Kavanaugh

1212224262770

Comments

  • tbergstbergs Posts: 9,810
    So far the only dissent I've seen in this thread is from men who voted for Trump. Real shock. Admonish the women, label it a liberal issue and worry about this man losing his dream job. I can't imagine the limited life experience one has to have to grasp such an unclear understanding of how shit like this has happened and can continue to happen.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • njnancynjnancy Posts: 5,096
    edited September 2018
    Post edited by njnancy on
  • Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

    I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.
    It’s all just a bunch of pissed off lying dem women, huh? How the “left” works? Who’s afraid of the FBI? Boo!
    Well are ya gonna bet me or just flap your guns more?
    After you answer my question about whether you’d hire someone who lied to you during a face to face interview and after I’ve thought about it some more. The repubs are as corrupt as Team Trump Treason and their selection of Kavanaugh is about protecting the coverup of NRA, RNC and Team Trump Treason’s complicity of colluding with putin on the ritz.

    Whats an equal goody? $35 t from shop? What size is the T? When’s the deadline for the bet?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • dignindignin Posts: 9,336
    Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

    I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.
    Given enough Fox news the Trumpers always come around.

    I've found that Trump supporters (like Trump) never honor a deal, so I'm gonna give you a hard pass.
  • Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

    I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.
    It’s all just a bunch of pissed off lying dem women, huh? How the “left” works? Who’s afraid of the FBI? Boo!
    Well are ya gonna bet me or just flap your guns more?
    You may very well be right. These repubs have no moral fiber and want women back where they think they belong. Are you proud of that?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • BentleyspopBentleyspop Posts: 10,767
    I've been waiting to give my 2 cents. So here goes.....

    I grew up in Bethesda, MD about a mile from Holton-Arms and a few miles  from Georgetown Prep. My sister, my step-sister, and a few really good friends went to Holton during the time period that Dr. Ford alleges she was assaulted. I heard multiple stories back then about the parties, the drinking, the drugs, and the "trains" involving the private school crowd.
    Neither of my sisters or my friends had that happen to them but they know girls who did.

    The boys from Prep and the other nearby all boys private schools were notorious for this behavior then and now. No parents around, school administrators that ignore, friends that lie and cover up, it's not new.
    And an overall culture that allows the "boys will be boys" mentality to continue.

    Is Judge Kavanaugh guilty?  I don't know.  But if he is I would not be surprised. 
  • tbergstbergs Posts: 9,810
    edited September 2018
    tbergs said:
    Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

    I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.
    Man, I don't know why they didn't think of this for Gorsuch. That poor Roy Moore guy too. Women are the devil. Too bad you weren't around to help keep slavery going, stop the 19th amendment and curb that BS civil rights movement. Keep 'em in line.


    Tldr.  

    Yawn.  Bet something if I’m so crazy.  People are tired of reading your nonsense.
    The only nonsense in this thread is when you comment because as you've admitted, you don't have time to read through the information presented, but expect others to do it for you. Why would I take a bet when we've already been shown how little the GOP, and you ignorant Trump supporters, care about sexual assault accusations. Your view is disgusting and some day karma will come knocking.

    Keep your shirt. No one wants it anyway. We'd prefer you find a way to quit supporting sex assaulters.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

    I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.
    It’s all just a bunch of pissed off lying dem women, huh? How the “left” works? Who’s afraid of the FBI? Boo!
    Well are ya gonna bet me or just flap your guns more?
    After you answer my question about whether you’d hire someone who lied to you during a face to face interview and after I’ve thought about it some more. The repubs are as corrupt as Team Trump Treason and their selection of Kavanaugh is about protecting the coverup of NRA, RNC and Team Trump Treason’s complicity of colluding with putin on the ritz.

    Whats an equal goody? $35 t from shop? What size is the T? When’s the deadline for the bet?
    I think you’re delusional and wanting something so bad you’ve become a sheep.  I think Kavanaugh is a respected professional who is a great candidate for the seat.

    anyway, I bet the value of an old shirt is more than a $35 dollars from the shop, but if that’s how you want to play it that’s fine with me- at least you’re willing to enjoy the game a bit.  If it makes it any more exciting, I’d bet a shuss 18 AP or a bottle of that BSB whiskey- stuff’s garbage but if someone wanted it it’s fair game
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • njnancynjnancy Posts: 5,096
    I've been waiting to give my 2 cents. So here goes.....

    I grew up in Bethesda, MD about a mile from Holton-Arms and a few miles  from Georgetown Prep. My sister, my step-sister, and a few really good friends went to Holton during the time period that Dr. Ford alleges she was assaulted. I heard multiple stories back then about the parties, the drinking, the drugs, and the "trains" involving the private school crowd.
    Neither of my sisters or my friends had that happen to them but they know girls who did.

