Did you conceal carry in those some 20 other countries you visited?
Alex, I'll take That's None of Your F-ing Business for $500 please.
It’s what you respond with when you’re afraid of an honest answer. I thought you were a tough guy?
I think you have me confused with those that lob personal attacks from the safety of their Mom’s basement. I’m sure someone here can help you with that.
Afraid of an honest answer? The answer was completely honest and factual.
How is asking you a question a personal attack? You claimed to have traveled to 20 some countries. I asked you an honest question. Paranoid and afraid I see.
His response did appear quite “honest and factual”. It is literally none of your business...I assume that is what most gun owners are telling the doctors that ask about gun ownership as well. And pollsters for that matter.
Are you being ironic when you say "literally"? Asking about guns is, literally, a doctor's business, particularly when there are children in the home. It's a public health issue, just like asking about car seats, safe storage of medications and poisons, and avoiding choking hazards.
And by definition, a pollster asking about guns is literally their business, since they are being paid for that.
No, it is literally non of Halifax’s business. I was just saying that the response is probably typical of the one gun owners would give pollsters or doctors. I’ve never had a doctor ask about car seats, safe storage of medication/poison, or things that could be a choking hazard...have you? I do not think those questions are standard practice unless the dr already feels the person is irresponsible for some reason. When I was a counselor, we would inquire as to if someone had access to knifes or guns if they were suicidal or homicidal, but it wasn’t standard otherwise. Even then, if someone said “no”, then there was no way of actually knowing if they were telling the truth, so it was a bit redundant. The person would only answer truthfully if they felt compelled.
I find it ironic that in multiple threads on this site the gun nutters openly brag about their arsenals and their CWPs but when questioned about it, as it relates to foreign travel, from my perspective of wanting to know more, the gun nutters get defensive and resort to personal attacks. What’s the secret and why the hostility?
Snowing hard in July, blizzard like conditions.
I don’t see how a us citizen could carry in a foreign country. I can imagine I would be able to bring my bolt action into Canada to hunt but no way could I carry a handgun. Shit I can’t even bring my handgun from New Jersey into New York.
You can bring up to three firearms into Canada, but all handguns are either restricted or completely banned, depending on the barrel size. You must declare all firearms obviously, fill out the correct declaration forms that are valid for 60 days (they can be renewed), and pay a fee. You also have to prove that you have a valid reason to be bringing the guns across the border (i.e. for a hunting trip you might show your reservations, prove you got a hunting license, etc). And the border guards will be very picky about how you're storing the guns, and make sure the guns you have match the documents you have for them. You also have to follow all of Canada's gun laws while you're there of course. There is also an option to have your guns shipped to your destination to avoid any hassle in person at the border, but you still have to essentially go through the same rigamarole.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Did you conceal carry in those some 20 other countries you visited?
Alex, I'll take That's None of Your F-ing Business for $500 please.
It’s what you respond with when you’re afraid of an honest answer. I thought you were a tough guy?
I think you have me confused with those that lob personal attacks from the safety of their Mom’s basement. I’m sure someone here can help you with that.
Afraid of an honest answer? The answer was completely honest and factual.
How is asking you a question a personal attack? You claimed to have traveled to 20 some countries. I asked you an honest question. Paranoid and afraid I see.
His response did appear quite “honest and factual”. It is literally none of your business...I assume that is what most gun owners are telling the doctors that ask about gun ownership as well. And pollsters for that matter.
Are you being ironic when you say "literally"? Asking about guns is, literally, a doctor's business, particularly when there are children in the home. It's a public health issue, just like asking about car seats, safe storage of medications and poisons, and avoiding choking hazards.
And by definition, a pollster asking about guns is literally their business, since they are being paid for that.
No, it is literally non of Halifax’s business. I was just saying that the response is probably typical of the one gun owners would give pollsters or doctors. I’ve never had a doctor ask about car seats, safe storage of medication/poison, or things that could be a choking hazard...have you? I do not think those questions are standard practice unless the dr already feels the person is irresponsible for some reason. When I was a counselor, we would inquire as to if someone had access to knifes or guns if they were suicidal or homicidal, but it wasn’t standard otherwise. Even then, if someone said “no”, then there was no way of actually knowing if they were telling the truth, so it was a bit redundant. The person would only answer truthfully if they felt compelled.
