She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
Yeah, it’s cause it’s left up to the states. States rights and all. Personally I’d be for a federal program...and that’s saying a lot
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
Yeah, it’s cause it’s left up to the states. States rights and all. Personally I’d be for a federal program...and that’s saying a lot
State elections should be left up to the states. Federal elections should be left up to the feds. That is how it works in Canada. Canada Elections doesn't run provincial elections. In BC, Elections BC runs the elections. Meltdown was only talking about federal elections. But of course, we have a different system of government altogether, so I get what he means. Like, while midterms in the US also involve selecting Governors, which is state level, it also elects federal senate and congress members. So the lines are way more blurred during the midterms than they are in Canadian provincial elections, which are completely separate from anything on the federal level, and then federal and provincial governments just do their best to work with one another. Which, humbly, make way, way, way more sense.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
funny that Ed and the other members of the band have little to no social media presence given the state of our humble country. I keep hearing Ticketmaster in my head...Help me @RichardMarx
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
Yeah, it’s cause it’s left up to the states. States rights and all. Personally I’d be for a federal program...and that’s saying a lot
State elections should be left up to the states. Federal elections should be left up to the feds. That is how it works in Canada. Canada Elections doesn't run provincial elections. In BC, Elections BC runs the elections. Meltdown was only talking about federal elections. But of course, we have a different system of government altogether, so I get what he means. Like, while midterms in the US also involve selecting Governors, which is state level, it also elects federal senate and congress members. So the lines are way more blurred during the midterms than they are in Canadian provincial elections, which are completely separate from anything on the federal level, and then federal and provincial governments just do their best to work with one another. Which, humbly, make way, way, way more sense.
That is correct. I was thinking of federal. Still might not be a bad idea to somehow have the same rules in every state, oversaw by the federal government. our elections are different that way, we never vote the same day for 2 different levels of government, or at least in Ontario we don't. If it wasn't for Wynn moving the provincial election date to earlier in the year, Ford might not be premier...lol
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
Yeah, it’s cause it’s left up to the states. States rights and all. Personally I’d be for a federal program...and that’s saying a lot
State elections should be left up to the states. Federal elections should be left up to the feds. That is how it works in Canada. Canada Elections doesn't run provincial elections. In BC, Elections BC runs the elections. Meltdown was only talking about federal elections. But of course, we have a different system of government altogether, so I get what he means. Like, while midterms in the US also involve selecting Governors, which is state level, it also elects federal senate and congress members. So the lines are way more blurred during the midterms than they are in Canadian provincial elections, which are completely separate from anything on the federal level, and then federal and provincial governments just do their best to work with one another. Which, humbly, make way, way, way more sense.
That is correct. I was thinking of federal. Still might not be a bad idea to somehow have the same rules in every state, oversaw by the federal government. our elections are different that way, we never vote the same day for 2 different levels of government, or at least in Ontario we don't. If it wasn't for Wynn moving the provincial election date to earlier in the year, Ford might not be premier...lol
Just to give you guys two very unique examples of states controlling the federal process, that just cropped this election:
In the Maine congressional, each voter ranks their selection of candidates. If no one gets 50%+1 voter, the top two candidates receive the #2 ranked votes on the ballots where the top two weren't number one. Then they move on to number 3 and so on until someone gets over 50%. So it matters who you rank #2. The Democratic candidate won the election this week based on the number of #2 votes he received, because no one won 50% in the straight ballot.
In the Mississippi Senate, they have to do a run off with the top 2 because no one got 50% in the direct. That's next week I think. So yeah, there are some unique systems in place, based on the formation of the original gov't.
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
Yeah, it’s cause it’s left up to the states. States rights and all. Personally I’d be for a federal program...and that’s saying a lot
State elections should be left up to the states. Federal elections should be left up to the feds. That is how it works in Canada. Canada Elections doesn't run provincial elections. In BC, Elections BC runs the elections. Meltdown was only talking about federal elections. But of course, we have a different system of government altogether, so I get what he means. Like, while midterms in the US also involve selecting Governors, which is state level, it also elects federal senate and congress members. So the lines are way more blurred during the midterms than they are in Canadian provincial elections, which are completely separate from anything on the federal level, and then federal and provincial governments just do their best to work with one another. Which, humbly, make way, way, way more sense.