    The boys from Prep and the other nearby all boys private schools were notorious for this behavior then and now. No parents around, school administrators that ignore, friends that lie and cover up, it's not new.
    And an overall culture that allows the "boys will be boys" mentality to continue.

    Is Judge Kavanaugh guilty?  I don't know.  But if he is I would not be surprised. 
    Thank you for coming forward with that information. It gives background to the allegations.
  • Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

    I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.
    It’s all just a bunch of pissed off lying dem women, huh? How the “left” works? Who’s afraid of the FBI? Boo!
    Well are ya gonna bet me or just flap your guns more?
    After you answer my question about whether you’d hire someone who lied to you during a face to face interview and after I’ve thought about it some more. The repubs are as corrupt as Team Trump Treason and their selection of Kavanaugh is about protecting the coverup of NRA, RNC and Team Trump Treason’s complicity of colluding with putin on the ritz.

    Whats an equal goody? $35 t from shop? What size is the T? When’s the deadline for the bet?
    I think you’re delusional and wanting something so bad you’ve become a sheep.  I think Kavanaugh is a respected professional who is a great candidate for the seat.

    anyway, I bet the value of an old shirt is more than a $35 dollars from the shop, but if that’s how you want to play it that’s fine with me- at least you’re willing to enjoy the game a bit.  If it makes it any more exciting, I’d bet a shuss 18 AP or a bottle of that BSB whiskey- stuff’s garbage but if someone wanted it it’s fair game
    Ah ha - we're up to "sheep" now. You're making progress on your right wing buzzword bingo! "Sheeple" would have gotten you extra points, but we can't have everything.
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • If three sentences are too long to read, I'm thinking that addressing and mailing a package would be a challenge, too. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 39,025
    edited September 2018
    Hey anyone want to gamble? I say he’s our newest Supreme Court judge because the smear is laughable to anyone who knows how the left works.

    I’ll bet a PJ shirt, unwashed, unworn.  It from early 2000’s I’d say or maybe late 90’s.
    It’s all just a bunch of pissed off lying dem women, huh? How the “left” works? Who’s afraid of the FBI? Boo!
    Well are ya gonna bet me or just flap your guns more?
    After you answer my question about whether you’d hire someone who lied to you during a face to face interview and after I’ve thought about it some more. The repubs are as corrupt as Team Trump Treason and their selection of Kavanaugh is about protecting the coverup of NRA, RNC and Team Trump Treason’s complicity of colluding with putin on the ritz.

    Whats an equal goody? $35 t from shop? What size is the T? When’s the deadline for the bet?
    I think you’re delusional and wanting something so bad you’ve become a sheep.  I think Kavanaugh is a respected professional who is a great candidate for the seat.

    anyway, I bet the value of an old shirt is more than a $35 dollars from the shop, but if that’s how you want to play it that’s fine with me- at least you’re willing to enjoy the game a bit.  If it makes it any more exciting, I’d bet a shuss 18 AP or a bottle of that BSB whiskey- stuff’s garbage but if someone wanted it it’s fair game
    You still didn’t answer my question. And what is it that I want so bad? And for the record, I’m a delusional, Cheeto eating, basement dwelling, keyboard warrior, Internet tough guy, #ptape, sheep.
     
     
                                                                                                            
    Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • If three sentences are too long to read, I'm thinking that addressing and mailing a package would be a challenge, too. 
    Cool story, no one cares.  You want in on the game? Put your merch where your keyboard is-  what will you gamble?  I’m serious- I’m looking to make it fun and have someone actually step up and gamble something nice instead of just talking tough page after page.  Vault 3 sealed? What will it take for someone
    to put it on the line?

    if you don’t think I’m serious, we can even pick a person like Mr. Switzerland or whatever you want to call them and each mail our shit tomorrow morning to this person.  If Rape Captain Kav gets in, it gets mailed to me.  If he doesn’t, it gets mailed to you.

    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • njnancynjnancy Posts: 5,096
    Making a bet on this is sleazy. But trolls need to be fed.
  • Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 39,025
    edited September 2018
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
     
    Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • njnancynjnancy Posts: 5,096
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
  • PJ_Soul said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    Why? That would just give him the opportunity to participate in SCOTUS decisions in the meantime, and then if he was removed later, any decision made while he sat would be brought into question. 
    Fair enough. So he’s confirmed in case he’s not guilty, but doesn’t get to rule until fbi investigation is finished thus giving fbi incentive not to drag feet.  

    See?  This is how fair compromise works.  I hear ya.  So how about that modification?   
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • tbergs said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    Thanks for your clearly partisan opinion on this matter. You obviously have no issues with pushing this through. We should always just hire/appoint people with these minor types of accusations, no matter what the job.
    I’m clearly parisan?  To funny.  I’m trying to solve an obvious problem.  Right wants to get it done now for obvious reason.  Left wants to delay for obvious reason.  I’m offering idea that serves both.   If it’s true, he shouldn’t sit.   If it’s not true, he should (not because of anything other than umder current circumstances we all know he’d be approved not bc I want him to).  

