I do worry that Lev is going to be Epsteined in the next couple of weeks. This is one hell of an entertaining and damning series of revelations and everyday brings new surprises.
Lev’s attorney’s have the goods. As does the DOJ. It’s just a matter of time. Tick tock, tick tock goes the impeachment clock. Gonna be a hot, hot summer.
Parnas making the allegation that CYA Barr has put the kabosh on the Dimitri Firtash extradition from Austria. By the DOJ Chicago office. Firtash was indicted during the Obama Administration. Now, why would CYA Barr stall justice? What does Firtash know? Why the dragging of feet? And why is Parnas saying “follow the trail” as to why Firtash isn’t in Chicago facing charges? Drip, drip, drip or is it dots? Remember those? Connecting dots is fun, fun, fun boys and girls!
Parnas making the allegation that CYA Barr has put the kabosh on the Dimitri Firtash extradition from Austria. By the DOJ Chicago office. Firtash was indicted during the Obama Administration. Now, why would CYA Barr stall justice? What does Firtash know? Why the dragging of feet? And why is Parnas saying “follow the trail” as to why Firtash isn’t in Chicago facing charges? Drip, drip, drip or is it dots? Remember those? Connecting dots is fun, fun, fun boys and girls!
I agree with this becoming laughable in its obvious egregiousness, but I've felt that for literally years now about the Trump presidency. My concern is when Michael Cohen was already prosecuted and gave some public testimony that if one connected the dots one would believe, the Republicans immediately said he wasn't credible, and his 'bombshell testimony' was dismissed rapidly. I suspect the same campaign to discredit Parnas is only going to escalate (a current foxnews.com front-page news link reads "Maher says Bidens will become the 'bigger scandal' if they testify, Lev Parnas 'not credible'") and it'll too fade into oblivion.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
I think we can mostly agree that Trump surrounds himself with duplicitous buffoons. Just because they decide to flip on him, they don't cease being duplicitous buffoons. Let the professionals gather whatever he is willing to give, but I'd caution investing too much hope in another Michael Cohen-esque character.
agreed. how quickly everyone is ready to jump to believe a fucking con man just because he's now anti-trump, when he was pro trump all the way, is interesting if not completely predictable.
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
I think we can mostly agree that Trump surrounds himself with duplicitous buffoons. Just because they decide to flip on him, they don't cease being duplicitous buffoons. Let the professionals gather whatever he is willing to give, but I'd caution investing too much hope in another Michael Cohen-esque character.
agreed. how quickly everyone is ready to jump to believe a fucking con man just because he's now anti-trump, when he was pro trump all the way, is interesting if not completely predictable.
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
We don't have to believe him, he has the evidence. Texts, emails, notes.
I think we can mostly agree that Trump surrounds himself with duplicitous buffoons. Just because they decide to flip on him, they don't cease being duplicitous buffoons. Let the professionals gather whatever he is willing to give, but I'd caution investing too much hope in another Michael Cohen-esque character.
agreed. how quickly everyone is ready to jump to believe a fucking con man just because he's now anti-trump, when he was pro trump all the way, is interesting if not completely predictable.
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
We don't have to believe him, he has the evidence. Texts, emails, notes.
let's be honest; people were ready to jump on the parnas train before any evidence was made public.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
I think we can mostly agree that Trump surrounds himself with duplicitous buffoons. Just because they decide to flip on him, they don't cease being duplicitous buffoons. Let the professionals gather whatever he is willing to give, but I'd caution investing too much hope in another Michael Cohen-esque character.
agreed. how quickly everyone is ready to jump to believe a fucking con man just because he's now anti-trump, when he was pro trump all the way, is interesting if not completely predictable.
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
We don't have to believe him, he has the evidence. Texts, emails, notes.
let's be honest; people were ready to jump on the parnas train before any evidence was made public.
Because his lawyer said he had the evidence. Seemed like a decent bet to believe him, especially when these characters almost always seem to pan out.
If someone says that Trump is a crook and they have the evidence to prove it, you can almost take that to the bank. It's the pattern and highly believable.
I think we can mostly agree that Trump surrounds himself with duplicitous buffoons. Just because they decide to flip on him, they don't cease being duplicitous buffoons. Let the professionals gather whatever he is willing to give, but I'd caution investing too much hope in another Michael Cohen-esque character.
agreed. how quickly everyone is ready to jump to believe a fucking con man just because he's now anti-trump, when he was pro trump all the way, is interesting if not completely predictable.
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
We don't have to believe him, he has the evidence. Texts, emails, notes.
let's be honest; people were ready to jump on the parnas train before any evidence was made public.
Because his lawyer said he had the evidence. Seemed like a decent bet to believe him, especially when these characters almost always seem to pan out.
If someone says that Trump is a crook and they have the evidence to prove it, you can almost take that to the bank. It's the pattern and highly believable.
it seems much of what parnas has, he and his lawyer consider evidence, legal experts do not.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
I think we can mostly agree that Trump surrounds himself with duplicitous buffoons. Just because they decide to flip on him, they don't cease being duplicitous buffoons. Let the professionals gather whatever he is willing to give, but I'd caution investing too much hope in another Michael Cohen-esque character.
agreed. how quickly everyone is ready to jump to believe a fucking con man just because he's now anti-trump, when he was pro trump all the way, is interesting if not completely predictable.
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
We don't have to believe him, he has the evidence. Texts, emails, notes.
let's be honest; people were ready to jump on the parnas train before any evidence was made public.
Because his lawyer said he had the evidence. Seemed like a decent bet to believe him, especially when these characters almost always seem to pan out.
If someone says that Trump is a crook and they have the evidence to prove it, you can almost take that to the bank. It's the pattern and highly believable.
