Donald Trump

josevolution

BS44325 said:

dignin said:

BS44325 said:

dignin said:

There is an argument to be made that playing by the rules makes you a loser. Republicans gave up on the rules years ago and continue to win where it matters. Democrats can hang their hat on their high morals and will probably still lose. Historically the whole political spectrum in the US has been shifted right. The right is winning the war by playing dirty.

The argument is that you can't win against a moraly corrupt GOP if you continue to play by the rules and expect them to meet you halfway. All while the left continues to eat its own over petty stuff. I totally understand what Halifax is saying.

The Lisa Page testimony just released yesterday says that the Obama DOJ overruled the FBI on charging Hillary. So who exactly is playing by the rules?

Given who I'm hearing this from I need a source.

Don't you read the news?

lol your back and when is HRC getting convicted since the Baffoon is off the hook as far as your concerned..

BS44325

dignin said:

BS44325 said:

dignin said:

BS44325 said:

dignin said:

There is an argument to be made that playing by the rules makes you a loser. Republicans gave up on the rules years ago and continue to win where it matters. Democrats can hang their hat on their high morals and will probably still lose. Historically the whole political spectrum in the US has been shifted right. The right is winning the war by playing dirty.

The argument is that you can't win against a moraly corrupt GOP if you continue to play by the rules and expect them to meet you halfway. All while the left continues to eat its own over petty stuff. I totally understand what Halifax is saying.

The Lisa Page testimony just released yesterday says that the Obama DOJ overruled the FBI on charging Hillary. So who exactly is playing by the rules?

Given who I'm hearing this from I need a source.

Don't you read the news?

Source?

Here are bipartisan sources for you outlining how the Obama DOJ was putting their foot on the scales of justice (and if you don't like these you can just read the transcripts yourself):

1) https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-newly-released-transcript-former-fbi-lawyer-fires-back-on-charges-anti-trump-bias-affected-trump-and-clinton-probes/2019/03/12/f669f198-44f9-11e9-8aab-95b8d80a1e4f_story.html?utm_term=.de032cc7702e

"Page said she and other FBI officials pushed back against the Justice Department at several points during the Clinton investigation, objecting when David Laufman, for example, asked to sit in on the interview of Clinton. That would have been a break with standard protocol, Page explained.

“I knew it would ultimately be my supervisory responsibility to weigh the investigative team’s recommendation on whether to charge or not to charge,” Laufman, a former senior official at the department, said late Tuesday. “Attending the interviews of the most consequential witnesses, including former secretary Clinton, was essential to fulfilling that responsibility because it gave me the ability to make firsthand assessments of witness credibility, which was critical to our factual findings and our recommendations to senior Justice Department leaders.”

Page said that “we all at FBI” also disagreed with the decision to let “fact witnesses” — in this case, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson — sit in on Clinton’s interview about her use of a private email server, a decision that was made by the Justice Department, Page said, not the FBI.

“It is not typically appropriate or operationally necessary to have fact witnesses attend an interview,” Page said in the transcript, noting that no other witness was allowed to bring such an entourage.

She pushed back against the suggestion that the FBI “blew over” potentially charging Clinton with gross negligence under the Espionage Act, saying officials did consider it — but decided that the move would be too “constitutionally vague,” unprecedented, and “that they did not feel that they could sustain a charge.” Page also said Richard Scott, the Justice Department official in charge of overseeing the Clinton probe, had advised against making the harsher charge."

2) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-fbi-lawyer-lisa-page-admitted-obama-doj-ordered-stand-down-on-clinton-email-prosecution-gop-rep-says

"So let me if I can, I know I’m testing your memory," Ratcliffe began as he questioned Page under oath, according to a transcript excerpt he posted on Twitter. "But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —"

Page interrupted: "That is correct," as Ratcliffe finished his sentence, " -- bring a case based on that."

https://www.scribd.com/document/401789093/Lisa-Page-Interview-Day-2#from_embed

BS44325

josevolution said:

BS44325 said:

dignin said:

BS44325 said:

dignin said:

There is an argument to be made that playing by the rules makes you a loser. Republicans gave up on the rules years ago and continue to win where it matters. Democrats can hang their hat on their high morals and will probably still lose. Historically the whole political spectrum in the US has been shifted right. The right is winning the war by playing dirty.