That is correct. I was thinking of federal. Still might not be a bad idea to somehow have the same rules in every state, oversaw by the federal government. our elections are different that way, we never vote the same day for 2 different levels of government, or at least in Ontario we don't. If it wasn't for Wynn moving the provincial election date to earlier in the year, Ford might not be premier...lol
Just to give you guys two very unique examples of states controlling the federal process, that just cropped this election:
In the Maine congressional, each voter ranks their selection of candidates. If no one gets 50%+1 voter, the top two candidates receive the #2 ranked votes on the ballots where the top two weren't number one. Then they move on to number 3 and so on until someone gets over 50%. So it matters who you rank #2. The Democratic candidate won the election this week based on the number of #2 votes he received, because no one won 50% in the straight ballot.
In the Mississippi Senate, they have to do a run off with the top 2 because no one got 50% in the direct. That's next week I think. So yeah, there are some unique systems in place, based on the formation of the original gov't.
As the courts become more political, I would not be surprised to see both of these challenged in federal court given their impact on left wing third party spoilers.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
Yeah, it’s cause it’s left up to the states. States rights and all. Personally I’d be for a federal program...and that’s saying a lot
State elections should be left up to the states. Federal elections should be left up to the feds. That is how it works in Canada. Canada Elections doesn't run provincial elections. In BC, Elections BC runs the elections. Meltdown was only talking about federal elections. But of course, we have a different system of government altogether, so I get what he means. Like, while midterms in the US also involve selecting Governors, which is state level, it also elects federal senate and congress members. So the lines are way more blurred during the midterms than they are in Canadian provincial elections, which are completely separate from anything on the federal level, and then federal and provincial governments just do their best to work with one another. Which, humbly, make way, way, way more sense.
That is correct. I was thinking of federal. Still might not be a bad idea to somehow have the same rules in every state, oversaw by the federal government. our elections are different that way, we never vote the same day for 2 different levels of government, or at least in Ontario we don't. If it wasn't for Wynn moving the provincial election date to earlier in the year, Ford might not be premier...lol
Just to give you guys two very unique examples of states controlling the federal process, that just cropped this election:
In the Maine congressional, each voter ranks their selection of candidates. If no one gets 50%+1 voter, the top two candidates receive the #2 ranked votes on the ballots where the top two weren't number one. Then they move on to number 3 and so on until someone gets over 50%. So it matters who you rank #2. The Democratic candidate won the election this week based on the number of #2 votes he received, because no one won 50% in the straight ballot.
In the Mississippi Senate, they have to do a run off with the top 2 because no one got 50% in the direct. That's next week I think. So yeah, there are some unique systems in place, based on the formation of the original gov't.
As the courts become more political, I would not be surprised to see both of these challenged in federal court given their impact on left wing third party spoilers.
I don't know anything about the Maine state constitution, but I don't understand where in the federal one, this would be illegal. The article isn't specific enough to identify why he is suing. Should be interesting.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
funny that Ed and the other members of the band have little to no social media presence given the state of our humble country. I keep hearing Ticketmaster in my head...Help me @RichardMarx
What good does a social media presence do? It's a cesspool, they are wise for avoiding the toxic pit
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
In Canada we have elections Canada who runs the elections, people vote the same way no matter where they live. How come the US does not create consistency in how people vote? Also, we just had municipal elections and I was not registered on the voting list ... I went to the polling station, showed my drivers licence, voted and was gone in less than 5 minutes...
Yeah, it’s cause it’s left up to the states. States rights and all. Personally I’d be for a federal program...and that’s saying a lot
State elections should be left up to the states. Federal elections should be left up to the feds. That is how it works in Canada. Canada Elections doesn't run provincial elections. In BC, Elections BC runs the elections. Meltdown was only talking about federal elections. But of course, we have a different system of government altogether, so I get what he means. Like, while midterms in the US also involve selecting Governors, which is state level, it also elects federal senate and congress members. So the lines are way more blurred during the midterms than they are in Canadian provincial elections, which are completely separate from anything on the federal level, and then federal and provincial governments just do their best to work with one another. Which, humbly, make way, way, way more sense.
That is correct. I was thinking of federal. Still might not be a bad idea to somehow have the same rules in every state, oversaw by the federal government. our elections are different that way, we never vote the same day for 2 different levels of government, or at least in Ontario we don't. If it wasn't for Wynn moving the provincial election date to earlier in the year, Ford might not be premier...lol
Just to give you guys two very unique examples of states controlling the federal process, that just cropped this election:
In the Maine congressional, each voter ranks their selection of candidates. If no one gets 50%+1 voter, the top two candidates receive the #2 ranked votes on the ballots where the top two weren't number one. Then they move on to number 3 and so on until someone gets over 50%. So it matters who you rank #2. The Democratic candidate won the election this week based on the number of #2 votes he received, because no one won 50% in the straight ballot.
