Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
exactly. the very founding of this country was pushback against power. what is a leak other than pushback?
If that is the case than why so mad if Trump colluded with Russia to leak the Hillary campaign's emails? Just pushback, you know, the foundation of this country?
colluding with an adversarial foreign power in the electoral process is a lot different than leaking pertinent info on corruptable power. And in the early stages of this particular administration, its a civic obligation imo.
Hillary was a corruptable power. The FBI was giving everybody the heads-up. It was just pushback.
still not the same ballpark. at all. preventing corruptable power so corruptable power can take office? stop insulting my intelligence.
props to the deftness of your PM the other day btw.
The only thing that has been suggested to be corruptable right now is Flynn post-lie to Pence. I'm not sure how that's worse then the known corruptable power that was Hillary. Not the same ballpark. At all.
In terms of my PM...Yeah. I don't like him but he played it right.
its emerging that Flynn wasnt the only one of the team. and now we're talking about well before election day. and given his continued deflections in regards to russia's exertion of influence, it suggests to me something involving him directly.
Actually none of that is emerging.
actually, it's been emerging for months...
3 Trump cronies down due to shady dealing with Russia... more to come... whether you realize it or not amigo
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
They weren't. That's not the situation here. The VP lied to the American people (possibly unaware that he did). The POTUS lied on Friday saying he was unaware of any situation with Flynn, and then we learned yesterday he had known for 18 days. THEY FUCKING LIED. And they didn't lie to protect national security interests. They lied to protect themselves. The leaker obviously believes the executive branch owes the American people the truth.
Just my opinion but Flynn didn't do anything without DJT's knowledge.
He has no relationship with the truth on any level. It's been a steady diet of bullshit since day one.
he and his surrogates have being lying from the get go....day one he lied about the size of his crowd then Spicer reiterated it.
Says he "won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally." November 28th There was "serious voter fraud" in Virginia. Nov 29 "We had a massive landslide victory, as you know, in the Electoral College." December 12th Americans don't "care at all" about Donald Trump's tax returns. Jan 11 "The media ... sort of made it sound like I had a feud with the intelligence community." Jan 22 "Here in Philadelphia murder has been steady — I mean — just terribly increasing." Jan 26th "As you know I’m very much opposed to Sanctuary cities, they breed crime" Feb 5 Terrorism and terrorist attacks in the United States and Europe have "gotten to a point where it's not even being reported." February 6th Says "109 people out of hundreds of thousands of travelers" were affected by the immigration executive order. February 6th
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
exactly. the very founding of this country was pushback against power. what is a leak other than pushback?
If that is the case than why so mad if Trump colluded with Russia to leak the Hillary campaign's emails? Just pushback, you know, the foundation of this country?
colluding with an adversarial foreign power in the electoral process is a lot different than leaking pertinent info on corruptable power. And in the early stages of this particular administration, its a civic obligation imo.
Hillary was a corruptable power. The FBI was giving everybody the heads-up. It was just pushback.
still not the same ballpark. at all. preventing corruptable power so corruptable power can take office? stop insulting my intelligence.
props to the deftness of your PM the other day btw.
The only thing that has been suggested to be corruptable right now is Flynn post-lie to Pence. I'm not sure how that's worse then the known corruptable power that was Hillary. Not the same ballpark. At all.
In terms of my PM...Yeah. I don't like him but he played it right.
its emerging that Flynn wasnt the only one of the team. and now we're talking about well before election day. and given his continued deflections in regards to russia's exertion of influence, it suggests to me something involving him directly.
And the failure to release his tax returns as Hillary has done, his son being on record boasting of lots of money from Russia pouring in, the intelligence community as whole believing that the white house's situation room is compromised and the 18.5% stake in a billion dollar Russian oil company "sold" to unknown buyers. Yup, nothing to see here. Follow the money.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
exactly. the very founding of this country was pushback against power. what is a leak other than pushback?
If that is the case than why so mad if Trump colluded with Russia to leak the Hillary campaign's emails? Just pushback, you know, the foundation of this country?
colluding with an adversarial foreign power in the electoral process is a lot different than leaking pertinent info on corruptable power. And in the early stages of this particular administration, its a civic obligation imo.
Hillary was a corruptable power. The FBI was giving everybody the heads-up. It was just pushback.
still not the same ballpark. at all. preventing corruptable power so corruptable power can take office? stop insulting my intelligence.
props to the deftness of your PM the other day btw.
The only thing that has been suggested to be corruptable right now is Flynn post-lie to Pence. I'm not sure how that's worse then the known corruptable power that was Hillary. Not the same ballpark. At all.
In terms of my PM...Yeah. I don't like him but he played it right.
its emerging that Flynn wasnt the only one of the team. and now we're talking about well before election day. and given his continued deflections in regards to russia's exertion of influence, it suggests to me something involving him directly.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
exactly. the very founding of this country was pushback against power. what is a leak other than pushback?
If that is the case than why so mad if Trump colluded with Russia to leak the Hillary campaign's emails? Just pushback, you know, the foundation of this country?
colluding with an adversarial foreign power in the electoral process is a lot different than leaking pertinent info on corruptable power. And in the early stages of this particular administration, its a civic obligation imo.