I find it ironic that in multiple threads on this site the gun nutters openly brag about their arsenals and their CWPs but when questioned about it, as it relates to foreign travel, from my perspective of wanting to know more, the gun nutters get defensive and resort to personal attacks. What’s the secret and why the hostility?
Snowing hard in July, blizzard like conditions.
I don’t see how a us citizen could carry in a foreign country. I can imagine I would be able to bring my bolt action into Canada to hunt but no way could I carry a handgun. Shit I can’t even bring my handgun from New Jersey into New York.
I’ve been traveling and at the ticket counter was a big notice about traveling with firearms. Unloaded, in a locked case, inside checked bag, ammo stored separately. For armed citizenry, some are awful touchy.
My bad guys, I thought Halifax meant concealed carry as in carry a handgun on you while you travel about a foreign country. I still think it would be extremely difficult to bring a handgun out of the country.
Did you conceal carry in those some 20 other countries you visited?
Alex, I'll take That's None of Your F-ing Business for $500 please.
It’s what you respond with when you’re afraid of an honest answer. I thought you were a tough guy?
I think you have me confused with those that lob personal attacks from the safety of their Mom’s basement. I’m sure someone here can help you with that.
Afraid of an honest answer? The answer was completely honest and factual.
How is asking you a question a personal attack? You claimed to have traveled to 20 some countries. I asked you an honest question. Paranoid and afraid I see.
His response did appear quite “honest and factual”. It is literally none of your business...I assume that is what most gun owners are telling the doctors that ask about gun ownership as well. And pollsters for that matter.
Are you being ironic when you say "literally"? Asking about guns is, literally, a doctor's business, particularly when there are children in the home. It's a public health issue, just like asking about car seats, safe storage of medications and poisons, and avoiding choking hazards.
And by definition, a pollster asking about guns is literally their business, since they are being paid for that.
No, it is literally non of Halifax’s business. I was just saying that the response is probably typical of the one gun owners would give pollsters or doctors. I’ve never had a doctor ask about car seats, safe storage of medication/poison, or things that could be a choking hazard...have you? I do not think those questions are standard practice unless the dr already feels the person is irresponsible for some reason. When I was a counselor, we would inquire as to if someone had access to knifes or guns if they were suicidal or homicidal, but it wasn’t standard otherwise. Even then, if someone said “no”, then there was no way of actually knowing if they were telling the truth, so it was a bit redundant. The person would only answer truthfully if they felt compelled.
I find it ironic that in multiple threads on this site the gun nutters openly brag about their arsenals and their CWPs but when questioned about it, as it relates to foreign travel, from my perspective of wanting to know more, the gun nutters get defensive and resort to personal attacks. What’s the secret and why the hostility?
Snowing hard in July, blizzard like conditions.
I don’t see how a us citizen could carry in a foreign country. I can imagine I would be able to bring my bolt action into Canada to hunt but no way could I carry a handgun. Shit I can’t even bring my handgun from New Jersey into New York.
I’ve been traveling and at the ticket counter was a big notice about traveling with firearms. Unloaded, in a locked case, inside checked bag, ammo stored separately. For armed citizenry, some are awful touchy.
My bad guys, I thought Halifax meant concealed carry as in carry a handgun on you while you travel about a foreign country. I still think it would be extremely difficult to bring a handgun out of the country.
Yeah, walking around with a gun in your pants in a foreign country is always a bad idea, lol.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
My bad guys, I thought Halifax meant concealed carry as in carry a handgun on you while you travel about a foreign country. I still think it would be extremely difficult to bring a handgun out of the country.
Yeah, walking around with a gun in your pants in a foreign country is always a bad idea, lol.
My bad guys, I thought Halifax meant concealed carry as in carry a handgun on you while you travel about a foreign country. I still think it would be extremely difficult to bring a handgun out of the country.