In the Mississippi Senate, they have to do a run off with the top 2 because no one got 50% in the direct. That's next week I think. So yeah, there are some unique systems in place, based on the formation of the original gov't.
As the courts become more political, I would not be surprised to see both of these challenged in federal court given their impact on left wing third party spoilers.
I don't know anything about the Maine state constitution, but I don't understand where in the federal one, this would be illegal. The article isn't specific enough to identify why he is suing. Should be interesting.
My response would be that he is suing because he lost. If he were the second choice of the majority of the voters; or he won with a clear majority I would bet there would be no lawsuit.
I like the idea of third party candidates having a second choice in case there is not a clear winner with over 50% of the vote. I hate to see someone lose by 1,000 votes when there are 20,000 votes that are just thrown away. It would solve the problem of people wanting to run as a third party and the desire for people to vote for people that are not in 'the two party system'. People get to vote their conscious and then have a second choice when that person, most times, loses.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
New England, all blue but for one governor and one senator.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
New England, all blue but for one governor and one senator.
That governor crosses the street against the light and almost got hisself, his wife and their pizza rundover.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
New England, all blue but for one governor and one senator.
That governor crosses the street against the light and almost got hisself, his wife and their pizza rundover.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
New England, all blue but for one governor and one senator.
That governor crosses the street against the light and almost got hisself, his wife and their pizza rundover.
And turned blue?
We all bleed red. Even the pizza.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
New England, all blue but for one governor and one senator.
That governor crosses the street against the light and almost got hisself, his wife and their pizza rundover.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
Stop being positive you fool, it makes you look like an elitist.
Were supposed to be crying in our beer while trying to get into the mind of a Trump supporter. Otherwise Trump wins 2020.
A simulation of what's going on in a Trump supporter's mind...study it...become it.
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
New England, all blue but for one governor and one senator.
That governor crosses the street against the light and almost got hisself, his wife and their pizza rundover.
And turned blue?
We all bleed red. Even the pizza.
What about white pizza?
White pizza don’t matter.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
She hasn't been declared a winner, right? The race is uncalled, but nice try.
I'm sure more votes will be found under the bed like AZ and Florida which all are for Democrats, right?
But every vote must be counted, right?
You speak like someone who has no idea about the mechanics of an election. In AZ, on election night, the mail in/drop off ballots had not been counted. That's why only 75% of the votes were in. There's a Republican gov and Sec'y of State in AZ and neither has claimed any malfeasance, nor has McSally. But you know better right... you just know there's a bunch of Mexicans changing their clothes in their portable adobes and going back into vote.
Young Kim lost, so she will not be in the picture. She would not appear in a freshman House picture even if she were elected as she was running as the incumbent.
Orange County - red to blue.
Woohoo! Keep the blue wave a crashin'!
New England, all blue but for one governor and one senator.
That governor crosses the street against the light and almost got hisself, his wife and their pizza rundover.
Comments
But every vote must be counted, right?
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
So I googled it.
Note the first response...
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/414309-democrat-defeats-gop-lawmaker-bruce-poliquin-in-maine
In the Maine congressional, each voter ranks their selection of candidates. If no one gets 50%+1 voter, the top two candidates receive the #2 ranked votes on the ballots where the top two weren't number one. Then they move on to number 3 and so on until someone gets over 50%. So it matters who you rank #2. The Democratic candidate won the election this week based on the number of #2 votes he received, because no one won 50% in the straight ballot.
In the Mississippi Senate, they have to do a run off with the top 2 because no one got 50% in the direct. That's next week I think. So yeah, there are some unique systems in place, based on the formation of the original gov't.
The process has already started in Maine.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/11/15/jared-golden-maine-election-993293
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Orange County - red to blue.
I like the idea of third party candidates having a second choice in case there is not a clear winner with over 50% of the vote. I hate to see someone lose by 1,000 votes when there are 20,000 votes that are just thrown away. It would solve the problem of people wanting to run as a third party and the desire for people to vote for people that are not in 'the two party system'. People get to vote their conscious and then have a second choice when that person, most times, loses.
It's a more structured version of caucuses.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Were supposed to be crying in our beer while trying to get into the mind of a Trump supporter. Otherwise Trump wins 2020.
A simulation of what's going on in a Trump supporter's mind...study it...become it.
But hard to unsee, for me.