The Senate Should Not Confirm Kavanaugh
Signed, 1,000+ Law Professors (and Counting)
OCT. 3, 2018
The following letter will be presented to
the United States Senate on Oct. 4. It will be updated as more
signatures are received.
Judicial temperament is one of the most
important qualities of a judge. As the Congressional Research Service
explains, a judge requires “a personality that is even-handed, unbiased,
impartial, courteous yet firm, and dedicated to a process, not a
result.” The concern for judicial temperament dates back to our
founding; in Federalist 78, titled “Judges as Guardians of the
Constitution,” Alexander Hamilton expressed the need for “the integrity
and moderation of the judiciary.”
We are law professors who teach, research and
write about the judicial institutions of this country. Many of us appear
in state and federal court, and our work means that we will continue to
do so, including before the United States Supreme Court. We regret that
we feel compelled to write to you, our Senators, to provide our views
that at the Senate hearings on Sept. 27, Judge Brett Kavanaugh
displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for
any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this
land.
The question at issue was of course painful for
anyone. But Judge Kavanaugh exhibited a lack of commitment to judicious
inquiry. Instead of being open to the necessary search for accuracy,
Judge Kavanaugh was repeatedly aggressive with questioners. Even in his
prepared remarks, Judge Kavanaugh described the hearing as partisan,
referring to it as “a calculated and orchestrated political hit,” rather
than acknowledging the need for the Senate, faced with new information,
to try to understand what had transpired. Instead of trying to sort out
with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh
responded in an intemperate, inflammatory and partial manner, as he
interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to senators.
As you know, under two statutes governing bias
and recusal, judges must step aside if they are at risk of being
perceived as or of being unfair. As Congress has previously put it, a
judge or justice “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which
his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” These statutes are
part of a myriad of legal commitments to the impartiality of the
judiciary, which is the cornerstone of the courts.
We have differing views about the other
qualifications of Judge Kavanaugh. But we are united, as professors of
law and scholars of judicial institutions, in believing that he did not
display the impartiality and judicial temperament requisite to sit on
the highest court of our land.
Signed, with institutional affiliation listed for identification purposes only, by the following:
See link for the list of over 1000 Law Professors.
If I am wrong later I will admit it but which way do these judges vote?
For the big money repub interest, every damn time. 73-0. Duh.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
“A president who is under investigation for conspiring in the subversion of his own election and obstruction of justice apparently rigged the investigation of his Supreme Court nominee, who thinks presidents shouldn’t be investigated.”
The Senate Should Not Confirm Kavanaugh
Signed, 1,000+ Law Professors (and Counting)
OCT. 3, 2018
The following letter will be presented to
the United States Senate on Oct. 4. It will be updated as more
signatures are received.
Judicial temperament is one of the most
important qualities of a judge. As the Congressional Research Service
explains, a judge requires “a personality that is even-handed, unbiased,
impartial, courteous yet firm, and dedicated to a process, not a
result.” The concern for judicial temperament dates back to our
founding; in Federalist 78, titled “Judges as Guardians of the
Constitution,” Alexander Hamilton expressed the need for “the integrity
and moderation of the judiciary.”
We are law professors who teach, research and
write about the judicial institutions of this country. Many of us appear
in state and federal court, and our work means that we will continue to
do so, including before the United States Supreme Court. We regret that
we feel compelled to write to you, our Senators, to provide our views
that at the Senate hearings on Sept. 27, Judge Brett Kavanaugh
displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for
any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this
land.
The question at issue was of course painful for
anyone. But Judge Kavanaugh exhibited a lack of commitment to judicious
inquiry. Instead of being open to the necessary search for accuracy,
Judge Kavanaugh was repeatedly aggressive with questioners. Even in his
prepared remarks, Judge Kavanaugh described the hearing as partisan,
referring to it as “a calculated and orchestrated political hit,” rather
than acknowledging the need for the Senate, faced with new information,
to try to understand what had transpired. Instead of trying to sort out
with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh
responded in an intemperate, inflammatory and partial manner, as he
interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to senators.