Yeah, walking around with a gun in your pants in a foreign country is always a bad idea, lol.
Definitely no bueno lol.
I’m sure Unsung has other ideas but seems afraid to answer, like it’s too much personal information despite having already shared it adnauseum on this forum.
Oh, yes, nurses visiting homes to help and inform new mothers is fairly normal here and in Europe as well. It's really too bad it's not more common in America. Mind you, while it's part of regular healthcare in certain European countries, it's not at all a given in Canada. I know plenty of moms who don't do it and don't want it. One needs to make arrangements for that kind of thing, and seek out the service and pay for it (though it could be at least partially covered by extended healthcare plans).
Not here in Alberta. They visit every new mother and baby, no cost.
Oh, yes, nurses visiting homes to help and inform new mothers is fairly normal here and in Europe as well. It's really too bad it's not more common in America. Mind you, while it's part of regular healthcare in certain European countries, it's not at all a given in Canada. I know plenty of moms who don't do it and don't want it. One needs to make arrangements for that kind of thing, and seek out the service and pay for it (though it could be at least partially covered by extended healthcare plans).
A free visit home visit by a public health nurse is available to all newborn babies in BC when they come home (assuming you don't live in the middle of nowhere), or the parent can choose to take the baby to a public health unit instead.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
My kids don’t get proper care because they weren’t asked about firearms. That’s a good one lol.
No, not getting proper care because of all the things I mentioned that you guys say you weren’t asked about - car seats, choking hazards, access to toxins. It’s hard to believe those things aren’t discussed in the usual well baby/child visits.
We had an initial car seat check when leaving the hospital but the rest is common sense. I m not understanding how the us medical field is terrible because a doctor didn’t tell me to put all toxins and medication out of reach.
That’s not why it’s terrible, but it’s a symptom of how it’s terrible. The American medical system, if you can call it that, does not prioritize preventive measures that would improve overall health. Instead, your insurance system focuses on dealing with problems after they occur. The US spends more on health care than any other developed nation and yet your health outcomes are terrible. For instance, the USA is the only developed nation in which maternal death rate has been RISING steadily, while it drops in every other developed nation. It’s now three times higher than any of those nations. That’s just one example. Another is the American child mortality rate - it’s the worst (ie highest) in the 20 richest nation. Of course, a big chunk of that is firearms deaths; some of the rest is automobile accidents (that’s why doctors should ask about car seats) and poisonings (that’s why doctors should ask about medication and chemical storage). It’s very strange to me that this is strange to you, but it’s indicative of your system.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
Very rare indeed elsewhere, though not unknown. Here’s to school shootings becoming much rarer in the US.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
I know what you're getting at, Jose, but personally I believe that talking about public health is on topic. Gun deaths in general, including school shootings in particular, are a major cause of mortality in the US that far outstrips most of the rest of the world. Many writers and researchers on this topic think that progress would be made if the US started to deal with shootings as a public health issue, and applied multi-pronged techniques that have been helpful in other major public health areas, like reducing automobile accidents.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Yeah we should keep the kids safe keep the movement alive don’t loose focus , thanks all for keeping this thread going ..
Jose, thank you for bumping this thread. School will be starting soon. Hopefully, it will be a peaceful year for all.
Serious question: do you guys think you can go one school year without a major incident?
Considering over 90% of mass shootings occur in gun free zones unfortunately no.
That stat is based on manipulated and controversial data based on a definition of "gun-free zones" that is not accepted by many. Just an FYI for others, in case they're new here and decide to take what you post at face value and not do their own research.
Manipulated based on the definition of gun free zones? These were FBI statistics.
So is the President treasonous because the FBI is to be believed except for when it comes to gun stats? Your side can't keep up with the excuses.
Oh wow, Unsung.
Speaking of your side unable to keep up with the excuses... 'your side' has never successfully refuted the damning statistics exclusive to the US which renders 'your side's' argument to drool.
