criticism is healthy, but it's key to understand what and why you are criticizing. I'd like to know why it's hypocritical to go to an exclusive event and promote a message to close the economic gap? that's exactly the audience you need to reach to gain those things in society, and to get people talking. talking to poor people is all fine and dandy, understanding their problems, but if you don't promote that message to the elite, you won't get anywhere.
I said it was hypocritical because she was attending said event, an event strictly for the elite, so her message is tone deaf at beast and to me hypocritical. She claims to be for the little people but she's attending one of the highest profile galas for the elite.
Spreading her message is fine but spreading that message while attending the Met Gala shows me she really doesn't get it.
disagree. we wouldn't be talking about her message today had she not done this.
that's called a successful outing.
I disagree with this. Success is moving the middle, not preaching to the choir.. As someone in teh middle, she didn't move me.
criticism is healthy, but it's key to understand what and why you are criticizing. I'd like to know why it's hypocritical to go to an exclusive event and promote a message to close the economic gap? that's exactly the audience you need to reach to gain those things in society, and to get people talking. talking to poor people is all fine and dandy, understanding their problems, but if you don't promote that message to the elite, you won't get anywhere.
I said it was hypocritical because she was attending said event, an event strictly for the elite, so her message is tone deaf at beast and to me hypocritical. She claims to be for the little people but she's attending one of the highest profile galas for the elite.
Spreading her message is fine but spreading that message while attending the Met Gala shows me she really doesn't get it.
disagree. we wouldn't be talking about her message today had she not done this.
that's called a successful outing.
I disagree with this. Success is moving the middle, not preaching to the choir.. As someone in teh middle, she didn't move me.
you are one person in the middle.
And I'm very inclined to liberal arguments too. Our local Rangers fan seems to feel the same way as me though.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
I disagree w taxing them until we are all on the same playing field. You need diversity. Remove that and then creativity dies, corruption blossoms.
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
400 families saw $1.4 trillion in wealth gain since 2019. I think they can swing it without missing a beat.
Teh problem you have his how those families live now. Because they have such massive assets, what they do is borrow against the assets and only draw down what is needed to pay the note on the loan. They live on the loan. It's very clever and prevents them from paying untold amounts of capital gains taxes. They only have to pay it on what they use to repay the loans.
400 families saw $1.4 trillion in wealth gain since 2019. I think they can swing it without missing a beat.
My question about this, if this is the case (and it is) and if there are super wealthy people (and there are)….why the $400,000 level for taxes? Why is that the number used? Plenty of hard working real Americans in that boat.
And I guess I don’t recall, is the $400,000 individual or total family income?
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
I disagree w taxing them until we are all on the same playing field. You need diversity. Remove that and then creativity dies, corruption blossoms.
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
Bit confused with your use of diversity here. Do you mean a wide range of socioeconomic status? Not sure how that promotes creativity and limits corruption. Quite the opposite, really. Wealth inequality is growing and the racial wealth divide is anything but diverse.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
I disagree w taxing them until we are all on the same playing field. You need diversity. Remove that and then creativity dies, corruption blossoms.
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
Bit confused with your use of diversity here. Do you mean a wide range of socioeconomic status? Not sure how that promotes creativity and limits corruption. Quite the opposite, really. Wealth inequality is growing and the racial wealth divide is anything but diverse.
If you tax a person until they aren't rich anymore does no good for anyone. That is pretty much communism. You need economic diversity, yes.
The racial wealth is bad, we all know this. Taking from someone else until they don't have it anymore won't go over well.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
I disagree w taxing them until we are all on the same playing field. You need diversity. Remove that and then creativity dies, corruption blossoms.
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
Bit confused with your use of diversity here. Do you mean a wide range of socioeconomic status? Not sure how that promotes creativity and limits corruption. Quite the opposite, really. Wealth inequality is growing and the racial wealth divide is anything but diverse.
If you tax a person until they aren't rich anymore does no good for anyone. That is pretty much communism. You need economic diversity, yes.
The racial wealth is bad, we all know this. Taking from someone else until they don't have it anymore won't go over well.
There is not one person declaring that we "should take from someone else until they don't have it anymore." At least that I know of. Maybe link to them or their statement(s), policy, etc.
400 families saw $1.4 trillion in wealth gain since 2019. I think they can swing it without missing a beat.
