Powerful and impressive piece of art. A picture is worth a thousand words, but can contain just as many if so desired.
Time covers have been killing it these past few years.
Something something lib'rul media something something fake news something something facts and book learning is fer coastal elites something something
The age of Trump.
When people can say stupid stuff like this and think they have a valid point.
"One word: Professors. Lol. Too funny. Like anyone should care what academics that couldn't cut it in the real world say."
Burn your books! Close the schools! We don't need no....
Beware of any groups that vilify academia or higher learning.
It's almost as if no one has learned anything from history.
Yeah, and while we're at it, let's throw some gas on stay at home parents. Just fucking losers who can't get a job.
You guys might need to go back to school if you have a difficult time understanding what I was saying. It was nowhere close to what crazy extent you took it to.
Teachers teach. Doers do. Sometimes they cross, but often times those that take shelter in academia have a lot of non-real world applicable knowledge. And while they can teach us things, they can't actually apply things. That's for the doers. So, the fact that 1,000 liberal lawyers that take shelter in such bastions of impartiality as academia thinks or says something is completely nonsensical
Furthermore, I'll give you the bigger hint - how many lawyers are there? 1,000 saying something seems like there's a large amount NOT saying that.
Now, before your simpleness takes that to an extreme, no that does not mean the rest agree or don't agree. But, as many say about Trump's supporters - just because you're the loudest doesn't make you right. It just makes you the loudest.
Post edited by EdsonNascimento on
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
Oh. And sorry you lost. The beauty and genius of our framers is that you can now elect a Democrat House and Senate and in 2 years you can elect a Democrat President and you can continue to do so until the Court flips the way you want it. And the pendulum will continue to swing.
Honestly, I find the whole thing funny b/c this fight is really about abortion and choice which most people would agree with you on, yet you've somehow managed to make this a Constitutional fight that you are completely wrong about. You'd be better to voice that concern instead of the stupidity of the Democrats that plays right into Trump's hands in that he's diverted everyone's attention from the real issue.
So, for the record, if that was your argument, I'd agree with you. I hope choice stays in place. I actually believe it will b/c if the Supreme Court ever overturns Roe v Wade (which I actually believe they won't, but if they do), Congress will enact a STRONGER law to protect it while local courts put stays and other legal things in place to allow choice to continue until such a thing happens. Why? Because our framers are geniuses and created checks and balances and ways to shift power over time that makes sure the people's voices are heard even if there's times the pendulum swings too far one way at a particular time.
So, keep Trump in power by diverting from the issues and fighting battles not only can't you win but shouldn't.
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
It takes so much effort to remain willfully ignorant in this day and age. In spite of facts people actually choose to go with falsehoods and are proud of it in addition to the morons they vote for.
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
I think item 2 proves my points about the impact of Obamacare. Thank you.
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant
I think item 2 proves my points about the impact of Obamacare. Thank you.
It doesn't prove any points on impact, yours or anyone else’s. Those are numbers without outcome measures attached. Care to provide any?
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
I think item 2 proves my points about the impact of Obamacare. Thank you.
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
Where are you getting declinig? from all accounts I’ve seen it’s skyrocketing, that’s the whole reason for the push for a universal system. Accorong to this up from20k to 28k since 2010
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
Where are you getting declinig? from all accounts I’ve seen it’s skyrocketing, that’s the whole reason for the push for a universal system. Accorong to this up from20k to 28k since 2010
Correct. And they are calling me willfully ignorant.
Funny thing is, Obama’s would agree with the assessment it has increased healthcare costs as that was his intention.
I also like how they are both ok with significant reduced spending on senior citizens healthcare via the Medicare program. Pathetic. To hell with them! They’ll be dead soon anyway!
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
You two are both confusing health care costs with insurance cost.
I’m not. I know exactly what I’m talking about. Yes, that goes directly to that, but overall trend has not abated, but quite the opposite. And, yes the expansion of Medicaid has contributed so wnat you are referring to does feed and is a cause of the overall expense increase.
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
You two are both confusing health care costs with insurance cost.
I’m not. I know exactly what I’m talking about. Yes, that goes directly to that, but overall trend has not abated, but quite the opposite. And, yes the expansion of Medicaid has contributed so wnat you are referring to does feed and is a cause of the overall expense increase.
I guess if healthcare spending is such a priority for you, you should have abandoned conservatives when they pulled their big Medicare Part D chicanery.
I don't understand how repubs wouldn't flip based on Kavanaugh lying....he fucking lit up that hearing
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
Sort of like Obama and the Democraps ramming through Obamacare that took Billions away from Medicare Beneficiaries AND increased costs of the healthcare system without letting anyone read the bill?
Oh great, another one of those
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
So it didn’t take Billions of dollars away from Medicare benificiaries? Is that the assertion you’d like to go with?
In one 'whatabout' you managed to tell 4 falsehoods. Impressive.
