I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
yup, the leftist of the left on MSNBC still presents well researched thoughtful discussion on various topics.
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I don't like her either. Repeating the same stuff over and over making a 4 minute segment into 15.
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I get it....but that's her job and she is very good at it. I would say you might be confusing passion as dramatic.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Haven't been in this thread in ages and not reading back, buuuuut seems like there is about a 100% chance of impeachment and a 0% chance of the Senate removing him from office, right?
That there appears to be the correct data at this point
Clintons popularity soared after impeachment...
Which is sad. Talk about rooting for your team over what is decent and right.
I guess democrats concern themselves less with a BJ than they do treason. Unlike Republicans.
I wish democrats would have concerned themselves with a president getting a BJ from a subordinate at work AND I wish the Repubs would concern themselves with a lawless president.
I'm against abuse of power I guess. Some only when it's the other team.
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I don't like her either. Repeating the same stuff over and over making a 4 minute segment into 15.
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I get it....but that's her job and she is very good at it. I would say you might be confusing passion as dramatic.
No it;s drama. Shes on tv after all.
Fox News < MSNBC but MSNBC still is partisan bullshit
hippiemom = goodness
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,315
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
If you are watching FOX at any time other than from 3-5 and 6-8 you're doing it wrong.
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I get it....but that's her job and she is very good at it. I would say you might be confusing passion as dramatic.
No it;s drama. Shes on tv after all.
Fox News < MSNBC but MSNBC still is partisan bullshit
Disagree. It's left leaning yet they cover the news. They don't cover conspiracy bullshit.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I get it....but that's her job and she is very good at it. I would say you might be confusing passion as dramatic.
No it;s drama. Shes on tv after all.
Fox News < MSNBC but MSNBC still is partisan bullshit
Disagree. It's left leaning yet they cover the news. They don't cover conspiracy bullshit.
What do you disagree with? You don;t think MSNBC is partisan? You call it "left-leaning"
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I don't like her either. Repeating the same stuff over and over making a 4 minute segment into 15.
I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too.
Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say.
It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things. Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment. Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...
The news shows are really getting tiresome. Does anybody read a source that isn't biased? Do they exist?
Yes they exist. Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.
Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair. Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support. MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts. They always present both sides of the story.
Maddow? Really?
Shepard Smith I happen to love. He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.
Yes, really. She is liberal and she let's you know it. But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information. She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.
her dramatics are what turn me off.
I don't like her either. Repeating the same stuff over and over making a 4 minute segment into 15.
but I hate the false equivalency.
I hate the overuse of the term false equivalency.
Sorry for using it once.
I shall now use it more
Was talking about it’s not use here and all over anymore. Nothing personal.
agree, and look at that. MSNBC is dangerously close, if not slightly overlapping into, to "extreme/unfair interpretations of the news".
It is in the Hyper-partisan/Analysis sections. I think that is accurate. Fox New is in the Hyper-partisan/Extremely Unfair interpretation of the news sections. I think that is also accurate.
agree, and look at that. MSNBC is dangerously close, if not slightly overlapping into, to "extreme/unfair interpretations of the news".
It is in the Hyper-partisan/Analysis sections. I think that is accurate. Fox New is in the Hyper-partisan/Extremely Unfair interpretation of the news sections. I think that is also accurate.
Whatever you are saying is accurate isn't visible to me.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,315
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.
Comments
www.headstonesband.com
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I'm against abuse of power I guess. Some only when it's the other team.
Fox News < MSNBC but MSNBC still is partisan bullshit
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
www.headstonesband.com
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Fox New is in the Hyper-partisan/Extremely Unfair interpretation of the news sections. I think that is also accurate.
Whatever you are saying is accurate isn't visible to me.
LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/
RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
The majority of the news of MSNBC comes from NBC which is ranked one of the highest on that chart.
.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Who said it was different?
I can't see the chart, so hard to comment on that.