Teh problem you have his how those families live now. Because they have such massive assets, what they do is borrow against the assets and only draw down what is needed to pay the note on the loan. They live on the loan. It's very clever and prevents them from paying untold amounts of capital gains taxes. They only have to pay it on what they use to repay the loans.
That "loophole" needs to be closed or at the least limited. Or taxed.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
I disagree w taxing them until we are all on the same playing field. You need diversity. Remove that and then creativity dies, corruption blossoms.
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
Bit confused with your use of diversity here. Do you mean a wide range of socioeconomic status? Not sure how that promotes creativity and limits corruption. Quite the opposite, really. Wealth inequality is growing and the racial wealth divide is anything but diverse.
If you tax a person until they aren't rich anymore does no good for anyone. That is pretty much communism. You need economic diversity, yes.
The racial wealth is bad, we all know this. Taking from someone else until they don't have it anymore won't go over well.
There is not one person declaring that we "should take from someone else until they don't have it anymore." At least that I know of. Maybe link to them or their statement(s), policy, etc.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
This was what I have been referring to and quoted that I disagreed with.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
I disagree w taxing them until we are all on the same playing field. You need diversity. Remove that and then creativity dies, corruption blossoms.
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
Bit confused with your use of diversity here. Do you mean a wide range of socioeconomic status? Not sure how that promotes creativity and limits corruption. Quite the opposite, really. Wealth inequality is growing and the racial wealth divide is anything but diverse.
If you tax a person until they aren't rich anymore does no good for anyone. That is pretty much communism. You need economic diversity, yes.
The racial wealth is bad, we all know this. Taking from someone else until they don't have it anymore won't go over well.
There is not one person declaring that we "should take from someone else until they don't have it anymore." At least that I know of. Maybe link to them or their statement(s), policy, etc.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
This was what I have been referring to and quoted that I disagreed with.
well I think she was just saying it made her think of a song. she wasn't advocating for that as policy. at least that's not how I took it.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
I disagree w taxing them until we are all on the same playing field. You need diversity. Remove that and then creativity dies, corruption blossoms.
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
Bit confused with your use of diversity here. Do you mean a wide range of socioeconomic status? Not sure how that promotes creativity and limits corruption. Quite the opposite, really. Wealth inequality is growing and the racial wealth divide is anything but diverse.
If you tax a person until they aren't rich anymore does no good for anyone. That is pretty much communism. You need economic diversity, yes.
The racial wealth is bad, we all know this. Taking from someone else until they don't have it anymore won't go over well.
There is not one person declaring that we "should take from someone else until they don't have it anymore." At least that I know of. Maybe link to them or their statement(s), policy, etc.
The first thing I thought of when I saw her dress was "I'd Love to Change the World" by Ten Years after - "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more".
This was what I have been referring to and quoted that I disagreed with.
well I think she was just saying it made her think of a song. she wasn't advocating for that as policy. at least that's not how I took it.
Yep. Just pointing out that I don't agree with it and letting Fax know where it all derived from.
The sun beams down on a brand new day No more welfare tax to pay Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light Jobless millions whisked away At last we have more room to play All systems go to kill the poor tonight -- DK
The sun beams down on a brand new day No more welfare tax to pay Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light Jobless millions whisked away At last we have more room to play All systems go to kill the poor tonight -- DK
Country Joe and the Fish are responsible for the US pulling out of Vietnam. If only Tricky Dick had known.
The sun beams down on a brand new day No more welfare tax to pay Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light Jobless millions whisked away At last we have more room to play All systems go to kill the poor tonight -- DK
Dead Kennedys are notorious for pointing out the atrocities done to poor people.
The sun beams down on a brand new day No more welfare tax to pay Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light Jobless millions whisked away At last we have more room to play All systems go to kill the poor tonight -- DK
Dead Kennedys are notorious for pointing out the atrocities done to poor people.
Comments
www.headstonesband.com
(I am not a fan of her policies, in general, but I liked this )
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
"so if that did happen, the media is saying that donating a bunch of money to a museum is a bad thing. That's an interesting take."
Hahahahaha! Killed them w that one!
I don't see what is wrong with a 2% increase across the board on the rich though. It's just enough to kick the bees nest and not get stung too bad.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The racial wealth is bad, we all know this. Taking from someone else until they don't have it anymore won't go over well.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
This was what I have been referring to and quoted that I disagreed with.
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
No more welfare tax to pay
Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light
Jobless millions whisked away
At last we have more room to play
All systems go to kill the poor tonight -- DK
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
ARREST THIS MAN!
Jeezus. Pile on won't you...