Sarah Huckabee Sanders says that the Rank and File had lost confidence in Comey. She wasn't under oath.
Acting Director McCabe said "that is absolutely not true". He is under oath.
Another person has sold their integrity to the devil that is DJT. How many people will he drag into the mud with him? How many people will lie for him? Word is from a Comey source is that he refused to pledge personal loyalty to Trump just last week. That was the end of Comey.
“People are starting to talk. They’re calling their former friends outside the bureau asking for help. We were asked to day to provide legal representation to people inside the bureau and agreed to do so and to former agents who want to come forward and talk. Comey thought this was going to go away.”
He explained, “It’s not. People inside the bureau are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel like they are being led by a hack but more than that that they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau inside right now is a mess.”
He added, “The most important thing of all is that the agents have decided that they are going to talk.”
People on background to the Daily Caller or guy under oath.. Hmm... One report from today or the one right before the election. Hmm. One quote is contemporaneous and one is out of the dust bins of history. Hmm.
Haaa. My entire point is that the whole Russia thread is "people on background" vs "people under oath"! You can't choose when to accept one over the other. Let's admit the public evidence we have on any of these issues is thin as shit!
Bullshit, again. So you are saying that Comey has denied under oath that he is investigating the Trump team's ties to Russia during the campaign? Is that your position here? Like, WTF are you exactly arguing? That there's no investigation? That there's no subpoena's coming out of a grand jury or out of the Senate committee? Are you saying that?
Not at all. There is an investigation into Russian interference and wherever that might lead. No evidence has been presented that team Trump is tied to that interference in any way shape or form. All details suggesting otherwise have come completely from people on background. People keep adding the Trump connections even though not a single person under oath has confirmed collusion.
Grand Jury and Senate committee subpoenas are not on background. Are you trying to argue that Flynn isn't under serious criminal investigation right now?
He's trying to deny that there are any "links" between Trump's campaign and Russia.
You left out the word "interference". Links to Russia are easy to demonstrate. Links to Russina interference is much more difficult for you.
Funny, you didn't use the word interference. You said "links" and "whether." With all that we know, you still don't believe there are any links between Trump, his campaign and Russian interference with our election? Is that what you're saying?
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders says that the Rank and File had lost confidence in Comey. She wasn't under oath.
Acting Director McCabe said "that is absolutely not true". He is under oath.
Another person has sold their integrity to the devil that is DJT. How many people will he drag into the mud with him? How many people will lie for him? Word is from a Comey source is that he refused to pledge personal loyalty to Trump just last week. That was the end of Comey.
“People are starting to talk. They’re calling their former friends outside the bureau asking for help. We were asked to day to provide legal representation to people inside the bureau and agreed to do so and to former agents who want to come forward and talk. Comey thought this was going to go away.”
He explained, “It’s not. People inside the bureau are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel like they are being led by a hack but more than that that they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau inside right now is a mess.”
He added, “The most important thing of all is that the agents have decided that they are going to talk.”
People on background to the Daily Caller or guy under oath.. Hmm... One report from today or the one right before the election. Hmm. One quote is contemporaneous and one is out of the dust bins of history. Hmm.
Haaa. My entire point is that the whole Russia thread is "people on background" vs "people under oath"! You can't choose when to accept one over the other. Let's admit the public evidence we have on any of these issues is thin as shit!
Bullshit, again. So you are saying that Comey has denied under oath that he is investigating the Trump team's ties to Russia during the campaign? Is that your position here? Like, WTF are you exactly arguing? That there's no investigation? That there's no subpoena's coming out of a grand jury or out of the Senate committee? Are you saying that?
Not at all. There is an investigation into Russian interference and wherever that might lead. No evidence has been presented that team Trump is tied to that interference in any way shape or form. All details suggesting otherwise have come completely from people on background. People keep adding the Trump connections even though not a single person under oath has confirmed collusion.
Grand Jury and Senate committee subpoenas are not on background. Are you trying to argue that Flynn isn't under serious criminal investigation right now?
He's trying to deny that there are any "links" between Trump's campaign and Russia.
You left out the word "interference". Links to Russia are easy to demonstrate. Links to Russina interference is much more difficult for you.
Funny, you didn't use the word interference. You said "links" and "whether." With all that we know, you still don't believe there are any links between Trump, his campaign and Russian interference with our election? Is that what you're saying?