The argument is that you can't win against a moraly corrupt GOP if you continue to play by the rules and expect them to meet you halfway. All while the left continues to eat its own over petty stuff. I totally understand what Halifax is saying.

The Lisa Page testimony just released yesterday says that the Obama DOJ overruled the FBI on charging Hillary. So who exactly is playing by the rules?

Given who I'm hearing this from I need a source.

Don't you read the news?

lol your back and when is HRC getting convicted since the Baffoon is off the hook as far as your concerned..

Patience...

PJ_Soul

mrussel1 said:

njnancy said:

PJ_Soul said:

cincybearcat said:

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

Ending the quote because it's out of control. 

Yes they are weaponizing it, and she should have been smarter.  That's been my point as well.  They gave the Trump side an opening and it's been exploited.  It was going to be weaponized as soon as she typed it.  Her Democratic colleagues were offended.  They are Jewish.  They were offended and saw the trope.  You can't say they fucked it up.  She fucked it up to start.  And Pelosi was forced into damage control and did the best she could to move past it while mollifying her own constituency.  

I can't say that because she was 100% right when it comes to the relationship the US has with Israel, and I'm not about to say that someone fucked up by being honest. I just wish more of them would talk about it. Her only mistake was being the one brave enough to say it out loud IMO. I can indeed say they fucked it up, and I'm not inclined to side with the ones who are offended Jews, because I don't believe it's right that they are offended. If the Dems had any balls at all, they would have stood behind her and finally initiated a REAL conversation about the US/Israel situation.

I tend to agree about her comments.

I also can’t  believe any women would be Muslim....or any person would take their kid to a Catholic Church...so what do I know 

Most religious people were born into it, meaning that they were brainwashed from birth, whatever the faith. They know nothing else, and simply truly believe the religious dogma they were taught, and lived in the middle of the culture that facilitates that, even if it is an impediment to them. I don't find that so hard to understand (although do find it hard to get how anyone believes the dogma - to me it seems ludicrous, but somehow people believe it like they believe their own existence). I do think it's very unfortunate though.

As for the Catholic Church and the pedo stuff... well, that's the reason Catholics have been leaving the Church in droves and why the Church is in permanent crisis now. They are working hard to try and bring some back, but it's probably ultimately too late... The Church will be around for a long time to come, but its power will likely dwindle more and more over time, and in a couple Centuries it will probably be a fringe religion.... Unless somehow there is a resurgence... if something really fucked in the world happens, like a massive pandemic or WWIII, that's possible too. They really do need to cut it out with the sexual repression and sexism though. That just isn't flying with most modern people anymore.

I just typed a long thing and erased it. 

Please don't refer to people who went to a Catholic school or who choose to practice their Jewish or Muslim faiths brainwashed. There are certain things that you are taught that stay with you but brainwashed is too severe a term and it also sounds condescending. It makes it sound like only people who are atheists have any idea of what is going on. I don't go to church anymore, I stopped when I went to public high school (which pissed the nuns off immensely) and there was a lot of bad shit that went on but also there were some really good people.  I had my son baptized by a Catholic priest who runs sobriety retreats - had to do it - and I had him receive Communion at an Episcopal Church with my sister's girls. My sister started going to Church in her 40's after being an atheist most of her life. The priest is an ex Catholic priest who is gay and is an awesome person. They got gluten free hosts just for my son. My sister felt a sense of community there and when she was dying she found a lot of comfort in speaking with the priest. So did I and so did my mom. I don't know what created everything (aside from the scientific realities) but I like to think that my dad and sis and bro are all together somewhere; another dimension? IDK.  My dad was my higher power during my early years of sobriety, he had died when I was weeks clean and it was the only connection I could make and it worked. Who am I to think I know better than other people?  If it brings them comfort and they are good people and not hypocritical aholes telling me how to live, then fine. I don't have it all figured out.  (This is the short version )

I'm with you all the way here.  I was brought up Catholic, being from Cleveland where everyone was Catholic.  I 'left' the church as soon as I could make my own choices, but I also baptized and confirmed all three of my children.  It was mostly out of tradition and to make the grandparents on both sides happy.  Nothing wrong with that.  You also can't discount the wealth of knowledge and wisdom that can come from reading the Bible.  The stories are timeless, so long as you treat them as parables and guideposts (New Testament) vs. a history book.  I don't judge people on their religion at all.  When I'm facing death, there's a really good chance I circle back to it. 