Come on, man. It boils down to this: there are zero good reasons to maintain the status quo in the US with regards to its horrendous gun ownership problems. Not one good reason. Nope. Not even one. The only reason it is maintained is for the simple fact that people love shootin' shit... they don't want anyone interfering with their ability to shoot shit... and there are gun companies with politicians stuffed in their back pockets that make money off people that love shootin' shit.
You're probably going to counter what I've said with some goofy comment about a document that was prepared centuries ago and talk about rights, but let's get serious... as much as your country clings to that thing... it was in need of serious revision a looooooong time ago.
If the nomadic cave people had created a constitution and painted on walls that no cave people were allowed to wander out after dark given the threat of saber tooth tigers... would you adhere to that?
Yeah we should keep the kids safe keep the movement alive don’t loose focus , thanks all for keeping this thread going ..
Jose, thank you for bumping this thread. School will be starting soon. Hopefully, it will be a peaceful year for all.
Serious question: do you guys think you can go one school year without a major incident?
Considering over 90% of mass shootings occur in gun free zones unfortunately no.
That stat is based on manipulated and controversial data based on a definition of "gun-free zones" that is not accepted by many. Just an FYI for others, in case they're new here and decide to take what you post at face value and not do their own research.
Manipulated based on the definition of gun free zones? These were FBI statistics.
So is the President treasonous because the FBI is to be believed except for when it comes to gun stats? Your side can't keep up with the excuses.
Oh wow, Unsung.
Speaking of your side unable to keep up with the excuses... 'your side' has never successfully refuted the damning statistics exclusive to the US which renders 'your side's' argument to drool.
Come on, man. It boils down to this: there are zero good reasons to maintain the status quo in the US with regards to its horrendous gun ownership problems. Not one good reason. Nope. Not even one. The only reason it is maintained is for the simple fact that people love shootin' shit... they don't want anyone interfering with their ability to shoot shit... and there are gun companies with politicians stuffed in their back pockets that make money off people that love shootin' shit.
You're probably going to counter what I've said with some goofy comment about a document that was prepared centuries ago and talk about rights, but let's get serious... as much as your country clings to that thing... it was in need of serious revision a looooooong time ago.
If the nomadic cave people had created a constitution and painted on walls that no cave people were allowed to wander out after dark given the threat of saber tooth tigers... would you adhere to that?
Don’t forget Russia. Russia enabled the NRA. Traitors.
Oh, yes, nurses visiting homes to help and inform new mothers is fairly normal here and in Europe as well. It's really too bad it's not more common in America. Mind you, while it's part of regular healthcare in certain European countries, it's not at all a given in Canada. I know plenty of moms who don't do it and don't want it. One needs to make arrangements for that kind of thing, and seek out the service and pay for it (though it could be at least partially covered by extended healthcare plans).
Not here in Alberta. They visit every new mother and baby, no cost.
Oh really? I didn't know that - that's good! (and to be honest, I was speaking from pretty damn old info... it's possible that BC has changed for the better with this in recent years. Since I'm not having kids I'm not going to bother looking it up). America should get on board with this concept, especially since parents/new mothers are struggling more and more for various reasons.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Oh, yes, nurses visiting homes to help and inform new mothers is fairly normal here and in Europe as well. It's really too bad it's not more common in America. Mind you, while it's part of regular healthcare in certain European countries, it's not at all a given in Canada. I know plenty of moms who don't do it and don't want it. One needs to make arrangements for that kind of thing, and seek out the service and pay for it (though it could be at least partially covered by extended healthcare plans).
Not here in Alberta. They visit every new mother and baby, no cost.
Oh really? I didn't know that - that's good! (and to be honest, I was speaking from pretty damn old info... it's possible that BC has changed for the better with this in recent years. Since I'm not having kids I'm not going to bother looking it up). America should get on board with this concept, especially since parents/new mothers are struggling more and more for various reasons.