Hillary was a corruptable power. The FBI was giving everybody the heads-up. It was just pushback.
still not the same ballpark. at all. preventing corruptable power so corruptable power can take office? stop insulting my intelligence.
props to the deftness of your PM the other day btw.
The only thing that has been suggested to be corruptable right now is Flynn post-lie to Pence. I'm not sure how that's worse then the known corruptable power that was Hillary. Not the same ballpark. At all.
In terms of my PM...Yeah. I don't like him but he played it right.
its emerging that Flynn wasnt the only one of the team. and now we're talking about well before election day. and given his continued deflections in regards to russia's exertion of influence, it suggests to me something involving him directly.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
exactly. the very founding of this country was pushback against power. what is a leak other than pushback?
If that is the case than why so mad if Trump colluded with Russia to leak the Hillary campaign's emails? Just pushback, you know, the foundation of this country?
Seriously?
No. Just as ridiculous as the statement I was responding too.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
exactly. the very founding of this country was pushback against power. what is a leak other than pushback?
If that is the case than why so mad if Trump colluded with Russia to leak the Hillary campaign's emails? Just pushback, you know, the foundation of this country?
Seriously?
No. Just as ridiculous as the statement I was responding too.
You think?? "Colluding with Russia" is the problem phrase there. Not "leak the Hillary campaign emails". If Trump and Russia had absolutely nothing to do with the email leaks, then there wouldn't be a problem. Obviously. But when Russia and a US presidential nominee orchestrate a leak in order to manipulate an election, that's kind of another ball of wax, lol.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
Surely not.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Your defense of the administration's lies to the American public are weak. You better flip back over to Fox or Twitter to tighten up these arguments. The story is the lying. It's not the leaking.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Your defense of the administration's lies to the American public are weak. You better flip back over to Fox or Twitter to tighten up these arguments. The story is the lying. It's not the leaking.
Not sure where that twitter comment is coming from. I post the tweets because that is what your very own POTUS is putting out there daily for the rest of the world to interpret not because I agree with them. Your interpretation is not the end all be all. I've said from the beginning pay attention to his tweets.
Perhaps being confronted with this info about Flynn the POTUS would not talk about it in public until all the facts were verified. Like not talking about a case that is before the courts.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Your defense of the administration's lies to the American public are weak. You better flip back over to Fox or Twitter to tighten up these arguments. The story is the lying. It's not the leaking.
Not sure where that twitter comment is coming from. I post the tweets because that is what your very own POTUS is putting out there daily for the rest of the world to interpret not because I agree with them. Your interpretation is not the end all be all. I've said from the beginning pay attention to his tweets.
Perhaps being confronted with this info about Flynn the POTUS would not talk about it in public until all the facts were verified. Like not talking about a case that is before the courts.
He said he was unaware of it. A non lying president would have said "We're reviewing x, I don't want to comment at this time, but we will shortly". Or better yet, fire the guy as soon as you learned (18 days ago) that he lied to the VP. Or better yet, don't instruct him to lie to the VP., Or better yet, be a normal human being with a conscience.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
Do you believe President Trump asked for his resignation?
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
Do you believe President Trump asked for his resignation?
Whether he did or not is irrelevant to the counterpoint I made to your point. When you said "So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed."
To that point, I stated that's what happened with Flynn. Hence, your point is irrelevant to my response.
Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.
I agree with that. What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"? Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job. You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed. Make up your mind.
Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
Yes. Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset. Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you. At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence. Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
This can't be a serious point. BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though. So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
Do you believe President Trump asked for his resignation?
Whether he did or not is irrelevant to the counterpoint I made to your point. When you said "So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed."
To that point, I stated that's what happened with Flynn. Hence, your point is irrelevant to my response.
Comments
3 Trump cronies down due to shady dealing with Russia... more to come... whether you realize it or not amigo
www.headstonesband.com
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
He has no relationship with the truth on any level. It's been a steady diet of bullshit since day one.
he and his surrogates have being lying from the get go....day one he lied about the size of his crowd then Spicer reiterated it.
Says he "won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally." November 28th
There was "serious voter fraud" in Virginia. Nov 29
"We had a massive landslide victory, as you know, in the Electoral College." December 12th
Americans don't "care at all" about Donald Trump's tax returns. Jan 11
"The media ... sort of made it sound like I had a feud with the intelligence community." Jan 22
"Here in Philadelphia murder has been steady — I mean — just terribly increasing." Jan 26th
"As you know I’m very much opposed to Sanctuary cities, they breed crime" Feb 5
Terrorism and terrorist attacks in the United States and Europe have "gotten to a point where it's not even being reported." February 6th
Says "109 people out of hundreds of thousands of travelers" were affected by the immigration executive order. February 6th
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset.
Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you.
At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence.
Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
"hack her emails, russia!"
"the real scandal here is that classified information is illegally given out by "intelligence" like candy"
www.headstonesband.com
So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
www.headstonesband.com
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
I've said from the beginning pay attention to his tweets.
Perhaps being confronted with this info about Flynn the POTUS would not talk about it in public until all the facts were verified.
Like not talking about a case that is before the courts.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
To that point, I stated that's what happened with Flynn. Hence, your point is irrelevant to my response.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com