I was talking about the practicing faithful, as well as those who tolerate injustices in the name of their religion/religious culture. I thought that was made clear, but I guess not. People who aren't even really practicing obviously managed to avoid the brainwashing, or their own parents/community didn't do it to them in the first place. And FWIW, reading the Bible doesn't mean much. I'm an Atheist, and I've read the Bible.

I do indeed think that just belief in God in general is a result of a kind of mass social brainwashing too though, sorry. I don't know any other word for it. It's just how I view religious belief.

Halifax2TheMax

dignin said:

BS44325 said:

dignin said:

There is an argument to be made that playing by the rules makes you a loser. Republicans gave up on the rules years ago and continue to win where it matters. Democrats can hang their hat on their high morals and will probably still lose. Historically the whole political spectrum in the US has been shifted right. The right is winning the war by playing dirty.

The argument is that you can't win against a moraly corrupt GOP if you continue to play by the rules and expect them to meet you halfway. All while the left continues to eat its own over petty stuff. I totally understand what Halifax is saying.

The Lisa Page testimony just released yesterday says that the Obama DOJ overruled the FBI on charging Hillary. So who exactly is playing by the rules?

Given who I'm hearing this from I need a source.

Faux News. WaPo reports that her testimony was that there were anti-Hillary forces pressing for an investigation of Hillary's emails as well. Gee, the FBI had partisans on both sides. Who knew? And which investigation was made public, closed and then reopened, then closed again? 

Ledbetterman10

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

I think it has to be more than that. Every politician running against an incumbent has made the argument of "look how bad the incumbent is," which is a sound-enough, ageless strategy. But in 2016, when he wasn't an incumbent, the left's most popular argument seemed to be "look how awful Trump is." That's fair enough because he is awful. But what are they going to say in 2020? "See? Told ya."? 

That strategy worked like a champ last November.  And Trump has done nothing to tack to the middle since then.  He's shut down the gov't for no reason whatsoever and now declared this emergency.  So I do think it's an effective strategy, far more than the Green New Deal in the general election.  

Well that's a given for sure. 

PJ_Soul

Halifax2TheMax said:

mrussel1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Outside Mar-I-Lieo, courtesy of the NYT. Show me the dem/lib equivalent.

Ask for psycho dems and you shall receive. 

I believe she was widely condemned by both sides, investigated by the Secret Service and has since been ostracized and blown away inot the dustbin of history. In fact, I don't even recall her name and haven't seen nor heard of her since. If that had been a Team Trump Treason supporter with Obama's head, she would have been made SOS or VP.

Okay so you were supportive of fellow liberals holding her accountable because what she did was wrong, even though the Republican's house isn't in order?  Or were you against condemning her because some lady has a sign outside Mar A Lago?

Yes, but my point being, the repubs will never get their house in order. Its too effective for them. Meanwhile, us libs will continue to have it shoved up our ass, all the while being told to be "more civil." Again, I'm more than happy to meet half way but I need to see movement on the right. The left moves all the time and tries to build bridges and coalitions and solicits cooperation. And what do we get for our efforts? More ridicule, demonization and denigration. The problem isn't biggest on, or with, the left. Were leftiies standing outside Obama's motorcade with signs ridiculing repubs/conservatives? Obama was ridiculed for wearing a tan suit by repub members of Congress. Remeber that?

