Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez

1…118119121123124…152

Comments

  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,715
    what dreams said:
    How can anyone look at the election results and claim the country is getting more and more progressive? The evidence is simply not there. 

    Go ahead, though, and replace Pelosi with someone to her left at this moment in time. We'll see how that works for us. Sure.

    They may as well go with someone hard left. I mean, they could go with Collin Peterson from Minnesota* who voted against impeachment and he'd still become the right's poster-child for evil and crazy liberalness. And everyone else would be even left of him!  If the position is going to be a figurehead for evil liberalism, may as well go all the way...

    *I neither know nor care whether he won
    1995 Milwaukee   1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin   2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley   2025 Nashville (II)
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,513
    OnWis97 said:
    what dreams said:
    How can anyone look at the election results and claim the country is getting more and more progressive? The evidence is simply not there. 

    Go ahead, though, and replace Pelosi with someone to her left at this moment in time. We'll see how that works for us. Sure.

    They may as well go with someone hard left. I mean, they could go with Collin Peterson from Minnesota* who voted against impeachment and he'd still become the right's poster-child for evil and crazy liberalness. And everyone else would be even left of him!  If the position is going to be a figurehead for evil liberalism, may as well go all the way...

    *I neither know nor care whether he won
    He didn't. Crazy Fischbach won. Die hard Trumpet.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,975
    static111 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:





    At least I get some good news
    100,000 people? Wow no idea she only has that few votes. Awful big voice for such a small base. 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,674

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • jerparker20
    jerparker20 St. Paul, MN Posts: 2,529
    edited November 2020
    Spiritual_Chaos said:

    Minnesota always has very high voter turnout. Omar can get some credit for bumping up turn out in her district, but the turnout in the rural areas in MN was just as high. Rural MN went deep red. I feel a big part of that was due to the unrest after George Floyd’s death, and Trump hammering on immigration and Omar on his visits to the state.

    She’s a lot like Trump. Her base in her district love her. Also her district would vote for a potato as long as it had a D next to the name. Outside of there, she’s loathed.
    Post edited by jerparker20 on
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,232
    cincybearcat said:
    static111 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:





    At least I get some good news
    100,000 people? Wow no idea she only has that few votes. Awful big voice for such a small base. 
    I think there are millions of people that aren’t in her district that believe in her. That might be what helps amplify her voice.  Also the republicans putting a target on her has made her very popular for the news networks.
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,232
    Spiritual_Chaos said:

    Sadly I think people on this forum are too conservative for any successful plan Omar or anyone of the squad has to offer.   I need to just move my family to Sweden.
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,232
    what dreams said:
    How can anyone look at the election results and claim the country is getting more and more progressive? The evidence is simply not there. 

    Go ahead, though, and replace Pelosi with someone to her left at this moment in time. We'll see how that works for us. Sure.
    Because Joe pandering to the right ...checks notes... brought Trump 93% of t he republicans vote vs 90% in 2016
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,674
    jerparker20 said:

    She’s a lot like Trump.
    Sure.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    edited November 2020
    static111 said:
    what dreams said:
    How can anyone look at the election results and claim the country is getting more and more progressive? The evidence is simply not there. 

    Go ahead, though, and replace Pelosi with someone to her left at this moment in time. We'll see how that works for us. Sure.
    Because Joe pandering to the right ...checks notes... brought Trump 93% of t he republicans vote vs 90% in 2016
    Please explain your cause and effect. Where is your evidence that one caused the other? Your're saying the 3% increase is the fault of Biden pandering to the right? Three percent of Trump voters looked at two right-leaning candidates and picked Trump? That's a bold claim as well, not sure it’s grounded in fact or just your opinion. I'll wait for a logical explanation of that.

    Maybe look at the numbers of newly registered Republican voters, and voters who came out this time just because the heat was on. The R's had a pretty strong registration drive in areas where they felt they needed it, and peeled off a lot of Latino and black men. I have my theories about why the latter turned out for him, and it's not because Joe is a secret Republican.
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,674
    what dreams said:

    The R's had a pretty strong registration drive in areas where they felt they needed it, and peeled off a lot of Latino and black men. I have my theories about why the latter turned out for him, and it's not because Joe is a secret Republican.
    What numbers did he have with latino and black men country.wide, with mail in votes added?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • jerparker20
    jerparker20 St. Paul, MN Posts: 2,529
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    jerparker20 said:

    She’s a lot like Trump.
    Sure.
    Nice edit of the rest of the comment to take it out of context. You may have a future working for the Daily Caller.
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,232
    what dreams said:
    static111 said:
    what dreams said:
    How can anyone look at the election results and claim the country is getting more and more progressive? The evidence is simply not there. 