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments 2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one) 3) Health care costs are declining 4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
Where are you getting declinig? from all accounts I’ve seen it’s skyrocketing, that’s the whole reason for the push for a universal system. Accorong to this up from20k to 28k since 2010
This year, the Milliman Medical Index increased 4.5%. That was only slightly higher than the 4.3% increase last year, the lowest increase in the 18 years that Milliman has compiled the index.
“We are moving in the right direction relative to where we were,” Weltz said.
Oh. And sorry you lost. The beauty and genius of our framers is that you can now elect a Democrat House and Senate and in 2 years you can elect a Democrat President and you can continue to do so until the Court flips the way you want it. And the pendulum will continue to swing.
Honestly, I find the whole thing funny b/c this fight is really about abortion and choice which most people would agree with you on, yet you've somehow managed to make this a Constitutional fight that you are completely wrong about. You'd be better to voice that concern instead of the stupidity of the Democrats that plays right into Trump's hands in that he's diverted everyone's attention from the real issue.
So, for the record, if that was your argument, I'd agree with you. I hope choice stays in place. I actually believe it will b/c if the Supreme Court ever overturns Roe v Wade (which I actually believe they won't, but if they do), Congress will enact a STRONGER law to protect it while local courts put stays and other legal things in place to allow choice to continue until such a thing happens. Why? Because our framers are geniuses and created checks and balances and ways to shift power over time that makes sure the people's voices are heard even if there's times the pendulum swings too far one way at a particular time.
So, keep Trump in power by diverting from the issues and fighting battles not only can't you win but shouldn't.
You two are both confusing health care costs with insurance cost.
Seeing how healthcare is now required by law, and that is what most families pay, how is that not relevant when discussing the increased costs? And if cost of health care has gone down, then why force people to pay more for health insurance? In the end the average family pays for more for medical care than they did 10 years ago. BecUse of Obamacare I pay thousands more each year for worse coverage than I had before. Millions of others do too, so I don’t know why you would defend the cost of “health care.”
You two are both confusing health care costs with insurance cost.
I’m not. I know exactly what I’m talking about. Yes, that goes directly to that, but overall trend has not abated, but quite the opposite. And, yes the expansion of Medicaid has contributed so wnat you are referring to does feed and is a cause of the overall expense increase.
Yet the idiot in chief with both houses on his side they couldn’t come up with anything better than ACÁ how many years did they have to get a plan in place ?
Meanwhile a scumbag that believes in unchecked POTUS authority and opposes Roe v Wade is about to be rammed through to the Supreme Court.
Lol, good luck America
I've never understood why so many people don't see what you just said? Why party first and country second?
Kavanaugh has been in the company of conservatives in Washington for years. Worked with them closely. I just can't see him being "balanced" in the court room...
Meanwhile a scumbag that believes in unchecked POTUS authority and opposes Roe v Wade is about to be rammed through to the Supreme Court.
Lol, good luck America
I've never understood why so many people don't see what you just said? Why party first and country second?
Kavanaugh has been in the company of conservatives in Washington for years. Worked with them closely. I just can't see him being "balanced" in the court room...
A partisan liar on the bench. I don't really care if he is for or against Roe v. Wade or any other case I may not agree with. People will have differing opinions about that and other highly contested cases, but the fact that he is a partisan liar should be a common theme all of the country should be able to agree on. This isn't a political position so politics need to be put aside. This is all about winning by one side right now and it fucking sucks for this country.
Meanwhile a scumbag that believes in unchecked POTUS authority and opposes Roe v Wade is about to be rammed through to the Supreme Court.
Lol, good luck America
I've never understood why so many people don't see what you just said? Why party first and country second?
Kavanaugh has been in the company of conservatives in Washington for years. Worked with them closely. I just can't see him being "balanced" in the court room...
A partisan liar on the bench. I don't really care if he is for or against Roe v. Wade or any other case I may not agree with. People will have differing opinions about that and other highly contested cases, but the fact that he is a partisan liar should be a common theme all of the country should be able to agree on. This isn't a political position so politics need to be put aside. This is all about winning by one side right now and it fucking sucks for this country.
That is the part that I don't understand. I'll most likely never understand why half the country would want someone that leans to one side.
The country doesn't "win" when there is a biased opinion in the courts...
Meanwhile a scumbag that believes in unchecked POTUS authority and opposes Roe v Wade is about to be rammed through to the Supreme Court.
Lol, good luck America
I've never understood why so many people don't see what you just said? Why party first and country second?
Kavanaugh has been in the company of conservatives in Washington for years. Worked with them closely. I just can't see him being "balanced" in the court room...
A partisan liar on the bench. I don't really care if he is for or against Roe v. Wade or any other case I may not agree with. People will have differing opinions about that and other highly contested cases, but the fact that he is a partisan liar should be a common theme all of the country should be able to agree on. This isn't a political position so politics need to be put aside. This is all about winning by one side right now and it fucking sucks for this country.