Sorry, but how is political art wrong in any way? Is everyone mad at Jim Carrey for his paintings too? I haven't noticed that anyone is, nor should they be. An idiot with a sign outside a building designated a safe place for MAGA supporters isn't the same thing as that Kathy Griffin art photography session at all - that was a terrible comparison (as much as it behooves me to defend her - I can't stand that woman).

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Meltdown99 said:

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1105862124620955649

4-5 with good behaviour I imagine, maybe less.

So much for the 10 additional years on his initial sentence.

Ouch. This must be soul crushing for Halifax.

Soul crushing? Hardly. 7 years will be his life sentence as theres no parole for federal crimes and it just goes to show you the disparity in sentencing based on skin color and wealth (see Cunningham, Representative). If his roomate doesn't shiv him for the bloody mess he keeps leaving on the floor from his gout. "Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason." You're good for a laugh.

mrussel1

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

njnancy said:

PJ_Soul said:

cincybearcat said:

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

Ending the quote because it's out of control. 

Yes they are weaponizing it, and she should have been smarter.  That's been my point as well.  They gave the Trump side an opening and it's been exploited.  It was going to be weaponized as soon as she typed it.  Her Democratic colleagues were offended.  They are Jewish.  They were offended and saw the trope.  You can't say they fucked it up.  She fucked it up to start.  And Pelosi was forced into damage control and did the best she could to move past it while mollifying her own constituency.  

I can't say that because she was 100% right when it comes to the relationship the US has with Israel, and I'm not about to say that someone fucked up by being honest. I just wish more of them would talk about it. Her only mistake was being the one brave enough to say it out loud IMO. I can indeed say they fucked it up, and I'm not inclined to side with the ones who are offended Jews, because I don't believe it's right that they are offended. If the Dems had any balls at all, they would have stood behind her and finally initiated a REAL conversation about the US/Israel situation.

I tend to agree about her comments.

I also can’t  believe any women would be Muslim....or any person would take their kid to a Catholic Church...so what do I know 

Most religious people were born into it, meaning that they were brainwashed from birth, whatever the faith. They know nothing else, and simply truly believe the religious dogma they were taught, and lived in the middle of the culture that facilitates that, even if it is an impediment to them. I don't find that so hard to understand (although do find it hard to get how anyone believes the dogma - to me it seems ludicrous, but somehow people believe it like they believe their own existence). I do think it's very unfortunate though.

As for the Catholic Church and the pedo stuff... well, that's the reason Catholics have been leaving the Church in droves and why the Church is in permanent crisis now. They are working hard to try and bring some back, but it's probably ultimately too late... The Church will be around for a long time to come, but its power will likely dwindle more and more over time, and in a couple Centuries it will probably be a fringe religion.... Unless somehow there is a resurgence... if something really fucked in the world happens, like a massive pandemic or WWIII, that's possible too. They really do need to cut it out with the sexual repression and sexism though. That just isn't flying with most modern people anymore.

I just typed a long thing and erased it. 

Please don't refer to people who went to a Catholic school or who choose to practice their Jewish or Muslim faiths brainwashed. There are certain things that you are taught that stay with you but brainwashed is too severe a term and it also sounds condescending. It makes it sound like only people who are atheists have any idea of what is going on. I don't go to church anymore, I stopped when I went to public high school (which pissed the nuns off immensely) and there was a lot of bad shit that went on but also there were some really good people.  I had my son baptized by a Catholic priest who runs sobriety retreats - had to do it - and I had him receive Communion at an Episcopal Church with my sister's girls. My sister started going to Church in her 40's after being an atheist most of her life. The priest is an ex Catholic priest who is gay and is an awesome person. They got gluten free hosts just for my son. My sister felt a sense of community there and when she was dying she found a lot of comfort in speaking with the priest. So did I and so did my mom. I don't know what created everything (aside from the scientific realities) but I like to think that my dad and sis and bro are all together somewhere; another dimension? IDK.  My dad was my higher power during my early years of sobriety, he had died when I was weeks clean and it was the only connection I could make and it worked. Who am I to think I know better than other people?  If it brings them comfort and they are good people and not hypocritical aholes telling me how to live, then fine. I don't have it all figured out.  (This is the short version )

I'm with you all the way here.  I was brought up Catholic, being from Cleveland where everyone was Catholic.  I 'left' the church as soon as I could make my own choices, but I also baptized and confirmed all three of my children.  It was mostly out of tradition and to make the grandparents on both sides happy.  Nothing wrong with that.  You also can't discount the wealth of knowledge and wisdom that can come from reading the Bible.  The stories are timeless, so long as you treat them as parables and guideposts (New Testament) vs. a history book.  I don't judge people on their religion at all.  When I'm facing death, there's a really good chance I circle back to it. 

