The Democratic Candidates

mrussel1

mcgruff10 said:

Meltdown99 said:

Whether this Beto or not...this funny.

Damn I hope he didn't do this at Wrigley!

What a ahole he was.  Im glad he's banned. 

Spiritual_Chaos

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

Meltdown99 said:

Whether this Beto or not...this funny.

Damn I hope he didn't do this at Wrigley!

What a ahole he was.  Im glad he's banned. 

Who? What?

mcgruff10

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

Meltdown99 said:

Whether this Beto or not...this funny.

Damn I hope he didn't do this at Wrigley!

What a ahole he was.  Im glad he's banned. 

Yeah you are right, it was the right move.  There's no place for that crap.

mrussel1

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

Meltdown99 said:

Whether this Beto or not...this funny.

Damn I hope he didn't do this at Wrigley!

What a ahole he was.  Im glad he's banned. 

Who? What?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kgun9.com/sports/cubs-ban-fan-from-wrigley-field-indefinitely-after-he-made-a-white-power-gesture-behind-black-man?_amp=true

Spiritual_Chaos

mrussel1 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

Meltdown99 said:

Whether this Beto or not...this funny.

Damn I hope he didn't do this at Wrigley!

What a ahole he was.  Im glad he's banned. 

Who? What?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kgun9.com/sports/cubs-ban-fan-from-wrigley-field-indefinitely-after-he-made-a-white-power-gesture-behind-black-man?_amp=true

Ah okey.. thought it was something about a tenclub member and the Pearl Jam shows tat wrigley.

... and instead it was just sports...

Good he got banned though.

mcgruff10

Please drop out of the race Senator Booker:
https://www.nj.com/politics/2019/05/no-cory-booker-toy-guns-are-not-more-tightly-regulated-than-real-ones.html

No, Cory Booker, toy guns are not more tightly regulated than real ones

WASHINGTON — When he called for requiring gun owners to pass a safety course and be licensed, U.S. Sen. Cory Booker also said that there was more government oversight of toy weapons than actual ones.

“In the U.S., we have more federal regulation over toy runs than real ones,” he tweeted.

Not so fast. While the Consumer Protection Safety Board regulates toy guns, other agencies oversee the safety of real weapons.

The Washington Post’s fact-checker called Booker’s claim “specious," noting that other agencies, most notably the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, have jurisdiction over firearms even as the CSPC does not.

“Firearms, at just about every level, are highly regulated in the United States,” the newspaper said. “Booker is calling for another level of regulation, but he can’t suggest toy guns are even more highly regulated.”

Booker campaign spokeswoman Sabrina Singh declined to comment.

mrussel1

Specious is a good word for it,  or unnecessarily hyperbolic. 

Spiritual_Chaos

mcgruff10 said:

Please drop out of the race Senator Booker:
https://www.nj.com/politics/2019/05/no-cory-booker-toy-guns-are-not-more-tightly-regulated-than-real-ones.html

No, Cory Booker, toy guns are not more tightly regulated than real ones

WASHINGTON — When he called for requiring gun owners to pass a safety course and be licensed, U.S. Sen. Cory Booker also said that there was more government oversight of toy weapons than actual ones.

“In the U.S., we have more federal regulation over toy runs than real ones,” he tweeted.

Not so fast. While the Consumer Protection Safety Board regulates toy guns, other agencies oversee the safety of real weapons.

The Washington Post’s fact-checker called Booker’s claim “specious," noting that other agencies, most notably the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, have jurisdiction over firearms even as the CSPC does not.

“Firearms, at just about every level, are highly regulated in the United States,” the newspaper said. “Booker is calling for another level of regulation, but he can’t suggest toy guns are even more highly regulated.”

Booker campaign spokeswoman Sabrina Singh declined to comment.

How dare he. 

I sure hope he doesn't have any "yo mama is so fat"-jokes in his closet that are not scientifically accurate.

Someone get Mueller on the line. Down with Booker!

mrussel1

Spiritual_Chaos said:

mcgruff10 said:

Please drop out of the race Senator Booker:
https://www.nj.com/politics/2019/05/no-cory-booker-toy-guns-are-not-more-tightly-regulated-than-real-ones.html

No, Cory Booker, toy guns are not more tightly regulated than real ones

WASHINGTON — When he called for requiring gun owners to pass a safety course and be licensed, U.S. Sen. Cory Booker also said that there was more government oversight of toy weapons than actual ones.