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders says that the Rank and File had lost confidence in Comey. She wasn't under oath.
Acting Director McCabe said "that is absolutely not true". He is under oath.
Another person has sold their integrity to the devil that is DJT. How many people will he drag into the mud with him? How many people will lie for him? Word is from a Comey source is that he refused to pledge personal loyalty to Trump just last week. That was the end of Comey.
“People are starting to talk. They’re calling their former friends outside the bureau asking for help. We were asked to day to provide legal representation to people inside the bureau and agreed to do so and to former agents who want to come forward and talk. Comey thought this was going to go away.”
He explained, “It’s not. People inside the bureau are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel like they are being led by a hack but more than that that they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau inside right now is a mess.”
He added, “The most important thing of all is that the agents have decided that they are going to talk.”
People on background to the Daily Caller or guy under oath.. Hmm... One report from today or the one right before the election. Hmm. One quote is contemporaneous and one is out of the dust bins of history. Hmm.
Haaa. My entire point is that the whole Russia thread is "people on background" vs "people under oath"! You can't choose when to accept one over the other. Let's admit the public evidence we have on any of these issues is thin as shit!
Bullshit, again. So you are saying that Comey has denied under oath that he is investigating the Trump team's ties to Russia during the campaign? Is that your position here? Like, WTF are you exactly arguing? That there's no investigation? That there's no subpoena's coming out of a grand jury or out of the Senate committee? Are you saying that?
Not at all. There is an investigation into Russian interference and wherever that might lead. No evidence has been presented that team Trump is tied to that interference in any way shape or form. All details suggesting otherwise have come completely from people on background. People keep adding the Trump connections even though not a single person under oath has confirmed collusion.
Grand Jury and Senate committee subpoenas are not on background. Are you trying to argue that Flynn isn't under serious criminal investigation right now?
He's trying to deny that there are any "links" between Trump's campaign and Russia.
You left out the word "interference". Links to Russia are easy to demonstrate. Links to Russina interference is much more difficult for you.
Funny, you didn't use the word interference. You said "links" and "whether." With all that we know, you still don't believe there are any links between Trump, his campaign and Russian interference with our election? Is that what you're saying?
Proving again that you don't read. Go back and read the quote where I got "links" and "whether" from. I believe it was CM's post. Are you purposely being obtuse?
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
You're losing your cool.
No, I'm just embarrassed for you. You're trying to defend the indefensible. David French, Larison, Dreher, none of the intellectually honest conservatives are defending his actions. The only ones that do are the lemmings and the hacks. Hannity, Rush, Alex Jones, Savage...the fucking hacks. And now you, even using the stupid campaign slogans that were totally full of shit.
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
You're losing your cool.
No, I'm just embarrassed for you. You're trying to defend the indefensible. David French, Larison, Dreher, none of the intellectually honest conservatives are defending his actions. The only ones that do are the lemmings and the hacks. Hannity, Rush, Alex Jones, Savage...the fucking hacks. And now you, even using the stupid campaign slogans that were totally full of shit.
No. You have lost your cool. And as far as the "intellectually honest conservatives" are concerned...fuck 'em....what makes them so "intellectual"? Most were #nevertrump from the get go and wrongly predicted that Trump would crash and burn in November while taking the entire GOPnwith him. Trump did it without those people and need not rely on their "intellectual honesty" for his support. Comey needed to go. Period. The end. An intellectually honest person recognizes that and makes the right leadership position irrespective of the outrage to follow. Trump did what was necessary while the real hacks cower.
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
You're losing your cool.
No, I'm just embarrassed for you. You're trying to defend the indefensible. David French, Larison, Dreher, none of the intellectually honest conservatives are defending his actions. The only ones that do are the lemmings and the hacks. Hannity, Rush, Alex Jones, Savage...the fucking hacks. And now you, even using the stupid campaign slogans that were totally full of shit.
No. You have lost your cool. And as far as the "intellectually honest conservatives" are concerned...fuck 'em....what makes them so "intellectual"? Most were #nevertrump from the get go and wrongly predicted that Trump would crash and burn in November while taking the entire GOPnwith him. Trump did it without those people and need not rely on their "intellectual honesty" for his support. Comey needed to go. Period. The end. An intellectually honest person recognizes that and makes the right leadership position irrespective of the outrage to follow. Trump did what was necessary while the real hacks cower.