I was talking about the practicing faithful, as well as those who tolerate injustices in the name of their religion/religious culture. I thought that was made clear, but I guess not. People who aren't even really practicing obviously managed to avoid the brainwashing, or their own parents/community didn't do it to them in the first place. And FWIW, reading the Bible doesn't mean much. I'm an Atheist, and I've read the Bible.

I do indeed think that just belief in God in general is a result of a kind of mass social brainwashing too though, sorry. I don't know any other word for it. It's just how I view religious belief.

I actually wasn't commenting as much on your statement, more on agreement with Nancy about how people view their religion.  But your comments on people leaving the church are interesting.  I think the pedo stuff certainly was extremely damaging and has hurt the opportunity for new converts.  That's why you see the only growth taking place in poorer areas.  But I left the Church for lots of reasons, and I actually thought about going back at one point.  But the disconnect for me is that they do not allow priests to marry.  It inhibits a priest from really being able to give sage advice when they have no experience that mirrors mine.  They are in a different world economically, socially, culturally and from a family perspective.  When I hear a homily, it's like it could have been said 150 years ago.  

Halifax2TheMax

Remind me again of how many Obama campaign staffers and administration officials were indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison? Yay, go Team!

CM189191

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1105871012065935366

lol

Ledbetterman10

Halifax2TheMax said:

Remind me again of how many Obama campaign staffers and administration officials were indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison? Yay, go Team!

Who here is suggesting that the Obama administration was corrupt like Trump's? 

PJ_Soul

mrussel1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

njnancy said:

PJ_Soul said:

cincybearcat said:

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

Ending the quote because it's out of control. 

Yes they are weaponizing it, and she should have been smarter.  That's been my point as well.  They gave the Trump side an opening and it's been exploited.  It was going to be weaponized as soon as she typed it.  Her Democratic colleagues were offended.  They are Jewish.  They were offended and saw the trope.  You can't say they fucked it up.  She fucked it up to start.  And Pelosi was forced into damage control and did the best she could to move past it while mollifying her own constituency.  

I can't say that because she was 100% right when it comes to the relationship the US has with Israel, and I'm not about to say that someone fucked up by being honest. I just wish more of them would talk about it. Her only mistake was being the one brave enough to say it out loud IMO. I can indeed say they fucked it up, and I'm not inclined to side with the ones who are offended Jews, because I don't believe it's right that they are offended. If the Dems had any balls at all, they would have stood behind her and finally initiated a REAL conversation about the US/Israel situation.

I tend to agree about her comments.

I also can’t  believe any women would be Muslim....or any person would take their kid to a Catholic Church...so what do I know 

Most religious people were born into it, meaning that they were brainwashed from birth, whatever the faith. They know nothing else, and simply truly believe the religious dogma they were taught, and lived in the middle of the culture that facilitates that, even if it is an impediment to them. I don't find that so hard to understand (although do find it hard to get how anyone believes the dogma - to me it seems ludicrous, but somehow people believe it like they believe their own existence). I do think it's very unfortunate though.

As for the Catholic Church and the pedo stuff... well, that's the reason Catholics have been leaving the Church in droves and why the Church is in permanent crisis now. They are working hard to try and bring some back, but it's probably ultimately too late... The Church will be around for a long time to come, but its power will likely dwindle more and more over time, and in a couple Centuries it will probably be a fringe religion.... Unless somehow there is a resurgence... if something really fucked in the world happens, like a massive pandemic or WWIII, that's possible too. They really do need to cut it out with the sexual repression and sexism though. That just isn't flying with most modern people anymore.