“In the U.S., we have more federal regulation over toy runs than real ones,” he tweeted.

Not so fast. While the Consumer Protection Safety Board regulates toy guns, other agencies oversee the safety of real weapons.

The Washington Post’s fact-checker called Booker’s claim “specious," noting that other agencies, most notably the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, have jurisdiction over firearms even as the CSPC does not.

“Firearms, at just about every level, are highly regulated in the United States,” the newspaper said. “Booker is calling for another level of regulation, but he can’t suggest toy guns are even more highly regulated.”

Booker campaign spokeswoman Sabrina Singh declined to comment.

How dare he. 

I sure hope he doesn't have any "yo mama is so fat"-jokes in his closet that are not scientifically accurate.

Someone get Mueller on the line. Down with Booker!

Im sure he has some jokes about black people smelling. 

mcgruff10

mrussel1 said:

Specious is a good word for it,  or unnecessarily hyperbolic. 

Agreed. I m not a booker fan at all, if he does drop out I hope he loses next election but seeing nj is as blue as can be I don’t see it happening. 

mrussel1

mcgruff10 said:

mrussel1 said:

Specious is a good word for it,  or unnecessarily hyperbolic. 

Agreed. I m not a booker fan at all, if he does drop out I hope he loses next election but seeing nj is as blue as can be I don’t see it happening. 

I have no issues with him,  but I think the gun culture is so perverse in this country, and the right laws are lacking,  that hyperbole is counterproductive.  I think you might disagree with that. 

mcgruff10

mrussel1 said:

mcgruff10 said:

mrussel1 said:

Specious is a good word for it,  or unnecessarily hyperbolic. 

Agreed. I m not a booker fan at all, if he does drop out I hope he loses next election but seeing nj is as blue as can be I don’t see it happening. 

I have no issues with him,  but I think the gun culture is so perverse in this country, and the right laws are lacking,  that hyperbole is counterproductive.  I think you might disagree with that. 

I actually liked booker’s idea of training but I don’t see it gaining any traction. 

njnancy

Spiritual_Chaos said:

njnancy said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

And people want this guy to be president instead of Bernie

https://twitter.com/justicedems/status/1127212935556812800

I don't know why you are so pro-Bernie, but to each their own.  I think you can qualify as a Bernie Bro soon.

He has a horrible record on gun control, that is a disqualifying policy stance for me. 

I am sick of people being shot everywhere and children being subconsciously traumatized by the damn things.

Bernie may be a socialist, but he likes guns without regulations. He may change his tune now, but that is not his true position. 

Down vote. 

Because I've got a feeling, a feeling deep inside that Bernie isn't chained to the patriotic/nationalistic indoctrination that you can see in the eyes of far to many Americans - from politicians, to journalists to regular folks.

And I think being freed from that gives great possibilities to open up for honest and productive change. Patriotism is, as stated by Sean Connery in The Rock, a virtue of the vicious.

Compared to Biden, who I bet is "same ol' same ol' the greatest experiment ever created and the legend of the godly founding fathers and the american spirit"

I've done AA's Steps 4-9 twice so I am blatantly aware of my own bullshit. But thanks for the reminder. 

Bernie has many ideas for making America more socialist, in a good way, as universal healthcare, free tuition, taxing the millionaires and billionaires (though he only says billionaires now that he finally released his taxes and, oh look, he's a millionaire - nothing wrong with it, but it hurts his talking point), clean energy, etc. Where Bernie does not make the cut is in several main areas that are necessary to be elected and to be a good President

1 - he does not fully work through his policies to say how he will  manage to pay for EACH of his policy ideas (besides 'let's tear down Wall Street' which would displace many, many regular everyday workers, in pursuit of ending Capitalism)  or how he will get it through a bipartisan Congress or how he would actually implement them, in detail.  I don't want happy ideas. I want facts. 

