34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
Ahhhh, but for Rubles, the NRA, the RNC, Cambridge Analytica, putin on the ritz’s oligarchs, their troll farms, three key electoral states and an unwitting, incapable of critical thinking American electorate and here we are. But why? What’s really going on? PTAPE? Russian Team Trump Treason Tower? Money laundering? Deep, deep indebtedness? Both monetary and personal? What’s really going on with Team Trump Treason?
The biggest and best gym pep rally of all time. Thousands will be denied due to capacity limits. Believe me.
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
President Trump's daughter-in-law Lara Trump says federal employees currently furloughed or working without pay due to the partial government shutdown are experiencing a "little bit of pain" for the "future of our country."
President Trump's daughter-in-law Lara Trump says federal employees currently furloughed or working without pay due to the partial government shutdown are experiencing a "little bit of pain" for the "future of our country."
Well if it was for a worthwhile cause it would be temporary pain for longterm gain. Instead its for a wall....that people will climb over, dig under, go around, go through....
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
But The National Polls Don't Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
But The National Polls Don't Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
Electoral polls weren't wrong either - it's that people need to be informed on how statistics work. He was given a ~30-35% chance of winning. That is nothing to sneeze at, that didn't mean Clinton was definitely going to win. For some reason this gave people comfort. If Electoral polls had him winning at 0-5% now that would be a comfort.
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
But The National Polls Don't Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
Electoral polls weren't wrong either - it's that people need to be informed on how statistics work. He was given a ~30-35% chance of winning. That is nothing to sneeze at, that didn't mean Clinton was definitely going to win. For some reason this gave people comfort. If Electoral polls had him winning at 0-5% now that would be a comfort.
Yeah...well I guess it's all moot now anyway. It's like trying to determine how the Falcons lost that Super Bowl to the Patriots. It's was a crazy Molotov Cocktail of circumstances and now we all have to live with the Patriots as five-time Super Bowl champions. Same thing here. A Molotov Cocktail of circumstances and now we all have to live with Donald Trump as President. At least for now. Or God help us, maybe until January 2025.
Yeah...well I guess it's all moot now anyway. It's like trying to determine how the Falcons lost that Super Bowl to the Patriots. It's was a crazy Molotov Cocktail of circumstances and now we all have to live with the Patriots as five-time Super Bowl champions. Same thing here. A Molotov Cocktail of circumstances and now we all have to live with Donald Trump as President. At least for now. Or God help us, maybe until January 2025.
This is totally my mentality. Any hope I had in people being decent went out the window two years ago - expect the worst, hope for the best. Actually, don't hope at all.
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
But The National Polls Don't Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
Why would you think they do not matter? What's a better way to gauge the mood of the country? Have a weekly national election? I'd argue they matter now more than ever. Republicans didn't start to part ways with Nixon until his numbers dropped into the low 30's. And approval numbers usually dictate winners and losers in government shutdowns---since more of the country blames Trump, Pelosi has the leverage to postpone the state of the union.
Regarding 2016: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-real-story-of-2016/ Another myth is that Trump’s victory represented some sort of catastrophic failure for the polls. Trump outperformed his national polls by only 1 to 2 percentage points in losing the popular vote to Clinton, making them slightly closer to the mark than they were in 2012. Meanwhile, he beat his polls by only 2 to 3 percentage points in the average swing state.3 Certainly, there were individual pollsters that had some explaining to do, especially in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where Trump beat his polls by a larger amount. But the result was not some sort of massive outlier; on the contrary, the polls were pretty much as accurate as they’d been, on average, since 1968.
More accurately the blind R's detached from Nixon when the audio tape leaked.
Less than the population of a college football stadium made the difference. Dems need to work harder this time around - simple as that.
Or stop being influenced by Putin on the ritz and think critically.
Whatever - no excuses. Dems should be able to make up that 90k of voters regardless.
Whatever? An American election was swayed by Russian influence, most likely in knowing coordination with Team Trump Treason. And the question remains, why? What does putin on the ritz have over Team Trump Treason?
I believe people are in denial about the power of social media and too embarrassed to admit that they fell for it, whether it was they thought they could vote from their phone or that Hillary gave birth to alien babies. Voters need to smarten the fuck up.
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
But The National Polls Don't Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
Why would you think they do not matter? What's a better way to gauge the mood of the country? Have a weekly national election? I'd argue they matter now more than ever. Republicans didn't start to part ways with Nixon until his numbers dropped into the low 30's. And approval numbers usually dictate winners and losers in government shutdowns---since more of the country blames Trump, Pelosi has the leverage to postpone the state of the union.