I just typed a long thing and erased it. 

Please don't refer to people who went to a Catholic school or who choose to practice their Jewish or Muslim faiths brainwashed. There are certain things that you are taught that stay with you but brainwashed is too severe a term and it also sounds condescending. It makes it sound like only people who are atheists have any idea of what is going on. I don't go to church anymore, I stopped when I went to public high school (which pissed the nuns off immensely) and there was a lot of bad shit that went on but also there were some really good people.  I had my son baptized by a Catholic priest who runs sobriety retreats - had to do it - and I had him receive Communion at an Episcopal Church with my sister's girls. My sister started going to Church in her 40's after being an atheist most of her life. The priest is an ex Catholic priest who is gay and is an awesome person. They got gluten free hosts just for my son. My sister felt a sense of community there and when she was dying she found a lot of comfort in speaking with the priest. So did I and so did my mom. I don't know what created everything (aside from the scientific realities) but I like to think that my dad and sis and bro are all together somewhere; another dimension? IDK.  My dad was my higher power during my early years of sobriety, he had died when I was weeks clean and it was the only connection I could make and it worked. Who am I to think I know better than other people?  If it brings them comfort and they are good people and not hypocritical aholes telling me how to live, then fine. I don't have it all figured out.  (This is the short version )

I'm with you all the way here.  I was brought up Catholic, being from Cleveland where everyone was Catholic.  I 'left' the church as soon as I could make my own choices, but I also baptized and confirmed all three of my children.  It was mostly out of tradition and to make the grandparents on both sides happy.  Nothing wrong with that.  You also can't discount the wealth of knowledge and wisdom that can come from reading the Bible.  The stories are timeless, so long as you treat them as parables and guideposts (New Testament) vs. a history book.  I don't judge people on their religion at all.  When I'm facing death, there's a really good chance I circle back to it. 

I was talking about the practicing faithful, as well as those who tolerate injustices in the name of their religion/religious culture. I thought that was made clear, but I guess not. People who aren't even really practicing obviously managed to avoid the brainwashing, or their own parents/community didn't do it to them in the first place. And FWIW, reading the Bible doesn't mean much. I'm an Atheist, and I've read the Bible.

I do indeed think that just belief in God in general is a result of a kind of mass social brainwashing too though, sorry. I don't know any other word for it. It's just how I view religious belief.

I actually wasn't commenting as much on your statement, more on agreement with Nancy about how people view their religion.  But your comments on people leaving the church are interesting.  I think the pedo stuff certainly was extremely damaging and has hurt the opportunity for new converts.  That's why you see the only growth taking place in poorer areas.  But I left the Church for lots of reasons, and I actually thought about going back at one point.  But the disconnect for me is that they do not allow priests to marry.  It inhibits a priest from really being able to give sage advice when they have no experience that mirrors mine.  They are in a different world economically, socially, culturally and from a family perspective.  When I hear a homily, it's like it could have been said 150 years ago.  

Yes, the celibacy oath is a big problem, and I actually think it is the main factor that attracts all those pedophiles to the Catholic Church. But I have an even bigger problem with the fact that women are not allowed to be leaders in the Church. At all. The entire Vatican has exactly zero women participating in Church politics, and women are not allowed to be priests, and now finally it is just coming out about how many nuns have been sexually abused by priests as well (which comes as NO surprise whatsoever). Just what kind of terrible message does that disseminate to Catholic followers???? It REALLY pisses me off! Someone asked how Muslim women could feel okay about being in that faith given the sexual inequality... Well what about Catholic women?? I don't understand how any woman is okay with that kind of blatant sexism. Frankly, it doesn't even seem legal to me. Has no one challenged it legally?? Someone should!

BS44325

Ledbetterman10 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Remind me again of how many Obama campaign staffers and administration officials were indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison? Yay, go Team!

Who here is suggesting that the Obama administration was corrupt like Trump's? 