Plain as day why Trump fired Comey and we both know it had nothing to do with his handling of Hillary's investigation. If were going to talk about honesty.
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
You're losing your cool.
No, I'm just embarrassed for you. You're trying to defend the indefensible. David French, Larison, Dreher, none of the intellectually honest conservatives are defending his actions. The only ones that do are the lemmings and the hacks. Hannity, Rush, Alex Jones, Savage...the fucking hacks. And now you, even using the stupid campaign slogans that were totally full of shit.
No. You have lost your cool. And as far as the "intellectually honest conservatives" are concerned...fuck 'em....what makes them so "intellectual"? Most were #nevertrump from the get go and wrongly predicted that Trump would crash and burn in November while taking the entire GOPnwith him. Trump did it without those people and need not rely on their "intellectual honesty" for his support. Comey needed to go. Period. The end. An intellectually honest person recognizes that and makes the right leadership position irrespective of the outrage to follow. Trump did what was necessary while the real hacks cower.
Okay so the neocon is now a nationalist (Canadian who supports a US Nationalist..irony....) because the nationalist won the election. So he says "fuck em". I think we can now put you into the intellectually dishonest category at this point.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders says that the Rank and File had lost confidence in Comey. She wasn't under oath.
Acting Director McCabe said "that is absolutely not true". He is under oath.
Another person has sold their integrity to the devil that is DJT. How many people will he drag into the mud with him? How many people will lie for him? Word is from a Comey source is that he refused to pledge personal loyalty to Trump just last week. That was the end of Comey.
“People are starting to talk. They’re calling their former friends outside the bureau asking for help. We were asked to day to provide legal representation to people inside the bureau and agreed to do so and to former agents who want to come forward and talk. Comey thought this was going to go away.”
He explained, “It’s not. People inside the bureau are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel like they are being led by a hack but more than that that they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau inside right now is a mess.”
He added, “The most important thing of all is that the agents have decided that they are going to talk.”
People on background to the Daily Caller or guy under oath.. Hmm... One report from today or the one right before the election. Hmm. One quote is contemporaneous and one is out of the dust bins of history. Hmm.
Haaa. My entire point is that the whole Russia thread is "people on background" vs "people under oath"! You can't choose when to accept one over the other. Let's admit the public evidence we have on any of these issues is thin as shit!
Bullshit, again. So you are saying that Comey has denied under oath that he is investigating the Trump team's ties to Russia during the campaign? Is that your position here? Like, WTF are you exactly arguing? That there's no investigation? That there's no subpoena's coming out of a grand jury or out of the Senate committee? Are you saying that?
Not at all. There is an investigation into Russian interference and wherever that might lead. No evidence has been presented that team Trump is tied to that interference in any way shape or form. All details suggesting otherwise have come completely from people on background. People keep adding the Trump connections even though not a single person under oath has confirmed collusion.
Grand Jury and Senate committee subpoenas are not on background. Are you trying to argue that Flynn isn't under serious criminal investigation right now?
He's trying to deny that there are any "links" between Trump's campaign and Russia.
You left out the word "interference". Links to Russia are easy to demonstrate. Links to Russina interference is much more difficult for you.
Funny, you didn't use the word interference. You said "links" and "whether." With all that we know, you still don't believe there are any links between Trump, his campaign and Russian interference with our election? Is that what you're saying?
Proving again that you don't read. Go back and read the quote where I got "links" and "whether" from. I believe it was CM's post. Are you purposely being obtuse?
Whether you got them from CM's post or not, those were the two words you put in quotations and seemed to focus on. When you added the word"interference", I asked you a direct question using all three words of your choosing. A direct question you avoided answering. You should replace spices with your spin. So are the 9-10 investigations sour grapes because liberals lost an election or are there 9-10 ongoing investigations because there are "ties" between the Trump campaign and "whether" there was collusion with the Russian "interference" in our election?
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
You're losing your cool.
No, I'm just embarrassed for you. You're trying to defend the indefensible. David French, Larison, Dreher, none of the intellectually honest conservatives are defending his actions. The only ones that do are the lemmings and the hacks. Hannity, Rush, Alex Jones, Savage...the fucking hacks. And now you, even using the stupid campaign slogans that were totally full of shit.