Regarding 2016: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-real-story-of-2016/ Another myth is that Trump’s victory represented some sort of catastrophic failure for the polls. Trump outperformed his national polls by only 1 to 2 percentage points in losing the popular vote to Clinton, making them slightly closer to the mark than they were in 2012. Meanwhile, he beat his polls by only 2 to 3 percentage points in the average swing state.3 Certainly, there were individual pollsters that had some explaining to do, especially in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where Trump beat his polls by a larger amount. But the result was not some sort of massive outlier; on the contrary, the polls were pretty much as accurate as they’d been, on average, since 1968.
Spot on regarding the 2016 polls. Nationally they were spot on, but some states (including many that play fast and loose with voting rights) were not.
In FL for example, is anyone going to point out in all the rural red districts, turnout was through the roof in 2018? While in the large city and suburban blue districts, turnout was only so so?
And the Rs lately are consistently finding a way to win elections FL statewide by 0.2%. Like they know the exact number of votes needed to win. Just like 2016 PA MI WI.
More accurately the blind R's detached from Nixon when the audio tape leaked.
Less than the population of a college football stadium made the difference. Dems need to work harder this time around - simple as that.
Or stop being influenced by Putin on the ritz and think critically.
Whatever - no excuses. Dems should be able to make up that 90k of voters regardless.
Whatever? An American election was swayed by Russian influence, most likely in knowing coordination with Team Trump Treason. And the question remains, why? What does putin on the ritz have over Team Trump Treason?
I believe people are in denial about the power of social media and too embarrassed to admit that they fell for it, whether it was they thought they could vote from their phone or that Hillary gave birth to alien babies. Voters need to smarten the fuck up.
I'm not dismissing the actions taken. And I think we pretty much know at this point why Trump did it - to build a Trump Tower in Russia and make money, not to win an election. And Putin's coming for receipts.
I'm not one to keep rehashing over what is done. Dems' ground game was no where near as strong as it was in the previous two elections. I just hope they realize there's major work to be done, regardless of Russian interference.
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
But The National Polls Don't Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
Why would you think they do not matter? What's a better way to gauge the mood of the country? Have a weekly national election? I'd argue they matter now more than ever. Republicans didn't start to part ways with Nixon until his numbers dropped into the low 30's. And approval numbers usually dictate winners and losers in government shutdowns---since more of the country blames Trump, Pelosi has the leverage to postpone the state of the union.
Regarding 2016: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-real-story-of-2016/ Another myth is that Trump’s victory represented some sort of catastrophic failure for the polls. Trump outperformed his national polls by only 1 to 2 percentage points in losing the popular vote to Clinton, making them slightly closer to the mark than they were in 2012. Meanwhile, he beat his polls by only 2 to 3 percentage points in the average swing state.3 Certainly, there were individual pollsters that had some explaining to do, especially in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where Trump beat his polls by a larger amount. But the result was not some sort of massive outlier; on the contrary, the polls were pretty much as accurate as they’d been, on average, since 1968.
Spot on regarding the 2016 polls. Nationally they were spot on, but some states (including many that play fast and loose with voting rights) were not.
In FL for example, is anyone going to point out in all the rural red districts, turnout was through the roof in 2018? While in the large city and suburban blue districts, turnout was only so so?
And the Rs lately are consistently finding a way to win elections FL statewide by 0.2%. Like they know the exact number of votes needed to win. Just like 2016 PA MI WI.
Funny how that works.
You think it's weird that they know what they need to do to win? That's weird.
If Hillary had thought about it and campaigned properly we wouldn't be in the mess we are in right now. Lots of people on those campaigns are paid to figure out how to eek out the right number of votes from each of the districts let alone the state.
34% of all registered votes support him, per that poll.
So how can we assume that the rest of the public isn’t the same ratio?
Is geography a factor?
I've always been kinda dismissive of polls like this. 34% of ALL registered voters support him? I wasn't polled. In fact, I've been a registered voter for 17 years and I haven't once been polled in any way.
I half kidding there. There's obviously some sort of mathematics/science behind polls that makes it credible because they often times predict the correct outcomes. But I didn't buy the polls during the 2016 election because I felt there were a lot of closeted Trump supporters (I actually knew a couple personally) that didn't want to admit they supported him because they'd be made fun of for it. I think there are more of those Trump voters than there are MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fans. I wonder if his horrible presidency will flip those "closeted" voters....because his fans aren't going anywhere. But they're just a vocal minority.
The National Polls Were Largely Correct In 2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
But The National Polls Don't Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
Why would you think they do not matter? What's a better way to gauge the mood of the country? Have a weekly national election? I'd argue they matter now more than ever. Republicans didn't start to part ways with Nixon until his numbers dropped into the low 30's. And approval numbers usually dictate winners and losers in government shutdowns---since more of the country blames Trump, Pelosi has the leverage to postpone the state of the union.