That is the part that I don't understand. I'll most likely never understand why half the country would want someone that leans to one side.
The country doesn't "win" when there is a biased opinion in the courts...
Because half the country is ignorant as hell. They don't care what they guy believes they just know that he's on their "team."
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018) The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Meanwhile a scumbag that believes in unchecked POTUS authority and opposes Roe v Wade is about to be rammed through to the Supreme Court.
Lol, good luck America
I've never understood why so many people don't see what you just said? Why party first and country second?
Kavanaugh has been in the company of conservatives in Washington for years. Worked with them closely. I just can't see him being "balanced" in the court room...
A partisan liar on the bench. I don't really care if he is for or against Roe v. Wade or any other case I may not agree with. People will have differing opinions about that and other highly contested cases, but the fact that he is a partisan liar should be a common theme all of the country should be able to agree on. This isn't a political position so politics need to be put aside. This is all about winning by one side right now and it fucking sucks for this country.
That is the part that I don't understand. I'll most likely never understand why half the country would want someone that leans to one side.
The country doesn't "win" when there is a biased opinion in the courts...
Because half the country is ignorant as hell. They don't care what they guy believes they just know that he's on their "team."
Politics is the only sport where if one side wins, everyone loses.
Comments
Teachers teach. Doers do. Sometimes they cross, but often times those that take shelter in academia have a lot of non-real world applicable knowledge. And while they can teach us things, they can't actually apply things. That's for the doers. So, the fact that 1,000 liberal lawyers that take shelter in such bastions of impartiality as academia thinks or says something is completely nonsensical
Furthermore, I'll give you the bigger hint - how many lawyers are there? 1,000 saying something seems like there's a large amount NOT saying that.
Now, before your simpleness takes that to an extreme, no that does not mean the rest agree or don't agree. But, as many say about Trump's supporters - just because you're the loudest doesn't make you right. It just makes you the loudest.
Honestly, I find the whole thing funny b/c this fight is really about abortion and choice which most people would agree with you on, yet you've somehow managed to make this a Constitutional fight that you are completely wrong about. You'd be better to voice that concern instead of the stupidity of the Democrats that plays right into Trump's hands in that he's diverted everyone's attention from the real issue.
So, for the record, if that was your argument, I'd agree with you. I hope choice stays in place. I actually believe it will b/c if the Supreme Court ever overturns Roe v Wade (which I actually believe they won't, but if they do), Congress will enact a STRONGER law to protect it while local courts put stays and other legal things in place to allow choice to continue until such a thing happens. Why? Because our framers are geniuses and created checks and balances and ways to shift power over time that makes sure the people's voices are heard even if there's times the pendulum swings too far one way at a particular time.
So, keep Trump in power by diverting from the issues and fighting battles not only can't you win but shouldn't.
"I reject reality and substitute it with my own opinion"
tRUmp supporters...
1) bill wasn't rammed thru - the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments
2) Obamacare cut $716 billion from Medicare in order to fund $1.9 trillion in new health care spending (I'll let you do the math on that one)
3) Health care costs are declining
4) the bill was read - In June and July 2009, with Democrats in charge, the Senate health committee spent nearly 60 hours over 13 days marking up the bill that became the Affordable Care Act. That September and October, the Senate Finance Committee worked on the legislation for eight days — its longest markup in two decades. It considered more than 130 amendments and held 79 roll-call votes. The full Senate debated the health care bill for 25 straight days before passing it on Dec. 24, 2009.
Also, you misspelled 'beneficiaries'. So are you lying or just willfully ignorant?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Willfully ignorant it is then. Duly noted.
from all accounts I’ve seen it’s skyrocketing, that’s the whole reason for the push for a universal system.
Accorong to this up from20k to 28k since 2010
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/676046002
Maybe people will wake up and the country will come alive, I know my fat ass will hit the streets
Funny thing is, Obama’s would agree with the assessment it has increased healthcare costs as that was his intention.
I also like how they are both ok with significant reduced spending on senior citizens healthcare via the Medicare program. Pathetic. To hell with them! They’ll be dead soon anyway!
Am I to infer you voted for Trump?
Hahahahhahahahahahahaha
I'll give you this: at least you admitted it.
It's a tool to create a functioning society.
And if cost of health care has gone down, then why force people to pay more for health insurance?
In the end the average family pays for more for medical care than they did 10 years ago. BecUse of Obamacare I pay thousands more each year for worse coverage than I had before. Millions of others do too, so I don’t know why you would defend the cost of “health care.”
Lol, good luck America
Kavanaugh has been in the company of conservatives in Washington for years. Worked with them closely. I just can't see him being "balanced" in the court room...
The country doesn't "win" when there is a biased opinion in the courts...
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2