No. You have lost your cool. And as far as the "intellectually honest conservatives" are concerned...fuck 'em....what makes them so "intellectual"? Most were #nevertrump from the get go and wrongly predicted that Trump would crash and burn in November while taking the entire GOPnwith him. Trump did it without those people and need not rely on their "intellectual honesty" for his support. Comey needed to go. Period. The end. An intellectually honest person recognizes that and makes the right leadership position irrespective of the outrage to follow. Trump did what was necessary while the real hacks cower.
Okay so the neocon is now a nationalist (Canadian who supports a US Nationalist..irony....) because the nationalist won the election. So he says "fuck em". I think we can now put you into the intellectually dishonest category at this point.
I've posted this before but this is what it comes down to usually. Spite before country, humanity and sanity.
And when it comes to being the president, winning isn't the ultimate goal...I hate to break it some people, implementing your policies is actually the objective. But for Trump, he only has two discernible policies: The Wall and No Muslims... well he's got nothing going on with either of them. Everything else is just a bunch of BS that has changed since the election.
Trump did the lengthy interview with Holt even though some on his staff believed it was a bad idea and gave his answers off-the-cuff. One person who spoke to him said he’d been “fixated” on his news coverage and believed his press team was failing him and that he needed “to take the situation into his own hands.”
The episode highlights two fundamental issues of the Trump presidency: It is often impossible to work for Trump in the White House — and it is often impossible for Trump to be happy with those who work for him.
“They’re hostages,” said longtime political consultant Mark Corallo, who served as Attorney General John Ashcroft’s spokesman under President George W. Bush.
In the span of a dizzying few hours, the president contradicted the vice president and his press secretary, who had maintained for two days that Trump fired Comey because Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggested it. Trump instead said the department was in “turmoil” even though he’d previously offered praise for Comey, even blowing him a kiss.
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
The only reason any dim trump supporter thinks Comey got canned is because Clinton isn't locked up yet. They think that because they got conned and still are stuck in that mindset of being conned, not because of their elaborate knowledge of who is establishment and who isn't.
The Clinton email investigation can still be reopened. The Clinton Foundation investigation is ongoing.
Care to link to a reputable source for that claim? I found Faux news declaring indictments and raids were forthcoming. From November 2016. I also found apologies from right wing media outlets for mischaracterizations of impending indictments and ongoing investigations. Care to provide a link to your claim?
How about instead of that ice cream you get the two houses of Congress, both Republican controlled, and both boot stepping behind this tyrant? I don't truss 'em as far as I could throw them...
Curious what all the forum Trump supporters think now? You guys bitched and moaned any time Obama went golfing and/or left your gun ranges for the grocery store, cleared out all the shelves and hunkered down in your underground bunkers thinking the world was coming to an end. So....whatcha' all think of this level of treason and corruption? Every president has probably had something to hide, but this? This is fucked.
Curious? If you have been reading through you wouldn't be curious. It's pretty much all here for you.
actually, you are pretty much the only one left that is still actively posting on the subject. some left, some got banned. but you're it.
"every society honours its live conformists and its dead troublemakers"
What a fucking idiot. Seriously. It's only a matter of time before he violates a law that he doesn't even know about. Oh wait, he already did that when he offered Carson a Cabinet position for his endorsement, and Carson was dumb enough to admit it on camera.
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
You're losing your cool.
No, I'm just embarrassed for you. You're trying to defend the indefensible. David French, Larison, Dreher, none of the intellectually honest conservatives are defending his actions. The only ones that do are the lemmings and the hacks. Hannity, Rush, Alex Jones, Savage...the fucking hacks. And now you, even using the stupid campaign slogans that were totally full of shit.
No. You have lost your cool. And as far as the "intellectually honest conservatives" are concerned...fuck 'em....what makes them so "intellectual"? Most were #nevertrump from the get go and wrongly predicted that Trump would crash and burn in November while taking the entire GOPnwith him. Trump did it without those people and need not rely on their "intellectual honesty" for his support. Comey needed to go. Period. The end. An intellectually honest person recognizes that and makes the right leadership position irrespective of the outrage to follow. Trump did what was necessary while the real hacks cower.
Plain as day why Trump fired Comey and we both know it had nothing to do with his handling of Hillary's investigation. If were going to talk about honesty.
I could accept this analysis as being intellectually honest
So can we finally put this myth to bed that Trump is brilliant and playing some kind of 3D chess?
Even the dimmest of bulbs among us must have come to the realization that the man is an idiot.
His people must be pooping their pants after that train wreck of an interview.