As you know, under two statutes governing bias
and recusal, judges must step aside if they are at risk of being
perceived as or of being unfair. As Congress has previously put it, a
judge or justice “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which
his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” These statutes are
part of a myriad of legal commitments to the impartiality of the
judiciary, which is the cornerstone of the courts.
We have differing views about the other
qualifications of Judge Kavanaugh. But we are united, as professors of
law and scholars of judicial institutions, in believing that he did not
display the impartiality and judicial temperament requisite to sit on
the highest court of our land.
Signed, with institutional affiliation listed for identification purposes only, by the following:
See link for the list of over 1000 Law Professors.
One word: Professors.
Lol. Too funny. Like anyone should care what academics that couldn't cut it in the real world say.
Post edited by EdsonNascimento on
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
And for the record, I actually don't agree with some of Kavanaugh's stances. And I have no idea if Ford is telling the truth.
But, that's irrelevant. That's the point. Everyone is just presuming the reality they want.
It's ok to voice displeasure over his judicial decisions. It's ok to support Ford (or Kavanaugh). But, both sides are creating realities that just don't exist. That's the problem with our politics, and why while the way it's delivered could be better, Trump has a point about the media. They are not helping the situation (on either side) by being op-ed pieces masquerading as factual news. Just give us the facts, not slanted headlines. Let us decide.
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
The Senate Should Not Confirm Kavanaugh
Signed, 1,000+ Law Professors (and Counting)
OCT. 3, 2018
The following letter will be presented to
the United States Senate on Oct. 4. It will be updated as more
signatures are received.
Judicial temperament is one of the most
important qualities of a judge. As the Congressional Research Service
explains, a judge requires “a personality that is even-handed, unbiased,
impartial, courteous yet firm, and dedicated to a process, not a
result.” The concern for judicial temperament dates back to our
founding; in Federalist 78, titled “Judges as Guardians of the
Constitution,” Alexander Hamilton expressed the need for “the integrity
and moderation of the judiciary.”
We are law professors who teach, research and
write about the judicial institutions of this country. Many of us appear
in state and federal court, and our work means that we will continue to
do so, including before the United States Supreme Court. We regret that
we feel compelled to write to you, our Senators, to provide our views
that at the Senate hearings on Sept. 27, Judge Brett Kavanaugh
displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for
any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this
land.
The question at issue was of course painful for
anyone. But Judge Kavanaugh exhibited a lack of commitment to judicious
inquiry. Instead of being open to the necessary search for accuracy,
Judge Kavanaugh was repeatedly aggressive with questioners. Even in his
prepared remarks, Judge Kavanaugh described the hearing as partisan,
referring to it as “a calculated and orchestrated political hit,” rather
than acknowledging the need for the Senate, faced with new information,
to try to understand what had transpired. Instead of trying to sort out
with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh
responded in an intemperate, inflammatory and partial manner, as he
interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to senators.
As you know, under two statutes governing bias
and recusal, judges must step aside if they are at risk of being
perceived as or of being unfair. As Congress has previously put it, a
judge or justice “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which
his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” These statutes are
part of a myriad of legal commitments to the impartiality of the
judiciary, which is the cornerstone of the courts.
We have differing views about the other
qualifications of Judge Kavanaugh. But we are united, as professors of
law and scholars of judicial institutions, in believing that he did not
display the impartiality and judicial temperament requisite to sit on
the highest court of our land.
Signed, with institutional affiliation listed for identification purposes only, by the following:
See link for the list of over 1000 Law Professors.
One word: Professors.
Lol. Too funny. Like anyone should care what academics that couldn't cut it in the real world say.
The Senate Should Not Confirm Kavanaugh
Signed, 1,000+ Law Professors (and Counting)
OCT. 3, 2018
The following letter will be presented to
the United States Senate on Oct. 4. It will be updated as more
signatures are received.
