your dates in one list. Whatever the last confirmation email you have from ticketstoday is what your entries would have been. I added a show after and so my last email from them had two shows and showed a "Maximum Total" for 4 tickets
I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct. I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one.
It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.
The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled.
I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever).
Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick. I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error. That just can’t be correct
Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.
I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them.
So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained.
So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.
Which did you list as priority 1 and priority 2? Which one did you get?
I have 3 other confirmed emails for LA1, Oak1, Oak2
But where’s your user error? You must have screwed something up!
What does "I have 3 other confirmed emails for LA1, Oak1, Oak2" mean? You should only have 1 email with all your dates in one list. Whatever the last confirmation email you have from ticketstoday is what your entries would have been. I added a show after and so my last email from them had two shows and showed a "Maximum Total" for 4 tickets
I got a separate email for all 4 confirmed shows. Still waiting on the last 2 and will get 2 emails, win or lose. I only had one email to confirm my choices when I entered them. I'm not good at IT stuff. The original is a combined 2 emails.
This thread died. Guess everyone got what they wanted, or didn't, and no one cares much about Phoenix and San Diego
I'm anxiously awaiting both today but don't have very high expectations after yesterday. Getting SD and PHX would make up for losing STL yesterday.
If the odds had been accurate as they used to be, we would've put STL and PHX higher and still gotten LA and OAK, but the odds indicated that LA and OAK would be tougher. So confused about STL at 99% and didn't make it past the 2nd round.
This certainly sounds like “Hi Weston, we messed up but aren’t ready to admit it, thanks!”
2010: Cleveland 2012: Atlanta 2013: London ONT / Wrigley Field / Pittsburgh / Buffalo / San Diego / Los Angeles I / Los Angeles II 2014: Cincinnati / St. Louis / Tulsa / Lincoln / Detroit / Denver 2015: New York City 2016: Ft. Lauderdale / Miami / Jacksonville / Greenville / Hampton / Columbia / Lexington / Philly II / New York City II / Toronto II / Bonnaroo / Telluride / Fenway I / Wrigley I / Wrigley - II / TOTD - Philadelphia, San Francisco 2017: Ohana Fest (EV) 2018: Amsterdam I / Amsterdam II / Seattle I / Seattle II / Boston I / Boston II 2021: Asbury Park / Ohana Encore 1 / Ohana Encore 2 2022: Phoenix / LA I / LA II / Quebec City / Ottawa / New York City / Camden / Nashville / St. Louis / Denver 2023: St. Paul II
Comments
I don't believe anyone that claims to have been filled at 4+ has provided proof of their priority.
I only see a Vitality Foundation Charity auction that basically ends at show time that is gonna wind up with outwardly laughable prices.
Edit, yup.
TEN CLUB TICKET OPTIONS
Single Tickets:
Ten Club members are no longer required to purchase tickets in pairs for this tour. You may now request a single ticket to the show(s) you want to attend. Requesting a single ticket does NOT change your odds of being confirmed.
Apr 11
Sat • 7:30pm
Glendale, AZ
Gila River Arena
GA Pit • Standing • $103.00 ea
Plus $20.00 service fee per ticket
99%
Reserved • Seating • $103.00 ea
Plus $20.00 service fee per ticket
99%
Apr 18
Sat • 7:30pm
Oakland, CA
Oakland Arena
99%
Apr 19
Sun • 7:30pm
Oakland, CA
Oakland Arena
99%
Apr 15
Wed • 8:00pm
Los Angeles, CA
The Forum
99%
Apr 16
Thu • 8:00pm
Los Angeles, CA
The Forum
99%
Apr 13
Mon • 7:30pm
San Diego, CA
Viejas Arena at Aztec Bowl
GA Pit • Standing • $107.00 ea
Plus $15.00 service fee per ticket
98%
Reserved • Seating • $107.00 ea
Plus $15.00 service fee per ticket
99%
Apr 16
Thu • 8:00PM
Pearl Jam
The Forum
I have 3 other confirmed emails for LA1, Oak1, Oak2
2016: Lexington and Wrigley 1
Everyone in priority #2 requested 2 tickets. There are 30 singles left. No one in #2 will get them.
20 people in priority #3 requested singles. 20 people will get them
20 people in priority #4 requested singles. 10 people will get them
I only see a Vitality Foundation Charity auction that basically ends at show time that is gonna wind up with outwardly laughable prices.
Baltimore has the charity
Let’s
go
isles
Posters for Sale: http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/117469/posters-for-sale
T-Shirts for Sale: http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/149289/pj-t-shirt-trade-or-sale
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
I'm anxiously awaiting both today but don't have very high expectations after yesterday. Getting SD and PHX would make up for losing STL yesterday.
If the odds had been accurate as they used to be, we would've put STL and PHX higher and still gotten LA and OAK, but the odds indicated that LA and OAK would be tougher. So confused about STL at 99% and didn't make it past the 2nd round.
Posters for Sale: http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/117469/posters-for-sale
T-Shirts for Sale: http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/149289/pj-t-shirt-trade-or-sale
2012: Atlanta
2013: London ONT / Wrigley Field / Pittsburgh / Buffalo / San Diego / Los Angeles I / Los Angeles II
2014: Cincinnati / St. Louis / Tulsa / Lincoln / Detroit / Denver
2015: New York City
2016: Ft. Lauderdale / Miami / Jacksonville / Greenville / Hampton / Columbia / Lexington / Philly II / New York City II / Toronto II / Bonnaroo / Telluride / Fenway I / Wrigley I / Wrigley - II / TOTD - Philadelphia, San Francisco
2017: Ohana Fest (EV)
2018: Amsterdam I / Amsterdam II / Seattle I / Seattle II / Boston I / Boston II
2021: Asbury Park / Ohana Encore 1 / Ohana Encore 2
2022: Phoenix / LA I / LA II / Quebec City / Ottawa / New York City / Camden / Nashville / St. Louis / Denver
2023: St. Paul II