Trump has only ever given train wreck interviews. You seem to be stuck on the idea that it matters. It has never mattered and it will likely continue to never matter. It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious.
You're reeling a bit.
You'd do well to listen to your last statement, It is not 3D chess when you recognize the obvious. Idiots voted for this man hoping for the moon. It was stupid of them.
No they did not. Hope was the slogan for the last presidency. This was a fuck the establishment vote. Part of the establishment took a massive hit yesterday. His voters will dig that.
How did part of the establishment take a hit, and then what will his voters be digging?
Comey is establishment. Bipartisan disgust for him. Like I said earlier...two days ago Comey being useless was the one thing the whole world agreed on.
How is Comey establishment? Is it because he went to college and got a job? He's a law enforcement officer for Christ sake's.
He is part of the swamp. The one that needs to be drained.
Whatever, another bullshit answer and you know it. You're now an official lemming. Make sure you use the word "fake" in everything you say. It's especially comical coming from you, an avowed neocon. They are the GOP establishment.
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
You're losing your cool.
No, I'm just embarrassed for you. You're trying to defend the indefensible. David French, Larison, Dreher, none of the intellectually honest conservatives are defending his actions. The only ones that do are the lemmings and the hacks. Hannity, Rush, Alex Jones, Savage...the fucking hacks. And now you, even using the stupid campaign slogans that were totally full of shit.
No. You have lost your cool. And as far as the "intellectually honest conservatives" are concerned...fuck 'em....what makes them so "intellectual"? Most were #nevertrump from the get go and wrongly predicted that Trump would crash and burn in November while taking the entire GOPnwith him. Trump did it without those people and need not rely on their "intellectual honesty" for his support. Comey needed to go. Period. The end. An intellectually honest person recognizes that and makes the right leadership position irrespective of the outrage to follow. Trump did what was necessary while the real hacks cower.
Okay so the neocon is now a nationalist (Canadian who supports a US Nationalist..irony....) because the nationalist won the election. So he says "fuck em". I think we can now put you into the intellectually dishonest category at this point.
Uhhh...no. I am still a neocon. This has zero to do with nationalism. We are talking about one action...the firing of Comey. It is irrelevant to the discussion of political philosophy. I believe Trump has the right to fire Comey. I believe he should have fired him a long time ago. I recognize that politically it looks terrible and might come with a short term price. None of that speaks to being a nationalist or a neocon and if anything since taking office Trump has moved towards the neocon position in action and in deed...it is why I can cut him some slack from time to time because aside from the daily messiness he is moving in a direction that I like.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders says that the Rank and File had lost confidence in Comey. She wasn't under oath.
Acting Director McCabe said "that is absolutely not true". He is under oath.
Another person has sold their integrity to the devil that is DJT. How many people will he drag into the mud with him? How many people will lie for him? Word is from a Comey source is that he refused to pledge personal loyalty to Trump just last week. That was the end of Comey.
“People are starting to talk. They’re calling their former friends outside the bureau asking for help. We were asked to day to provide legal representation to people inside the bureau and agreed to do so and to former agents who want to come forward and talk. Comey thought this was going to go away.”
He explained, “It’s not. People inside the bureau are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel like they are being led by a hack but more than that that they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau inside right now is a mess.”
He added, “The most important thing of all is that the agents have decided that they are going to talk.”
People on background to the Daily Caller or guy under oath.. Hmm... One report from today or the one right before the election. Hmm. One quote is contemporaneous and one is out of the dust bins of history. Hmm.
Haaa. My entire point is that the whole Russia thread is "people on background" vs "people under oath"! You can't choose when to accept one over the other. Let's admit the public evidence we have on any of these issues is thin as shit!
Bullshit, again. So you are saying that Comey has denied under oath that he is investigating the Trump team's ties to Russia during the campaign? Is that your position here? Like, WTF are you exactly arguing? That there's no investigation? That there's no subpoena's coming out of a grand jury or out of the Senate committee? Are you saying that?
Not at all. There is an investigation into Russian interference and wherever that might lead. No evidence has been presented that team Trump is tied to that interference in any way shape or form. All details suggesting otherwise have come completely from people on background. People keep adding the Trump connections even though not a single person under oath has confirmed collusion.
Grand Jury and Senate committee subpoenas are not on background. Are you trying to argue that Flynn isn't under serious criminal investigation right now?
He's trying to deny that there are any "links" between Trump's campaign and Russia.