Judicial temperament is one of the most
important qualities of a judge. As the Congressional Research Service
explains, a judge requires “a personality that is even-handed, unbiased,
impartial, courteous yet firm, and dedicated to a process, not a
result.” The concern for judicial temperament dates back to our
founding; in Federalist 78, titled “Judges as Guardians of the
Constitution,” Alexander Hamilton expressed the need for “the integrity
and moderation of the judiciary.”
We are law professors who teach, research and
write about the judicial institutions of this country. Many of us appear
in state and federal court, and our work means that we will continue to
do so, including before the United States Supreme Court. We regret that
we feel compelled to write to you, our Senators, to provide our views
that at the Senate hearings on Sept. 27, Judge Brett Kavanaugh
displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for
any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this
land.
The question at issue was of course painful for
anyone. But Judge Kavanaugh exhibited a lack of commitment to judicious
inquiry. Instead of being open to the necessary search for accuracy,
Judge Kavanaugh was repeatedly aggressive with questioners. Even in his
prepared remarks, Judge Kavanaugh described the hearing as partisan,
referring to it as “a calculated and orchestrated political hit,” rather
than acknowledging the need for the Senate, faced with new information,
to try to understand what had transpired. Instead of trying to sort out
with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh
responded in an intemperate, inflammatory and partial manner, as he
interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to senators.
As you know, under two statutes governing bias
and recusal, judges must step aside if they are at risk of being
perceived as or of being unfair. As Congress has previously put it, a
judge or justice “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which
his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” These statutes are
part of a myriad of legal commitments to the impartiality of the
judiciary, which is the cornerstone of the courts.
We have differing views about the other
qualifications of Judge Kavanaugh. But we are united, as professors of
law and scholars of judicial institutions, in believing that he did not
display the impartiality and judicial temperament requisite to sit on
the highest court of our land.
Signed, with institutional affiliation listed for identification purposes only, by the following:
See link for the list of over 1000 Law Professors.
One word: Professors.
Lol. Too funny. Like anyone should care what academics that couldn't cut it in the real world say.
Hey look! We got a real genuine Trump voter right here!
Listened to an NPR interview this morning with Missy Carr defending Kavanaugh. The interview shows that if you are left thinking Kavanaugh is a liar and if you are on the right Ford is a liar.
No matter which way this goes, the conspiracy theorists will be out in force.
National Council Of Churches Calls For Brett Kavanaugh’s Withdrawal
The Supreme Court nominee “has disqualified himself,” said the council, which represents 38 Christian denominations.
The National Council of Churches called for the withdrawal of Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination on Wednesday, citing his behavior during last week’s Senate hearing and his “political record.”
“We believe he has disqualified himself from this lifetime appointment and must step aside immediately,” the Washington-based council said in a statement.
According to its website, the organization represents over 40 million people and 38 Christian denominations.
The Senate Should Not Confirm Kavanaugh
Signed, 1,000+ Law Professors (and Counting)
OCT. 3, 2018
The following letter will be presented to
the United States Senate on Oct. 4. It will be updated as more
signatures are received.
Judicial temperament is one of the most
important qualities of a judge. As the Congressional Research Service
explains, a judge requires “a personality that is even-handed, unbiased,
impartial, courteous yet firm, and dedicated to a process, not a
result.” The concern for judicial temperament dates back to our
founding; in Federalist 78, titled “Judges as Guardians of the
Constitution,” Alexander Hamilton expressed the need for “the integrity
and moderation of the judiciary.”
We are law professors who teach, research and
write about the judicial institutions of this country. Many of us appear
in state and federal court, and our work means that we will continue to
do so, including before the United States Supreme Court. We regret that
we feel compelled to write to you, our Senators, to provide our views
that at the Senate hearings on Sept. 27, Judge Brett Kavanaugh
displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for
any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this
land.
The question at issue was of course painful for
anyone. But Judge Kavanaugh exhibited a lack of commitment to judicious
inquiry. Instead of being open to the necessary search for accuracy,
Judge Kavanaugh was repeatedly aggressive with questioners. Even in his
prepared remarks, Judge Kavanaugh described the hearing as partisan,
referring to it as “a calculated and orchestrated political hit,” rather
than acknowledging the need for the Senate, faced with new information,
to try to understand what had transpired. Instead of trying to sort out
with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh
responded in an intemperate, inflammatory and partial manner, as he
interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to senators.