    So so take off your left wingnut goggles off and try to join a cogent discussion.  
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
     
    That’s what you think the end result of this is if she’s proven to have not quite told the truth?   I want to live in your world.  
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • EdsonNascimentoEdsonNascimento Posts: 5,521
    edited September 2018
    njnancy said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
    I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

    Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
     
    That’s what you think the end result of this is if she’s proven to have not quite told the truth?   I want to live in your world.  
    If an FBI investigation clears Kavanaugh as you seem to believe in his innocence, he gets confirmed and sits on the SC. If there’s confirmation of the allegations and his nomination is withdrawn or he’s voted down, he returns to the DC circuit. His life is hardly “ruined.” Further, why would his life be ruined if he’s the innocent choir boy he claims to be? Seems you might not believe in his innocence and are playing the “victim” card.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • njnancynjnancy Posts: 5,096
    njnancy said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
    I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

    Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  
    Disingenuous 
  • Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    How is his life ruined? He goes back to the DC circuit and hits the speaker circuit to lecture about evil liberal dem women and their false allegations to protect their radical abortion agenda. Ruined? And why not an FBI investigation? What is he afraid of, or what are you afraid of, if he’s innocent as you and he claim?
     
    That’s what you think the end result of this is if she’s proven to have not quite told the truth?   I want to live in your world.  
    If an FBI investigation clears Kavanaugh as you seem to believe in his innocence, he gets confirmed and sits on the SC. If there’s confirmation of the allegations and his nomination is withdrawn or he’s voted down, he returns to the DC circuit. His life is hardly “ruined.” Further, why would his life be ruined if he’s the innocent choir boy he claims to be? Seems you might not believe in his innocence and are playing the “victim” card.
    Ha ha. Typical left.  Please quote where I said I think he’s innocent.
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • njnancy said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
    I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

    Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  
    Are those alternate facts that you’re believing in?
     

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • njnancy said:
    njnancy said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
    I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

    Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  
    Disingenuous 
    Classic emotional response when your argument is proven foolish.  You forgot to correct my grammar.   

    You also forgot got to call me a nincompoop 
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • PJ_Soul said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    Why? That would just give him the opportunity to participate in SCOTUS decisions in the meantime, and then if he was removed later, any decision made while he sat would be brought into question. 
    Fair enough. So he’s confirmed in case he’s not guilty, but doesn’t get to rule until fbi investigation is finished thus giving fbi incentive not to drag feet.  

    See?  This is how fair compromise works.  I hear ya.  So how about that modification?   

    So, your compromise is "hey, you get the job but you can't do the job until we decide if you're fit for the job or not".

    Whereas in the real word people don't get a job until the ones doing the hiring are convinced they are fit to do the job.

    There's no justifiable reason to rush the vote. There are plenty of reasons to delay the vote.
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • njnancynjnancy Posts: 5,096
    njnancy said:
    njnancy said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
    I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

    Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  
    Disingenuous 
    Classic emotional response when your argument is proven foolish.  You forgot to correct my grammar.   

    You also forgot got to call me a nincompoop 
    I simply prefer people to use correctly spelled words when they try to intimidate me. Which you don't. 
  • njnancy said:
    njnancy said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
    I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

    Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  
    Disingenuous 
    Classic emotional response when your argument is proven foolish.  You forgot to correct my grammar.   

    You also forgot got to call me a nincompoop 

    If the shoe fits....
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • njnancy said:
    Realizing there would need to be a Constitutional Amendment change to make this happen, but would you liberals allow this scenario in this order:

    1)  Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately.
    2)  Do complete FBI investigation - if proven guilty, he is removed and we start over again.  If not guilty, life goes on
    How about this....put the appointment on hold until the investigation is done.  We operated with 8 justices for most of 2016 if you remember.
    Except you know and I know that means he never gets confirmed.  So if she recants or is proven liar his life is ruined.   My option allows everyone to get what they want.  Your option only ensures you get what you want.   If this was brought up timely as Feinstein very easily could have in an anonymous fashion, ok.  But this smells of something else, and unfortunately those playing that game don’t like others calling their potential bluff.  
    Please stop with the 'if this was brought up in a timely manner' blather. It came up when it came up. And then people started talking, people from his past. Not people being paid by the Democratic CON MEN. It's simply ridiculous to continually hear this pathetic excuse about Feinstein.

    Get over it. The dam has burst. 
    I’m not over it because I was never under it.  You’re assuming what I think of his nomination.  Whatever it is is irrelevant.  

    Unlike many of you, I’m sticking to facts as we know them today.   What you are saying is disengenuous at best.  
    Are those alternate facts that you’re believing in?
     

    What facts are you believing?   If you’re referring to the accusations they’ve yet to be proven true or false.  You and I have no idea.  That’s the point.  
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
Sign In or Register to comment.