    Go ahead, though, and replace Pelosi with someone to her left at this moment in time. We'll see how that works for us. Sure.
    Because Joe pandering to the right ...checks notes... brought Trump 93% of t he republicans vote vs 90% in 2016
    Please explain your cause and effect. Where is your evidence that one caused the other? Your're saying the 3% increase is the fault of Biden pandering to the right? Three percent of Trump voters looked at two right-leaning candidates and picked Trump? That's a bold claim as well, not sure it’s grounded in fact or just your opinion. I'll wait for a logical explanation of that.

    Maybe look at the numbers of newly registered Republican voters, and voters who came out this time just because the heat was on. The R's had a pretty strong registration drive in areas where they felt they needed it, and peeled off a lot of Latino and black men. I have my theories about why the latter turned out for him, and it's not because Joe is a secret Republican.
    The whole point of tacking right was to get the moderate Republican vote because the left couldn’t be counted on. Nevertheless, the right went hard for Trump.  
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 40,117
    jerparker20 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    jerparker20 said:

    She’s a lot like Trump.
    Sure.
    Nice edit of the rest of the comment to take it out of context. You may have a future working for the Daily Caller.
    he really likes editing. 
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,674
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    he
    yes.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,232
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    he
    yes.
    😂
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 40,117
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    he
    yes.
    LMAO. that was actually funny
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    static111 said:
    what dreams said:
    static111 said:
    what dreams said:
    How can anyone look at the election results and claim the country is getting more and more progressive? The evidence is simply not there. 

    Go ahead, though, and replace Pelosi with someone to her left at this moment in time. We'll see how that works for us. Sure.
    Because Joe pandering to the right ...checks notes... brought Trump 93% of t he republicans vote vs 90% in 2016
    Please explain your cause and effect. Where is your evidence that one caused the other? Your're saying the 3% increase is the fault of Biden pandering to the right? Three percent of Trump voters looked at two right-leaning candidates and picked Trump? That's a bold claim as well, not sure it’s grounded in fact or just your opinion. I'll wait for a logical explanation of that.

    Maybe look at the numbers of newly registered Republican voters, and voters who came out this time just because the heat was on. The R's had a pretty strong registration drive in areas where they felt they needed it, and peeled off a lot of Latino and black men. I have my theories about why the latter turned out for him, and it's not because Joe is a secret Republican.
    The whole point of tacking right was to get the moderate Republican vote because the left couldn’t be counted on. Nevertheless, the right went hard for Trump.  
    Again, you cause and effect confuses me. Biden went right BECAUSE the left is unreliable? Really? Answering yes is a problem. 
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 31,008
    static111 said:
    what dreams said:
    static111 said:
    what dreams said:
    How can anyone look at the election results and claim the country is getting more and more progressive? The evidence is simply not there. 

    Go ahead, though, and replace Pelosi with someone to her left at this moment in time. We'll see how that works for us. Sure.
    Because Joe pandering to the right ...checks notes... brought Trump 93% of t he republicans vote vs 90% in 2016
    Please explain your cause and effect. Where is your evidence that one caused the other? Your're saying the 3% increase is the fault of Biden pandering to the right? Three percent of Trump voters looked at two right-leaning candidates and picked Trump? That's a bold claim as well, not sure it’s grounded in fact or just your opinion. I'll wait for a logical explanation of that.

    Maybe look at the numbers of newly registered Republican voters, and voters who came out this time just because the heat was on. The R's had a pretty strong registration drive in areas where they felt they needed it, and peeled off a lot of Latino and black men. I have my theories about why the latter turned out for him, and it's not because Joe is a secret Republican.
    The whole point of tacking right was to get the moderate Republican vote because the left couldn’t be counted on. Nevertheless, the right went hard for Trump.  
    And centrist,  independent vote.  I know people who would have stayed home had Bernie been the nominee. 
  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    How does one build a coalition with unreliable voters?

Categories