As you know, under two statutes governing bias
and recusal, judges must step aside if they are at risk of being
perceived as or of being unfair. As Congress has previously put it, a
judge or justice “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which
his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” These statutes are
part of a myriad of legal commitments to the impartiality of the
judiciary, which is the cornerstone of the courts.
We have differing views about the other
qualifications of Judge Kavanaugh. But we are united, as professors of
law and scholars of judicial institutions, in believing that he did not
display the impartiality and judicial temperament requisite to sit on
the highest court of our land.
Signed, with institutional affiliation listed for identification purposes only, by the following:
See link for the list of over 1000 Law Professors.
One word: Professors.
Lol. Too funny. Like anyone should care what academics that couldn't cut it in the real world say.
Listened to an NPR interview this morning with Missy Carr defending Kavanaugh. The interview shows that if you are left thinking Kavanaugh is a liar and if you are on the right Ford is a liar.
No matter which way this goes, the conspiracy theorists will be out in force.
I don't subscribe to some of the crazy on the right, but how is Kavanaugh not a liar?
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
And for the record, I actually don't agree with some of Kavanaugh's stances. And I have no idea if Ford is telling the truth.
But, that's irrelevant. That's the point. Everyone is just presuming the reality they want.
It's ok to voice displeasure over his judicial decisions. It's ok to support Ford (or Kavanaugh). But, both sides are creating realities that just don't exist. That's the problem with our politics, and why while the way it's delivered could be better, Trump has a point about the media. They are not helping the situation (on either side) by being op-ed pieces masquerading as factual news. Just give us the facts, not slanted headlines. Let us decide.
The real problem is neither side is interested in facts and reality. But the republicans in this case are the ones who control whether we get to the facts and reality, so this is on them. There is NO reason a vote needs to happen so soon. There is no reason not to investigate longer and take their time. Other than political reasons if course.
I suppose Feinstein deserves some of the blame here keeping it so long. But that doesn’t matter. We still have a chance for the right thing to be done.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album. And, related to this thread, if KISS was playing while Kav was groping, then it is probably KISS’s fault.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
I bet Kav is a KISS fan...just saying, lol. I really have no qualms with KISS and like some of their songs as well, but I do find their theatricals a bit over the top for my liking.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Well.... You pull the trigger of myyyyyyyyyyyy
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
I bet Kav is a KISS fan...just saying, lol. I really have no qualms with KISS and like some of their songs as well, but I do find their theatricals a bit over the top for my liking.
Wow.
You had to hit below the belt, eh? I'm going to work now, but rest assured I'll be thinking of a wicked insult for you. It's going to be extra special.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
I bet Kav is a KISS fan...just saying, lol. I really have no qualms with KISS and like some of their songs as well, but I do find their theatricals a bit over the top for my liking.
Wow.
You had to hit below the belt, eh? I'm going to work now, but rest assured I'll be thinking of a wicked insult for you. It's going to be extra special.
Kiss is just terrible. Rush, Journey and Kiss are my three most hated bands.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
I bet Kav is a KISS fan...just saying, lol. I really have no qualms with KISS and like some of their songs as well, but I do find their theatricals a bit over the top for my liking.
Wow.
You had to hit below the belt, eh? I'm going to work now, but rest assured I'll be thinking of a wicked insult for you. It's going to be extra special.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
I bet Kav is a KISS fan...just saying, lol. I really have no qualms with KISS and like some of their songs as well, but I do find their theatricals a bit over the top for my liking.
Wow.
You had to hit below the belt, eh? I'm going to work now, but rest assured I'll be thinking of a wicked insult for you. It's going to be extra special.
Kiss is just terrible. Rush, Journey and Kiss are my three most hated bands.