Nobody. Trump's team...if you can call it that...is/was being investigated for things that pre-dated his administration. I don't believe his Presidency is being accused of being corrupt. I know a lot of you "feel" that it is but that is not exactly the same thing. I am saying that the Obama administration was corrupt "unlike" Trump's. Fast and Furious, IRS, Bengazhi, Uranium One, DOJ interfering in FBI investigations, FISA abuse to spy on one's political opponents...to name a few.

dignin

CM189191 said:

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1105871012065935366

lol

Haha, "a blameless life"

BS44325

CM189191 said:

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1105871012065935366

lol

And again...nothing to do with Trump...except for the fact that it removes Trump's pardon power for any state charges/convictions.

Halifax2TheMax

Ledbetterman10 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Remind me again of how many Obama campaign staffers and administration officials were indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison? Yay, go Team!

Who here is suggesting that the Obama administration was corrupt like Trump's? 

Which Team you root for speaks to your moral compass. And for the record, I fully expect Team Trump Treason to pardon Pauly Manafort, particularly because conviction of the just filed NY State charges will result in a life sentence. "Nothing to do with Team Trump Teason." Bhahahahahahahahahahahaha.

PJ_Soul

BS44325 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Remind me again of how many Obama campaign staffers and administration officials were indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison? Yay, go Team!

Who here is suggesting that the Obama administration was corrupt like Trump's? 

Nobody. Trump's team...if you can call it that...is/was being investigated for things that pre-dated his administration. I don't believe his Presidency is being accused of being corrupt. I know a lot of you "feel" that it is but that is not exactly the same thing. I am saying that the Obama administration was corrupt "unlike" Trump's. Fast and Furious, IRS, Bengazhi, Uranium One, DOJ interfering in FBI investigations, FISA abuse to spy on one's political opponents...to name a few.

I beleive his presidency is indeed being investigated for fraud, corruption, and/or grievous conflicts of interest, all relating to the fact that Trump is personally profiting through his business while he is president, and using this presidency to facilitate it. Not to mention his daughter and son-in-law. And if that isn't in fact part of the investigation, then it damn well should be, since we ALL know it's happening, and that it's not legal.

Ledbetterman10

Halifax2TheMax said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Remind me again of how many Obama campaign staffers and administration officials were indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison? Yay, go Team!

Who here is suggesting that the Obama administration was corrupt like Trump's? 

Which Team you root for speaks to your moral compass. And for the record, I fully expect Team Trump Treason to pardon Pauly Manafort, particularly because conviction of the just filed NY State charges will result in a life sentence. "Nothing to do with Team Trump Teason." Bhahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Ok, was just confirming that you were yelling at the clouds as usual. If there were true fans of....I can't believe I'm going to type this...."Team Trump Treason" here, I could see you mocking them with "yay, go team!" But there's not. 

mrussel1

PJ_Soul said:

Yes, the celibacy oath is a big problem, and I actually think it is the main factor that attracts all those pedophiles to the Catholic Church. But I have an even bigger problem with the fact that women are not allowed to be leaders in the Church. At all. The entire Vatican has exactly zero women participating in Church politics, and women are not allowed to be priests, and now finally it is just coming out about how many nuns have been sexually abused by priests as well (which comes as NO surprise whatsoever). Just what kind of terrible message does that disseminate to Catholic followers???? It REALLY pisses me off! Someone asked how Muslim women could feel okay about being in that faith given the sexual inequality... Well what about Catholic women?? I don't understand how any woman is okay with that kind of blatant sexism. Frankly, it doesn't even seem legal to me. Has no one challenged it legally?? Someone should!

Completely agree on the women in leadership part.  It's a relic.  As far as the pedos, again I think you are right.  But I also think that the Church attracts gay men (not equating with pedos).  Boys who were Catholic but did not feel attracted to women saw the church as the next logical step.  They must have been "called" to the church.  It was almost a refuge, a reason they didn't live the same life as other people.  Now you put them in a spot where they are voluntarily repressed, but surround them with the same sex.  It seems like a combustion chamber.  Allowing women and married men into the church clergy could really have changed this dynamic.  It's sad.