2 - The implementation of all of his policies would be AS chaotic to the country as Trump, just from the opposite end of the spectrum.  A   failing of the Democratic Socialists is a lack of self realization that their imposition of ideas on the country is just as fascist as the far Right doing all the crazy shit it is doing right now.  Progressives do not see any wiggle room. The system needs to be overhauled and anyone who does not agree with ALL of their ideas and accept them unconditionally is WRONG and not worthy of consideration. They know what's best, in the same way the pro-life zealots are uncompromising in their position regardless of their overreach, and expect everyone to accept their policies NOW because they know what is best for the country. That is not how you reach Americans and it is heavy handed no matter if I agree with the end result or not. It took everything Obama had to get Obama Care passed, in a watered down form due to Congressional negotiations, and it took his first 2+ years in office to get it passed. How is Bernie going to change everything he says he will? Especially if he is not interested in negotiating with those who are not on the same page. 

3 - He has no foreign policy experience. Our standing in the world is completely screwed up because we have someone in office who knows nothing about foreign policy and does not care to learn. Bernie may be willing to learn, but he has been in Washington for a long time and ran for President once already. The fact that he hasn't taken time to become more knowledgeable about the world is not a good sign.  We need someone who knows how the hell diplomacy works and how to appoint people who can start to fix our broken relationships, get us back into the treaties and accords we bailed on and do it all without starting a war somewhere. 

4 - He represents a state that is almost entirely white. He has not been interested in reaching out to minorities in his time in office and his last Presidential run. He has not shown diversity in his campaign staffing and his outreach to minority communities so far has been extremely lacking. You can not win the Democratic nomination, or the Presidency without the backing of black women. They are the backbone of the Democratic Party. They were responsible for a lot of the 2018 upsets. They do not like Bernie and he isn't trying to understand the needs of the black community. And he voted for the crime bill so he has that on his record too.  

5 - The people who back him are eerily similar to the people who back Trump. Not in ideology, but in their cult like devotion. They were willing to throw the election to Trump because they were so pissed off that Bernie didn't get the nomination. That may be great for a rock band or a movie star, but it is not a good thing to have as a politician. He has done nothing to temper his rhetoric to cause those who support him to understand that the most important thing is getting Trump out of office, no matter who the Democratic nominee is.

6 - He does not help his fellow Senate and Congressional candidates who are running in 2020 (he didn't do so in 2016 and I do not see any change in how he views the election), with money or endorsement. He has a purity test for candidates and he also just seems to care about Bernie winning without thinking of the need for change in the Senate and holding onto the Congress. 

So aside from the gun issue, I see a lot of bullshit in Bernie's campaign. I know where my political bullshit lies, but I want to win and Bernie is not going to win the Presidency against Trump. You may not realize it, but the way you defend Bernie is just like his supporters. It is dismissive of anyone who thinks differently, instead of trying to see why they think what they think.  He would have his base and people who would vote Democratic because we want Trump out, but there are major forces in the Democratic Party who would not turn out for him. Just like other major Democratic strongholds did not turn out for HRC. 

This is how it works in America. It's a fine dance and a big country with people of diverse political beliefs. I believe the country would keep the far Right fascist instead of swinging all the way around to vote for the far Left fascist. But I can understand why you find him appealing. America is not Sweden. There are policies that Sweden has which I think would be great in America, but I only have one vote. And I actually don't even have that because of the damn electoral college. 

Spiritual_Chaos

njnancy said:

 America is not Sweden. There are policies that Sweden has which I think would be great in America, but I only have one vote. And I actually don't even have that because of the damn electoral college. 

Well, as someone so famously sang once -- change don't come at once, it's a wave building before it breaks.

Meltdown99

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1128242890528964608

Another Dem entering a crowded field...

mrussel1

Meltdown99 said:

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1128242890528964608

Another Dem entering a crowded field...

theoretically he takes votes from Biden, but I can't see him getting any traction.  He's a little known governor from a lesser known state.  

Halifax2TheMax

mrussel1 said:

Meltdown99 said:

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1128242890528964608

Another Dem entering a crowded field...

theoretically he takes votes from Biden, but I can't see him getting any traction.  He's a little known governor from a lesser known state.  

Almost by nature a repub.

Meltdown99

mrussel1 said:

Meltdown99 said:

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1128242890528964608

Another Dem entering a crowded field...

theoretically he takes votes from Biden, but I can't see him getting any traction.  He's a little known governor from a lesser known state.  

I was surprised Montana had a dem governor...was the election held on the day there was a blizzard keeping voters home...lol

Spiritual_Chaos

What do these no-names think when there are 20 people ahead of them running...

The Juggler

Betto and Abrams should've run for the senate.