Yes, BC does this too
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Oh, yes, nurses visiting homes to help and inform new mothers is fairly normal here and in Europe as well. It's really too bad it's not more common in America. Mind you, while it's part of regular healthcare in certain European countries, it's not at all a given in Canada. I know plenty of moms who don't do it and don't want it. One needs to make arrangements for that kind of thing, and seek out the service and pay for it (though it could be at least partially covered by extended healthcare plans).
Not here in Alberta. They visit every new mother and baby, no cost.
Oh really? I didn't know that - that's good! (and to be honest, I was speaking from pretty damn old info... it's possible that BC has changed for the better with this in recent years. Since I'm not having kids I'm not going to bother looking it up). America should get on board with this concept, especially since parents/new mothers are struggling more and more for various reasons.
Yes, BC does this too
That is good.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Yeah we should keep the kids safe keep the movement alive don’t loose focus , thanks all for keeping this thread going ..
Jose, thank you for bumping this thread. School will be starting soon. Hopefully, it will be a peaceful year for all.
Serious question: do you guys think you can go one school year without a major incident?
Considering over 90% of mass shootings occur in gun free zones unfortunately no.
That stat is based on manipulated and controversial data based on a definition of "gun-free zones" that is not accepted by many. Just an FYI for others, in case they're new here and decide to take what you post at face value and not do their own research.
Manipulated based on the definition of gun free zones? These were FBI statistics.
So is the President treasonous because the FBI is to be believed except for when it comes to gun stats? Your side can't keep up with the excuses.
You are right. It shows how dangerous that 10% left is in that the guns are brought from there. Thank you for pointing that out, if we can tackle that remaining 10% we just might not have have 10 year olds killed in school next year.
Back on topic kids getting gun down in schools is only an American problem can someone show me when a school massacre has happened in any other country? I thought so !
I know what you're getting at, Jose, but personally I believe that talking about public health is on topic. Gun deaths in general, including school shootings in particular, are a major cause of mortality in the US that far outstrips most of the rest of the world. Many writers and researchers on this topic think that progress would be made if the US started to deal with shootings as a public health issue, and applied multi-pronged techniques that have been helpful in other major public health areas, like reducing automobile accidents.
Comments
https://www.browardschools.com/site/default.aspx?PageType=3&DomainID=50&ModuleInstanceID=3855&ViewID=6446EE88-D30C-497E-9316-3F8874B3E108&RenderLoc=0&FlexDataID=88908&PageID=93
There is also an option to have your guns shipped to your destination to avoid any hassle in person at the border, but you still have to essentially go through the same rigamarole.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
DISAPPEARING HEADLINES
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
A free visit home visit by a public health nurse is available to all newborn babies in BC when they come home (assuming you don't live in the middle of nowhere), or the parent can choose to take the baby to a public health unit instead.
(A vert unsing-kind of response I know. Your point still stands)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kauhajoki_school_shooting
But whatever.
I know what you're getting at, Jose, but personally I believe that talking about public health is on topic. Gun deaths in general, including school shootings in particular, are a major cause of mortality in the US that far outstrips most of the rest of the world. Many writers and researchers on this topic think that progress would be made if the US started to deal with shootings as a public health issue, and applied multi-pronged techniques that have been helpful in other major public health areas, like reducing automobile accidents.
Oh wow, Unsung.
Speaking of your side unable to keep up with the excuses... 'your side' has never successfully refuted the damning statistics exclusive to the US which renders 'your side's' argument to drool.
Come on, man. It boils down to this: there are zero good reasons to maintain the status quo in the US with regards to its horrendous gun ownership problems. Not one good reason. Nope. Not even one. The only reason it is maintained is for the simple fact that people love shootin' shit... they don't want anyone interfering with their ability to shoot shit... and there are gun companies with politicians stuffed in their back pockets that make money off people that love shootin' shit.
You're probably going to counter what I've said with some goofy comment about a document that was prepared centuries ago and talk about rights, but let's get serious... as much as your country clings to that thing... it was in need of serious revision a looooooong time ago.
If the nomadic cave people had created a constitution and painted on walls that no cave people were allowed to wander out after dark given the threat of saber tooth tigers... would you adhere to that?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
horrible news !