Listened to an NPR interview this morning with Missy Carr defending Kavanaugh. The interview shows that if you are left thinking Kavanaugh is a liar and if you are on the right Ford is a liar.
No matter which way this goes, the conspiracy theorists will be out in force.
I don't subscribe to some of the crazy on the right, but how is Kavanaugh not a liar?
I'll flip it for you as I hear both sides of the coin and this is what A Kavanaugh defender says.
How is she not? Fear of flying, second door in the house, What house, how'd she get home, doesn't remember how she got there, the former boyfriend just came out with a statement that attacks her credibility.
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
I bet Kav is a KISS fan...just saying, lol. I really have no qualms with KISS and like some of their songs as well, but I do find their theatricals a bit over the top for my liking.
Wow.
You had to hit below the belt, eh? I'm going to work now, but rest assured I'll be thinking of a wicked insult for you. It's going to be extra special.
Kiss is just terrible. Rush, Journey and Kiss are my three most hated bands.
Give Destroyer a chance. Great album.
NO. Its middle of the road.
The garagey Debut, the rough Hotter than Hell and the super-produced Dynasty and Unmasked.
Fo sho
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
If he gets through, then @mcgruff10 and @unsung and whoever had to sell their Bruce albums can never again try to argue that the US belong even in the discussion about the greatest countries in the world.
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
I don't own any Bruce albums but I'd be happy to use Kiss albums as target practice.
Lol, why waste the bullet on a Kiss album? Just throw it in the trash
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
The caloric expenditure would obviously be more to shoot it and then throw the pieces away individually...unless you just leave them laying on the ground...which would be fine as well since it is a KISS album.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
I bet Kav is a KISS fan...just saying, lol. I really have no qualms with KISS and like some of their songs as well, but I do find their theatricals a bit over the top for my liking.
Ofc he is. KISS is a very pro-gun, pro-U-S-A, trump inauguration playing kind of band. Up your alley. I know you're down in your man cave listening to KISS chugging down Bud Lights. WE ALL KNOW IT.
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
Comments
Duh.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
And that is even with Unsung even having no problems mocking Sexual Assault victims. The US is done. It's over. No trophy for you.
Lindsey Graham and the Swinging Swampers orchestra.
“A president who is under investigation for conspiring in the subversion of his own election and obstruction of justice apparently rigged the investigation of his Supreme Court nominee, who thinks presidents shouldn’t be investigated.”
Lol. Too funny. Like anyone should care what academics that couldn't cut it in the real world say.
But, that's irrelevant. That's the point. Everyone is just presuming the reality they want.
It's ok to voice displeasure over his judicial decisions. It's ok to support Ford (or Kavanaugh). But, both sides are creating realities that just don't exist. That's the problem with our politics, and why while the way it's delivered could be better, Trump has a point about the media. They are not helping the situation (on either side) by being op-ed pieces masquerading as factual news. Just give us the facts, not slanted headlines. Let us decide.
Say it with me now, dumb is good.....smart bad!
No matter which way this goes, the conspiracy theorists will be out in force.
more at https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/national-council-of-churches-kavanaugh-withdrawal_us_5bb5400de4b028e1fe3a4a19
I suppose Feinstein deserves some of the blame here keeping it so long. But that doesn’t matter. We still have a chance for the right thing to be done.
Bullets are cheaper than the caloric expenditure necessary to throw a Kiss album in the trash (gotta keep those guns firing I reckon!).
since it is a KISS album.
And, related to this thread, if KISS was playing while Kav was groping, then it is probably KISS’s fault.
Anything after Love Gun can be thrown on the ground and I wouldn't lose any sleep. I really like earlier Kiss.
Wow.
You had to hit below the belt, eh? I'm going to work now, but rest assured I'll be thinking of a wicked insult for you. It's going to be extra special.
How is she not? Fear of flying, second door in the house, What house, how'd she get home, doesn't remember how she got there, the former boyfriend just came out with a statement that attacks her credibility.
The garagey Debut, the rough Hotter than Hell and the super-produced Dynasty and Unmasked.
Fo sho
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com