You left out the word "interference". Links to Russia are easy to demonstrate. Links to Russina interference is much more difficult for you.
Funny, you didn't use the word interference. You said "links" and "whether." With all that we know, you still don't believe there are any links between Trump, his campaign and Russian interference with our election? Is that what you're saying?
Proving again that you don't read. Go back and read the quote where I got "links" and "whether" from. I believe it was CM's post. Are you purposely being obtuse?
Whether you got them from CM's post or not, those were the two words you put in quotations and seemed to focus on. When you added the word"interference", I asked you a direct question using all three words of your choosing. A direct question you avoided answering. You should replace spices with your spin. So are the 9-10 investigations sour grapes because liberals lost an election or are there 9-10 ongoing investigations because there are "ties" between the Trump campaign and "whether" there was collusion with the Russian "interference" in our election?
So you are confirming that you are being purposely obtuse. Amazing. The word "interfere" is in the initial quote. The words "links" and "whether" go back to the word "interfere"...my kids in junior high know this. You know this. Now as far as your 9-10 investigations are concerned we actually don't know anything about them. Nothing. So your question cannot be answered unless you would like to pre-assume guilt. We don't go on background here...only under oath testimony and all testimony to date has been "no evidence". Can you accept that? No. You need tax returns. You need a "special prosecutor" because it will be investigation #11 that will get to the bottom of this!
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
And Trump is doing a bang up job with all the Goldman people in his cabinet.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
And when it comes to being the president, winning isn't the ultimate goal...I hate to break it some people, implementing your policies is actually the objective. But for Trump, he only has two discernible policies: The Wall and No Muslims... well he's got nothing going on with either of them. Everything else is just a bunch of BS that has changed since the election.
Brilliant!!!
Trump did the lengthy interview with Holt even though some on his staff believed it was a bad idea and gave his answers off-the-cuff. One person who spoke to him said he’d been “fixated” on his news coverage and believed his press team was failing him and that he needed “to take the situation into his own hands.”
The episode highlights two fundamental issues of the Trump presidency: It is often impossible to work for Trump in the White House — and it is often impossible for Trump to be happy with those who work for him.
“They’re hostages,” said longtime political consultant Mark Corallo, who served as Attorney General John Ashcroft’s spokesman under President George W. Bush.
In the span of a dizzying few hours, the president contradicted the vice president and his press secretary, who had maintained for two days that Trump fired Comey because Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggested it. Trump instead said the department was in “turmoil” even though he’d previously offered praise for Comey, even blowing him a kiss.http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/11/trump-interview-james-comey-fbi-firing-238291
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.apnews.com/abab84187de84e6ca16f715699b89820/US-prosecutors-told-to-push-for-more,-harsher-punishments
Trump threatens Comey in new tweet
"James Comey better hope that there are no 'tapes' of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press,"http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/12/politics/donald-trump-james-comey-threat/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
It's only a matter of time before he violates a law that he doesn't even know about. Oh wait, he already did that when he offered Carson a Cabinet position for his endorsement, and Carson was dumb enough to admit it on camera.
http://thefederalist.com/2017/05/11/want-checks-balances-stop-ignoring-constitution-youre-power/#.WRRvZQS4UFg.facebook
In a nutshell...Harsanyi believes the firing was a mistake but that it wasn't about Russia...it was about Trump being Trump.
Uhhh...no. I am still a neocon. This has zero to do with nationalism. We are talking about one action...the firing of Comey. It is irrelevant to the discussion of political philosophy. I believe Trump has the right to fire Comey. I believe he should have fired him a long time ago. I recognize that politically it looks terrible and might come with a short term price. None of that speaks to being a nationalist or a neocon and if anything since taking office Trump has moved towards the neocon position in action and in deed...it is why I can cut him some slack from time to time because aside from the daily messiness he is moving in a direction that I like.
So you are confirming that you are being purposely obtuse. Amazing. The word "interfere" is in the initial quote. The words "links" and "whether" go back to the word "interfere"...my kids in junior high know this. You know this. Now as far as your 9-10 investigations are concerned we actually don't know anything about them. Nothing. So your question cannot be answered unless you would like to pre-assume guilt. We don't go on background here...only under oath testimony and all testimony to date has been "no evidence". Can you accept that? No. You need tax returns. You need a "special prosecutor" because it will be investigation #11 that will get to the bottom of this!