DOJ has the evidence as well. You know who else has the evidence? Mcgahn, John Boy Bolton, Devin Nunca, CYA Barr, Pompouspeo, OMB, et. al.
What if Hunter Biden refuses to appear? What if the dems’ witnesses testified first and Hunter refuses to show up? Or, takes the fifth? As the prosecution typically presents its case first, why wouldn’t you offer that up and then tell the repubs to go pound sand? Or, can Hunter’s attorneys object to the line of questioning and get procedural votes or make Roberts rule on allowing the question(s)?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I can't wait until Giuliani flips and he goes from Ghouliani to America's Mayor again overnight.
"How dare you besmirch the man who got New York through 9/11! He will be the one to bring down Trump for certain!"
Ghouliani will never be America’s mayor again for he has shown himself to be who he really is. Four divorces will do that to a once “honorable,” and even that’s in question, man.
I can't wait until Giuliani flips and he goes from Ghouliani to America's Mayor again overnight.
"How dare you besmirch the man who got New York through 9/11! He will be the one to bring down Trump for certain!"
Ghouliani will never be America’s mayor again for he has shown himself to be who he really is. Four divorces will do that to a once “honorable,” and even that’s in question, man.
It ain’t the 4 divorces brother, it’s the 4 marriages
I can't wait until Giuliani flips and he goes from Ghouliani to America's Mayor again overnight.
"How dare you besmirch the man who got New York through 9/11! He will be the one to bring down Trump for certain!"
Ghouliani will never be America’s mayor again for he has shown himself to be who he really is. Four divorces will do that to a once “honorable,” and even that’s in question, man.
It ain’t the 4 divorces brother, it’s the 4 marriages
To be honest, I think it’s his being up to his googily eyeballs in alimony that turned a once “honorable” man into a POS supporter of Team Trump Treason but you’d have to ask Ruddy why he’s prostituted himself out in such a manner. Can’t wait for his Ukraine bombshell from his private investigation. Remember that?
Alan’s not sleeping well. Maybe he has a conscience? More likely he’s embarrassed. About his legacy. “If the glove don’t fit, you must acquit.” “Sorry my beloved, it’s time.” Now, here we are. Like Ruddy Ghouliani, he wonders his place in the annals of history. Nice legacy Alan.
What if Hunter Biden refuses to appear? What if the dems’ witnesses testified first and Hunter refuses to show up? Or, takes the fifth? As the prosecution typically presents its case first, why wouldn’t you offer that up and then tell the repubs to go pound sand? Or, can Hunter’s attorneys object to the line of questioning and get procedural votes or make Roberts rule on allowing the question(s)?
The problem is every procedural vote will have enormous pressure from McConnell and trump to vote the party line.
trump came out with his legal rebuttal yesterday and it basically says he has the power to do anything he wants.
when is someone going to speak of Biden’s legal rights as a citizen?
I am waiting for anyone to ask Dershowitz where in the constitution it says that a citizen has a constitutional right of due process among many rights except when personally being investigated by the president?
If I was Hunter Biden, I'd appear, but only appear as the LAST witness called. After all the relevant fuckers went. Bolton, Parnas, Pompeo, Pence, Mulvaney, I mean errybody. Then I'd 5th amendment those sons o bitches.
Support for REMOVING Trump at 51% in new poll. Again--this never got to 30% for Clinton. Waiting a few weeks has only garnered more support for removal .
I think we can mostly agree that Trump surrounds himself with duplicitous buffoons. Just because they decide to flip on him, they don't cease being duplicitous buffoons. Let the professionals gather whatever he is willing to give, but I'd caution investing too much hope in another Michael Cohen-esque character.
agreed. how quickly everyone is ready to jump to believe a fucking con man just because he's now anti-trump, when he was pro trump all the way, is interesting if not completely predictable.
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
We don't have to believe him, he has the evidence. Texts, emails, notes.
let's be honest; people were ready to jump on the parnas train before any evidence was made public.
Because his lawyer said he had the evidence. Seemed like a decent bet to believe him, especially when these characters almost always seem to pan out.
If someone says that Trump is a crook and they have the evidence to prove it, you can almost take that to the bank. It's the pattern and highly believable.
Support for REMOVING Trump at 51% in new poll. Again--this never got to 30% for Clinton. Waiting a few weeks has only garnered more support for removal .
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
word
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Answer-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf
he could be telling the truth. but why now? is it revenge? is it to save his own skin? surely one does not just grow a conscience over night.
-EV 8/14/93
-EV 8/14/93
If someone says that Trump is a crook and they have the evidence to prove it, you can almost take that to the bank. It's the pattern and highly believable.
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://apple.news/A_pd58A5gSlqYcVmxId0czQ
What if Hunter Biden refuses to appear? What if the dems’ witnesses testified first and Hunter refuses to show up? Or, takes the fifth? As the prosecution typically presents its case first, why wouldn’t you offer that up and then tell the repubs to go pound sand? Or, can Hunter’s attorneys object to the line of questioning and get procedural votes or make Roberts rule on allowing the question(s)?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"How dare you besmirch the man who got New York through 9/11! He will be the one to bring down Trump for certain!"
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
witnesses
germane
Coverup
https://apple.news/AAdeRWQX2Sp-Cw0JPJsCZdA
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
trump came out with his legal rebuttal yesterday and it basically says he has the power to do anything he wants.
when is someone going to speak of Biden’s legal rights as a citizen?
I am waiting for anyone to ask Dershowitz where in the constitution it says that a citizen has a constitutional right of due process among many rights except when personally being investigated by the president?
69% want witnesses.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/20/politics/cnn-poll-trump-impeachment/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©