Regarding 2016: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-real-story-of-2016/ Another myth is that Trump’s victory represented some sort of catastrophic failure for the polls. Trump outperformed his national polls by only 1 to 2 percentage points in losing the popular vote to Clinton, making them slightly closer to the mark than they were in 2012. Meanwhile, he beat his polls by only 2 to 3 percentage points in the average swing state.3 Certainly, there were individual pollsters that had some explaining to do, especially in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where Trump beat his polls by a larger amount. But the result was not some sort of massive outlier; on the contrary, the polls were pretty much as accurate as they’d been, on average, since 1968.
Spot on regarding the 2016 polls. Nationally they were spot on, but some states (including many that play fast and loose with voting rights) were not.
In FL for example, is anyone going to point out in all the rural red districts, turnout was through the roof in 2018? While in the large city and suburban blue districts, turnout was only so so?
And the Rs lately are consistently finding a way to win elections FL statewide by 0.2%. Like they know the exact number of votes needed to win. Just like 2016 PA MI WI.
Funny how that works.
You think it's weird that they know what they need to do to win? That's weird.
If Hillary had thought about it and campaigned properly we wouldn't be in the mess we are in right now. Lots of people on those campaigns are paid to figure out how to eek out the right number of votes from each of the districts let alone the state.
I'm definitely not here to shit on 2016 or Clinton, but there was a lot of hubris on that team. But, hey, in some weird way this was all needed - more people than ever are charged up, engaged and involved in some form of their local or national political environment; silver linings to some degree.
I've only seen bits and pieces of this story. Can someone give a cliff-notes version of it? All I've seen is a Native American man banging a drum about a foot away from the face of some kid wearing a MAGA hat and the kid just stands there smirking. But obviously there has to be more to it than that.
I had to laugh at Fox and Friends playing a video of approximately 100 immigrants scaling a tall fence on the border. Playing up fear for a border wall by showing a border wall's total inability to stop immigrants who can *gasp* buy and carry ladders lol
I had to laugh at Fox and Friends playing a video of approximately 100 immigrants scaling a tall fence on the border. Playing up fear for a border wall by showing a border wall's total inability to stop immigrants who can *gasp* buy and carry ladders lol
The only problem is the fact that Trump's bucktoothed yokels that are yeehawing for the wall have diminished capacity and would never be able to make that connection.
Comments
National
Polls
Were
Largely
Correct
In
2016
They mostly had him losing the popular vote by about 3%, which is roughly what he lost the popular vote by.
Sorry. But I feel like I've had to say this to folks a million times over the last few years.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/01/24/government-shutdown-lara-trump-little-bit-pain-sot-ac360-vpx.cnn
The
National
Polls
Don't
Matter
Unless of course you give a crap about the popular vote. As for some polls that actually matter, Trump trailed in polls in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan on the eve of the election, and won all three states.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Regarding 2016:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-real-story-of-2016/
Another myth is that Trump’s victory represented some sort of catastrophic failure for the polls. Trump outperformed his national polls by only 1 to 2 percentage points in losing the popular vote to Clinton, making them slightly closer to the mark than they were in 2012. Meanwhile, he beat his polls by only 2 to 3 percentage points in the average swing state.3 Certainly, there were individual pollsters that had some explaining to do, especially in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where Trump beat his polls by a larger amount. But the result was not some sort of massive outlier; on the contrary, the polls were pretty much as accurate as they’d been, on average, since 1968.
Less than the population of a college football stadium made the difference. Dems need to work harder this time around - simple as that.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I believe people are in denial about the power of social media and too embarrassed to admit that they fell for it, whether it was they thought they could vote from their phone or that Hillary gave birth to alien babies. Voters need to smarten the fuck up.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Spot on regarding the 2016 polls. Nationally they were spot on, but some states (including many that play fast and loose with voting rights) were not.
In FL for example, is anyone going to point out in all the rural red districts, turnout was through the roof in 2018? While in the large city and suburban blue districts, turnout was only so so?
And the Rs lately are consistently finding a way to win elections FL statewide by 0.2%. Like they know the exact number of votes needed to win. Just like 2016 PA MI WI.
Funny how that works.
I'm not one to keep rehashing over what is done. Dems' ground game was no where near as strong as it was in the previous two elections. I just hope they realize there's major work to be done, regardless of Russian interference.
If Hillary had thought about it and campaigned properly we wouldn't be in the mess we are in right now. Lots of people on those campaigns are paid to figure out how to eek out the right number of votes from each of the districts let alone the state.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nathan-phillips-native-american-activist-d-c-standoff-forgives-catholic-n962131?fbclid=IwAR0-NKI7TaK5lr5-IRgfpocG6YlczHJl0ff6NOkgUHF5BTdDMLEHwiXVVGA
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Playing up fear for a border wall by showing a border wall's total inability to stop immigrants who can *gasp* buy and carry ladders lol
The only problem is the fact that Trump's bucktoothed yokels that are yeehawing for the wall have diminished capacity and would never be able to make that connection.